วีดีโอ

What does the Bible say ? WHO is God ? 👇 1 KINGS 18:39 [ American Standard Version ] "And when all the people saw it, they fell on their faces: and they said, Jehovah, he is God; Jehovah, he is God."

WISH I COULD GET TRANSCRIPTS FROM THIS

thanks fr hitting the nail on the head

@danieletlapocalypse613 I disagree with your claim the "Masiyach" in Dan 9:25 doesn't refer to the Messiah, Jesus. The 70 Weeks prophecy in Daniel 9 is about the Messiah, Jesus, and His holy city Jerusalem, His people. v24, 25. I don't believe "Messiah the Prince" refers to anyone else BUT Jesus. Jesus is called "Messiah" and "Prince" all throughout scripture. He is also called the "Most Holy" in Dan 9:24! This is no title for a mere man. As for the date of the decree to rebuild and restore Jerusalem (Dan 9:25), 457 BC FITS precisely with Jesus' baptism. Why? John the Baptist's preaching of repentance began in the 15th year of Tiberias Caesar (which was ALSO the year of "Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene" Luke 3:1-2), which Google says was 26 AD. Jesus was younger than John by at least 9 months, which would have made him "about thirty" in 27 AD when He was anointed, baptized. Dan 9:24, Luke 3:21-23

@danieletlapocalypse613 I disagree with your claim the "Masiyach" in Dan 9:25 doesn't refer to the Messiah, Jesus. The 70 Weeks prophecy in Daniel 9 is about the Messiah, Jesus, and His holy city Jerusalem, His people. v24, 25. I don't believe "Messiah the Prince" refers to anyone else BUT Jesus. Jesus is called "Messiah" and "Prince" all throughout scripture. He is also called the "Most Holy" in Dan 9:24! This is no title for a mere man. As for the date of the decree to rebuild and restore Jerusalem (Dan 9:25), 457 BC FITS precisely with Jesus' baptism. Why? John the Baptist's preaching of repentance began in the 15th year of Tiberias Caesar (which was ALSO the year of "Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene" Luke 3:1-2), which Google says was 26 AD. Jesus was younger than John by at least 9 months, which would have made him "about thirty" in 27 AD when He was anointed, baptized. Dan 9:24, Luke 3:21-23

