วีดีโอ

@@bartosdiagos You would have to explain how Billy Carson completely missed the facts that Wes Huff provided.

@@chaseorosco9017 first, it was a question, second, no one knows absolute truth, might be a good idea to expand your mind. :)

@@bartosdiagos Absolute truth is as real as you are absolutely certain the statement you just made is true.

@@chaseorosco9017 and God?

@@bartosdiagos God is the absolute necessary being for anything to exist.

We have and nothing in the Bible can be proven, at all. U really think 6,000 yrs of human history is in one book?😂 a car mechanic book for one car is bigger than the Bible. No one knows that’s why it’s called faith, faith doesn’t prove anything. Snake in sheep’s clothing =wes.

@@jcreature11 Do you disagree with Bart Earman, an agnostic scholar who admits the New Testament is the most historically attested document of ancient history?

@@MadMax-gc2vj How so?

@@chaseorosco9017 You still young which is good , i am 60. But you and everyone else is getting F*cked with the ignorance of the Bible. I started reading the Bible since 6 yrs old Spanish and English and by 8 or 9 yrs old i knew it was stupidity and ignorant to pursue this scam.

@@chaseorosco9017If it's true, why is it wrong? By what Standard? 👀

@@nicolascruz3045 I don’t understand your question.

Carson claims he's god dude. No proof he can ressurect dead guys yet. New Age people think they can answer life's mysteries but when they say something that is not factually true we win debate by default.

I mean sure, but I was more focused on a Catholic understanding of John 6:37-44.

@@chaseorosco9017What is your concern regarding Catholic teaching on John 6:37-44? Btw, the Catholic Church does not have teachings of specific verses of scripture. It has teachings which are backed up by scripture as a whole and may quote verses for context.

@@chaseorosco9017Is your issue to do with predestination? I am just guessing here. Please tell me which Catholic teaching you believe is wrong. I have done a lot of research since yesterday so have lots of authentic Catholic resources to give you.

@@michaelbrunsdon8938 The video addresses the issue. I am responding to a Roman Catholic’s attempts to deal with John 6:37-44.

@@chaseorosco9017What you do believe is the Catholic teaching on John 6:37-44?

I have to disagree. I mean, I would agree that they took some things way over the top, like the part where she carries Taigen up a wall over her back and throws him through a window like nothing is ridiculous. Some of the fight scenes are just too over the top but I think that was the point. And there is the constant talk about “women in society” which I admit can be a red flag. At the same time, while we ought to be weary of these things, it actually isn’t wrong to say that many of the cultural norms of old were indeed sexist, and I say that as a Christian who believes in the patriarchal concept of the Bible. I’m not so sure it is a whole trans show; if it is, they managed to do it with excellent storytelling. It depends on what happens in future seasons. It’ll go in either one of two directions: Mizu’s supposed gender dysphoria will manifest into full on trans, or she’ll come to terms with her own trauma and find redemption. Like I said in this review, my hope is that we see Mizu, instead of seeing her entire existence as a curse, come to see how blessed she is just to be alive, find peace in that, and embrace who and what she is. That’s finding true peace. That would be an excellent story arc. But I’m leaning towards it not being a trans show because whole episode five showed betrayal from a man, it didn’t seem to curse her love for the man. Their love was genuine, she found real happiness, and enjoyed womanhood, which, from a storytelling perspective, implies this is what will make her happy. It just wasn’t the right fit. Finding peace, embracing her womanhood was what fulfilled her, helped her to move on; that’s what the story tells you. So that means, again from a narrative standpoint, Mizu’s redemption is found in that. If they decide to go full woke, then you’re right, and it will at that point be disastrous storytelling.

"It's literally about trans biracial "samurai" who is devoted to killing the evil white European men (rapists, drug, weapon, human traffickers, evil capitalist and the patriarchy) that are trying to control Japan." No. It's literally about a biracial human who is devoted to killing the four Caucasian European males that were in Japan at the time of her conception, as at least one of them would logically be her father, and therefore the cause of her suffering. Fixed it for you. "Another strong woman protagonist." And the problem with those are...? "If you know much Japanese cultural and history, the story really wasn't Japanese." During the time in history when the events of the show occur, legalized revenge killing( katakiuchi ) was not only common, it was, much like seppuku, widely glorified and romanticized through woodblock prints, literature, poetry and theater. The Japanese have always loved this stuff, evidenced by it being a recurring theme in their modern films and literature as well. Katakiuchi gained such a hold on the populace in pre-modern Japan, that at some point during the Edo period, petitions for permission to engage in katakiuchi from commoners far outnumbered those from samurai. Just pointing out that the story of Blue Eye Samurai is very, VERY Japanese. "The idea that a small petite woman could defeat trained large men is silly." Ah, yes. This old chestnut. First of all, in no way does the show depict Mizu as "small" and/or "petite." Secondly, the history of our planet is rife with examples of women warriors besting men larger than themselves. It has to do with body mechanics, leverage, timing, boring stuff like that. Lastly, your assumption that a person who is trained will always magically defeat someone who is untrained in combat is reductive, if not ridiculous. Because not all training is equal. For what it's worth, I've spent a not insignificant portion of the past thirty years studying classical Japanese martial arts, among others. How someone trains is a LOT more important than what they are training. "the underlying story is culturally Marxist to the core." I could ask you to define Marxism for us, with or without a cultural context, but obviously there's no way of knowing you wouldn't just cheat and look that up on your phone. So I'll just say this: it's only culturally Marxist when you can prove that Mizu's motivation comes 100% from a sense of her not just feeling but actually being oppressed and victimized. And you can't. "I think most actual Japanese would find it very much inaccurate and not in the true spirit of Japan or Samurai culture." That's another ridiculous supposition. Several problems with it: First, you'd have to ask Japanese people to watch the show and give you an honest assessment of it based on your criteria. No Japanese person is going to be honest with you about their own culture and history. The next problem is finding enough Japanese people to watch the show, somehow guarantee that they ARE giving you an honest assessment about it, and then finding enough to have a majority consensus that agrees with your supposition. Lastly, please define for us, and to any Japanese person you encounter, precisely what you believe to be the "true spirit" of Japan and samurai culture. This should prove interesting. Because the one thing that all Japanese people absolutely LOVE is when foreigners define Japanese culture to them.

