- 334
- 297 380
Preach Christ or Die!!
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 7 เม.ย. 2019
Making it easy to find the best answers to Bible questions in short straight to the point content by some of our greatest Bible teachers .
John MacArthur Q&A: What is the Lordship salvation?
HTTPS://www.gty.org
Bible Question and Answers 20
Bible Question and Answers 20
มุมมอง: 3 456
วีดีโอ
John MacArthur Q&A: Does God use music to save sinners
มุมมอง 9197 หลายเดือนก่อน
HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Question and Answers 20
John MacArthur Q&A: What about sin we still struggle with, Does a pastor need difficulties ?
มุมมอง 1.7K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Question and Answers 20
John MacArthur Q&A: Should a Christian protest, Kids struggling in other countries
มุมมอง 1747 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Should a Christian protest, Kids struggling in other countries
John MacArthur Q&A:What is predestination?
มุมมอง 2.2K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Questions and Answers 31
John MacArthur Q&A: Isaiah 53:1-9 and what is the day of the Lord and the great tribulation?
มุมมอง 8077 หลายเดือนก่อน
HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Questions and Answers 31
John MacArthur Q&A: What are the morality, and political views, of a Christian saltshaker?
มุมมอง 7797 หลายเดือนก่อน
HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Question and Answers 31
John MacArthur Q&A: Why are people baptized for the dead?
มุมมอง 1.8K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
Https://www.gty.org Bible Questions and Answers 31
John MacArthur Q&A: what the Bible says about the unnatural way to have babies
มุมมอง 3.2K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: what the Bible says about the unnatural way to have babies
John MacArthur Q&A: How did God create different races and how old is the earth?
มุมมอง 3.9K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Question and Answers 31
John MacArthur Q&A: Did God create the animals for food for us to eat?
มุมมอง 1.9K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
#johnmacarthur HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Questions and Answers 31
John MacArthur Q&A: Is mental illness in the Bible looked at as demonic possession?
มุมมอง 8K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
#johnmacarthur HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Questions and Answers 31
John MacArthur Q&A: Hebrews says it’s for men to die once but Lazarus an others died twice?
มุมมอง 1.7K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Questions and Answers 30
John MacArthur Q&A: Before the law was Adam eternally separated from God because of his sin?
มุมมอง 6927 หลายเดือนก่อน
#johnmacarthur HTTPS://www.gty.org Bible Question and Answers 30
John Piper Q&A: What is your prayer life like every day?
มุมมอง 1757 หลายเดือนก่อน
#johnpiper #christianprayer
John MacArthur Q&A: Should a Christian be involved in any kind of lawsuit?
มุมมอง 7837 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Should a Christian be involved in any kind of lawsuit?
John Piper Q&A: How to teach the Doctrine of Grace in a hostile place?
มุมมอง 1127 หลายเดือนก่อน
John Piper Q&A: How to teach the Doctrine of Grace in a hostile place?
John MacArthur Q&A: Explaining Ecclesiastes 9
มุมมอง 2.7K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Explaining Ecclesiastes 9
John MacArthur Q&A: What is the Abomination of desolation?
มุมมอง 8507 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: What is the Abomination of desolation?
John MacArthur Q&A: Can a man see God and live?
มุมมอง 5587 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Can a man see God and live?
John MacArthur Q&A: Can a Christian sin away the grace of God?
มุมมอง 2.4K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Can a Christian sin away the grace of God?
John MacArthur Q&A: Do Christians have an old nature?
มุมมอง 4.3K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Do Christians have an old nature?
John MacArthur Q&A: What is the purpose of circumcision?
มุมมอง 1.2K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: What is the purpose of circumcision?
John MacArthur Q&A: Don’t call no man Father
มุมมอง 2.1K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Don’t call no man Father
John MacArthur Q&A:How can Jesus be tempted with sin without a sin nature?
มุมมอง 7468 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A:How can Jesus be tempted with sin without a sin nature?
John MacArthur Q&A:Can a Christian loose their salvation?
มุมมอง 2.2K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A:Can a Christian loose their salvation?
John MacArthur Q&A: Gen 6:4 when the sons of God had relations with the daughters of men.
มุมมอง 1.9K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Gen 6:4 when the sons of God had relations with the daughters of men.
John MacArthur Q&A: The genealogy of Mary vs Joseph
มุมมอง 9148 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: The genealogy of Mary vs Joseph
John MacArthur Q&A: If it’s appointed for men to die once what about people who died twice?
