Converging Dialogues
Converging Dialogues
  • 338
  • 73 210
#338 - Victim: A Dialogue with Andrew Boryga
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Andrew Boryga about his novel on victimhood. They discuss how he approaches writing novels vs. non-fiction pieces, choosing themes for the novel, personal influence on fictional characters, evolution of characters, and using tragedy and victimhood for clout. They also discuss dealing with social justice themes, shaped by environment, stereotypes, talking about experiences honestly, and many more topics.
Andrew Boryga is a writer, editor, and author who’s writing has appeared in The New York Times, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, The Paris Review, The Daily Beast, and many other outlets. He has also taught fiction and non-fiction writing to elementary school students, college students, and incarcerated men in Florida. He is the author of the new novel, Victim.
Website: www.andrewboryga.com/
Substack: @Andrew Boryga
มุมมอง: 27

วีดีโอ

#337 - Wahhābism: A Dialogue with Cole Bunzel
มุมมอง 9316 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Cole Bunzel about the Islamic branch of Wahhābism. They talk about the current landscape of Wahhābism, extreme and non-extreme uses of Wahhābism and some of the differences between terrorists groups that use Wahhābism. They discuss Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and how he started a movement, modeling himself after the Prophet Muhammad, being against polyt...
#336 - The Secular Gospel of Ralph Waldo Emerson: A Dialogue with James Marcus
มุมมอง 76วันที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with James Marcus about the life and work of Ralph Waldo Emerson. They discuss how the book is formed and how themes are pulled from Emerson’s life, his religious background and relationship with religion over his lifetime, unitarianism, and when do we find our identity. They talk about first and second marriages, self-reliance and individualism, n...
#335 - Hubert Humphrey: Giant of Liberalism: A Dialogue with James Traub
มุมมอง 3314 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with James Traub about Hubert Humphrey. They define liberalism, background and context of Humphrey and his internal motivations, how he governed as mayor in Minneapolis, and how he was a liberal and a progressive. They talk about his time as a U.S. Senator, a cold war liberal, and his relationship with Lyndon Johnson. They discuss Humphrey’s foreig...
#334 - Recognizing Others: A Dialogue with Michèle Lamont
มุมมอง 2514 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Michèle Lamont about recognition and interpersonal dynamics. They define recognition and worth, the three avenues of building recognition and ordinary universalism, and what blocks change. They talk about inequality, individualism/collectivism, and challenges of the American dream. They also discuss using media, role of institutions, how we ca...
#333 - The Genius of Ibn Sina and Biruni: A Dialogue with S. Frederick Starr
มุมมอง 11114 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with S. Frederick Starr about the lives and work of Ibn Sina and Biruni. They discuss who were Ibn Sina and Biruni, their time and context, and the correspondence between Ibn Sina and Biruni. They discuss their interactions in the Muslim world, Ibn Sina as vizier, the canon of Ibn Sina and the canon of Biruni. They also discuss work post-canon, how...
#332 - Nostalgia: A Dialogue with Clay Routledge
มุมมอง 5521 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Clay Routledge about nostalgia. They define nostalgia, nostalgia being forward thinking, nostalgia with positive and negative memories, and the downsides of nostalgia in pop culture. They discuss nostalgia with self-concept, self-continuity, and self-esteem, nostaglia for understanding existential anxiety and death, best ways to use nostalgia,...
#331 - Making Sense of Our Delusions: A Dialogue with Lisa Bortolotti
มุมมอง 10121 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Lisa Bortolotti about delusions. They talk about why we should think about delusions, delusions as emotional and rational beliefs, defining delusions, clinical and non-clinical delusions, and why we believe delusions. They talk about when delusions cause harm, can people change their delusional beliefs, and many more topics. Lisa Bortolotti is...
#330 - Deceiving Ourselves: A Dialogue with Ajit Varki
มุมมอง 10021 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Ajit Varki about the evolutionary origins of denial and self-deception. They discuss the evolutionary perspective of human origins, self-awareness in humans, theory of mind, and how false beliefs and denial evolved. They also discuss lying, self-deception, religion, positive uses of deception, climate change, future of Mind Over Reality theory...
#329 - Fighting Women's Rights Around The World: A Dialogue with Sima Samar
