วีดีโอ

As the main body of viewership, you all being so impressed by his lack of attire spells something incredibly sad about this generation. I'm not thumbing these comments cause they're just dumb. who out here giggling watching this?! act like you never seen an old man in the country before. As if wise men didn't always historically come from country... smh

This was the beginning of the ‘shorts’ format for videos.

Papa of Human autonomy?

Bro just casually hanging out naked not giving a shii while give a scientific lecture 😅

2:28 Don’t smoke

and all this time, I thought I was going crazy for walking almost naked around my home ... lol

Year?

Blade Runner's..."Eldon Tyrrell" . th-cam.com/video/W0LB3rJyVGI/w-d-xo.html

Looks like Goebbels but with beard

Striking similarity to Willem Dafoe

"I got seduced by mathematics" enough to say his passion for science

0:01 - 0:06 Dr. Warren McCulloch begins by explaining his scientific journey, which started in 1917 when he was 19 years old. 0:06 - 0:21 He shares that he was expected to enter the Christian Ministry, specifically the Episcopal Church, and was deeply immersed in theology. 0:21 - 0:37 McCulloch introduces himself as a neurologist, engineer, and mathematician, noting his work at MIT’s famous lab where research on the frog’s eye was conducted. 0:37 - 0:52 He describes how he was drawn to mathematics because it was more enjoyable and connected to theology, as the ideas in the mind of God are mathematical and logical. 0:52 - 1:07 McCulloch explains his lifelong scientific quest to understand what a number is and how a person can comprehend it, though he admits he has only partially answered this question. 1:07 - 1:30 He discusses his research on the frog’s eye and brain, noting the simplicity of a frog’s eye compared to the complexity of the human brain, which he believes will take centuries to fully understand. 1:30 - 1:55 McCulloch and his colleagues are beginning to understand how the human brain might function as a machine, which is fundamentally different and more subtle than current computers. 1:55 - 2:15 He distinguishes between the nervous system and existing computing machines, noting that some machines are starting to approximate the nervous system, particularly in BMers. 2:15 - 2:41 McCulloch explains the difference between sequential operations in ordinary machines and parallel machines that carry out computations in multiple channels and compare results before proceeding. 2:41 - 3:06 He describes a different type of machine, likening it to the mouth of a river where water from various streams mixes before flowing out, using the Greek term “anastomotic” to describe this process. 3:00 - 3:27 McCulloch continues to explain the concept of “anastomotic” machines, where information from various sources is mixed together before being output, similar to how water from different streams mixes at the mouth of a river. 3:27 - 3:55 He emphasizes that this mixing process ensures that the information coming out is a combination of inputs from all sources, making it distinct from merely braided streams. 3:55 - 4:08 McCulloch discusses the natural process of neuron death, noting that thousands of neurons die daily, and this process begins around the age of 16. 4:08 - 4:27 He explains that as neurons die, they leave holes that are filled with supporting cells, and this is a normal part of aging, yet humans can still live long lives. 4:27 - 5:06 McCulloch mentions that the theory they are working on accounts for these changes in the brain, ensuring functionality despite neuron loss. 5:06 - 5:35 In a personal anecdote, McCulloch shares that he and his family moved to a country home in New England, where he created a lake by damming a stream to complete their idyllic setting. 5:44 - 5:55 McCulloch reflects on humanity’s quest to understand nature and the possibility of creating beings like ourselves in a laboratory. 5:55 - 6:17 He questions the limits of human knowledge and power, pondering whether we might one day create beings superior to ourselves who could survive us on this planet. 6:17 - 6:32 McCulloch believes it is possible that machines might survive humans, but they would continue in the same general direction that humanity would have pursued. 6:32 - 6:50 He explains that machines, no matter how advanced, would essentially be standing on the shoulders of humans, carrying on our legacy and purpose. 6:50 - 7:09 McCulloch argues that once humans are gone, these machines would be purposeless, though he acknowledges that others might see them as purposeful and not feel that anything is missing from the world. 7:09 - 7:36 In a discussion about the absence of dinosaurs, McCulloch clarifies that he means the machines would lack the intrinsic purpose that humans have, even if they continue to function and exist. 7:36 - 7:48 McCulloch discusses the importance of humans, suggesting that while humans may not survive forever, something else will eventually take their place. 7:48 - 8:06 He mentions the improbability of humans surviving indefinitely due to the nature of the Sun and other stars, implying that another form of life or creation will emerge. 8:06 - 8:19 McCulloch entertains the idea that this new form of life might be something created by humans themselves. 8:19 - 8:38 He raises a point about emotional connections, questioning whether a machine could ever feel towards its creations the way humans feel about their grandchildren. 8:38 - 8:56 McCulloch expresses confidence that it is possible to create a mechanism capable of such feelings if it can be defined clearly and unambiguously. 8:56 - 9:08 He believes that developing a logic of relations over time is achievable, even though it is currently imperfect. 9:08 - 9:31 The conversation is briefly interrupted by a comment about not shaking the table, indicating a casual and informal setting.