มุมมอง 1.2K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: If it’s appointed for men to die once what about people who died twice?
John MacArthur Q&A: Did God use Rahab's lie or Her faith?
มุมมอง 1.7K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
John MacArthur Q&A: Did God use Rahab's lie or Her faith?
It does not start with a decision. We need to be born again. Our Salvation does not start with Jesus, It starts with the God The Father. It is the Drawing of The Father and the convicting work of the Holy Spirit. John 6:44 No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day. born again, means a new begin, and the old no longer exist in us. Matthew 12:41 The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here. FROM WHAT DID THEY REPENTED? SIN. (METANOIA) METANOEŌ Acts 2:38 Then Peter said to them, “REPENT, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. The same Greek word is used in Acts. Acts 26:20 declares, “I preached that they should repent and turn to God and prove their repentance by their deeds.” The full biblical definition of repentance is a change of mind that results in a change of action. The principal mistake of many is basing their understanding of repentance on the root form of the Greek word. The Greek verb metanoeō (to repent) is built on the preposition meta (“with, after”) and the verb noeō (“to understand, to think”). The conclusion some then draw is that the only sense in which a Christian is required to repent is to change one’s mind or to rethink sin and one’s relationship with God. But the meaning of words is not determined in this way, but rather on usage and context. A change of mind or perspective is of no value if it isn’t accompanied by a change of direction, a change of life and action. The are two sides of one coin, and belong together. Repentance, by no means ends, with heartfelt conviction of sin. It begins with an unequivocal, heart-rending recognition of having sinned, and hating, and turning away from sin. It means loving Jesus above all, and stop hating our neighbour, or brother. Altar calls are a deception for millions.
Sadly for the evangelical church dispensationalism has been the largest single contribution to the destruction of the church's witness to the fallen world. If you shave off all the fancy words and wrong interpretations of prophecy you find dispensationalism says the Jesus is a failure. It goes on to say that God is a racist and a real estate agent.
Others are praying for me but God doesn´t answer their prayers and not mine either. I want to be saved and delivered from demons but He doesn´t answer. He must have rejected me bc i have given up too many times and lived like the world - in sin. But then i have come back praying to Jesus to save me time after time but NO!
I have many photos showing the idol of Ba'al in many churches. it is seen with mainstream, with the majority.
According to the bible He allowed it although it wasn't called polygamy but rather a man just taking a woman as his concubine, the concubine woman is not the man's wife nor could she be called his wife, a wife was specific and for a specific reason, usually a woman the man made a covenant with and her with him, concubines did not have or get a covenant although in Jesus mind if she bore that man a child she could not be sent or put away, the man was just as responsible for her and her child as his wife would be, the concubine woman is mentioned in the new testament more often than once only the translators used the word wife for her simply because reading the text made them think she was the man's wife, the two are so closely related in terms of responsibilities it would be easy to mistranslate the word, what Jesus told the Samaritans that made them believe He was the savior of the world had to do with a concubine and IF the man followed the rule for having one would eliminate any child born not out of sin as being fatherless, no one will ever figure this out reading a KJV or any other version that doesn't factor in the concubine woman and a child born to her, studying ancient Greek won't help either if you rely on others to translate the word, identifying a wife also cannot be done trying to use law neither the word for husband, these words didn't exist in ancient times, what did exist in the words for man and woman are rather what kind of man or woman they were, customs and traditions have nothing to do with it, you can think of it like this though, if she made the man a child that would be his wife, two shall become one flesh is seen in the child, having sex with a woman is only being one in body which is why Paul said not to join with a harlot, men seek sex, God seeks children, until you factor this into your belief your never going to understand God's will concerning sexual relations between a man and a woman nor will you ever understand why it's only the woman that's bound by law and not the man
im post trib i only see one return of Jesus in bible.he will return as he went to heaven acts says.
Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; *but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.* 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. What is the will of the father? John 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. 40 And this is the will of him that sent me, *that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life* : and I will raise him up at the last day. Open your eyes Johnny, and anyone that believes your heresy. Only Jesus Christs righteousness counts for salvation, your filthy rags mean nothing.
God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve
Deuteronomy 14th. Ch.
