วีดีโอ

A very nice conversation. ❤❤❤

Philosophical things , need to be explained in an easy language.

I really liked this podcast. 🎉🎉🎉

Ibn Arabi defended 😮

🤍✨

Maroof Saheb is a very good Scholar.🎉🎉🎉

Wahdatul Wajood needs more elaboration ❤❤❤.

Very nice podcast as usual. ❤❤❤

❤❤❤

This discussion has many untouched dimensions.

Wahdatul wajood derives it's concept from Sanatan dharam.

❤❤❤❤

Excellent sir

❤❤❤❤❤

Ibn khuldun was also a strong critique of Ibn Arabi.

❤❤❤

Maroof sab, is your name but in reality you are a phenomenon. Your intellect is majestic.

❤❤❤❤

❤❤❤❤❤

Dr mahroof shah is a great scholar.. Allah bless u both.. Very nice

❤❤❤😊

Metaphysics binds the humans Whereas the organised religion divides.

According to hadees Daily 5 times prayer, but not found in Qur'an. It is said that the Prophet said through a hadith to pray five times a day. Then, noon prayer ( luhur prayer ) instead of offering the prayer on Friday, pray 2 rak'ahs on Jumu'ah. From the Qur'an, Jumu'ah prayer is obligatory for everyone. So, can Friday's complusion prayer of luhur 4 times be replaced by another complusion prayer on Jumu'ah 2 times? That's why, hadees different says about Salah ( Prayer).According to Quran 11:114, the time fixed prayers "Luhar, Asr "is not found in the Quran, so the Quran says 2 times prayer. It can be understood that one is fajr, (2 rakah)) and maghrib(3 rakah), then According to 11:114 the night prayer is "Tahajjud." Thats why hadees is we cannot belive mostly compare to Quran.

Very good

Amazing work❤

Well versed personality Blessed....!

"This series absolutely is a must watch"🙌

We want regular vedios from this teacher....good session

امام احمد رضا خان بریلوی کے افکار پر کوئی مکالمہ کیجیے۔

You can differ with him but this is a fact that Dr Maroof Saheb is a very learned Scholar.

Needs a more elaboration.The question put for second episode is very crucial and needs an explanation.Anyway kudos to makers( @educational cosmos) and gratitude to Dr Maroof Saheb.

Unfortunately, he doesn't know much about امام ابن تيمية as MaroofShah is not well versed in Arabic sciences.

The Messenger of Allah clarified this when he said, “Upon you is my sunnah, and the sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs after me; and be warned of newly innovated matters, for every innovation is misguidance.” Therefore, tasawwuf (and it’s people) are in opposition to the guidance of the Messenger (peace and blessings upon him), innovation and misguidance is obligatory for the Muslim to stay far away from. He should take his path to Allah from the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger.

Prof nisar lacks intellect Misuses the Islamic dictums Either know or refrain

बात समझमे नही आती और आसान होना था muchh easy necesry

Bechara sach bolne mai dar raha hai....

th-cam.com/video/wJAtrrmzi0U/w-d-xo.htmlsi=FAzCEv3pXMkUFzZl Reality of So called Tasawwuf

Saying Ibn Taymiyyah was a Sufi or promoted or agreed with any core aspect of sufiism is like saying Muhammad Ali was champion football player. Ibn Taymiyyah made great refutations on the false ideologies including Sufiism. Infact the greatest refutations by any Muslim scholar on Christianity was done by ibn Taymiyyah To be very fair the speaker seems pretty ill informed about the Aqeedah of ibn Taymiyyah. A simple reading of his book "Al Aqeedah Al Waasitiyyah" or "Minhaj As Sunnah An Nabawiyyah" will enlighten the speaker whether ibn Taymiyyah was really a Sufi or against it!!

Well, i hope he still laughs the same old way. Nice to see an old pal!! Dua!!

Product of Government High schoool Arin.

wah wah....plzz 2nd part

I think this should not be put in public domain

We may differ but let's maintain a standard of decency towards one another. I believe it is crucial to engage with and understand the contributions of these scholars, as their work enriches our knowledge and offers valuable insights.

According to the refrences provided by Ghamidi Saheb, it seems that Ibn Arabi denied the concept of khatme Nabuwat.

اچھا موضوع ہے

(On looking at the comment section) Imagine a level of mental depravity when much much lesser people start ranking eminent scholars of Islam on the basis of their skewed & flawed, rather non-existent understanding.

Really good

Did realy he have read Ibn Taymiayas Literature, From Original Sources.

A neutral view would have been more encouraged.

A very nice podcast.