วีดีโอ

It’s a really beautiful film. Would love to shoot a portrait series on it

Nice experiment Mark. I found half a roll of expired vx200 in a camera in a bucket at a carboot sale so no idea how it had been stored. Reset the ISO to 50 and finished the roll, the shots had some colour shift but came out great, definitely not pink! I loved it so much that I always grab it when I see a cheap roll and have got some VX100 in 120 to play with in future. hope you find some more rolls!

4:10 - Same

I like how at 2:20 the sign for Bens of kings road is in the same part of the frame in both photos, it cuts well.

so have you determined what actuall stock this is, I assume some soft of Movie LAB film.?

I have a roll of that stuff I think. Bought it from my local lab a year ago, it was hand rolled by some local guy who named it "slow your roll" and just can't get myself out to shoot it. Good thing it's only 27 exposures too. Got another stock of black and white in ISO 6 as well, maybe a combo shoot

Best thumbnail ever! Good video too 👌

Why are Bens photos so low res, is he WhatsApping them to you??

The perfect film to use a 0.95 lens

Gotta watch for those stingers!

holy shit those colors are weird, was not expecting that. Great video lads! subscribed

ISO 1 film. 30s exposure when in bright sunlight. 😂

I quite enjoyed the fact checking mark pop ups

Enjoyed this! Thanks for the shout out for Harry too! 😂

If you’ve shot this film we want to see your photos. Send them to us on Instagram! instagram.com/thefullframepodcast?igsh=NzJwczc4cGgzcHdi&

the low iso 1.6 colors are phenomenal

Nice one gents.

iso 1 sounds unbelieveable

Malaysia Reason: We Got Nasi Lemak

ISO 1!!! That’s crazy, but so cool! I bet it would be so much fun to shoot in the summer 😮

Nice Video, thank you! I was looking at pictures on lomography and videos of this camera while in the process of buying a film cam and I'm quite shocked at how little this model is documented for the quality of pictures. Did you experience with films other than the kodak pro image 100 on this camera? What would you recommend? Thanks again for the video!

More Daisy please

cracking film good people.

Such a cool idea, I still don’t quite fully understand double exposures so I’m anxious to try it.

Such an epic video!! Well done guys

This camera is shit, as all from canon ;-) one broke only by leght on regal ;-) - and this is ubershit - buy NIKONOS V - don't say bulls* like that work AF - becuse not, AF not workin on this canon as underwater camera - al all other is irelevant ;-)

Very informative video. Nicely done guys 🌞

How is this the "ultimate guide" to anything? This is just two guys shootin' the shit and talking shop about street photography. Misleading title at best.

Cracking vlog gents.

Hey! I have the camera. But I can't open the battery slot. Any tip?

Wheres my invite?

Why did I have to blink??

Beautiful work!

I love this! ❤🎉

Love this set up x Daisy is awesome! X

Daisy is rad. The link to her channel doesn't work.

Two wonderful guys! Thanks for chatting

Y'all would love 66! Did a month long trip barely scraped the surface. Grainydays made me do it. He should head the historic 66 tourism board lol😂

you forgot to add the links in the corner also your pointing could be better, photos weren't bad though.

What a gray area it is! I get it, the intent of us film shooters is to get it right in camera and embrace the inherent limitations, but why not push the envelope? People been dodging, burning, and retouching before computers. Subbed! BTW on a slightly related note, if you have a sec, I just posted a silly light hearted childish look into the ethics of wide angle close up vs telephoto voyeurism when shooting the public. It is titled "Photographers are Creeps." Sorry for the plug here, but at least I buried it under the "read more" button lol

Great photos!

whats that hanging next to Ben just to the right of the sound panel, is it 3D printed?

Just stumbled across this- thanks for making this video! I was looking for something this comprehensive and 2k resolution was a bonus for the end product. The underwater test was actually very useful for what I'm looking at this camera for so appreciate it being included

Need to sort out the exposure and basic photography and get out of the mindset of shooting like with a phone for the 35mm. The 120mm def more on the mark.

I've done a little research on the film before and the "light leaks" on the black and white was light piping from how you loaded it. The reason the leader is a different color is to protect the film, but its supposed to be loaded in a dark environment to prevent this.

Back in the late 70s I was given a bulk roll of 35mm x-ray film by a friend who worked in a hospital. I loaded it into 35mm cassettes and spent much time experimenting. I could never find the right developer and in those days there were not resources like the internet to get information about obscure things like that. In the end I gave up!

the out of focus might be your ground glass in your viewfinder being a different distance away from the lens to the film.

I tried limo purple on 35mm on a sunny day and was surprised how good it was, I'll have to try it a night having seen your results (if I can find some lights to shoot somewhere!)

RE: editing film (or digital for that matter) - I think it only is a problem if authenticity is an intended part of the photo (reportage, wildlife, etc.). I also think this is softened if the intended photo could have been captured anyway with sufficient patience. Whether you waited or edited, the result is the same. Basically, as long as *how* you arrived at the photo doesn't comprise part of the art or meaning in the photo, who cares? People don't care about the color of trousers you were wearing when taking the photo, so by the same token they shouldn't care about editing vs waiting.

500t > cinesteal 800t