He begins with a huge error. Matthew 5:32 is not a clause about adultery. Adultery has already been exempted from the meaning, by stating with all the marriage and divorce paperwork adultery DOES NOT break the marriage bond. Seeing this the KJV writers correctly wrote "fornication" as the meaning, such as a woman claiming to be a virgin when she is not. There was even "the law of the false virgin" in the middle ages. For this reason John Macathur is the leader of a sex cult, allowing UNBIBLICAL divorce and remarriage.
Instead of asking if Polygeny is a sin, I wish our people would start asking themselves why does God allow Polygeny. Why is it lawful? Do you not understand that the laws of God are the constitution and bill of rights for the Kingdom of Israel? This is what they govern themselves by. This is what God govern them by. He has never allowed them to sin! Neither has he had laws of sin written by his righteousness. No one is forced to marry or not marry. You have the free will to marry how you please. God will judge all things by his word/law. But please stop saying women who choose to marry one man are sinning. Or a man who has more than one wife is sinning. Stop trying to seperate Christ from the father. They are 1. That is either ignorant or evil to think or say such a thing! You are calling God the minister of sin! Please Stop judging by your religion and see God's righteousness. God allows Polygeny because he is against sin. He gave Polygeny/marital law to put away all manner of fornication (1 Corinthians 6:18). To put away whoredom (using women as one does a whore) from among the children of God (Deuteronomy 23:17). To put away all manner of sexual immorality (Exodus 22, Leviticus 21, & Deuteronomy 22). To keep confusion from among his people by keeping a man's children and the women thereof under one headship (1 Timothy 5:8, Proverbs 22:6 Deuteronomy 11:16-19, & 1 Timothy 3:5). To keep a woman that desires to wear a man's masculinity, sexuality, and headship from among the children of God/vice versa (Proverbs31:3, Deuteronomy 22:5, Leviticus 18:22, Romans 1:24-32, 1 Corinthians 11:3), and the list goes on family. I ask you all, when did that change? The law is righteous and will always be righteous. Your unrighteousness doesn't change that. In fact, it's why you must die. God made marriage the rule of Law in all the earth (Genesis,1 , 2, 9, Psalm 24:1, etc). Polygeny is marriage, and marriage is honorable in all (Hebrews 13:4). Even if you were taken as a servant wife God still honors you (Exodus 20:10 & Exodus 21:7-10). A restriction given to a Bishop or Deacon is not an implication of sin. Just as there is law specific to women and some specific to men. Their is law specific to a King and some for a prophet. If you do not hold these positions/work in your lifetime, these laws do not apply to you. Concerning Deuteronomy 17:14-20 this is law pertaining to Kings, not to all men. We live in a nation where most men live by its culture, customs, and laws instead of the word/law of God (Matthew 4:4, Matthew 15:3, Acts 5:29, etc..). What they practice here is fornication and is ungodly (Revelation 21:18). Polygeny can never be a sin, because by God's decree: sin is the disobedience to the laws of God (1 John 3:4). They cannot grasp this because they do not understand the Kingdom (Matthew 13:11) because they have no respect/honor for the laws of God. For the constitution, the bills if rights, the civil and moral laws given to Israel. Even the penal codes thereof. They only know a democracy, a republic, communism, socialism, etc... What they can vote in and out. Some man-made stuff. They do not know or honor the Kingdom of God is the government setup over heaven and earth ( Isaiah 9:9, Matthew 3:2, Luke 10:9, Matthew 7:24-25). They lack knowledge that all the word/decrees of the King is law and is lawful (Deuteronomy 8:3, Psalm 119:89, Matthew 24:35). They lack this understanding to be able to apply or divide the word of God rightly. As for divorce, Christ in Matthew 19 said it best: In the beginning, it wasn't so. The beginning being "Genesis." No man in the bloodline of Christ in Genesis divorced his wife or wives. God didn't give Adam another wife. Jacob endured his son laying with one of his wives and kept them both among him. Abraham was told by God to move out the bond woman and his son by God. He didn't choose to. No one ever put away their wives lawfully until the law of Moses. This is what it means when said but Moses. Before the law of Moses, divorce was never lawful for the lineage nor the children of Israel. You never see it throughout time until God allows Moses to give it. That's when it becomes lawful. This is what Christ is saying. He's dealing with divorce. It's not Christians who are confused. It's all men who do not understand that which Christ has preached throughout his whole ministry was purely the word of God. The main thing and focus of his message, is "The Kingdom" Which he mentions over a 100 times throughout his gospels. These men and women are of this world and worldly minded. Ever learning but unable to come to the truth of God (2 Timothy 3:7). Still focused on the intent of God and never moving with God into the purpose of man (Ecclesiastes 12:13 & 1 John 5:3). Allowing sin to rule the day instead of his son. Christ gives God what he intended to get out of mankind. If God could get the perfection he desires out of the children of Adam, he would not have sent another. Be wise family and let God be true & every man a liar.