Hello this approach is impossible. And there are many reasons. 1 Contrary to the comment of the gentleman who says that the decree of Artaxerxes took place in the fall of 457, the date of the decree of Ezra 7.11 is not known either from the Bible or from history. We only know that the decree took place before Ezra's departure for Jerusalem Esd 7.9 who left Babylon on the first day of the first month of the 7th year, in March 458. The decree could therefore have taken place from the first year in 465 to the 6th year of Artaxerxes in 459. So already on this basis, knowing that Ezra leaves on the first day in March of the 7th Year, the decree seems unlikely to arrive 6 months after he left and moreover, respecting the historical chronology of the spring of 458, to be proclaimed 1, 5 years after Ezra's departure. In the comment on the mister site are 2 people who have written a book claiming that history and archeology proves that the decree was taken in 457 the 7th year of Artaxerxes, this is therefore in contradiction with the scriptures and this approach is probably not without conflict of interest. And why not also on October 22nd while we're at it? 2 The decree of Esd 7.11 does not concern the reconstruction of Jerusalem, it is related only to the inspection of the city and matters related to the temple. What the gentleman says about the institutions that would be set up at that moment is a mistake; because in Esd 7.25 the judges, the magistrates already exist before the coming of Ezra, see Esd 9.2, Esd 10.14. In V 25 the word used by some of the judges and magistrates is (led) which means to measure, which we find written by hand on the wall on October 12, 539 during the fall of Babylon. This is what Ezra is going to do, he is going to measure the integrity of the judges who already exist, but also prince Esd 1.8 of the governors Esd 6.7 of the Levites, elders etc.. there is no addition of institutions that are already existing. BE CAREFUL. In the video the gentleman says that in Esd 7.13 there is the word dabar which means speech in connection with Da 9.25 and the output of speech. It is not so, the word used is te'em which means authorization, in his explanation he also says V 13 that the king asks people to rebuild the city it is also not so. He also says that we find the same words in Hebrew in this verse as that of Da 9.25, this is not the case because the text of Daniel 9 is written in Hebrew and the text of Ezra 7 from verse 12 to 27 is written in Aramaic. 3 In this decree there is no word, Ezra only receives a copy of a letter.Esd 7.11. The gentleman does not take as an example and even disparages the first decree of Cyrus, which has all the characteristics of this resonance, namely a word, (he will say of Jerusalem whatever is rebuilt Esa 44.28 and 45.13) Cyrus is called the mashia Esa 45.1 he asks for the reconstruction of the city and the date of its issuance is known. Esd 1.1. 4 The gentleman also disparages the decree of Neh 2 where the date is known, the 20th year of Artarxerxes Neh 2.1, where the king speaks with Nehemiah and gives him a letter Neh 2.8, and the decree concerns the reconstruction of the city which is declared destroyed by Nehemiah Neh 2.3,5. The decree of Ezra 7 had no effect on the city because Nehemiah 13 years later says that the city is destroyed and he asks to leave to rebuild it. Moreover, in his explanations another error creeps in, to highlight the decree of Ezra and minimize that of Nehemiah. This is the reference he takes from Esd 4.21 Where King Artaxerxes forbids the reconstruction of the city and the temple. He places this event just after the coming of Ezra. But: In Esd 4.12 the king's reaction is following a letter he receives telling him that the Jews who have left your house are rebuilding the rebellious city, raising the walls, and its foundations. Ezra is in Babylon and not in Susa, the capital of Neh 1.1 and Neh 2.1 where Nehemiah is in front of the king. The mail that the king receives is therefore after the coming of Nehemiah and not that of Ezra. Note that the text therefore considers that the foundations, and the city were not realized before the coming of Nehemiah see also Neh 7.4. 5 The gentleman's reasoning asserts that the mashia of Da 9.25 is Christ. And so with this certainty everything is done to plane the pieces of the puzzle. The weeks are in years, the mashia does not arrive after 7 weeks but it is the city that is rebuilt, it is not decided after 62 but it is baptized, the years are solar of 365.24 days and not of 360 like the 40 years in the desert or that of Da 7.25, Ap 11.2,3 etc.. 6 Concerning baptism in the year 27. John the Baptist begins his ministry in the 15th year of Tiberius = after September 18, 29 . see: Luke 3.1. And he baptizes Christ when he is recognized throughout Judea ..It is therefore impossible for Christ to be baptized in 27 as the commentator asserts. In addition, by calculating with biblical and historical data. The reign of Artarxexes begins in 465. The decree starting from the first year 465 until the 6th in 459 gives us as arrival -483 years in + 19 to + 25 ne our era. This doctrine is completely erroneous and there are still many elements in detailing Daniel 9 among others. The true interpretation of Daniel 9 =. The word that announces in Da 9.25 is the one that Daniel sealed and it is that of the son of man who will announce the reconstruction of the Jerusalem of Rev 11.2. The weeks are those of Jer 5.24. The Mashia in Da 9.25 will come as he writes in the 7th week and his head will be sliced after 62. and his things will happen at the end of time and not as in the time of Ezra 9:9. This mashia is not Christ, but the one who is called in Hebrew culture the Mashia Ben Yosef. see Gen 49.1 and Gen 41.22,26. The scriptures are contrary to the visions of Ellen Goold White whose number of her name should make you think. Brother serves the testimony of Jesus and not the one who takes his place. I hope that God will raise up a people in the Adventist Church who will clean up. God keep you, but not in this way. Yves

