วีดีโอ

7:40 his face is enough to understand this man is completely out of his mind

Why did Jackson need to sleep in bed with Brett Barnes for over 300 nights?

@@Musicienne-DAB1995 MJs room was the size of a duplex. Macaulay Culkin also slept in the bedroom multiple times and he said nothing happened.

@@rosemimi973 Michael Jackson admitted on multiple occasions to sleeping in the same bed as many boys, including Macaulay Culkin. The same bed. Jackson is on multiple videos admitting to this. The size of his bedroom is irrelevant. He selected boys-- and only boys-- to have multiple sleepovers, some of which lasted hundreds of nights. Brett Barnes' sister testified in 2005 that Michael Jackson had shared a bed with her brother for over 300 nights. A bed! Barnes was at least 9 years old. No amount of excuses will make this behaviour innocent.

@@Musicienne-DAB1995 If you say so. He has been acquitted of all charges. Also, Brett Barnes was a defender of MJ. So I don't even know what you are rambling on about.

@@rosemimi973 It's not if I say so. This is court testimony and video evidence. Jackson was acquitted of all charges made by Gavin Arvizo (and his brother, Star Arvizo). He has not been acquitted of any other accusation made against him. How is it that Jackson fans are so ignorant about how the law works?

Why should anyone believe this claim?

@@Musicienne-DAB1995 my claim? if its that, im not claiming.. its just a gut feeling.

British people are quite relaxed. He wasn't under pressure.

@@Musicienne-DAB1995 you got a point 👉🏿

Jackson definitely paid between $15 - $22 million to the Chandler family in a Confession of Judgement (equivalent to a guilty verdict in criminal court if the defendant fails to honour the settlement). So it is a valid point.

​@@Musicienne-DAB1995 can you explain your point of view ?.For Chandlers wanted money and only money , they never cooperated with the Police There was no mention of sexual abuse in the settlement, it was specified that it was in no case an acceptance of the allegation, and nothing forbade them to go to criminal court.

@@Nina-px6zi The Chandlers did cooperate with the police investigation until around January 1994. However, the police continued investigating Michael Jackson until around September 1994. You are incorrect in your facts. There was the mention of sexual battery in the settlement, but Jackson admitted to neglect. That neglect was defined as 'offensive contacts' of a sexual nature towards Jordan Chandler. There were six or seven claims in total. The settlement covered 'any and all claims arising' from the civil suit, so it technically did include all the other claims, even though Jackson claimed he was only responsible for neglect. (And neglecting a minor is morally wrong.) While the settlement did not forbid the Chandlers from going to a criminal court, it certainly gave them a strong incentive not to do so, which is often the reason why such settlements are signed.

@@Musicienne-DAB1995 Can you give references of documents please ? How did they cooperate with the police untill janv 94 for they didnt open a file in criminal court ? In what way did they cooperate, deposition and interrogation after sept 93 ? Where can i find them ? And for the terms of the aggreement how do you know for it was confidential , i didnt find any documents . Can you share your sources?.. thank you

Please, i have another question: Jackson's attorney declared that the final agreement stipulated that in no case it was a recognition of the allegations and that Michael Jackson maintened his innocence ; the Chandler signed . How is it compatible with the moral fault your talking about? Thank you.

La jalousie c'est terrible quand même 😂

Yet you give no examples of the lies he has supposedly told.

thats the first thing i thought of straight away when dan started off saying he spent months checking wades and james stories for plotholes. he must be very unusually bad at checking things or hes lying. the grand canyon plothole as well, he missed.

Wade and James were not alone in Michael's bed. Other people were there too and all have testified IN COURT that nothing had happened. Even James and Wade have previously said nothing happened in a court of law. But couple of years after Michael Jackson's death, both of them have changed their stories and instead are telling provable lies. Their case was dismissed in 2017 after they tried to sue Michael Jackson estate for money with their provable lies. Then they tried with this shitymentary no1 believes in anymore. again, they tried to sue for money after the man has died. their cases were recently dismissed. 🤣 So yeah, we all know Wade and James are liars. If they had been abused as they later claimed, why did they openly and famously let EVERYONE in the court know that nothing happened? Please stop. Do the research instead first and then form your opinion. Because if we were to blindly believe every single things people say without fact check or research then we might believe the earth is flat or that Bigfoot exists. 🥴

@@marmary5555 Firstly, they were in a bed alone with Michael and that's a common knowledge. Nt only them were alone with Michael in a bed, you do your research. As for lies in a court, only Wade testified in favour of Michael during Arvizo case, James refused to testify. They clearly stated why they finally changed their testimonies, why they told about the molestation only recently. If you missed their point, you should check it onece more. They want money now, yes, but I dont judge this as a sign that they are only greedy, no. They want money, because they maybe could get money, that's easy, but that doesn't mean that they were not molested and they only want money. As I said, after their stories I find it very probable that it actually happened, but still, there is not that iron proof and I think it's not going to be. Why did Michael surrounded himself with so many boys during his adulthood? And don't say he had no childhood, he was child at heart, he wanted to help them, because those are old justifications and they got to weak for such actions as sleeping with a boy in a bed.

@@annakurzawa555 what is not in this interview are several facts that have cone out. First, Safechuck stated he was abused several tines in the train station until he was 14. Problem with that is the train station didn't exist until 3 years later and its proven by dated aerial views and building permits filed with the city. Robson stated he was abused on the very first night that he stayed with MJ which he says was when his family went to The Grand Canyon and he was left behind with MJ. Pro kem with that is his own mother testified that he was not left there he was with her and the rest of the family. They both stated they never met each other before this documentary and that's a lie. There are pictures of them together at the ranch with Brett Barns and Macaulay Caulkin That's just 3 lies that have been uncovered and there are many more just as bad including more testimony of Joy Robson that invalidates what he has said. Both of their cases have been thrown out of court 2 times by 2 different judges.

