- 179
- 625 320
Lanier Theological Library
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2019
A beautiful private library open to registered patrons in NW Houston focused on research in theology, philosophy and related topics.
Science, Technology, and Human Dignity Panel Discussion
This 90-minute session will feature a panel made up of these distinguished participants:
John Lennox (Professor of Mathematics (Emeritus) at University of Oxford; Emeritus Fellow at Green Templeton College, Associate Fellow at Saïd Business School, Oxford, England)
Gary Habermas (Distinguished Research Professor of Apologetics and Philosophy at Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA)
Gretchen Huizinga (Research Fellow at AI and Faith, Podcast Host at Microsoft Research, Principal Investigator and Podcast Host for Beatrice Institute’s Project Being Human in an Age of AI, Woodinville, WA)
Andy Steiger (Founder and President of Apologetics Canada Ministries (AC), Abbotsford, British Columbia)
Mark Lanier (Moderator - J.D. Trial Attorney, Bible Teacher, Author, and Founder of Lanier Law Firm and Lanier Theological Library, Houston, TX)
To connect with us check out these links
The library- Lanier Theological Library- www.laniertheologicallibrary.org
Our Podcast-The Stone Chapel Podcast- www.laniertheologicallibrary.org/the-stone-chapel-podcasts/
Biblical Literacy- biblical-literacy.org
Our Facebook page- LanierTheologicalLibrary
Our Instagram page- laniertheologicallibrary
John Lennox (Professor of Mathematics (Emeritus) at University of Oxford; Emeritus Fellow at Green Templeton College, Associate Fellow at Saïd Business School, Oxford, England)
Gary Habermas (Distinguished Research Professor of Apologetics and Philosophy at Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA)
Gretchen Huizinga (Research Fellow at AI and Faith, Podcast Host at Microsoft Research, Principal Investigator and Podcast Host for Beatrice Institute’s Project Being Human in an Age of AI, Woodinville, WA)
Andy Steiger (Founder and President of Apologetics Canada Ministries (AC), Abbotsford, British Columbia)
Mark Lanier (Moderator - J.D. Trial Attorney, Bible Teacher, Author, and Founder of Lanier Law Firm and Lanier Theological Library, Houston, TX)
To connect with us check out these links
The library- Lanier Theological Library- www.laniertheologicallibrary.org
Our Podcast-The Stone Chapel Podcast- www.laniertheologicallibrary.org/the-stone-chapel-podcasts/
Biblical Literacy- biblical-literacy.org
Our Facebook page- LanierTheologicalLibrary
Our Instagram page- laniertheologicallibrary
มุมมอง: 455
วีดีโอ
The Resurrection of Jesus: The Minimal Facts Approach with Gary Habermas
มุมมอง 490หลายเดือนก่อน
n this lecture, Gary Habermas will explore his approach to analyzing ancient sources to determine “what really happened.” He argues that even agnostics, atheists, and skeptics must acknowledge certain facts. Dr. Habermas identifies six historical facts that support the claim that the bodily resurrection of Jesus offers the most compelling explanation. He contends that alternative interpretation...
The Gospels and the Anti-Slavery Movement with Esau McCaulley
มุมมอง 627หลายเดือนก่อน
During the 19th-century, there was extensive theological and biblical debate around the issue of slavery in North America. The scholarly consensus seems to suggest that the pro-slavery faction had the better biblical argument, but the pro-abolitionist side had the better moral argument. In addition, many contend that abolitionists searched frantically and often in vain for biblical support for ...
Amy Orr-Ewing - on "C. S. Lewis and the Problem of Pain"
มุมมอง 8833 หลายเดือนก่อน
C.S. Lewis has had a phenomenal impact on the reception of the Christian faith beyond his own lifetime. His writing on the Problem of Pain has been particularly meaningful for people struggling to reconcile a loving God with this pain filled world. In this session we will explore Lewis’ approach to suffering and ask what we can learn from it today and consider how to develop our own responses t...
