วีดีโอ

I'm new to your channel. Another approach is to see how we should understand Genesis 1 in light of Exodus 20:8-11 and ask "What does 'Remember' (zakar /זכר) mean throughout the OT and its NT equivalent ἀνάμνησιν (anamnēsin)?" Specifically in relation to redemptive-historical (or in this case creational) events.

No one watching this video was ever under the law of Moses, so what Paul wrote does not apply directly to anyone today. The OT prophets wrote that when the Messiah came, the two houses of Israel (Judah and Ephraim) would be reunited. The dividing wall between them was the law. Paul’s gospel was to the scattered Israelites living among the nations (non-Jewish Israelites) to call them back to Yahweh through a new covenant, a new covenant which was only promised to the house of Israel and the house of Judah (Jer. 31). Paul’s Gentiles were not non-Israelites. Paul’s Gentiles were uncircumcised scattered Israelites living among the nations. You have to start there if you’re going to understand anything Paul wrote.

Regarding Galatians 3:19, when a single verse or small pericope is unclear it may because you’re looking at a leaf through a microscope. Take a step back to see the entire tree and the forest. I’m not suggesting an interpretation, just a an approach to getting a better picture.

Great video! You remind me of my new character

Nicely done 👍👍

Humbly, may I suggest.. An intermediary implies more than one party. The Abrahamic promise is made by God to the Offspring. The fact that the Law covenant is enacted through an intermediary shows that it is not part of the covenant inherited by the Son. The proof is that God is one party: He doesn’t need an intermediary when giving things to God.

Very interesting. I had wondered about these verses, but hadn't had the time to dig in deep yet.

Thoroughly enjoy this. It's always good to dig deeper into the Word of God. Thamks for sharing with us. Blessings to you and your family 🙏

I am really surprised that those scholars (who I respect) are all seriously getting Torah wrong. I highly recommend you do a book review of John Walton's "Lost World of the Torah" where he turns that whole law = legislation thing on its HEAD . He delves into the Near Ancient Eastern world to demonstrate they had no concept of government legislation so the "law" is a wrong translation of "Torah" which is instruction for wisdom (Deuteronomy 4:6) . Judges/kings would learn wisdom from the examples given to make decisions. Walton says Paul doesn't interpret the OT but the way the Torah had been used by the Second Temple Judaism or in Galatians the way the Judaizers were using it. Id suggest it's only relevant to understanding Paul and the Judaizers (Gordon Fee reconstructs the scriptural arguments of the Juadizers to show how Paul is countering their arguments) not generally the Torah. The church fathers knew nothing about the context of the Near Ancient East John Waltons book is a paradigm shift, he does have footnotes so he isn't alone

I'm currently studying Galatians to teach to our Bible school. This video and your videos on new perspective have been super helpful

Book of the new sun review when

It was actually helpful and you nailed it !!!

The Septuagint is older and was translated from the living word by Hebrew scholars, not the Masoretic text. This is why Christianity exploded, because all the authors were preaching from the Septuagint because Greek was the world language at the time. The Masoretic text also made multiple changes to the text that differed from the original living word that is present in the Septuagint. So if you want to get to the original living word, you need to either just read the Septuagint or compare the two against each other.

It is describing the Creation through Christ. Like Jonah Christ was under the waters of Death. No cross no creation. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.

@CalebSmith3 I would like to hear your arguments for Exclusivism view, why you think it is true

@CalebSmith3 - why don't you do videos more often?!

I appreciate your balanced explanation and allowance for logic.

Would you make your outline available?

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. What beginning was the devil murderering ? Genesis 1:1 In the beginning. Genesis 1 is ELOHIM (Lucifer and the fallen angels). They made this realm. They made man in their image. (tares) Man is an idol, a trap to hunt angels. Genesis 2:7 the Lord God forms His representative in their system. (wheat) One Gospel: Gospel (GOOD ANGEL) of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.

Get in losers. We’re watching Caleb Smith tonight

Really interesting, I'll reference this video as a great case study on the complexity that goes into merely reading the bible, and the assumptions we bring to the text that we may not be aware of.

very helpful, Caleb Smith. Thank you. I would not say ANY of these points are in any way trivial. When you're building a house you can see how it's all essential to holding something crucial together. Looking to its future use and its permanence is not trivial. We must learn to realize all "NEW" claims are parts of MOVEMENTS, working spiritually, often institutionally, academically, together toward something THEY want to believe, a vision that has come to infiltrate and dominate all else. That is not to say the so-called "Old" may not also suffer under its own dominance of vision that has twisted the truth, but then call that specifically & carefully out. In this case a radical turn toward "NEW" foundational ideas is just using "OLD" and its short-comings to quickly/sneakily establish a new AUTHORITY. In the case of undermining Paul's writings to supposedly honor & champion the raw "JESUS" this is a new DEMAND for freedom to create a NEW (supposedly radically shared we see in culture) AUTHORITY along with all its assumptions and worldview.. Many many non-believers see that & are jumping in to a gospel vision with a false mixing, merging & matching. Also the radical rejection of the individual by treating all conceptions of the individual in terms of individual-ISM and it's extremes in American culture in the past should be challenged-every time-because it is presently is an extreme fad/lie of academia that undermines truth & reality for the sake of the larger cultural MOVEMENT. It is a bully movement, a majority wins through elite lying love movement. If these theologians can't bother to observe and note these salient happenings that are presently viciously dominating in their own culture but YET can insist on giving that culture more power over Paul's theology they are obviously OFF. They are refusing to see the very opposite & far more difficult calling-this is their failing: to CHALLENGE the cultural powers & its spiritual & intellectual manipulation. They are love babies, loving themselves and the world, serving the wrong master. It is a type of endlessly-interesting & creatively self-fulfilling Bible masturbation.