Hello this approach is impossible. And there are many reasons. 1 Contrary to the comment of the gentleman who says that the decree of Artaxerxes took place in the fall of 457, the date of the decree of Ezra 7.11 is not known either from the Bible or from history. We only know that the decree took place before Ezra's departure for Jerusalem Esd 7.9 who left Babylon on the first day of the first month of the 7th year, in March 458. The decree could therefore have taken place from the first year in 465 to the 6th year of Artaxerxes in 459. So already on this basis, knowing that Ezra leaves on the first day in March of the 7th Year, the decree seems unlikely to arrive 6 months after he left and moreover, respecting the historical chronology of the spring of 458, to be proclaimed 1, 5 years after Ezra's departure. In the comment on the mister site are 2 people who have written a book claiming that history and archeology proves that the decree was taken in 457 the 7th year of Artaxerxes, this is therefore in contradiction with the scriptures and this approach is probably not without conflict of interest. And why not also on October 22nd while we're at it? 2 The decree of Esd 7.11 does not concern the reconstruction of Jerusalem, it is related only to the inspection of the city and matters related to the temple. What the gentleman says about the institutions that would be set up at that moment is a mistake; because in Esd 7.25 the judges, the magistrates already exist before the coming of Ezra, see Esd 9.2, Esd 10.14. In V 25 the word used by some of the judges and magistrates is (led) which means to measure, which we find written by hand on the wall on October 12, 539 during the fall of Babylon. This is what Ezra is going to do, he is going to measure the integrity of the judges who already exist, but also prince Esd 1.8 of the governors Esd 6.7 of the Levites, elders etc.. there is no addition of institutions that are already existing. BE CAREFUL. In the video the gentleman says that in Esd 7.13 there is the word dabar which means speech in connection with Da 9.25 and the output of speech. It is not so, the word used is te'em which means authorization, in his explanation he also says V 13 that the king asks people to rebuild the city it is also not so. He also says that we find the same words in Hebrew in this verse as that of Da 9.25, this is not the case because the text of Daniel 9 is written in Hebrew and the text of Ezra 7 from verse 12 to 27 is written in Aramaic. 3 In this decree there is no word, Ezra only receives a copy of a letter.Esd 7.11. The gentleman does not take as an example and even disparages the first decree of Cyrus, which has all the characteristics of this resonance, namely a word, (he will say of Jerusalem whatever is rebuilt Esa 44.28 and 45.13) Cyrus is called the mashia Esa 45.1 he asks for the reconstruction of the city and the date of its issuance is known. Esd 1.1. 4 The gentleman also disparages the decree of Neh 2 where the date is known, the 20th year of Artarxerxes Neh 2.1, where the king speaks with Nehemiah and gives him a letter Neh 2.8, and the decree concerns the reconstruction of the city which is declared destroyed by Nehemiah Neh 2.3,5. The decree of Ezra 7 had no effect on the city because Nehemiah 13 years later says that the city is destroyed and he asks to leave to rebuild it. Moreover, in his explanations another error creeps in, to highlight the decree of Ezra and minimize that of Nehemiah. This is the reference he takes from Esd 4.21 Where King Artaxerxes forbids the reconstruction of the city and the temple. He places this event just after the coming of Ezra. But: In Esd 4.12 the king's reaction is following a letter he receives telling him that the Jews who have left your house are rebuilding the rebellious city, raising the walls, and its foundations. Ezra is in Babylon and not in Susa, the capital of Neh 1.1 and Neh 2.1 where Nehemiah is in front of the king. The mail that the king receives is therefore after the coming of Nehemiah and not that of Ezra. Note that the text therefore considers that the foundations, and the city were not realized before the coming of Nehemiah see also Neh 7.4. 5 The gentleman's reasoning asserts that the mashia of Da 9.25 is Christ. And so with this certainty everything is done to plane the pieces of the puzzle. The weeks are in years, the mashia does not arrive after 7 weeks but it is the city that is rebuilt, it is not decided after 62 but it is baptized, the years are solar of 365.24 days and not of 360 like the 40 years in the desert or that of Da 7.25, Ap 11.2,3 etc.. 6 Concerning baptism in the year 27. John the Baptist begins his ministry in the 15th year of Tiberius = after September 18, 29 . see: Luke 3.1. And he baptizes Christ when he is recognized throughout Judea ..It is therefore impossible for Christ to be baptized in 27 as the commentator asserts. In addition, by calculating with biblical and historical data. The reign of Artarxexes begins in 465. The decree starting from the first year 465 until the 6th in 459 gives us as arrival -483 years in + 19 to + 25 ne our era. This doctrine is completely erroneous and there are still many elements in detailing Daniel 9 among others. The true interpretation of Daniel 9 =. The word that announces in Da 9.25 is the one that Daniel sealed and it is that of the son of man who will announce the reconstruction of the Jerusalem of Rev 11.2. The weeks are those of Jer 5.24. The Mashia in Da 9.25 will come as he writes in the 7th week and his head will be sliced after 62. and his things will happen at the end of time and not as in the time of Ezra 9:9. This mashia is not Christ, but the one who is called in Hebrew culture the Mashia Ben Yosef. see Gen 49.1 and Gen 41.22,26. The scriptures are contrary to the visions of Ellen Goold White whose number of her name should make you think. Brother serves the testimony of Jesus and not the one who takes his place. I hope that God will raise up a people in the Adventist Church who will clean up. God keep you, but not in this way. Yves

All Glory to Our Saviour LORD JESUS CHRIST 🙏🏻 Amen Amen This message was posted 15 years ago for us to watch what's happening now. Amos 3:7,8 Amen Thank you so much Pastor Stephen Bohr. GOD bless you and family Always Brother.