มุมมอง 2528 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Sima Samar about her life and work for women’s rights. They discuss her reasoning for writing her memoirs, history of modern Afghanistan, impact of Islam, and the rule of the Taliban. They talk about her work in medicine and human rights advocacy, women’s rights in Afghanistan, becoming Vice President and Minister of Women’s Affairs of Afghani...
#328 - Listening to Prozac: A Dialogue with Peter Kramer
มุมมอง 69หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Peter Kramer about Prozac. They talk about the 30th anniversary of Listening To Prozac and antidepressants, origins of antidepressants, classes of antidepressants, selfhood, criticisms of SSRIs and the serotonin hypothesis, risk of suicide with Prozac, future of SSRIs, and more more topics. Peter Kramer is a psychiatrist who practiced and taug...
#327 - The Invention of Prehistory: A Dialogue with Stefanos Geroulanos
มุมมอง 543หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Stefanos Geroulanos about the history of prehistory. They talk about why studying history is important and why it is not final, the emphasis on the nature of man, why Rousseau and Hobbes’ ideas still persist, human nature and equality, and the impact of Darwin. They also talk about the impact of Marx, Neanderthals, thin veneer, and the instinc...
#326 - Puerto Rico: A Natural History: A Dialogue with Jorell Meléndez Badillo
มุมมอง 97หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Jorell Meléndez Badillo about the history of Puerto Rico. They talk about the origins of the island of Puerto Rico, Taino peoples, reasons for Columbus coming to Puerto Rico, and indigenous peoples fighting back. They talk about enslaved peoples in the mid 16th century, origins of the term “Puertorriqueños,” impact of race and colorism, and ha...
#325 - Health Problems: A Dialogue with Elizabeth Barnes
มุมมอง 41หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Elizabeth Barnes about the ideas surrounding health. They discuss why we care about health and how we define health, social impact of health, and discussing health publicly. They also talk about shame and stigma with health, disability and health differences, ameliorative skepticism, and many more topics. Elizabeth Barnes is Professor of Philo...
#324 - Paying Attention In A Distracted World: A Dialogue with Christian Madsbjerg
มุมมอง 106หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Christian Madsbjerg about perception in the world. They discuss why perception and observation are important, the work of Merleau-Ponty, perception being reality, and intersubjectivity. They discuss the role of the body in phenomenology, phenomenology of space, the “other,” practical ways of paying attention in the world, and many more topics....
#323 - Wonderstruck: A Dialogue with Helen De Cruz
มุมมอง 70หลายเดือนก่อน
#323 - Wonderstruck: A Dialogue with Helen De Cruz
#322 - Democracy Birthed in Darkness: A Dialogue with Katlyn Carter
มุมมอง 29หลายเดือนก่อน
#322 - Democracy Birthed in Darkness: A Dialogue with Katlyn Carter
#321 - Homer and His Iliad: A Dialogue with Robin Lane Fox
มุมมอง 113หลายเดือนก่อน
#321 - Homer and His Iliad: A Dialogue with Robin Lane Fox
#320 - The Art of Public Conversation: A Crossover Episode with Where We Go Next
มุมมอง 16หลายเดือนก่อน
#320 - The Art of Public Conversation: A Crossover Episode with Where We Go Next
#319 - Somebody's Gotta Win the 2024 US Presidential Election: A Dialogue with Tara Palmeri
มุมมอง 98หลายเดือนก่อน
#319 - Somebody's Gotta Win the 2024 US Presidential Election: A Dialogue with Tara Palmeri
#318 - Virtues and the Founding Fathers: A Dialogue with Jeffrey Rosen
มุมมอง 30หลายเดือนก่อน
#318 - Virtues and the Founding Fathers: A Dialogue with Jeffrey Rosen
#317 - The Five-Year Presidency: A Dialogue with Christopher Liddell
มุมมอง 17หลายเดือนก่อน
#317 - The Five-Year Presidency: A Dialogue with Christopher Liddell
#316 - The Brain From the Inside-Out: A Dialogue with György Buzsáki
มุมมอง 109หลายเดือนก่อน
#316 - The Brain From the Inside-Out: A Dialogue with György Buzsáki
#315 - Regulating AI Systems: A Dialogue with Robert Trager
มุมมอง 332 หลายเดือนก่อน
#315 - Regulating AI Systems: A Dialogue with Robert Trager
#314 - A Central American Exodus and the Reshaping of America: A Dialogue with Jonathan Blitzer
มุมมอง 1142 หลายเดือนก่อน
#314 - A Central American Exodus and the Reshaping of America: A Dialogue with Jonathan Blitzer
#313 - The Mongol Storm: A Dialogue with Nicholas Morton
มุมมอง 1272 หลายเดือนก่อน
#313 - The Mongol Storm: A Dialogue with Nicholas Morton
#312 - Empire of Refugees: A Dialogue with Vladimir Hamed-Troyansky
มุมมอง 2372 หลายเดือนก่อน
#312 - Empire of Refugees: A Dialogue with Vladimir Hamed-Troyansky
#311 - Shifting Grounds: Territory, Society, and Conflict: A Dialogue with Burak Kadercan
มุมมอง 912 หลายเดือนก่อน
#311 - Shifting Grounds: Territory, Society, and Conflict: A Dialogue with Burak Kadercan
#310 - Comparative Cognition: A Dialogue with Nicola Clayton
มุมมอง 632 หลายเดือนก่อน
#310 - Comparative Cognition: A Dialogue with Nicola Clayton
#309 - Sex, Evolution, and the Female Animal: A Dialogue with Lucy Cooke
มุมมอง 1.2K2 หลายเดือนก่อน
#309 - Sex, Evolution, and the Female Animal: A Dialogue with Lucy Cooke