It is much easier to understand what Lordship Calvinist salvation is with this bed time story that John MacArthur endorses. Little Johnny, God has predestined the minority of people to be saved and go to heaven forever, and He has predestined the majority of people to be eternally damned and burn in the fires of hell. We have no idea, little Johnny, if God has predestined you to be forever damned or forever saved. We love you, little Johnny, but we accept the fact that God might not love you, and that He may have plans to send you to hell for your future sins. If you do find yourself one day burning in hell because He hasn’t elected to save you, just remember that we will always love you, even if God hates you. Take comfort knowing that we are not like God. We will be in heaven forever only because we were unconditionally chosen for salvation before we were born. That would be the only reason that we won’t be in hell with you if you find yourself there. It won’t be because of anything we did. So also take comfort in knowing that. It may not seem fair, but who are we to judge God? So again, if you find yourself in hell, remember that we will always love you as we forever worship the God who loved us but who hated you, the God who sent His Son to die for us but not for you. Please, we ask, don’t let it bother you-if you find yourself in hell-that we love the God who hated you and showed you no mercy. We must accept the fact that God is sovereign, and He does what He pleases. We teach this to your children and grandchildren! Funny how we see no spiritual progress over the ensuing years of their lives. They seem to feel more and more like Pinocchio with Calvi-god (Gesepo) pulling their puppet strings. They have no assurance, no joy just fear. We teach them to sing songs like this to comfort them to no avail! When they sing it ,they are so humbled by it, that it's all that you can do to keep from bursting with pride, which is the glue that keeps them together. Yet I fear they are just turning into mindless Robots. "Jesus loves me, this I know. As for you, I don't think so. Only some to Him belong. We are right and you are wrong. Yes, Jesus loves me! Yes, Jesus loves me! Yes, Jesus loves me! Aren't you happy and proud that God chose us for heaven and decided not to fry us in Hell like everyone else! 'Eenie Meenie Miney Moe, this one goes to heaven off to hell another one goes!' But then again, I hope this isn't evanescent grace that I'm walking in and instead I'm actually deceived and one of the reprobates that He created to burn as a candle for His glory in Hell forever."
Lol what a convoluted contradictory message. “Oh it’s just fruit. It’s just evidence. Buuuut you better submit to Christ as Lord! You better obey or you will be burned in Hell forever! Oh yeah but keep in mind, we’re saved by grace.” What a modern day Pharisee. What a fraud. Learn the truth at MZTV.
Paul in Romans 9 speaks of the children of promise he says that spiritual Israel are not those that are Israel by birth but they are Israel through belief
Why did, and why does God use the Jews and Israel, and why is Israel as a nation used separately from the Christian church? Only for one reason, to show the world exactly who He is by plotting their course and choosing to save who He wants to save at the end of the age. God didn't choose Israel because they are good or special. He made them special to Him to show the world His unique goodness.
Folks might be more willing to understand that is the did a study on "name's sake" by looking up all of the references.
"What is the Abomination of Desolation?" It's like when, God was creating this Earth. But, that will be done again...When Jesus', 2nd creating the last 7th, of of our 1,000 yrs! No Nothing, but "dirt and rock". And, NO water or seas either, etc, nothing atoll... That, is when Jesus has (every human), separating the Born Again's; from the Non Born Again's. Then He, will cast ALL "non" Born Again's; into a "Burning Lake of Fire." (to Hell). But the Born Again's, will be sent to a New Earth, and a New Heaven, a New Jerusalem and a New Holy Temple (And that is Jesus). Where we Born Again's; will be with Jesus in a "ONE" Spiritual "being", Forever! AMEN!