All Glory to Our Saviour LORD JESUS CHRIST 🙏🏻 Amen Amen This message was posted 15 years ago for us to watch what's happening now. Amos 3:7,8 Amen

WATCH… Risk of Eternal Loss Stephen Bohr… th-cam.com/video/QFz8N826UrY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=2DraWNcgYq5pT-dC

Isaiah 44: Fear ye not , neither ve afraid : have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? Ye are even my witnesses. Is there a a God biside me ? Yea , there is no God; I know not any. ( King James version 1819) , guys I ve notice that the version which pastor Stephen Bohr ia got,it is different then King James version 1819 ! It is written ( beside and not besides right? ) , i don't trust this translation which this pastor says s presented to us ! No way

Which version is got this man ?

Powerful message

Me, Myself, and I are three (3) Body, Spirit, and Soul are three (3) in Likeness of The Godhead.

Happy Sabbath

Break it down. ❤

Nothing could be clearer than the presentation of pastor bohr. Only a closed mind can not understand what is clearly taught in scripture regarding the oneness of The Father, Son and Holy Spirit

21:25 - 22:12 Absolutely ridiculous! The Spirit of the Lord (subjective genitive) is one entity. Pr. Bohr, you forgot to count the Lord too, yeah? because the spirit (1) of the Lord GOD (2; absolutely ridiculous) me (3) and because the Lord (4) .... I’m really hoping that at least one person out there can see that this sermon is absolute GARBAGE!

20:06 - 21:04 By this same logic, God, in Zechariah 2:6-7, must be talking to two different people groups despite His saying, Deliver *thyself, O Zion*.

17:40 - 18:33 So in this sermon, the _us_ in “let *us* go down and confound their language” (speaking of the tower of Babel), refers to two members of the Godhead; but in _Catching Up to Jesus, The Pentecostal Disappointment_ from 17:36 to 19:33, the *us* refers to the Lord and the angels. Which is it? Of course it’s the latter. This is supported by the SOP. But desperate to support the trinity, see how conveniently this now changes to two members of the Godhead?

12:24 That is exactly what Isaiah (as inspired by the Spirit of God and/or Christ) is saying, that God (the sovereign over all the universe -- the Father) is numerically one.

9:49 Notice what the text says: "... and *HIS* redeemer the LORD of hosts". What does this mean? it means that the pre-incarnate Son of God, who is also called by His father's name, Yᵊhōvâ, *belongs* to His Father Yᵊhōvâ, the King of Israel.

6:49: Yes, it is logical nonsense.

Where exactly does scripture teach that god is one god composed of three persons?

1+1+1=1 defies logic. Does the God of the Bible, the God who created logic, need such arguments on his side?

Hi Pr Bohr, you told me via a TH-cam message a few years ago that you believed not the trinity but the Godhead only... The Heavenly Trio I believe but the word persons is not what Ellen White wrote down in her own handwriting, this evidence is well known about today... The wisdom God The Father gave EG White not to ever pen the word trinity in her 70 years of serving the church is being overlooked, this is what the 144,000 will understand in the end... Plus Ellen White warned against using science or even the Sun or moon to describe God the Father... I believe you have great insight into the SOP, but humility when error is realised is the meekness of Jesus Christ... Christ also told us plainly that the Spirit has not a body... Luk 24:39 KJV Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.