ความคิดเห็น

  • @itr6540
    @itr6540 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think narcisism can be developed afterwards, after going through severe racism, discrimination, humiliation. Immigrants in racist societies are full of such evidences, and they heal when the environment changes (they go back to root culture etc)

  • @JCBuni
    @JCBuni 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is an excellent discussion and should be required listening for all visitors to PR.

  • @TheEssaysOfFelipeBautista
    @TheEssaysOfFelipeBautista 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The name “Fichte” is not pronounced “Feesh-tah”, it is pronounced “Fich-tah”. Imagine that you are about to say the English word “how” - the pronunciation of the “h” sound in the beginning of the English word “how” is similar to the pronunciation of the “ch” in “Fichte”. Imagine that you are about to say the English word “fix”; now, imagine that, instead of pronouncing the “x” sound at the end of the English word “fix”, you replace it with the “h” sound at the beginning of the English word “how” - next, add a “tah” sound (the “ah” in “tah” should sound like the “a” at the end of the English word “sofa”, or like the “ah” your dentist may have you pronounce when he says to you “Say ‘Ah’”); and now you have an appropriate pronunciation of the name “Fichte”.

  • @karachaffee3343
    @karachaffee3343 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The West has never come to terms with the anti semitism of the Catholic church from the earliest Church Fathers --that is that the destruction of the Jews has been the wet dream of Christianity from Paul of Tarsus onward--and they didn't make any bones about it .

  • @dubbelkastrull
    @dubbelkastrull 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1:35:23 bookmark

  • @Aparturum
    @Aparturum 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    lol I think the interviewer was struggling with the facts that white people colonised the rest of the world and now he is struggling with the fact that racism is driving most of not all of the alarmist behaviour we are seeing in the West. I want to remind the interviewer that the United States is not a YOUNG country. There were people living there before white peoples colonised that area.