Well done. If we keep in mind that MOVEMENTS have come to take over the culture we live in, over many years and now those involved more subtlety are tasting total dominance and self-indulgence, you can trace the development of leaders like NT Wright & their capitulation We are being groomed to the vision and euphoria/mania of the world under a worldly multicultural lying love. If the advocates admitted & challenged the "rats" in the multicultural revolution perhaps their changed views could be considered, though not orthodox. But by NOT taking on the evil in the present movements & their powers, these views must be marked with great suspicion and those advocating them criticized very closely for suddenly discovering a new "reading" of Paul. This reading is not a helpful reading at our cultural moment, but a harmful compromised reading There is a sense of horror when you see what is going on. What is required is continual reading of these passages. for a fresher much fresher view (a truthful view) and hard questions and insistence that the full secular non-Biblical highly enculturated paradigm they FOLLOW be exposed & challenged over & over & over.

He’s back!

Be curious to see a video on what you feel MH gets wrong regarding theology in this book. Thanks for all your effort in offering concise summaries- appreciate you! 🙏

I enjoyed this. I would however like to hear your view on this.

I wonder what Paul ment when he said to avoid "wrangling over words."

I'm a simple man: I see a new Caleb Smith video, I click and watch!

This type of systematic analysis is very interesting. Definitely interested in more of this type.

Man just slips in casually like no time passed at all. Love it.

Review the Book of the New Sun

Malpass has destroyed this argument, or more boradly this type of argumentation. I am surprised people even bring it up anymore. But for those interested, you should be particularly suspicious of any ideology which: 1. Tells you that you were "chosen" specifically to understand it. 2. That people outside your ideology have no standing to question your beliefs. 3. That people who no longer hold to the ideology were never "true adherents" 4. That you dont "really" believe what you believe. It doesnt matter if it is a religious sect, MLM, conspiracy theory etc.

LETS GO NEW CALEB SMITH UPLOAD! This was some pretty interesting stuff I hadn’t thought about before. It’s cool and awesome to me to see just how many different ways there are to interpret God’s word. Thanks for that bit at the end explaining why it’s important to think about these things!

Thanks for this video and your great summary of all of these views. As always, you do a great job presenting all the views as they are without a strawman or any noticeable bias. I would love to see another video!

After a loooooong time

Greetings from the Philippines! I am glad you're back!

YES!!! I was worried you were just gone for good. Thank God you’re back cus this channel is a small little gem! Best news of my already great Sunday! Thanks

The Jewish Atheist Philip Roth. Not just Atheist Philip Roth. It makes a difference.

The music is ridiculous, maybe this is years old but I can’t listen to that for 20 minutes

Trying to remember the term Avril had for the dirt and other particles from your feet that always end up in your bed. Can anybody help me out?

I love this book. Surprised it isn’t more popular

This was amazing. Thank you so much.

Lewis Patricia Garcia Jessica Gonzalez Carol

I was fall in germany theology when i stated to readings Tom books and it's was my "salivation".

Love your channel!

Worth saying thst on the subject of pisris christou, there are people in all campa with differing opinions. James dunn for instance is a NPP guy who reads it the old way.

I was a fan of this video up until the point you claimed that Arminianism believes faith is a work. That is absolutely absurd.

What is your physical evidence for a physical JC?

I have the NIV CULTURAL BACKGROUNDS STUDY BIBLE and the footnote for Psalm 82:1 states that the hebrew expression great assembly can be rendered more lit. assembly of God or divene assembly, congregation, devine council. Yahweh, the God os israel, stands at the head of an assembly of heaavenly beings, which in the old testament texts are usually called gods or sons of god.

Thee most correct cutting of His word is that between the gospel of Jesus and the gospel of the risen Christ and smack dab in the middle is the most important event in the history of the universe, the cross of Christ. And these two radically different gospels are NOT to be mixed because doing so just causes chaos and confusion and brings great joy to Satan. The basics: The Jews, Circumcisionists v. The Gentiles, Uncircumcisionists (Gal. 2:7 and OF is vital, not to); Under law, good works v. Under grace; Forgiven if you do this this and this v. Justified, declared righteous so no need for forgiveness; Must go through the tribulation v. Not appointed to indignation and thus snatched away before Jacob's trouble commences; A terrestrial destination v. A celestial destination; Peter and his peoplev. Paul and his people; The bride of the Lambkin v. The body of Christ. The latter are not under law but grace, thus under no covenants. The former are not under the new covenant until after the 1000 years when there becomes a new heaven and earth. During the 1000 years the old covenant still exists and earth's inhabitants have to do the law. With the new earth, God changes their hearts of stone to hearts of flesh. Hope this helps. Regarding law, never forget Romans 5:20: yet law came in by the way, so that the offense should be INCREASING.