Pablo Deiros - La Iglesia de Siglo XXI (The Church in the 21st Century)
มุมมอง 4104 หลายเดือนก่อน
¿Cómo podemos imaginar a la iglesia del presente siglo XXI? Hay ciertas consideraciones que nos permiten darnos cuenta de que nunca como hoy se ha visto más claramente la necesidad de des-institucionalizar a la iglesia y transformarla en lo que de verdad es: una comunidad de personas, bajo el señorio de Cristo, llena del Espiritu Santo y al servicio del reino de Dios. La excesiva complejidad de...
Evangelical Identity in a Fragmented Age- Ed Stetzer Panel
มุมมอง 5066 หลายเดือนก่อน
This 90-minute session on Friday will feature a panel made up of these distinguished participants: Timothy Dalrymple (CEO and Editor-in-Chief of Christianity Today, Carol Stream, IL) Nicole Martin (Reverend, Chief Impact Officer at Christianity Today, Founder and Executive Director of Soulfire International Ministries, Adjunct Professor of Ministry and Leadership Development, Gordon-Conwell T...
George Yancey - Anti-Christian Bias in the Academy and How to Fight It
มุมมอง 2746 หลายเดือนก่อน
American culture has shifted dramatically in the last decade toward stances which are openly hostile to the Christian faith. Views now aggressively promoted in popular and journalistic media, flourished decades earlier only in elite liberal arts faculties. We need an elite generation of Christian academics to feature in tomorrow’s universities, ensuring that a gospel-centered voice informs ever...
N.T. Wright - The Mission of God in the Gospel of John
มุมมอง 31K6 หลายเดือนก่อน
John frames his gospel with deliberate echoes of the creation story in Genesis, all the way from ‘in the beginning’ at the very start to the ‘new Eden’ themes in chapter 20. In chapter 1 the focus is on Jesus as the ‘Word made Flesh’, uniquely revealing the glory of God to the world, but in chapter 20 the focus is on the disciples, who are equipped with the Spirit to be, for the world, what Jes...
Replacing the Center: Putting the Bible Back into Biblical Archaeology with Bill Devers
มุมมอง 5259 หลายเดือนก่อน
#archaeology #biblicalarchaeology American archaeology in Israel is at a crisis stage. The older style “Biblical archaeology” of the 1920’s-1970’s was superceded by a more professional and largely secular “Syro-Palestinian archaeology” from about 1980-2000. Now our field, usually called “Levantine archaeology” by younger Americans, is so divided that it can hardly be called a real “discipline.”...
Alister McGrath - C. S. Lewis: His Significance for Personal Faith and the Ministry of the Church
มุมมอง 1.6K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
#cslewis C. S. Lewis is widely regarded as one of the most important and accessible Christian writers of recent year. In this lecture, Professor Alister McGrath of Oxford University will speak on how Lewis can help us consolidate and develop our personal faith and resource the preaching and outreach of churches. How can Lewis encourage us and help us to grow in our faith, or even explain our fa...
Coping With Pluralism: A Biblical Alternative to Culture War
มุมมอง 700ปีที่แล้ว
Coping With Pluralism: A Biblical Alternative to Culture War
An Evening with Fred Gray, Renown Civil Rights Attorney for Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr.
มุมมอง 418ปีที่แล้ว
An Evening with Fred Gray, Renown Civil Rights Attorney for Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr.
Ed Stetzer on Cultural Shifts and Gospel Response-Where Do We Go in These Tumultuous Times?
มุมมอง 902ปีที่แล้ว
Ed Stetzer on Cultural Shifts and Gospel Response-Where Do We Go in These Tumultuous Times?
The Surprising Rebirth of Belief in God with Justin Brierley
มุมมอง 1.3Kปีที่แล้ว
The Surprising Rebirth of Belief in God with Justin Brierley
John Lennox on "2084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity"
มุมมอง 184Kปีที่แล้ว
John Lennox on "2084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity"
How to Have Difficult Conversations When You Know You Disagree
มุมมอง 497ปีที่แล้ว
How to Have Difficult Conversations When You Know You Disagree
Christian Scholars Conference 2023 Interview with Fred Gray
มุมมอง 616ปีที่แล้ว
Christian Scholars Conference 2023 Interview with Fred Gray
How Badly Did the Scribes Corrupt the Bible?