  • @don-eb3fj
    @don-eb3fj 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for this dialog with one of the brightest lights of hope in the current psychology sphere, I always find Dr. Nancy's very relatable conversational approach to human psychology and relations very encouraging. As a recently self-assessed schizoid (+) with a lifetime of very tangled issues to sort through and few resources available outside myself, Nancy's humanistic approach helps demystify and depathologize the dense hodgepodge of literature and competing theories, providing a reliable outline for self study and advocacy for better education and realistic therapeutic approaches for those of us who fall outside the brackets of validating the common "evidence-based" statistics and methods. My own ongoing study of the PDM2 gives me a deep appreciation for her understanding of the phenomena of human development and trauma-related adaptations for which I am most grateful. As one of the more influential heirs of the vast body of object relations clinical observations and literature compiled over the past century, her interpretations of technical descriptions of complex processes into common language has made accessible better tools for self insight that are not replaceable with more superficial (and frankly insulting) mechanistic approaches to human psychology. Each opportunity for Nancy and others who share similar perspectives to share them in a public forum is like an intellectual cloning of those minds, a flowering and scattering of the seeds of change to the wind, to sow hope on an otherwise stark landscape. Thanks for being part of a solution for so many of us who have found the status-quo woefully wanting.

  • @SuheinBeck
    @SuheinBeck 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Excellent in-depth interview. The interviewer was incredibly empathetic towards the Circassian traumas and trials. This is rare, and appreciated from an actual Circassian who is discovering her history thanks to academic scholars like Vladimir Hamed-Troyansky. Your work is filling in huge voids that were purposely erased from history. Thank you! I am writing a book and now your book has become an essential resource.

  • @ericadler9680
    @ericadler9680 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    AfD in Germany and FPÖ in Austria are not neo-fascist, they are democratic parties who accept the constitution. Wolin is lying.

  • @ericadler9680
    @ericadler9680 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Honest conversation? That guy is a distinguished professor of lies. Just check what he says about the AfD here in Germany.

  • @WilliamMcKenzie-kj7ig
    @WilliamMcKenzie-kj7ig 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for a great interview. It's always instructive to go through this fascinating theory - each time I get something new out of it. Deeply moving to hear of Prof. Varki's illness. What a sterling human being he is.

  • @deljay1840
    @deljay1840 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Caucasian capitalist predator colonized the world's citizens as his prey. Then he uses science, history and now prehistory to justify it.

  • @danchiappe
    @danchiappe 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Is it my imagination, or do many arguments run as follows: this can’t be true because I don’t like the possible political consequences

  • @paulcreaser9130
    @paulcreaser9130 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I had never heard of him, until today. Always good to hear different explanations for the human brain.

  • @letdaseinlive
    @letdaseinlive หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hmm. I appreciate his, like, partially valid de haut en bas with respect to horrible people like Pinker, Harari, Dimond, Graeber (who is more substantive in his awfulness) and others. I feel though, he's pretty bad too. He's way better in his reading. But, then he just plays around eith shitty nornatives on the basis of nothing. Or, as sheer whigish Leftism.But, why is he autherized to be political at all in this domain?

    • @charliedoyle7824
      @charliedoyle7824 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Good one Archie Bunker, you looked up "de haut en bas" all by yourself.

    • @letdaseinlive
      @letdaseinlive 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@charliedoyle7824 He's in the NY times now. Front page.

    • @charliedoyle7824
      @charliedoyle7824 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@letdaseinlive I'm referring to the idiot guy who made the comment, not the author.

  • @LaureanoLuna
    @LaureanoLuna หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'd rather put it in the following terms. Kant`s precise research into the nature of reason led to the self-cnsciousness of reason and this is what Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel represent: the development of the consequences of the full self-conscousness of reason.

  • @LM-lv6fv
    @LM-lv6fv หลายเดือนก่อน

    Prehistory is worth all our efforts to understand as fully as we possibly can 👍🏼 And yes I am a Living Example of Humanity in all its’ complexity, as we all are✌🏼💖

  • @galek75
    @galek75 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok bro, you sound like you either just woke up or don't want to be recording your podcast. Can you talk more like a non-slob?

  • @ansellgerety3666
    @ansellgerety3666 หลายเดือนก่อน

    💐 "Promo SM"

  • @AlexRayNiemela
    @AlexRayNiemela หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tara Palmari is attractive, she need to show her face

  • @danchiappe
    @danchiappe หลายเดือนก่อน

    What always struck me was the difference in style between the Iliad and the Odyssey. Given the differences in style, is it still reasonable to attribute them to the same author? What is the latest thinking on that?

