วีดีโอ

Hi Paul, checking in on your progress I'll send comments after I watch it all

Its interesting he brings up selective sweep there because it doesnt absolve the issue his father initially raised, it points it out.

I clicked here to listen these kinds words from Zenon to Fodor what a philosopher and thinker

Thank you for posting.

i read around many critics. it is easily noticeable that Fodor's writing style was pretty much convoluted. it is duty of next generation to spread and deepen Fodor's contribution to science, to make it more accessible without losing its grip i have much appreciated the conference, Pianelli-Palmarini is very clear all throughout the questions at the end

I too, only clicked to know how to pronounce Pylyshyn

Nice!, I wish i could say how much jerry impacted my life but it seems like i cant put it into words. Fart. Jerry would say this everyday to me the first time we met, safe to say he was incredible!

Inutile studiare e parlare di questi temi se non si sperimentano nella propria vita! Continuerete ad andare in giro a cercare il Sacro Graal.. impegnatevi di più nel cercare dentro ciò di cui parlate.. vedrete che alla fine riuscirete a convertirvi🙏😊🤗per adesso girate intorno a punto senza divertirvi troppo.. forza, ci siete quasi.. ora smettete di parlare ed iniziare ad autocurarvi! Vivete💪🥐🥐🥐🎉🥳e smettete di chiamarvi professori per l’amor del cielo, trovatevi un lavoro da artigiani e vivete.. sembrate già morti🤣🤣🤣😅😇

We need a book of "Jerry jokes" please

Jackendoff is a good cognitivist and linguist.

Excellent content but it is a shame that this material was not included in the book "What Darwin Got Wrong" which, frankly, tries too hard to be clever and does a poor job of crystallizing and validating its key message.

the other guy talked too much

Honestly I only clicked to hear the pronunciation of Zenon. She pronounced it just like I do.

Honestly I only clicked to hear the pronounciation of Pylyshyn but that was very sweet

This man speaks nonsence. The understanding of man having a nonphuysical spirit is throughout the Bible, both old and new Testaments. He is preaching Egyptian and Greek gnosticism, and telling a lie about the scriptures. To see just how wrong he is about it, do a search in the Bible for the words "spirit" and "soul" and read the passages. You will discover that the Bible tells us of a non-physical spirit a great many times. For example, passages that speak of possessions prove him wrong. Now, if someone claims the spirit is a field around the brain like the magnetic field, they are still wrong. If mind were such a perposterous thing, then being close to a powerful magnet or putting headphones on or a cell phone to your head should cause insanity, death, or other profound effects upon the mind.

If atheism were true, humans would be soulless bags if matter with no innate value. Therefore, atheism is not only absurd, obviously false, and cannot provide for the existence of anything including morality, but is in fact a dangerous necromancy that has caused the death of hundreds of millions of people in the 20th century - a mountain of bodies and a river of blood - all because atheists refuse out of pride to acknowledge God. Atheism is a sickness that has done too much harm already. It should be internationally illegal to tell anyone they are a souless bag of matter. This is abuse of the highest order. Atheism is the least intellectual idea ever produced by a human, and requires a person to be in denial of a large percentage of the accrued knowledge of mankind. Atheists believe the universe exploded from a spaceless point, produced astonishing order, ultimately producing rock soup which came alive which then organized itself into Beethoven and space probes. They believe soulless bags of matter write novels too. Logical, rational, scientific stuff if I ever heard it. Those atheists are so smart! If the mind is entirely caused by matter, free will cannot exist. If free will does not exist, then there is no such thing as an opinion. Therefore the atheist assertion, "There is no evidence for the existence of God." is is just chemical reaction, not an opinion, and cannot be either true or false. If atheistic materialism were true, then immaterial things like propositions, such the proposition that materialism is true, can't be true. Atheism is logically incoherent and self-refuting. If atheistic materialism were true, then the atheist proposition, "There is no evidence for the existence of God." is is just chemical reaction, neither true nor false. Atheism is logically incoherent and self-refuting. When asked how chemistry (of the brain) is able to produce opinion, assertions, queries, or make observations, atheists cannot provide an answer. They go silent. "If the mind is entirely caused by matter, free will cannot exist. Matter is governed by fixed laws, and if our thoughts are entirely the product of brain chemistry, then our thoughts are determined by brain chemistry. But chemistry doesn’t have "truth" or "falsehood," or any other values for that matter. It just is. Enzymatic catalysis isn’t true or false, it just is. In fact, the view that "materialism is true" is meaningless… if materialism is true. If materialism is true, then the thought "materialism is true" is just a chemical reaction, neither true nor false. While there are some philosophers who assert that free will can exist in a deterministic aterialistic world (they’re called "compatibilists"), and some have argued that quantum indeterminacy may leave room for free will, the most parsimonious explanation for free will is that there is an immaterial component of the mind that is undetermined by matter."- Dr. Michael Egnor, award winning neurosurgon "Atheists are people who demand of themselves to believe that only atheists, a small minority of the people in the world, are right about the existence of non-physical things, such as their own spirit, because they refuse to accept the inference that their own sentience is evidence of their spirit and that the cause of their spirit is God." -- NephilimFree "It really is that absurd. For materialists, the metaphor of memory for computer storage of electronic representations has become metaphysics, which (sadly) is a bit of an improvement on actual materialist metaphysics, which is utterly incoherent. The proper response to this pitiful error is a bit of common sense, explained slowly." - Dr. Michael Egnor, award winning neurosurgon "Materialists have taken note of the growing efforts by non-materialist neuroscientists to point out the deep problems with the inference that the brain is entirely the cause of the mind. Materialist neuroscience, like materialist evolutionary biology, is a vacuous orthodoxy, and its proponents resent threats to their dogma. Darwinian explanations for functional biological complexity are nonsense, but some familiarity with the relevant science is necessary to understand that it is nonsense. Materialist explanations for the mind are transparent nonsense." - Dr. Michael Egnor, award-winning neurosurgeon "The plain fact is that the materialist picture of the body and brain as the producers, rather than the vehicles, of human consciousness is doomed. In its place a new view of mind and body will emerge, and in fact is emerging already. This view is scientific and spiritual in equal measure and will value what the greatest scientists of history themselves always valued above all: truth." - Dr. Alexander, University of Virginia Medical School, former faculty member at Harvard Medical School "There are not many options - essentially just two. Either human intelligence ultimately owes its origin to mindless matter; or there is a Creator. It is strange that some people claim that it is their intelligence that leads them to prefer the first to the second." - John Lennox, PhD mathemetician Oxford University, theologian "Materialism is an atheistic philosophy that says that all of reality is reducible to matter and its interactions. It has gained ground because many people think that it’s supported by science. They think that physics has shown the material world to be a closed system of cause and effect, sealed off from the influence of any non-physical realities - if any there be. Since our minds and thoughts obviously do affect the physical world, it would follow that they are themselves merely physical phenomena. No room for a spiritual soul or free will: for materialists we are just “machines made of meat.” - Stephen M. Barr, professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy of the University of Delaware web.physics.udel.edu/about/directory/faculty/stephen-barr

It is wrong to think there is nothing in the natural world to correspond with number 7, with the concept of 7 days a week. Actually, there is. It is the quarter of the lunar month which is the very beginning of the human calendar.