The spirit of Satan I believe is either here on earth, or has not fallen yet, i think about now he is gathering the angels to rebel and we can see it in how the world is today. The war in heaven effects the lives on earth
Everyone who’s studying Daniel and the prophecies, read the OLD GREEK version! it is dated to be OLDER than the Theodotion! And EVERYONE has the Theodotion in their Bible! And YES, they are incredibly DIFFERENT. Check the correspondence to the Dead Sea scrolls as well! But more than that, ACTUALLY read what it says; And let the words themselves unfold, so that the truth may be revealed. And of course, let the Holy Spirit lead you into all truth! Amen. Pray about this and listen to the Spirit, NOT yourself. Amen. May the grace and peace of GOD our FATHER and our Lord Jesus Christ, be with you! Amen.
Happy teachers day
So why are so many Methodist churches and Presbyterian churches so liberal?
After having heard several of your sermons, Mr Buchan, I can't help comming to the conclusion that all you really do sucsesfully, is to critisise other pastors I can only presume Jealousy is the motive. Calling (even by name) another God ordained preacher a false prophet, that implies that you take the right to judge, while the Bible tells us that If you dare to judge another person, you have already been judged! Only GOD has the right to judge!!
Was dispensationalism the reason that Martin Luther took the plan of salvation out of Acts ch.2:38 and moved it to Rom.ch.10:9,10 ?
There is no earthly promise left to be fulfilled for national Israel. All earthly promise God gave to them fulfilled when God brought them out of Egypt and gave them the land of Palestine. All subsequent promises are spiritual promises which fulfilled in Christ in the New Covenant. Now there is only one Body (Eph. 3:5; 4:4), comprise of Jews and Gentile believers as the Scriptures teach (there is no Jew, no Greek..Gal. 3:27-29).
regardless of mixtures, percentages, water, blablabla anyone with half a brain cell knows what drunkenness is. It's like the phrase I can't describe what is pornography but I know what it is when i see it. a glass of wine with dinner is perfectly reasonable but if you have a problem going on to the second, third, fourth drink, or drinking anything at all around a person that can't help but do that it's best to stay away from it at all. we don't need all of this "historical context" mumbo jumbo. just read the word of God for what it is. avoid druinkeness. if you're feeling that drinking anything at all is not allowed by God's word you find yourself in works righteousness territory which is a far far worse thing to do than having a glass of wine with dinner unmixed with water. same with dancing and card playing or anything else. just read the bible. you start getting into all this historical context business and you start entering denying the true Word of God and fall into the dangerous trap of "historical criticism" of the bible which denies the authority of the bible by putting everything into a historical context such as saying Paul is a bigot because in today's world homosexuality is good but bad in the culture of that time of Jesus and the apostles. God hates homosexuality then and now. Do everything in honor of God and let's not fall into a potentially pharasitical trap.
There you have it, a celebrity liar masquerading as a pastor or teacher! Be careful your idol pastor will drag more to hell than to the Saviour with his fancy nonsense
I like how he says that the beatings and curses are for Israel literally but when it comes to the blesssings then we say that’s that’s for the church. For example the new hearth, but I have heard him preach on Jhon 3 and say to the audience that if you’re not born again, if you don’t have a change of hearth then you can not enter the kingdom. So now he gets to misinterpret and apply the passage how he wants hmmmmm
There was sarcasm involved here, and it was not a doctrinal statement.
You obviously have very little knowledge of marriage a lot of I think this and I think that. Also, bring up some positive points of polygamy from the old testament obviously you had a preconceived negitive opinion of polygamy before you even read one verse in the bible.
I have a question, How can Jesus be tempted/tested, by this "Satan" if Jesus already had the power to walk on water, heal the sick, raise the dead, stand in a furnace of fire and not be burned? He probably did more than the Bible recorded. If Jesus could turn water to wine, then turning stones to bread wasn't any big deal. Seems to me this "Satan" didn't have anything to offer that Jesus didn't already have. So how can one be tempted?
But isn’t he frozen in the Ninth Circle of Hell
[8]For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it(eternal life) is the gift of God: [9] not of works, lest any man should boast. Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV The grace of God is not cheap, it cost God the precious blood of his only Son. We are saved by believing in the finished work of Jesus Christ. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 KJV Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. John 6:47 KJV
Praise the Lord for Still having good True Bible Believing Preachers like mine, Macathur, and Jeremiah ❤❤🙏
He misrepresents the other side constantly. Easy to create “straw men” and knock them down.