  • @wayofspinoza2471
    @wayofspinoza2471 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Steven Nadler gives us much information about Spinoza’s philosophy; however more clarity is needed. As a private teacher and student of Spinoza’s Ethics, I understand that free will is an illusion and that the laws of necessity and self-preservation govern and direct all of existence. Also, intuition is required to understand his Ethics, reason alone will not help you. His philosophy is to be lived and understood; otherwise, it becomes abstract and only entertaining.

  • @lewisalmeida3495
    @lewisalmeida3495 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Steven Nadler gives us much information about Spinoza’s philosophy; however more clarity is needed. As a private teacher and student of Spinoza’s Ethics, I understand that free will is an illusion and that the laws of necessity and self-preservation govern and direct all of existence. Also, intuition is required to understand his Ethics, reason alone will not help you. His philosophy is to be lived and understood; otherwise, it becomes abstract and only entertaining.

  • @gojira2892
    @gojira2892 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Xavier, I really enjoy your show and would love to see it get more engagement. I think your titles and thumbnails are not helping you in this regard. I assume you want more views or you wouldn't be putting so much time and effort into the episodes, so it might be worth reconsidering your approach for TH-cam. Much love man!

  • @JaromEubanks
    @JaromEubanks หลายเดือนก่อน

    great stuff

  • @sayyestofairness4266
    @sayyestofairness4266 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish Republicans and right wingers cared more about what we can do for more technological advancement and fighting more important issues like climate change and reproductive healthcare as they did about a fictitious "border crisis" that's really just their xenophobic imagination.

  • @user-eu8ub9cm5t
    @user-eu8ub9cm5t 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A Saint who married Heretic? How is this possible/Light married to Darkness? How Many Byzantine Empresses were Saints ? How many Anti Saint heretics? Why are Byzantinists so absent from TH-cam? Sophia Gyftopoulou of Oxford St John UK ? And Anne McClanan USA Empress Ariadne does not even mention her title as you do on Justinian Orthodox Church consider her a Saint Feast 22 August Charles Diehl Byzantine EMPRESSES Kenneth Holum Theodosian Empresses Lynda Garland and Judith Herrin Nothing on Audio/TH-cam Even siren Celik Emperor Manuel II

  • @ChucksExotics
    @ChucksExotics 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Describing the ethnic replacement of White people in America as "dynamic" is atrocious. This is not some organic process, this is what the government has decided. They decided they don't want Whites. Government policy is directed to advantage non-whites in everyway. Every White community in America has been targeted for "diversification." It's just a slow genocide program. And any other group of people in the world would feel this way if it were happening to them. But we are expected not to. We are expected to celebrate our demise.

  • @ChucksExotics
    @ChucksExotics 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great idea for a book. But telling a narrative about a bunch of random families is low IQ pop non-fiction.

  • @ari7610
    @ari7610 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    love Nancy!

  • @JSwift-jq3wn
    @JSwift-jq3wn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Superficial and sophomoric.

  • @michaelerdmann4447
    @michaelerdmann4447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is more ...meaningful, truthful, and useful.... across ...mathematics, philosophy, religion, science, and tech.... coming forth and going forward? Considering, Imagining, and Viewing: The Science of ...Being, Becoming, and Beholding..... across ...Phenomenology, Metaphysics and Conscience.... with ...Wiser Virtuous Subjective Architectures.... Engineering Enlightenments and The Art of Awakenings

  • @youtoobfarmer
    @youtoobfarmer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why do Americans pronounce Semitic "semetic"?

  • @exlauslegale8534
    @exlauslegale8534 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shouldn't you, as Americans, be satisfied enough with Melville's definition of man as "money making animal"? How much more profound than Heidegger Melville was when he detected racism and capitalism as much greater dangers for humankind than technology (or technicity, as Simondon much more precisely names it) could ever be? That is because Melville was concerned for "being" as life, and not solely for "being" as humankind. How can you expect "deep philosophical thinking" from someone who proceeds with his lecturing as if nothing happened while from the window of his classroom he can still see and smell smoke rising from the ashes of a burned down synagogue that his party friends set alight the night before? Did it ever occur to you what would Nietzsche say if he ever read a line from this "posterboy for ad hominem argument"? How would Nietzsche, who likened himself to be a Polish aristocrat just to avoid to be a German, think of H.'s theories of Blut und Boden? And do I have to remind you how obsolete H.'s philosophy is with regard to poststructuralism of the 21st century? His "philosophy" that completely disregards the body? And if we should "return to that fork in the road where philosophy went astray" shouldn't it be precisely at the question "Hegel or Spinoza?"