มุมมอง 3.2Kปีที่แล้ว
How Badly Did the Scribes Corrupt the Bible?
Reading the Bible with the Majority World
มุมมอง 341ปีที่แล้ว
Reading the Bible with the Majority World
Good God, Moral Choice and the Presence of Evil
มุมมอง 485ปีที่แล้ว
Good God, Moral Choice and the Presence of Evil
Formatting the Word of God with Dan Wallace
มุมมอง 20Kปีที่แล้ว
Formatting the Word of God with Dan Wallace
Mensajes y Milagros de Jesús el Cristo: Implicaciones Transformadoras
มุมมอง 530ปีที่แล้ว
Mensajes y Milagros de Jesús el Cristo: Implicaciones Transformadoras
What Is Parchment and how long does it last?
มุมมอง 366ปีที่แล้ว
What Is Parchment and how long does it last?
Textual criticism, early greek manuscripts of the Bible and the Gettysburg Address
มุมมอง 852ปีที่แล้ว
Textual criticism, early greek manuscripts of the Bible and the Gettysburg Address
Does Scientific Progress Undermine Belief in God
มุมมอง 567ปีที่แล้ว
Does Scientific Progress Undermine Belief in God
Styles of Apologetics & The Need to Offer Compelling Arguments for the Faith in Contemporary Culture
มุมมอง 459ปีที่แล้ว
Styles of Apologetics & The Need to Offer Compelling Arguments for the Faith in Contemporary Culture
Psalms, Hymns, and Spiritual Songs: The Power of Worship to Shape Us
มุมมอง 675ปีที่แล้ว
Psalms, Hymns, and Spiritual Songs: The Power of Worship to Shape Us
Bone of My Bone and Flesh of My Flesh: A Perspective on Genesis 2
มุมมอง 1.9Kปีที่แล้ว
Bone of My Bone and Flesh of My Flesh: A Perspective on Genesis 2
Praise to the Lord! God is so good! Love and Blessings!
Hermoso mensaje
N T Wright is great - but this other annoying whiny presenter is a truly infuriating, rude character.
Rompiendo paradigmas! Muy bien y también tan necesario. Saludos a mis hermanos del seminario que también vieron el video.
Jesus is not devine.!
One god ,not three!
Best one ever! How can a man speak about such deep and consequential things and still be so congenial and warmly human, at the same time? Is it because he carries Jesus with him?
John Lennox, the worlds leading expert in bloviation.
Trolling much? 😁
@@p.b.7603 Nope, I leave the tolling to people like you.
I've learned so much from this very thought-provoking discussion. Thank you!
Habermas and this argument is peak clownery
Very goods!🎉😮😮😮😮😮😮❤
Spe salvi facti sumus
25:00 Government's "gratis' / charity Giving freely without heart is not "benevolence for the poor," also "Christian love in its highest manifestation," from Old French charité "(Christian) charity, mercy, compassion; alms; charitable foundation" (12c.), from Latin caritatem (nominative caritas) "costliness; esteem, affection," from carus "dear, valued" (from PIE *karo-, from root *ka- "to like, desire")."
Please, would you put the playlist according to the title of the teachings
Thruvthe church the manifold wisdom of God will be made known to the powers & principalities! We are transformed by the renewing of the mind to the revelation of Jesus
Never thought I'd say this, but wow Scalia appears poorly read. Appears unfamiliar with classical Roman Catholic philosophy. Read St Augustine. Read St Thomas Aquinas. Or at least John Finnis for a contemporary take
Scalia was crap
jerk
Tom, in all sincerity and humility, I ask you, if the first coming of Christ ushered everything in, then why is the world such a mess? Where are His post coming promises? Sincerely curious
Братья, это было великолепно! Огромное удовольствие слушать вас. Такие нужные и полезные размышления. Много нового открываю для себя.