THE SECOND COMMANDMENT, THE TRINITY AND THE OMNIPRESENCE OF GOD I always wondered what was so significant about the second Commandment that Rome found it necessary to remove it altogether from the Ten Commandments. But it appears that there is a fundamental truth in that Commandment concerning where God's presence is that is intended to protect us from all forms of false worship. The second Commandment tells us that we should not bow down before any image. This implies that God is not in any image. Which means that God is not everywhere. The Bible tells us that God is in heaven; and heaven is not everywhere. Heaven is above the earth and that is where we should direct our worship to God, where He is. He knows everything that happens everywhere and can go wherever He pleases but His abode is in heaven where Jesus, our High Priest and intercessor, is presenting our cases to Him. - "Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens" (Heb. 8:1). Furthermore, both the prophets Daniel and John saw God in heaven with the angels gathered around His throne and Jesus being separate and distinct (Dan. 7 and Rev. 4, 5). Daniel said "the Ancient of days did sit" (Dan. 7:9) and "one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days" (Dan. 7:13). John said "one sat on the throne" (Rev. 4:2) who was worshipped as the Creator to whom it was said "Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created" (Rev. 4:11), with Jesus appearing before Him to receive a book and power and authority, as the Lamb who was slain, while the angels sang, "Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever." (Rev. 5:13). God is not everywhere all at once like a vapour while part of Him or an image sits on the throne representing Him. God Himself sits, of whom man was made in His image after His likeness, "made after the similitude of God" (James 3:9). Logically, if God is everywhere, He can be worshipped wherever He is. One could then bow down and worship before a stone, a tree, a person or any object, not as worshipping the object but as worshipping God, since God is in it. That would open the door for the worship of false Gods as no one would be able to tell the difference whether you are worshipping the true God or not. It would not be consistent to forbid worshipping before an object if God is in the object and one is worshipping, not the object, but God who is in the object. This is evident in the experience of the children of Israel in the wilderness. God appeared to them in a cloud and they were not forbidden to bow before Him in the cloud - "And the LORD said unto Moses, Lo, I come unto thee in a thick cloud" (Ex. 19:9), "And all the people saw the cloudy pillar stand at the tabernacle door: and all the people rose up and worshipped, every man in his tent door" (Ex. 33:10). If God is not in a particular place, say in an image, it means that there is at least one place where He is not. He cannot be everywhere and not everywhere at the same time. The idea that the Holy Spirit is God present everywhere was precisely the argument that Dr. John Harvey Kellogg put forward to justify his pantheistic teachings. And Ellen White told him that he was wrong. Initially, he said that God was in everything. And when God instructed Ellen White to oppose it, he modified it by saying that at the time of his first presentation of the matter in the book "The Living Temple" he did not believe in the Trinity. Because of that, he said he had not given a clear explanation of the matter. He went on to explain that he had now come to believe in the Trinity and could better explain his idea. The new explanation was that it was not God the Father, but God the Holy Ghost who was everywhere and in everything. Ellen White told him that he was wrong. And we can see why. If God the Holy Spirit is everywhere and can be worshipped, it is a doorway to replace worshipping God and Christ in heaven entirely. Another modified version of Kellogg's idea is that the Holy Spirit is really Christ himself or both God and Christ in an omnipresent form. This is also not correct as it places God and Christ on earth rather than in heaven. The pioneers of Seventh-day Adventism stated in their Fundamental Principles of faith published in the 1889 Yearbook that God was everywhere present by His representative, the Holy Spirit. At face value, this would suggest that this representative is omnipresent. But it is perhaps more consistent with scripture to say that He is everywhere present by His representatives the holy spirits. Holy spirits are ministering spirits sent from heaven - "And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man." (John1:51). "Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?" (Heb. 1:14). This is consistent with the Hebrew word ruach and the Greek word pneuma that are translated in the Bible as spirit. These words are also translated spirits, thus indicating that the Holy Spirit need not be seen as one individual being who is omnipresent but many spirit beings representing God everywhere. From this perspective, there is no denying that the Comforter, the Holy Spirit, sent at Pentecost is a person - only not a God-being to be worshipped. Like the Angel of Revelation 18 who comes down from heaven with the latter rain - a similar occurrence as that which took place at Pentecost except more extensive - the Comforter would be seen as a messenger sent by Christ from heaven, as stated repeatedly in John 14-16. Ellen G. White describing the latter rain speaks of a mighty angel from heaven being sent to do this work and further said, "Angels were sent to aid the mighty angel from heaven" (Ellen. G. White, Story of Redemption, p. 399). It should be noted that Jesus's warning against blaspheming against the Holy Spirit is not implying that the Holy Spirit is more to be revered than Jesus Himself. Jesus went back to heaven and promises to return to this earth to take us to His Father's house in heaven. He left the Holy Spirit to guide us until He returns. If we reject that guidance by blasheming against the the Holy Spirit, there will be nobody to guide us. The situation is similar to what God told the children of Israel in the wilderness - "Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him." (Ex. 23:20, 21). It is simply warning us not to reject the Holy Spirit's guidance. It is not forbidding us seeking to understand who the Holy Spirit is or what the Holy Spirit does. So, there we have it. The church has now fully accepted Kellogg's idea. Ellen White said that the initial presentation by Kellogg was the alpha of deadly heresies. She said that the omega would follow shortly afterwards and would be accepted. And it did follow shortly afterwards in Kellogg's modified version, based on his acceptance of the Trinity. And the church has now fully accepted it - that God (the Holy Spirit) is everywhere and should be worshipped. So, based on current practice, Jesus is worshipped, the Holy Spirit is worshipped but the One true God is almost entirely ignored. Jesus, praying to His Father, made it clear who the "only true God" is and identified Himself as the one sent by God - "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." (John 17:3). Nowhere in the Bible is worship given to anyone else except the one seated on the throne who is referred to as "LORD God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come" (Rev.4:8) and to the Christ, the Lamb, as it will be in the new earth - "And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it." (Rev. 21:22). God is the Father of Christ. Accordingly, Christ, the Lamb is seen with "an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads" (Rev. 14:1). It is the name of the Lamb's Father that will be written in their foreheads. Whatever one's concept of the Godhead, the term "godhead" is used only three times in the Bible (Acts 17:29, Rom. 1:20 and Col. 2:9) and in none of these places is the expression used to replace the idea of God being a single individual who has a Divine Son who is worshipped alongside Himself. And not even once does the term "godhead" in scripture allude to the worship of anyone else. All worship should be directed to God and Christ in heaven. It is not about where we are when we worship but, like sending a petition to the king of England, we do not send it to Spain or Australia but to him in England where he is. Similarly, Jesus in teaching us how to pray directed that we say, "Our Father which art in heaven". We should not be praying to nor worshipping anything on earth. We should pray to God in heaven, approaching His throne through Christ, our Mediator, and we should direct our worship to heaven where God is. This is the substance of the second Commandment that Rome has removed.