    • @Cornflakes-sr3nq
      @Cornflakes-sr3nq 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      By God you types are insufferable

    • @galek75
      @galek75 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a lot of fake news you're babbling about, mister.

  • @jakecarlo9950
    @jakecarlo9950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always enjoy folks like your guest here who can convey the view of Heidegger from 10,000 feet. It is so helpful to have some basics and broad-stroke background, to commit the sin of simplifying, so that there is some tether to the stakes of the larger game as dude whisks your brain off for a wild ride.

  • @AliBhai-sl8gc
    @AliBhai-sl8gc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No my definition of incel is the most accurate and backed by data. First, let's look at my definition of incel. Incel: A single male that is not in a long-term loving relationship with a partner that THEY find attractive. They may or may not have kids. These men are likely to be excess men of low social and financial standing. But due to our Darwinian high pressure, society...."more above average men" are finding themselves locked out of having a long-term loving relationship. This is what will cause society to destabilise and fall in quality and safety. Indeed, we are seeing it NOW already. And these men will either check out or become destructive. Both are not good news for society in terms of economic, social, and security reasons. Remember, the media and even others are not correct about what an incel is. It's not about just getting "3ex"......its realising that you have been unable to find a long-term loving, mutually validating relationship with a partner that YOU find attractive. My question to the world is this..... If a man IS IN a long-term loving relationship with a partner that THEY find attractive and they have kids. And that man is close to his parents and relatives and family, kids and friends. If he does a job that may not earn him all the money in the world. But it's enough to get his family by in dignity, and he finds purpose in that line of work. And that man is respected in HIS family, community........ TELL ME HOW MANY MEN LIKE THIS DO YOU FIND COMMITTING CRIMES, RIOTING, LOOTING???? THEY ARE THE PILLERS OF A STABLE SOCIETY. Now, "chads" that trun a lot of plates and have a lot of options are not strictly speaking incels, providing they don't have prolonged dry spells between "relationships".....but make no mistake these men are not necessarily destructive like incels, but are ultimately unfulfilled.....they are not as happy/stable as the man I described above. And that's all these is to know on the matter..... Peace

  • @a_seltzererwin
    @a_seltzererwin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish there was more discussion of Nietzsche, and I think the host wishes so too. How is Heidegger's essential point not just an elaborate articulation and expansion of Nietzsche's essential point of placing life before wisdom? Kierkegaard and some features of the Platonic dialogues are noted as important precursors, but Nietzsche is brushed over when every page he ever wrote seems to be just dripping in this existential rejoinder to the purely conceptual. And this is done by the great interpreter of Nietzsche, Pippin! Very strange. Did Pippin get so deep into Heidegger that he has started taking up Heidegger's silly disavowal of his greatest influence, Nietzsche? Sartre's admission that he was just re-wording Nietzsche is far more honest. So was Heidegger!

  • @muntahafaiaaz
    @muntahafaiaaz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good books

  • @artemieva_al
    @artemieva_al 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the podcast and such good questions. I have been studying Lisa Barrett's theory of constructed emotions for a long time, with great gratitude and respect for the discoveries and free access to literature, articles and videos on TH-cam. But there is no opportunity to ask some questions (and there are many of them) yet. Your questions were right on target. Thank you and Professor Lisa Barrett. Hello from Russia <3333

    • @convergingdialogues2485
      @convergingdialogues2485 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Much appreciated! Hope you subscribe, keep listening, and share the podcast! 😊

  • @bresophil
    @bresophil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A shame this discussion only has a few hundred views

  • @felixionescu6720
    @felixionescu6720 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does anyone know where I can read more about the story at 36:08 about Heidegger visiting the Nietzsche Archive in May 1934? Did Wolin himself write about it? I don't think he mentions it in this particular book.

