![Siskel and Ebert Reviews by Jason Bagherian](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 21
- 23 360
Siskel and Ebert Reviews by Jason Bagherian
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2023
Siskel & Ebert Review Blue Thunder (1983) John Badham
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
มุมมอง: 87
วีดีโอ
Siskel & Ebert Review Dracula (1979) John Badham
มุมมอง 359 หลายเดือนก่อน
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review Saturday Night Fever (1977) John Badham
มุมมอง 329 หลายเดือนก่อน
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review Jaws: The Revenge (1987) Joseph Sargent
มุมมอง 289 หลายเดือนก่อน
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review Jaws 3-D (1983) Joe Alves
มุมมอง 249 หลายเดือนก่อน
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review Jaws 2 (1978) Jeannot Szwarc
มุมมอง 359 หลายเดือนก่อน
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Roger Ebert on Stanley Kubrick & Eyes Wide Shut (At the Movies TV Special 1999)
มุมมอง 133ปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Roger Ebert Reviews Eyes Wide Shut (1999) Stanley Kubrick
มุมมอง 324ปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review Full Metal Jacket (1987) Stanley Kubrick
มุมมอง 98ปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review A Clockwork Orange (1971) Stanley Kubrick
มุมมอง 604ปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) Stanley Kubrick
มุมมอง 762ปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review Spartacus (1960) Stanley Kubrick
มุมมอง 6Kปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use". A wonderful review by Gene Siskel who comes across as really loving Kubrick's Spartacus. Spartacus is the best of the old school epics and here are the reasons why I love the film so much. I saw Spartacus in 1979 or 1980 when I was 2 or 3 years old. As a child h...
Siskel & Ebert Review Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) Francis Ford Coppola
มุมมอง 151ปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use". Francis Ford Coppola has directed my two favorite films; Apocalypse Now and The Godfather. The opening 6 minutes of Bram Stoker's Dracula is some of the most incredible film making that I have ever seen. I'm sure many people will not like Bram Stoker's Dracula b...
Siskel & Ebert Review The Godfather Part III (1990) Francis Ford Coppola
มุมมอง 216ปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review Rumble Fish (1983) Francis Ford Coppola
มุมมอง 2.7Kปีที่แล้ว
DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
Siskel & Ebert Review Apocalypse Now (1979) Francis Ford Coppola
มุมมอง 1.5Kปีที่แล้ว
Siskel & Ebert Review Apocalypse Now (1979) Francis Ford Coppola
The Conversation (1974) Behind the Scenes with Francis Ford Coppola
มุมมอง 3.7Kปีที่แล้ว
The Conversation (1974) Behind the Scenes with Francis Ford Coppola
Siskel & Ebert Review The Conversation (1974) Francis Ford Coppola
มุมมอง 3.7Kปีที่แล้ว
Siskel & Ebert Review The Conversation (1974) Francis Ford Coppola
Siskel & Ebert Review The Godfather (1972) Francis Ford Coppola
มุมมอง 1.4Kปีที่แล้ว
Siskel & Ebert Review The Godfather (1972) Francis Ford Coppola
Roger Ebert Reviews The Brown Bunny (2003) Vincent Gallo
มุมมอง 1.4Kปีที่แล้ว
Roger Ebert Reviews The Brown Bunny (2003) Vincent Gallo
Siskel & Ebert Review Buffalo 66 (1998) Vincent Gallo
มุมมอง 96ปีที่แล้ว
Siskel & Ebert Review Buffalo 66 (1998) Vincent Gallo
Spoiler alert
Fun fact: S.E. Hinton (writer of Rumble Fish & The Outsiders & many more) plays a cameo in the scene where Motorcycle Boy & Rusty James are talking about his fear of being alone. She is the "hooker" that propositions Rusty James & then Steve at the bottom of the stairs.
As long as white people can built machines that work properly, human slavery will not come back.
Poor gene, i wish both were alive and did a show where they re review films
Fredo wants a bigger role in the eavesdropping business
So laughably stupid it boggles the mind that anyone could rave about it. I think the torment that people see in Hackmans' performance is the torment of agreeing to do this film. THAT is why he didn't want to do another small picture.
What a stupid comment.
What about this movie is stupid? I'm interested to hear your reasoning.
