วีดีโอ

Cry harder.

To be clear, it was the Boxers who did the "intervention." The Qing government wasn't defending China, so they created a mass uprising to exterminate all foreigners and Chinese Christians. Herbert Hoover an American engineer working for the Chinese, had to flee with his wife Lou to Tientsin, where they helped defend the city. Lou Henry Hoover is, as far as I can tell, still the only American First Lady who was an actual combat veteran.

@@ramonencarrizo2681 That's not kung-fu fu.

😂😂😂😂😂

@@MichaelSaunders-y2m We were the ones selling "fentanyl" i mean opium. the boxers were trying to stop it,

the Boxers were the good guys. they were trying to keep the western powers out. they wanted china for china

Its not racist... it was simple because at this time their were no chinese actors in the west. China was poor, underdeveloped and closed to foreign powers. So the filmmakers could not use native actors, they must improvise. Not everything is racist, because it looks so... sometime its a good idea to see the world and political situation in the time were the films were created before condemn them as racists. You can not value a historical event, products, etc without knowing the historical context of it. And you can not value historical action with modern morale. If you do so, ever people in the past, even the open-minded, cosmopolitan and unbiased people in the past are with current morale and ethical values were rassists as hell. If you want to critisize someone in the past, you must evaluate him, with the ethics and morale of the time he lived in. Or do you want to condemed for an action you did in the past and which was not criminal. But with new laws years later it is criminal... was your action criminal or not? It was not... because at the time you did it, it was not criminal and legal. You can not condemn someone retrospectively for actions which were not illegal while they did them. If the government increases the fine for speeding from 20 to 50 EUR... the government can not demand the money from further speeding, only from current and future speeding drivers.

@@nordstern2664 there’s a movie called flower drum song with a predominantly Asian and mostly American cast that came out in 1961 and predates (with the exception of Gunga Din) practically all the movies I mentioned here, so to say that there was no Asian or Chinese actors who could have portrayed Asian or Chinese characters is demonstrably wrong,the same could be said about black actors who could have covincingly played the role of the Mahdi in “Khartoum”…being ethnically accurate in films where ethnicity is part of the story did exist even in the 30s and 40s but usually in a negative sense such as how Japanese characters are portrayed in movies dealing with WWII or Chinese characters are seen in where Western culture comes into conflict with Chinese values and traditions….so there were many examples of actors who were available to perform in roles that they were ethnically suited for but Hollywood choose to go with what’s marketable and palatable to their audiences…

In this earth, it's eat or be eaten. Mother nature hasn't changed a bit.

These fish characters are just humanized from human perspective. Hence, why we're feeling bad about their massacre. In reality, they don't even have the brain capacity to think about freedom and fear of death. Fish just live by the simple rule of eat or get eaten.

Hasta antes del hombre la vida funciona así bro, los depredadores también los comen vivos

Are you sure about that? What about all the atrocious acts committed like Nanjing ?

“55 Days at Peking” 😎

What "civilization" and what "barbarians" are you talking about exactly?

Tell me how little you understand from history.

@@cezar211091 ok, who built Europe and America? Chinese? No, UK and other European powers.

@@Apenas_Um_Brasileiro British and Chinese

That comment is super racist.

This is a joke right

I think it was just a shock value thing. The Boxer with the sword expected Lewis to strike him but he turned the tables around. Movie was filmed in 1963 so interesting to see some actual weaponry/Chinese Boxing/Kung Fu on film.

Agree with 1st reply - the Qing prince was making out there was no way a Westerner could hurt a Boxer, but instead of cutting at the Boxer, he thrusted, thus taking him by surprise and helpless

The Boxers were almost hypnotised in believing they would be impervious to Western bullets. I'd love to see any artifacts from that period in a Museum if there are any.@@francisjones174

……the scene was also a slap in the face to ‘Prince Tuan’, who led the Boxers’.

No it’s not ashame that they don’t make movies like this anymore…there are three sides to every story side A, side B, and the absolute truth! You’re just seeing the Western side!

You think so? I love it. I think i've watched this movie like 30 times when i was a child.

Then do not watch it 😂

I don’t think the USMC were involved in D Day, they were too busy getting a hiding from the Japanese. The Normandy invasion wasn’t an American enterprise, it was the U.K. Canada and the USA. Interestingly the USMC haven’t been successful in any military engagement since 1945. They do suck really bad