Did you not even give one minute in preparation for what you were going to say?!! You did not even take note of the meaning of the words!! abomination of desolation. OT ...Hebrew..to be filthy, loathe abhor International Standard... idolatrous worship... offensive NT -bdelygms...a foul thing... detestable desolation....OT..shaman..to destroy, devastate NT -eremosis.. making desolate ABHORRENT AND DETESTABLE TO GOD Dan12:11 referred to by JESUS CHRIST... Matthew 24:15 Alexander the great...devastated the jews...his general seleucus nicstor...358-281BC emerged as one of the strongest generals after Alexander. ...ruledhis old area . Babylon Mesopotamia central asia...the land north of Jerusalem, and known as the North. There is also the South. The Jews were continually killed and/or made slaves. antiochus epiphanies...greek for 'manifestation of GOD....Muslims have temples right at the holy place.. I have so much that I could put but my daughter and granddaughter are almost here. I will put it on my channel this evening or tomorrow evening. Thank you for your work brother, but we are accountable, so please take the time. We are all family, and no person should be without correct understanding!!
Where can I find the full video
Worst thing said here was that quote from Dr. Feinberg (spelling?). He said, "....but the Gentile church gets all the blessing." Ummmmmmmmm there's no such thing as a "the Gentile church"......... There's the church, which is for everyone, as evidenced by, say, the fact that 100% of the Apostles of the church were full blown Jews? By sayyyyyy Jesus commanding to take the gospel to "JUDEA, Samaria, and the ends of the earth." What the heck are we even talking about "Gentile church" vs Jews? What is going on?
What's going on is that scholars recognize what went on in Acts 15 and it's not proper to compel Gentiles to become Judaized. Dr. Charles F. Feinberg is a converted Jew by the way and a Pre-Millennial one at that. I have a few of his books.
Saying that God intended one thing (monogamy-only), but then: 1. Wrote it in the law how to do the opposite righteously 2. Assisted and even caused mankind to act against that intention 3. Portraying Himself as acting against His own intent 4. Sending Jesus 2000 +/- years later to change a practice conveyed in 1-3 above, thereby creating a double standard makes Him out to be: 1. neglectful (failure to adequately inform) 2. forgetful (acted contrary to His intent because of dementia 3. Intentionally deceitful (knowing He would send Jesus to make the change but still allowing, regulating, portraying, and assisting in a practice He supposedly never intended) and is therefore blasphemous, calls into question His character and integrity, and takes His name in vain.
If you’re going to tell me Jesus would abstain from playing uno I’m gonna tell you you’re wrong, and also delusional. You can make an argument for Alcohol, seeing that some people claim that it was mixed with water back in those days. Dancing? It depends, if a song comes on that you like and your in your own room dancing the way you feel like, there is zero sin potential there. Only if you’ve been taught sinful moves like twerking by the world.
So did Calvinism 😂
Thought provoking I like it
The Only One who can be the Begotten is God 😊
What?? God is the only one who is NOT begotten. Are you confused?
don't care nobody is going to take it away
this is where i disagree with you Rev Dr MacArthur I would not say God's son were fallen angelic, I would say, God's sons are the descendants of Seth, those that call upon the name of the Lord Daughters of man, are those of the descendants of Cain, they went away from the presence of the Lord
Jesus turned water into wine at the party. I thinks alcohols ok
1 woman is more and ol/or too much much than 3 or four, specially now and with conflicts. To be linear... Gay marriages legal, of so should polygamous marriages.
Amen! Good job!!
He equates "modern" dancing with sexy dancing or partner dancing, but then goes on to acknowledge that ancient people danced sexually as well. At the same time he doesn't seem aware of any of the dozens and dozens, perhaps hundreds, of traditional & modern dance styles which are completely un-sexual. What a disjointed and ignorant train of thought! I expected something much more rational and biblically founded from such a well-respected pastor.
The Kingdom of God is within, and flesh cannot understand spiritual things.
Huh...instead of just saying "I dont know why God allowed it." John starts a very long and confusing lecture.