Never underestimate the length bible bashers will go to to try and prove that some of it may be true.
Even if you had a page that was written by Jesus himself and it said he was a god, that would be useless as evidence. Someone saying they are a god is just that, someone making a claim. The fact is we have no good and sufficient evidence to prove the supernatural world. An old book makes a claim, big deal, give up this nonsense which harms so many people.
Evidence as defined by philosophers is as, “Something in which raise the probability of a hypothesis.” If Jesus was to do something like that it would mean that the story of the New Testament is more likely to be true. What about a Christian idealist? They wouldn’t claim there’s a distinction between natural and supernatural worlds.
Perhaps, if you haven't already, check out the highly evidential near death experiences. I'm not talking about the ones where people report going to heaven, etc. I am referring to the ones that have this world corroboration by professionals that have "no horse in the race". If you come away from that denying life after this life then maybe it's not the evidence that's the issue.
@@TombaoT-gc4ri If there’s no distinction then where are all the supernatural occurrences in our world?
@@philly5330 I’m sure you’re aware of how drugs and chemicals can affect the brain and its activity, and I’m also sure you’ve heard that we have those chemicals in our brain naturally at all times…
@@r4v4g3r I mean idealism suggests that everything is of the same nature, so there are no distinction between the natural and supernatural worlds. So every event is natural.
Waffle.
Dear Joseph Shullam Thank you for this wonderfully witty presentation and rehabilitation of this great teacher and brother of you (and me, although merely a gentile). If I may say two things: He had opposition from natural Jews, too. (Of course, you know that, but some may have gotten that wrong.) And second, ΜΕΛΙΤΗ in the first century was today's Kephallonia, not μελιτα, Malta. My best and kindest regards to you! Hans
+JMJ He was America's greatest Justice. Requiem aeternam dona ei, Domine, et lux perpetua luceat ei. Requiescat in pace.
Brilliant intellect. Missed.
Good analogy for neutrality of Jerusalem between the southern Judaha and northern Ephraim/Israel. Think Ottawa between English speaking Toronto and French speaking Montreal in Canada. neutral for stabilization.
Did not our hearts burn w/in us while he talked to us on the "Romans Road" and opend the scriptures unto us!! 🤎
❤
The name says it all Artificial !
I lost my faith because I feel no justice in the world and I see no fight for the innocent. But, this is not right. Peter, the holder of the keys, explains that JC goes to hell to retrieve savable souls. JC himself says to the thief he will be in paradise with him later in the day. It's almost as God only gets things right in the new creation that the lecturer reads in Paul. But Paul did not meet JC and to believe in the second creation means that God got it wrong the first time.
I think there was scribal notation with oral traditions working working together. I am sure scribes took notes for censure as well.
For me it is.
Decent academic group.
Our brains are simply of unknown origin and maker. Brain is so advanced that we cant understand it at all. Not close. Somebody or something who make us keep all that in secret from us for reason. But if we are just watery grey mush and after we die we just stop to exist why i making so much effort every day,every minute to survive so caled life knowin i will one day just cease to exist? What is then point of surviving every secon for so many years? Or death is just a name people invented? What if after death is start of our true shape and true purpose? One way to find out,wait your last moment and you will get answers for sure or simply lost your mind what makes you,and fall in endless non aware oblivion ...
The moderator spoke too much.
we have code message to debunked deep fakes!! slow down voice rec
John and others like William Lane Craig were some of the people who opened the door for me to return to faith after over a decade as an atheist. He's a treasure
When God created the eath, He didn't intend for it to have climate warming, it was good and perfect, but sin changed all things. Our sin actions have consequences in our lives, and global warming ia one of the consequences.
What a connection with the book of revelation!