This movie was ahead of its time. Explore how technology is going to affect our lifes, providing deep information instantenously about us to other entities (the scene of car chase is an extraordinary example) and the alienation of our relationships because of that. A masterpiece that overcome the test of the time.
The words shock him out of his techne role
Ebert was right in 1979. Siskel’s take, in retrospect, comes off as almost amateurishly tangential and beside the point of the film’s now-obvious, lightening-in-a-bottle genius. Roger saw what many couldn’t see at the time.
Such a classic! The mid 70s seemed like such a vintage year for great movies.
It has it's faults, but there is plenty to love about Rumble fish. I do wonder if I over rate it because of the way it looks and the brilliant soundtrack thou.
The movie was genius i.m.o. I think the reason Gene didn't like it, is because he's never had to live a hard life. The movie's plot was simple. It was Rusty James trying to find himself like every other teenager in their life. His brother was his hero, because his father was a horrible role model. His brother had already been through the craziness of their parents divorce, and had come back to I believe help his brother. My dad was a horrible father figure too. I grew up on an army base during the Vietnam war, and when he came back. He was a very violent person. He eventually left our family for another women, then conveniently committed suicide a few weeks later when I was nine. So I understand where this moving is coming from. Maybe thats why Gene didn't get it.
That's kind of a silly argument You don't have to be in the mob to enjoy Goodfellas He didn't have to live in the slums to love Pixote I grew up in the Bronx and I didn't think Rumble Fish was good It was ok , not terrible, but very muddled plot wise
They both missed the symbolism at the end, when Rusty James finally gets to the ocean, the mother of all.
They really did. This movie was phenomenal i.m.o. But when you have never lived a life like their's. It's really hard to understand the full meaning of the movie.
Stone-cold masterpiece. Hackman is phenomenal in this.
Siskel and Ebert don't know shit. I've seen the movie at least 100 times - and it is an absolute masterpiece. I love "Lawrence of Arabia" as well - but for dramatic impact, "Spartacus" does far more in less time. Kubrick and Douglas were at their best, the cast was excellent and the score by Alex North is just brilliant. The movie is arguably one of the best set during the time of Ancient Rome.
Why did Anthony Hopkins have to put the dialogue in that scene? wasn’t the original audio not available?
I never realized back when I was a kid how stupid These two dumbass critics are. My God if they made a movie like this these days… All they make now are superhero bullshit movies Coppola was among the last great Directors of real artistic movies.
Peter Ustinov stole movie.
I wonder what led Coppola to cast Gene Hackman. Hackman is fantastic in this but it's so unlike any characters he had played before. I wonder if Coppola saw something specific that persuaded him that Hackman was right for the role.
Hello..... According to Francis Ford Coppola's autobiography, he originally had written the character of Harry Caul with Marlon Brando in mind to portray the role. However, Brando declined Coppola's offer to portray the role much to Coppola's dismay...... Therefore Gene Hackman was cast to portray the role of Harry Caul & the rest is history.....
@@johnjacobs5199 Thanks for your response. I'm glad Brando wasn't cast. I don't think he would have been right for it at all. Did Coppola explain why he chose Hackman?
Used the love theme at my Greek father's funeral. (Although the tape stopped playing halfway!!) Love this movie. So poignant that Varinia and Spartacus' baby ride off into the sunset with Batiatus, endowed with Graccus' money, owner of the Gladiator school, to start a new life.
Gene is correct
This film is a stone-cold masterpiece
I’ve tried to watch it several times but it is the antithesis of SK’s revolutionary approach to film. The diagetic score, in particular, Mickey Mouses every plot point, telling the audience how to feel. Much of the photography looks like studio bound technicolor. It has its moments, but it feels like SK was directing with one hand tied behind his back.
Muhammad Ali with one hand behind his back still could beat most competitors though.
Wonderful score by Alex North, wonderful photography by Russell Metty, Kubrick should have directed his following films with two hands tied behind his back, they could have been better.
Larry brilliant as Crassus 👏👏 Should won an Oscar as supporting actor.
Yes.....he was hypnotic here. ! He COULD be a dreadful old Ham at times but at his best he was untouchable.!
