วีดีโอ

🙏🙏

🙏

🙏

👍

सही होने के chances ज्यादा लग रहे है भाई लड्डू मंगवा लो

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

धन्यवाद 🙏🙏

राधे राधे। 🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

Radhey Radhey Balram ji was avtar of sheshnaag ji please read rigweda🙏🙏

@umashaktipeethvrindavan5638 First of all Rgveda doesn't have anything to do with Vishnu and his avatars. I've studied Rgveda very precisely and can assure you that the name Vishnu doesn't even appear there once. The concept of Vishnu and his avatars appear in the Bhagavat Puran. Even there too the 8th Avatar is Balaram and not Krishna. Balaram being the Avatar of Sheshnag is a different concept which came much later. Please read the scriptures properly and then comment. The Dasavtar of Vishnu never mentioned Krishna. Even the concept of Vishnu came during the Gupta period. Prior to that Vishnu was not mentioned in the Puranas. Please do some research before commenting

Jyotibikas ji in every manvantra you will find different concept of every avtar it is univeral dashavtar concept which we followed if you go in depth you will find marriage of hanuman ji discussion of Ram ji and Ravana in Janakpur and many more but anyways we believe we all are descendants of Vishnu ji accordingly we Can describe Hari anant hari katha ananta In Valmiki Ramayan in Ramcharit manas you find Laxman ji was avtar of Sheshnag ,He requested to Vishnu ji I will b your elder in Dwapar as Balram it took place

@@umashaktipeethvrindavan5638 even from your words it proves my point that you are not aware of the scriptures as such. Please read and go through the scriptures thoroughly before debating. Half cooked knowledge of the scriptures by listening to Hari Katha will only lead to confusion and nothing else. Now coming to Manvantara and Yuga are two dimensions of time. It has got nothing to do with the Avatars getting changed. Avatar means manifestation of God on earth. So Avatars can be many and at the same time God can manifest in two and in multiple forms in the single time frame. So Balaram and Krishna can both be Avatars of Vishnu residing on earth at the same time. But when it comes to Dasavtar then all of the scriptures mention the name of Balaram to be the 8th Avatar of Vishnu. That doesn't mean that Krishna is not the Avatar of Vishnu. But Krishna is not part of the Dasavtar lineage inspite of being an Avatar of Vishnu. That was my point. If somebody says something wrong in the public media related to our history and culture and especially related to the scriptures, then it is our duty to correct them, so that others may have the proper information. According to Vaishnava tradition, Krishna is not a mere mortal manifestation of Vishnu. Krishna himself is Vishnu. That's why Krishna is not considered to be an Avatar of the Dasavtar line. Krishna is the Supreme Lord. For that reason He is called the Leela Avatar. Moreover your suggestion for me reading the Rgveda proves that you are simply not aware of the Vedic texts. None of the Vedas doesn't mention the name of Vishnu or Shiva. Only the words Purusha and Tryambak has been mentioned which later shaped the conceptual formation of the Godheads Vishnu and Shiva in the much later literatures i.e. the Puranas. I personally would like to suggest you that please kindly go through our scriptures before making any comment on the subject in future. That might lead to a better and knowledgeable debate.

Yes, you're absolutely correct. Shri Anant or Balaram ji is an avatar of Shri Narayan. I discovered this fact when I was reading Shri Lalitopakhyanam. From her 10 fingers Mata Lalitambika produced 10 avatars of Narayan to quash 10 different demons from all yugas. One of the demon was "duwit vanara" which was slain by Shri Balaramaji.

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

You’re welcome 😊

Thank you 🙏

🙏

🙏😊

🙏🙏

❤️❤️

Stay tuned. 🙏😊

🙏🙏

Jai sia ram. 🙏🙏. Thank you.

🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

☑️

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏🙏

🙏

​@@DivineBhaktiBlesssingskripya maharaj ji se chaturthi vrat ki vidhi bhi pochiyega

Ok 👍

Radhe Radhe 🙏

🙏🙏🙏