- 29
- 920
Flâner Podcast
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 24 มี.ค. 2024
วีดีโอ
It's All About People
มุมมอง 8วันที่ผ่านมา
Dan leads in with a provocative statement: It's all about people and the conversation meanders from there.
S2 E4 - Office Political Activists Part II
มุมมอง 814 วันที่ผ่านมา
The Flâneurs discuss what it means to be an "office political activist." This is the first part of a 2-part discussion.
S2 E3 - Office Political Activists Part I
มุมมอง 1321 วันที่ผ่านมา
The Flâneurs discuss what it means to be an "office political activist." This is the first part of a 2-part discussion.
S2 E2 - We Are All Human
มุมมอง 18หลายเดือนก่อน
The Flâneurs discuss Open Management and humanity in the workplace with Dr. Cherry Vu and Rob England.
S2 E1 - Tackling the Consequences of Extreme Cultural Dysfunction
มุมมอง 37หลายเดือนก่อน
The Flâneurs chat with Sal Naseem, former Director of the UK IOPC, about the challenges of cultural dysfunction.
S1 Bonus - Season One Retrospective
มุมมอง 196 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Flâneurs have a retrospective on their first 12 episodes: a glimpse into the behind the scenes conversations that go into the making of Flâner.
Bonus Clip Flâneur Cafe
มุมมอง 76 หลายเดือนก่อน
Clip from the Season One Retrospective bonus episode.
S1 E12 Change Agents’ Loneliness
มุมมอง 826 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Flâneurs discuss how change agents - coaches being among change agents - are in a position that lends itself to loneliness. Is that just part of the gig? How do we deal with being isolated or being ejected by systems when the role we’ve been hired to do creates more change or friction than perhaps some were expecting or prepared to deal with?
S1 E11 Our Beautiful, Messy Conversation
มุมมอง 536 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Flâneurs with special guest John Cutler discuss feature factories, career Wardley Mapping, Trojan Horses, community, click-bait, and Dungeons & Dragons.
Dungeons and Dragons
มุมมอง 116 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Flâneurs and guest flâneur John Cutler discuss a D&D analogy.
S1 E10 - The No [One is an] Asshole Rule
มุมมอง 717 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Flâneurs chat about the topic of a talk Dan gives titled "The No [One is an] Asshole Rule"
S1 E9 - The Lenses We Use
มุมมอง 387 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Flâneurs discuss the way they approach entering a new system: what lenses do they use? How do they tailor their help to the needs of the client? Mostly, Dan just wants to know - Is Kanban Matt’s “silver bullet”?
S1 E8 - Agile Coaching is Jollof Rice
มุมมอง 767 หลายเดือนก่อน
Is there such a thing as “Agile”? Is there such a thing as an “Agile Coach”? The Flâneurs discuss recent debates about whether “Agile” or “Agile Coaching” exist and arrive at the conclusion that, like Jollof Rice, the world is better off having multiple versions, each of which has its place in the right context.
Sandjiri - Means to an End
มุมมอง 67 หลายเดือนก่อน
Sandjiri says Agile Coaching is a means to an end, and it's the end that matters.
Matt - Mourn the Passing of Office Interactions
มุมมอง 87 หลายเดือนก่อน
Matt - Mourn the Passing of Office Interactions
S1 E7 - Don't Make a Big Deal About Change
มุมมอง 287 หลายเดือนก่อน
S1 E7 - Don't Make a Big Deal About Change
S1 E5 - Return to Office - Yea or Nea?
มุมมอง 448 หลายเดือนก่อน
S1 E5 - Return to Office - Yea or Nea?
S1 E3 - (Mis)understanding "Fail Fast"
มุมมอง 268 หลายเดือนก่อน
S1 E3 - (Mis)understanding "Fail Fast"
S1 E2 - Is Discomfort Psychologically Safe?
มุมมอง 659 หลายเดือนก่อน
S1 E2 - Is Discomfort Psychologically Safe?
I think we are loners because we help improve everything and anyone around us and as a result everyone and everything around us is a potential improvement candidate
i think there isn't enough said about flipping the ratio from heavy consultants to heavy FTE The only other variable with the fbi sentitel project outside of adopting scrum was flipping the ratio of consultants to FTE.
It is indeed quite interesting how so much conversation can be triggered by so few words. Maybe that was kind of the point of the post, at least in part!?
Most definitely Rodrigo.
@@turnermaround one of the frames that occurred to me for this: if agile wants to be something more profound that impacts whole organizations and the market, then indeed it’s a problem if we don’t know where we are going on the macro level despite so much deeper techniques on the micro. And that’s not necessarily a criticism on the latter. And both, not either or.
Maybe the phrase “uncovering better ways” means that much of this already exists? It might not be about inventing new stuff under the agile umbrella but utilising methods that already exist. Seems to me lots of older theories have been co-opted and recategorised as agile. Maybe Agile should calm down and be glad its good at something?! Maybe, I dunno😊