S'not bad, but the whole movie was produced because Kirk Douglas was pissed off that Charlton Heston (not Jewish) had the starring role in Ben Hur, which was a better film IMO.
Ben Hur is a wonderful epic once it gets going. But it is marred by that lengthy opening sequence blathering on about a religious myth and that myth later being brought up again in the film. If it just stuck to the main story of Ben Hur it would stand higher in my opinion. Not containing religious nonsense makes Spartacus so much better than Ben Hur.
@@1ouncebird It sure does.
Spartacus may not be as good as Lawrence of Arabia (I agree with this) but that is really nitpicking. Spartacus is an absolutely brilliant film. Fantastic! It stands way up there among epics and beats most of them in my opinion. Just an amazing achievement by all who created it.
If I had to choose between the two, I think Spartacus is better than Lawrence of Arabia - though both are excellent of course.
The use of The Blue Danube for the docking scene was brilliant.
Freado sets Mike up with whores because to him that’s the best gifts to give. 😅hahaha what a great idea. He can’t believe everyone else isn’t a whoremonger like him.
I think the original was a seriously emotional piece of art
At least they talked it out
My favorite Kubrick movie.
Motorcycle boy is still alive, rusty James is alive 🎉❤
Many of Roger Ebert's critiques were so blatantly WRONG that I can't even understand how they gave him his own TV show! For example, him not calling "Spartacus" an epic is the one of the most idiotic statements I've ever heard about films, and I'm 76-years old. Don't believe me? Take a look at the ending battle scene, a scene so huge that it could have never even been made today with the use of actual extras, only CGI. And take another good look at the huge CAST, consisting of the greatest film and stage actors who ever lived. By ANY use of the term, the sheer scope and size of this monumental film qualifies it as a bona fide epic for all time, including "Ben Hur."
2:51 He calls it "a good epic". He just doesn't consider it to be as "great" in quality as "Lawrence of Arabia", which Siskel seems to agree with.
@@JacobDragyn That's HIS opinion, certainly not MINE.
@@JacobDragyn Exactly, and not as epic as Lawrence of Arabia. It was something of a formula epic of the era, which was probably why Kubrick hated it.
2:05 Roger got it right here
Vincent is played to much over the top and forced.
I saw it in the theater as a kid and didn’t like it. It came out on TV years later and did a 180 and loved the film. Fast forward to today and I put it in the top ten movies of all time.
Great review guys, but Mike didn’t put Fredo in charge in Vegas, he was out there long before Mike had any power. And sealed is right, in fact they even point that out in the picture, over killing a cop, but this cop is crooked so they get away with it. Be my friend, lol like grade school kids.? Will you be my friend?
It's true that Hollywood could not make this film today. There are no adult actors in Hollywood, just superhero types.
Perfect movie
Sad we don’t have directors like FFC or Martin Scorsese anymore. Unique, with integrity and true to their vision. Do not give an f what anyone thinks. Roger had this right. This is such a great film and music.
They are both alive
@@r00tbeard I meant up and coming directors. FFC is retired and I don’t know how much longer MS will be able to direct. He’s in his early 80s.
@@PurplenpinkkFFC has a new movie coming out this year
@@innitthough712 Really?! I totally thought he had retired! I look forward to that then.
Surprised that Gene was such a hater. It ain’t for everyone, but I legit loved this movie. You know how when you see movies when you’re a kid, and you think, “Wow, I wanna be that guy!” Indians Jones, Han Solo, whatever. Well, with Rumble Fish, I saw Motorcycle Boy, and I was like, aw, shit. That’s me.
Ebert is so wrong here. What a dickhead.
Brilliant! Thank you for uploading.
4K?? Gotta pick up my shorts rq.
Thumbs down. You idiots have spoiled the ending. 🤦🏻♂️
One would assume that in 2024 watching a review from the 90's about a huge movie from 1960, that you would know what's coming.
I didn't know what that movie was missing until I listened to Gene. It was kind of cheap and generic.
All 4 of the iconic Vietnam war movies, The Deer Hunter, Apocalypse Now, Platoon and Full Metal Jacket were not only about the horrors of war, but the insanity and its toll. In Apocalypse Now, the farther up river the greater the insanity until the end and Colonel Kurtz gone over the edge of insanity.
Gene ...... what a tool
Definitely a masterpiece