Lord doesn't mean Jesus' diety? Where in scripture does it say to repent of sin to he saved? Yes, people can believe Jesus died on cross, etc. and not be saved but has nothing to do with repenting of sin, but rather they are those who are convinced by the evidence all those things but still want nothing to do with Jesus. They still reject him. An example is in scripture where there were those who believed it was true but desired the praise of man and refused to put their faith in Jesus. He's not going to force Himself on anyone. A more modern example would be the late atheist richard dwakins (spell). Heard him say once that he's not an atheist because the evidence on his side is overwhelming, but because even if God were true he still wouldn't believe because he hates Him. That's exactly why confession with the mouth, romans 10:9-10 is an acceptance of the free gift of salvation. For it says if one believes in their heart Jesus died on cross for your sin, buried and rose from the dead, and confesses with their mouth Jesus is Lord (God, yehovah, Adonai, almighty creator) then they are saved. We believe in our hearts and those things and Jesus' not only is payment for our sin, but He clothes us in His righteousness! Repenting of sin is heretical and here's why this is so important. 1) These people have redefined repent which biblically always means a change of mind (metanoia, or meta=change as in metamorphosis, noia=mind), no work involved. 2) Repenting of sin contradicts gospel in bible. For gospel (john 3:16, romans 10:9-10, 1 cor. 15:1-4, elsewhere) is first believing Jesus died on the cross FOR YOUR SIN. A false gospel, the devil, says you have to turn from your sin. In otherwords, you come to cross sinless. They're completely contrary. MacArthur even contradicts himself when he said you have to confess your sin, then turn from sin. Well, which is it? Bottom line is nobody can turn from sin. Greater men have tried and all failed. God's standard is way to high. Heck, Adam and Eve couldnt even obey one command. Hence our need of a savior! Jesus is offering to take the yoke of your sin and give you His yoke of grace which He purchased through His death, burial and resurrection. All sin has been dealt with. These wolves, however, want you to keep you enslaved and yoked to sin, keep you in their pews and control you. MacArthur, Billy Graham, Paul, King David or any other person could never turn from their sin before or after they were saved. 3) This false gospel means you can lose your salvation of at very least never know you're saved. And of there is one work needed for salvation, whether that's turning from sin (Impossible. Unquantifiable. Undefinable) or even as simple as not eating an apple on a specific tree, and not solely by believing in Jesus and His finished work, then news flash, nobody in history of all humanity is nor ever will be saved for all fall short of the glory of God, all our works are filthy rags to the Lord and 1 john clearly states to the already saved believer (thats who he is writing to) that if we claim we have no sin (as MacArthur claims to have turned from of his sin) then the truth is not in us and we make God out to be a liar. Galatians 3:3 "Are you so foolish (MacArthur)? Having begun in the spirit (given when we believe in Jesus), are you now made perfect in the flesh (thinking you have to turn from your sin, be good person or doing something in the flesh like living a certain way, etc.)?" Romans 10:10 KJV [10] For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Oh, my… Pastor MacArthur made a really grave & dangerous error in calling polygamy “a sin.” If it were so, that would mean our Holy, Living God not only advocated sin, but caused David to sin & sinned, Himself… 2 Samuel 12:7-8: “Nathan said to David, ‘You are the man! Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, “I anointed you king over Israel, & I delivered you out of the hand of Saul. And I gave you your master's house & your master's wives into your arms & gave you the house of Israel & of Judah. And if this were too little, I would add to you as much more.” MacArthur also failed to mention how the Lord never once condemned bigamy/polygamy in His Law as He so blatantly did adultery; & He never “regulated” sin (like, “Well, if you are going to commit this sin, do it this way…”), & we find He had special protections for bigamist wives & their offspring. Like, what of Exodus 21:10? It’s *definitely* not talking about a widower remarrying (as John wrongly claimed Deut.21:15-17 was referring to). “If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish her food, her clothing, or her marital rights.” A teacher & pastor calling good “evil” is no harmless error.
You are 100% correct. Saying that God intended one thing, but then: 1. Wrote it in the law how to do it righteously 2. Assisted and even causing mankind to act against that intention 3. Portraying Himself as acting against His own intent 4. Sending Jesus 2000 +/- years later to change a practice conveyed in 1-3 above, thereby creating a double standard makes Him out to be: 1. neglectful (failure to adequately inform) 2. forgetful (acted contrary to His intent because of dementia) 3. Intentionally deceitful (knowing He would send Jesus to make the change but still allowing, regulating, portraying, and assisting in a practice He supposedly never intended) and is therefore blasphemous, calls into question His character and integrity, and takes His name in vain.
I love this❤
@@Sir_Viveru have reinforced my belief polygamy ain't a sin ❤❤❤
@@davidnsude2986 it's as much @MelodyHope8188 as any of my contribution, but I'm just glad you see truth!
@@davidnsude2986 🙂