I don’t, I’m afraid.

So, “Before me no god was ordained, neither shall there be after me.” How does that change anything?

@@chaseorosco9017 God was not formed or created he has always been so would he say before me there was no God formed.? In 1 Peter 1 he teaches us that Jesus was "verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world". In Isa 43 it is saying the same thing. Jehovah/Jesus was the only one pre-ordained to be the Savior, among the other sons of God. In Heb 1 it talks of this when his God anoints him with the oil of gladness above his fellows. Go to the end of of Isa 43 Jehovah says ; I blot out your transgression, let us plead together that thou maybe justified. To whom is Jehovah pleading if there is no other God above him?

@@NancyBrown-xw8hg What’s the biblical evidence that links those passages together? You can’t just take a verse here and a verse there that may likely have nothing to do with each other and say “See! All it means is predestined!” That’s not how this works. That’s eisegesis, reading a theology into the text rather than reading God’s word and taking it as it stands. That Jesus is predestined from the foundation of the world in no way proves your understanding of Isaiah 43:10. And it STILL doesn’t address the fact that even if we take your understanding, the text is still saying there is no God before or after Elohim. There are no others. You will not be a god/goddess, no one will be. There is only one and there has only ever been one and none were before him, none will be after him.

@@chaseorosco9017 But Elohim is plural. After Jesus' resurrection he talks to some men on the Road to Emmaus, they are puzzled the Messiah wasn't suppose to die? So Jesus opens the scriptures for them in a different way. For generations they had been interpreting the scriptures wrong, their traditional understanding was wrong. Christianity has fallen into the same trap. I'm going off subject here but it's a good example. Here's something I learn just the other day, the word faith didn't mean at the time of Paul what it means today. We think of faith as a conviction of something you believe to be true. We believe Jesus died on the cross, but a little stronger than belief. There is this guy who went back into history to see how the Hebrews and Greeks used it at the time of Christ. (Must be his doctrinal theist or something) Then he followed it through Christianity, he could pinpoint where the drastic change began. What it meant in the culture of Paul was more like; we have a good faith agreement. It doesn't have anything to do with what you believe in but what you are willing to commit to. It is based in a patron client relationship, a covenant. So in Eph 2 Paul is saying we Jews had the works of the law of Moses to make our covenant but you gentiles didn't have to do any works to come under covenant, to be brought into the household of God. It gives a whole different feel and deeper meaning to Paul's message. Christians need to be willing to rethink their traditions, do their own studying and comparing of the scriptures. I sat down with my Bible and a Strongs Bible Concordance. I also went to several different commentaries, to get different opinions. I started with, In the beginning..., and worked my way through. Took me about 3 years an made a better Mormon of me. Ex 15 "Who is like unto thee, O Lord, among the gods? who is like thee, glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing wonders?" Why is Jehovah called God of gods, Lord of Lords? Which gods?

I had an alarm go off in the beginning of the video which stopped the recording as I was talking about the recent passing of my grandma. I didn’t feel like starting over so kept going, and I wasn’t going to have time today to splice the two videos together so I just went with it. I might post that other video up some time soon.

Lol, it actually is! I didn’t even realize that till now. 😅

Praise God, brother! I'm planning on making a new video for tomorrow on apologetics and then continue with my little series on the Screwtape Letters. A great book that I hear people talk about (though I haven't read it yet) is The King James Only Controversy by James White. I listen to a lot of Daniel Wallace from Dallas Theological Seminary. He's got books and lots of great lectures here on TH-cam. I'm currently reading his book "Revisiting the Corruption of the New Testament" where he critiques Bart Ehrman's criticisms of the text. I think it's a real good layman's book about the whole issue. :)

@@chaseorosco9017 I'll definitely check out your upcoming video and your past videos. Thank you for the book recommendations and I'll definitely check out Dan Wallace's videos. I meant to ask, what's your preferred translation?