  • @dubbelkastrull
    @dubbelkastrull 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:41 bookmark

  • @recipehacker9752
    @recipehacker9752 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interviewer, this is not about you. Please let the the guest speak, the subtitle includes the word ‘dialogue’

  • @mokamo23
    @mokamo23 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    such a silly conversation: "moving from an organism not just reacting from one thing to do...to multiple cues...and multiple behaviors" -- more information does not equate to free will. smdh.

  • @kirstinstrand6292
    @kirstinstrand6292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the most encouraging discussion that I've listened to regarding psychoanalysis ever! It's a wondered door opener and is truly encouraging. Thank you.

  • @markcorrigan3930
    @markcorrigan3930 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    01:02:00

  • @guilelmusguilelmus8267
    @guilelmusguilelmus8267 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dark side?? For me it’s the bright and right side…:)

  • @andrewbaldwin4454
    @andrewbaldwin4454 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great interview with the author of a great book about a great president! When I read Troy Senik’s biography I was a little puzzled when I came across references to 19th century spending estimates re-expressed in 2019 dollars, as the US CPI estimates only start in 1913. At the end of his book I found the explanation. He was using a time series provided by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis that gives annual CPI estimates back to 1800. I am so impressed. I am Canadian and our official started in 1914, about the same time as the US CPI, but so far as I know there is no backdated series available, not even one that would incorporate Department of Labour estimates that go back to about 1910. One of our best monetary economists, Kenneth G. Steward, has said that he generally prefers to work with US data simply because there are time series estimates available on a continuous basis for more series and for much longer than for any other country. From 1851 to 1890 the series was calculated by Ethyl D. Hoover of the BLS and from 1890 to 1912 by NBER economists Albert Rees and Donald P. Jacobs. Unfortunately, after 1880, a major data source is no longer available so from 1881 to 1890 the estimates are pretty sketchy. This may explain why they show 0.0% inflation for all four years (1885 to 1888) of Cleveland’s first term, although this follows on declines of between 3% and 4% in the preceding two years 1883 and 1884. For his second term, based on NBER estimates, they show inflation rates of 0% for 1893, -3.7% for 1894, -3.8% for 1895 and 0.0% for 1896. Although of course, these aren’t the best numbers, the two annual declines in Cleveland’s second term were the sharpest declines in inflation since 1878, and it shows the sharp deflation that Cleveland had to contend with, dragging down US output. But as Troy Senik points out, if Cleveland had let the Free Silverites have the US government mint silver coins with no limit there would have been a huge inflationary upsurge, and avoiding this outcome was perhaps his greatest service to the American people. It is a wonderful book, and not just for statistical nerds. It deserves a huge readership.

  • @mel_cosentino
    @mel_cosentino 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am always amazed when people list evidence for something that I see as evidence for exactly the opposite. All I heard was how is not physically possible to have free will, regardless of the level you are looking at. But much enjoyed the conversation!

    • @mokamo23
      @mokamo23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      exactly. they kept describing the mechanics of an individual being and its environment. i see no conceptual difference between "primitive agency" and decisions of the human brain. in either case, the being is responding to its environment; there is no emergent entity in that process--yet they both kept trying to grasp onto agency. the only agency is the volitional response of the entity to the environmental stimulus. the brain and nervous system are part of that process, but are not functions of an invisible entity. smdh.

  • @bennguyen1313
    @bennguyen1313 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    On the 3 Takeaways podcast (Christina Swarms , Jed Rakoff, and Martha Minow), they mention how incarceration reform and the criminal justice system need to be fixed together.. especially as it pertains to eyewitness / memory evidence. The overwhelming majority of cases are settled with a plea-deal along the lines of, admit you are guilty to this lesser offense and get 3 years in prison, or take your chances with the court/jurors, where if you lose you go to prison for life. Many simply don't have the financial means nor the trust in the system to go to court. I also recommend the Amanda Knox documentary (or her interview with Sam Harris) and 'Taxi to the Dark Side' on the interrogation techniques that lead to false confessions.