All these conservatives like Scalia miss an important point. The recognition of property as such and the protection of property (by police) is not questioned by them. They take it for granted that there is a huge police apparatus which protects their wealth from being taken away by the poor. But if state protects property, the state should also protect minimum standards of material well-being for the poor. This is rather a question of fairness and security than a question of charity. On the other hand, socialism is not needed to fulfil this task. It is enough to have capitalism (with all its important advantages) and a social security system which works at least as good as the police.
"But if state protects property, the state should also provide minimum standards of material well-being for the poor" Could you explain your reasoning or your intuition here? I don't see how one necessarily leads to the other.
@@hans7686 The intuition is very easy to explain - I think it is quite self-evident. If a state protects properties of rich people by employing an expensive police - and in that same state the poor people have no housing or even no food or no health services, you can not call such a state state a democracy! Such a state acts solely in the interests of the rich part of the population and does not even represent the poor people and this is diametrically opposed to the idea of a democracy. Because of this important fact social security can have the status of a basic right. In fact in contemporary Germany this is the case, there is a currently valid German Supreme Court ruling which grants poor people welfare by state which includes cost for housing.
Your premise is incorrect - the police aren’t there to protect the property of the rich, but exist to enforce laws. Laws created by representative government - not democracy, per se, but within a constitutional republic. This constitutional republic represents the poor and the rich, and the middle, as well. You may rail against the state favoring the rich, at the expense of the poor, but that also leads to dichotomy - putting your finger on the scale to favor the poor, would destroy Justice. Justice, itself, alone, is altruistic. And therein lies the problem with socialism - preambling justice with some qualifier (social-, racial-, economic-…) leads to ‘x’ at the expense of ‘y’. Or, as Scalia put it, ‘what was once asked as a favor, is now demanded as an entitlement’. This entitlement is wholly economic. And, thankfully, those of us more soberly-minded understand that man is not merely an economic cog - as socialism requires - but is a much larger and more broadly member of a society.
@@arctain1 I am especially criticizing the views of conservatives like Scalia about social welfare. I am 100% sure that conservatives like Scalia will always defend the law which demands that police has to protect all kinds of private property. Even in communism (and socialism) police always protects private property (which also exists in such systems). So it is logical that if you want to have a society based on a common law which benefits ALL citizens - really also including those that are NOT materially rich - you have to provide a broad social security. This social security includes a guarantee that police can not enforce the payment of bills against materially poor people (proctection in case of private bankruptcy). So social security HAS TO BE PROVIDED by state IF you want to include every citizen into the statehood. There is no good alternative to that, but Scalia wrongly suggests such an alternative and calls that "Christian". This is what I criticize, and by the way: There is NO need to introduce socialism or communism. You can have a state-run welfare system in capitalism - in fact capitalism is incomplete without such a system!
@@hans7686 This is very easy. In capitalist societies police does very much to protect the properties of rich people and also the market standards are protected. So to have a really lawful society which also benefits people without much money, there must be a social security imposed by state (as police is also imposed by state). Such a social security also includes that police can not execute payments of debts it the debtor is really bankrupt.
It's interesting to me that we worry about pattern and logic based learning models taking over the world but we trust psychopaths like some of our current leaders with weapons that could end life as we know it. The problem is the idea that AI can't take a moral position, because pure logic and data can't understand logic. But morality is there, I believe there's enough context throughout history for AI to draw an accurate conclusion on what is definitively "good" and definitively "evil" from a universal perspective. It just needs a solid foundation to begin on.
I will say it this way: God didn’t make a mistake in the first hand of the creation, he on the contrary gave man a FREE WILL to choose good or bad. This is the Lord’s teaching of us to finally become true Christians who can’t do evil just like Jesus. ❤🇩🇰
I attended Mr McCauleys lecture and the entire thought I had ... from the inteoduction of the topic is... "Why is whether slavery supported by scripture even a topic!" My answer to my own question is, "Because the slavers and those that think like them, did not ... do not consider... those who were enslaved to be HUMAN. Otherwise, the Golden Rule would apply... and not only the question, but slavery would GO AWAY."