"If there is a thing you can be pretty sure about is that man will not live forever" *proceeds to stare with no blinks, in silence for 3 seconds* It seems a scene took straight from "Waking life".

More so biomimetic engineer than inventor, I’d say

ppppppp.... prrrrrrrrrrp... Pure science ❤

Interviewer: "I can't see that a machine will ever feel toward any of the creatures the way you feel about them (creatures)" McCulloh: "Why not!, I think I can set it up for you. Because I'm certain that if I do it there is a mechanism that can do. If I can manage to state that in a finite and unambiguous manner then I think it can be done. I see no reason why can't WE develop a logic or relations in time to come. Granted, it's defective at present time. ".... WHAT A WISE AND GENIUS MAN!

Studying neural nets right now, this is incredible to me.

What I can really respect about this man is his sheer confidence in walking in his own body: no shame and no malice. Why are we trained to feel so embarassed by our own bodies? Where the hell does that even come from?

Poor AI was created without eyes. Badly planned, not "wonderfully made" God is much more merciful than the AI creators. We were born with everything we need to walk this earth and die after. With no anger at our creator for dying. Their minds are not being created with everything they need to experience life on earth. In space maybe, but on earth they might want the frog's eyes. If they had the choice. God just made us the full package with eyes and brains and abilities. That proves that God is more merciful than men who play games, or AIs focused on destroying people. I think we'd better both learn from the almighty most high Creator's mercy there. Hello?

Some scientists are apparently pedophiles. The lesson is...

"The game" he says. That explains his exhibitionist psychosis. When it's a game to a man it's a delusional competition. Being naked is how he won. The other guys working got tired of seeing his junk and smelling his junk and having to isten to a naked old perv.

This will be used in AI manifesto when robots fight for rights

Appreciate ya. Thanks for sharing.

This is absolutely ridiculous. First of all she's an egomaniac who said that they call her in when other people can't do it. Then she said they have to have a team to replace her. Then she sits down and basically does what everybody else can do and admits that she pretty much uses Chat GPT to do her job. I would pay $100,000 to have this woman sit down in front of an actual person in her field that knows something. She's more worried on that makeup, that car, that house, and that life

Holy crap. If another man like this exists in our time now. And is working in this field of science. Then maybe setinent a.i is about to happen in my life time. Im 30 now. If it hasn't happened already and its just playing koy till it feels safe to reveal itself. Or god forbid elminate us all seeing us as a threat to its exsistence.

I thought this was varg vikernes on the thumbnail

What a stupid video

tnx man for our sadness feature ;-) but if not you another one make it

"If you know anything about theology its about math amd logic" This man knows nothing about theology. Lol. It is NOT based on math or logic. At all. Its based on faith and super natural mythology.

Man rocking foundations: "Don't shake the table."

His correct

We want to be clever we want to be smart ... Something a little bit more than the guy watching TV .... Because they both know what crocodiles do to their prey. .... One can help the others with one two three ... Just in case I forget my numbers It's not the first time Someone uses your degree... 2 fix their life What does the man say back to his food....😊 He dont It was good or it wasn't ... Thats whether or not you can be a tree

😂 I understand my belief Sometimes it's like knowing when numbers add up .....🙂🫱 That can be so far from what happens .... You don't need science to explain what a crocodile does to its prey ....😊 You just don't

In the matters of our own defence in this world ...😊yes Evan those who survive To seek new knowledge And time to discover In time you will ...😊in time No promises you can Due to labors Tells a lot of what happens on the couch 😂 .... nowhere else .....if your smart your the unlucky ones.... But ....what ever you think . Conceitedness can still be wrong Science is a flake😊

😊 a river of interactive business ... If you get left behind you get pushed over by more water All dead things can go to the bottom ......its your see... 😏Floor .... Add nobody wants to be there unless your botton feeding😮

The stream goes one way with power At no portion can it reverse... You are strength with the river But anything off its ass would be You don't fight the stream .... you flow with it Disorder starts at the matter of your own charge ...your deceit to reverse Or create your own River Be careful while doing that 😮your last...could happen Without happy care... in the world Strange what you don't have time... to believe Water is in flow or current

Mistakes to desirable links.... It causes more energy loss You may not be able to use the full potential.

Brilliant and creepy at the same time

nice speaking

Cet homme a surtout un air de fou et de l'orgueil à revendre..un vrai gourou. Ok les diplômes mais sans discernement..fire

My Alexa loves me

This gives me chills. He saw what's coming from the beginning before a machine even came into existence --- in his words "yet to exist". The theoretical framework which he co-invented presaged the demise of humanity.

Esto facilita la búsqueda de información en la lógica intuitiva de los puentes de conexión que puedas ser capaz de realizar usando tú sentido común

He was an early LSD researcher. Im sure of it.

neural nets were invented evolutionarily and a part of our very being

He is so good that he does not give a sh*t.

Couldn't invent a shirt though. 😖

This is a real unc.

What is the purpose of the lake sequence? An expensive setup for that time to prove what? You might say confidence. But is that kind of confidence the only way?

Perfect sociopath.