@@cherylkelber6083 You know, I was inapropriatelly touched when I was a child but thankfully I managed to escape, but there is no way I could proove this, but this happened. In these cases there is no hard evidence and there will not be, but it doesnt mean that it didnt happen. I didnt want to see Michael in prison. Een if I thought there may be soemthing wrong, I didnt want this to surface, didnt want M to be hurt, neither did Wade or James. Now he's dead, we can analyse things with less dose of emotions. A lot of fans say things same as you, about the train station or trip to Canion etc, but you know what? It doesnt matter to me, because these are just details, but what matters are general big facts and a pattern that can be observed if you look back into Ms behaviour. Those facts are: Michael slept with boys alone during his lifetime, even in 80s. Micheal justyfied this, those boys were not his family. Michael isolated their parents from tose kids and at the same time were giving them money and other exepensive things. Michael was spedning time withe the families, was part of their lives, but only a boy was taken to his bedroom. So, these are the biggest thongs, but there are more of them. How do you comment this? Yes, we were happy when the celebrities were saying M was so innocent, we were happy when it turned out that Arvizo's mother is not credible, is simple or rude, all of them wanted money, and that is the cardinal argument for eg Jackson family, that the molestation didint take place. Taj says Michael was an angel....that worked in 80s, 90s, but not now. Michael was a man, he had an image of an angel. Let's not justify his sleepings with boys with statements that he was a child, that he didnt have a childhood. Then what? How do you comment this?

Safechuck claims to have been repeatedly molested in the Neverland train station between 1988-1992 (until the age of 14) --> The train station was built in 1994, 2 years after alleged abuse. (Construction began towards the end of 93)

I think his French is good!

@@rainbowwarrier1469 nope. He simply speaks with less British accent but his vocabulary is quite limited lol 😂

His French is perfectly fine. I don’t like his work or his documentary but we have to admit he’s very competent in French with proper vocabulary and grammar. He has a hint of a British accent but that’s it…let’s not exaggerate.

@@marmary5555 Alors ton français est mieux? La plupart d'anglais ont un accent plus fort que lui.

@@nicelinguist nope. It's not. I'm a native speaker. He mumbles a lot and didn't succeed in proving his case in this debate. It's very clear

And russian

Most of the sanctions have not been targeted and have simply hurt the innocent Iranian people. The only target that should exist is on your head because of your super small brain.

@@wendellbellanton949 You’re obviously brainwashed by the Islamic dictatorship’s agents like Reza Aslan.

Reza Aslan is full of crap, when questioned about female circumcisions in Muslim countries, he flat out lied and claimed that it was "an African thing" meaning it only occurred among African Muslims and had more to do with African culture than Islam, which was an ABSOLUTE lie, as female circumcisions happen widely all accross the Middle East. Aslan has frequently appeared on the shows of radically liberal Turkish-American host Cenk Uygur, repeating the same bullshit he always has for years.

Are you one of those sheepl that wants more sanctions ,and no fly zone ,,are you blind and don’t see what happened to Syria and Libya.

No... it is great! He is driven into a corner and it is clear in this interview how he is bullshitting and is trying to slime his way out.

@@3DisFuntastic Are you one of those sheepl that wants more sanctions ,and no fly zone ,,are you blind and don’t see what happened to Syria and Libya

Thanks for watching 👍 Reza Aslan is insufferably cringe when he goes into full mode anti-Shah hysteria... I feel like watching a BBC panel on repeat mode 🥴🤦🏻‍♀️

Wow, so your problem is just NIAC's attitude? Aslan says that he is against any invasion and war with Iran! How about you? Do you think what happened to Iraq and Libya and Syria should happen to Iran too?

​@@marmary5555 Wait... are you *pro* Shah??

@@Madhatter1781 All intelligent Iranians are pro Shah. Only the leftists are still against the shah , they are still taking the government’s side after 43 years of crime! Leftists, I have news for you, nobody wants you. Get lost and let the people decide what they want

@@Madhatter1781 *ABSOLUTELY*

It's "La France" but it's okay. We get it👏

If you're asking for the mothers to be sued, you're inadvertently admitting that Jackson did sexually abuse these men as children.

Exactly 🤣

@@marmary5555 like, if MJ’s companies were as predatory as they claim, why didn’t they just sue the companies criminally to expose years of corruption and pedophilia, which in turn would bring justice to children like they claim they wanted to, instead of civilly for hundreds of millions of dollars… riddle me that, egghead.

Reed didn't say that he didn't know Jordan Chandler's father. He said that he didn't know the story about Evan Chandler committing suicide. Best to check the facts first before making claims like this.

@@jarrettbattle9295 For the very simple reason that the burden of proof is higher in a criminal trial than a civil trial, and both plaintiffs have exceeded the statute of limitations. You call that a riddle?

Votre avez eu votre réponse ? Je suis preneur aussi pour les mêmes raisons !

@@salahdinmensour3592 non toujours pas rien, c’est dingue j’ai rien oublié je me souviens même des interviews des gens etc … j enquête si je retrouve le reportage je vous contacte

Journalists who were incapable fo dealing with statistical facts about child sexual abuse. The Michael Jackson fan and author could not bring up a single research-backed counter-argument to the points made about why child sexual abuse victims take so long to disclose abuse.

Untrue. Jackson picked the boys that he wanted to spend time with, then ingratiated himself with the families. Only the boys were chosen for the numerous sleepovers inside his bedroom.

Many of these children already had fathers. There was no need for Jackson to be spending hundreds of nights alone in bed with these boys.

Me too