Anti-Semitic Garbage… NT Wright is the Modern Day Origen. Confused, Deluded, and Deceived. Just like the Samaritans who had partial truths, “You worship that which you don’t know. We worship that which we know; for salvation is from the Jews.” John 4:22 When you don’t understand the First Century Jewish Context, you just redefine it all into your antithetical own context lol. Praying for you Brother Tom 🙏🏽 Look at the Jewish Prayer the Amidah, that Jews have been praying since 500 BCE and STILL pray three times a day to this day…. THAT is the context for The New Testament and First Century Judaism… The Second Blessing called GEVUROT… MIGHT… THAT is the Context for Paul the Pharisee in Romans 8:38-39… not just merely that G-D loves you a lot…. THAT is the context for 1 Peter 3:18-20 and 1 Peter 4:3-6…. And THAT is the context for the MYSTERY Paul the Pharisee doesn’t want you IGNORANT of in Romans 11:25-27…. In the wilderness… the difference between when satan is quoting Scripture versus when Messiah is quoting Scripture is one thing… Context…. And that is what NT Wright is missing completely… trying to redefine , reimagine, and reinvent… The devil can’t change THE WORD… but he can completely remove it from its context… And when you forget…. That you’re talking about THE G-D of Israel, THE G-D of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob… and the Jewish Messiah, who was promised to come by the Jewish Prophets, in the Hebrew Scriptures… it might help you understand what was going through the mind of the first century Jews… that clearly understood and were taking action… when they heard Messiah preaching The Gospel of The Kingdom (Matt 4:23)…before the cross… before the resurrection… and before 2,000 years of the theological game of telephone that the Supersessionist “church” has been baffled by… with 44.000 denominations off of half of a book…all claiming to be the 1 with “the truth” , pridefully thinking that if you don’t do it like they do then you’ll burn in hell… as if, somehow, someway…salvation is up to YOU… and YOUR abilities…to “sell” , persuade, and articulate the gospel…. MOST don’t even understand … and not dependent on HIM …. And HIS Revelation….and HIS GRACE that NONE of us deserve, whether we’re still alive, or have been dead…
?
To me, Jesus was the Suffering Servant, and that through his life, people would repent and would be filled by spirit.
I love what William has done for archeology. He's honest and his intentions are true.
Don’t you just love the British accent
Мир превращается ареальный кошмар и в этот кошмар на метле появился учёный,который просто потерял свой разум.Кто-то должен помочь ему,иначе будет большой дизастер.
Worthless. Indiscriminate amalgamation of Biblical and pagan elements. Pure syncretism. A clear state of apostasy. HELL is made for such heretics.
There was no word called hell during biblical times. The word hell originated during the medieval times. The word was inserted into the King James Bible which was published in 1611. Research it.
Rather than Jesus being tortured to death by His Father, Jesus was tortured on the orders of sinful Israel. At the demand of the Temple hierarchy, and the Israelite people themselves, Pilate not wanting a riot from them, washed his hands of the death of this innocent man, relented and ordered that the Righteous Jesus receive the death penalty due the criminal, Barrabus, in his place. If we grasp this horrendous act of betrayal of their Messiah, we can understand the fury and wrath with which Jesus left the House of Israel desolate forever in 70 AD (Dan 9:26-27). How much this betrayal would have weighed on Christ's heart on the Cross. Jesus wasn't receiving God's wrath for our sin; He was allowing Christ to die by the hand of mankind's sin, in order to, paradoxically, be the Redeemer of them. If He doesn't die, and isn't resurrected, then Adam's curse of death would still be valid on all his descendants. I presume that the physical torment and suffering of crucifixion became so great, that He wondered how long before God was going to summon His human spirit to leave His body and go home. At the right time, Jesus gave up His human spirit to the loving protection of His Father (Luke 23:46), so He didn't feel abandoned - it was finished - He offered up His sinless human body (Heb 10:5) as a living sacrifice, or substitute, for our sinful human bodies, that were under the sentence of death. That was pure love on the part of the Father and Son, not wrath.