Amazing thank you

Can someone explain to me who is the Ancient of Days and who is the Son of man in Daniel 7vs13

These are so very good. 👍👍👍

Powerful 🙏

Amen

Is this available in Italian

Amen im blessed by this sermon. Now i understood why the seventh day adventist church insisted on keeping the 10 commandments of God

Amen

Mr red man Edom how can you be john the revelator

This is total truth as is found in Jesus Christ, the HOLY SPIRIT is in deed the third person in the Godhead.

Sabbath?? True.... But how Islam getting along with Christianity.....😊. I would follow Lord Jesus and Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him Amen. The holy quaran is also a great book.( Final) Until the doctrines of Covenant. ( Amen).😊

This is complete lies and non biblical at all.Yeshua,who would know told us the truth about God. John 17:3

Tell the lord Thank you so much. I miss Arfa ln well duh and his sisters and Abu Ji my father in law. Favorite father in law.

Where are you these days Elder John? My goodness with you following the lords orders. Oh right. No major to be desperate. Oh I believe you John even though others read it. It's funny how my past life regression I started remembering. What castle is the lord sending me towards. I have no major memory of that. Yes yes the lord Jesus is the King Lord and High major priest of the celestrial kingdom. Everyone believes he is coming back. Why the seven trumpets. I hope your reading this from celestrial kingdom. Amen. Meet you inshallah in the temple. When Iam reunited with Arfan.😊

This series is such a blessing!

Reminds me of the Catching Up with Jesus series. Love this series, too!

Please help me understand. Is the Holy Spirit a group of holy angels/messengers or just one holy person equal with God the Father ( a third person of the Trinity)??

There are three living persons of the heavenly trio; in the name of these three great powers, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Those who receive Christ by living faith are baptized, and these powers will cooperate with the obedient subjects of heaven in their efforts to live the life in Christ. -Evangelism, pg 615. Evangelism, p. 615. The definite time of our Lord's coming is declared to be beyond the knowledge of mortals. Even the angels, who minister unto those who shall be heirs of salvation, know not the day nor the hour. "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." (Mark 13:32) --4T 307 (1879

if Jesus paid the price of sin and sin seperates us from the Father could this be why Christ said Lord why hast thou forsaken me? so Jesus, who is part of the God head paid a much higher price for our sins than what we would have recieved as He has been seperated from his own family as part of the Godhead He was seperated from himself?

amazingly precise studies of Pastor Bohr great preachers like walter veith and ivor myers

God is always might and greater

Meet me inside the lords house. Iam extremely so sorry what you call it.... Prejudice the lord Issa Christ. Because Because I have been become insolence Because Because I will admit Because he stole Arfans mission dignity of Prophet Muhammad's house Peace be upon. Arfan known as Shaji is the secretive hidden 13th Shia Iman like the same Iman Muhhamad Ali Mahdi.😊 My sincere apologies. Christians???? What about Muslims where they stand? Equally. Ask him..Ask him directly??.

And the holy quaran is the final book until Iman AL Mahdi returns. Yeah AL- Mahdi. Mashallah😊