วีดีโอ

13:14 excuse me sir, that frog is BODY POSITIVE!!!!!! Nice batrep as always :)

You need 3 propper ranks, to be stedfast on your knights. 😀

Work as one: Mark the centre of the table. At the end of the game, you win this Secondary Objective if you have at least two or more Scoring Units within 9″ of the centre of table, and the opponent has not.

Oh and just wanted to say that I really enjoy your content. Being German (missed getting to play with you over there by a thin margin) and married to an American and also playing DE, makes me relate to your experiences. Maybe on warhall sometime.

For the restricted attacks, as I understand if he choses to hit to the flanc with the carnosaur his attacks get restricted and if he wants to put some to the front he can but they are still restricted. So if he puts 2 to the front he only has 3 left to the flanc. If he puts everything to the front he isn't restricted.

Super Schlachtbericht. Viele Grüße aus Deutschland

Thanks for the great battle report. I am a regular watcher of all your videos. Greetings.

10:55 you had two units more expensive than my most expensive unit, so primary was 90-10 your favor I think. I also didnt have a way of dealing with your chaff which has to be corrected in future lists. 20:04 yeah, mistake in deployment. that unit should have been in my battle line. 34:05 I rolled poorly on my 5+ too, 5/26... I will admit, killing 2nd model was good for me though. end of game situation - wasn't thinking of best play. one of my hopes for the game was to test the vampire build. So this was chance to do that. Obviously he did not perform with the dice I rolled, but doing 3hp damage on "the low end" of output seems ok. btw had whispers on altar so was wounding it on 2+.

Great battle report! Surprising to see a magicless list do so well, didn't realize DE had so many passive bonuses if you combo your units right.

This is wich game?

Good Win, my friend! Enjoyed the report too - Always a good amount of detail. Might add a comment later with a few bits on game situations from my pov :)

Thanks very much for the in-depth vid. It'll be interesting to see how your opponent develops his list too. I'm working on VC vid doing exactly that.

you have: clear font to actually read the lists clear audio with easy accent good explanations humor only thing you lack is a bit of volume thanks a lot for the BR! keep it up!

1st 3.0 batrep 🙌

Great battle report! Kind of surprised to see how few battle reports there have been in general for 3.0. Really interesting to hear your thoughts on the changes in the edition, though :)

Great report! Cheers to 3.0 and all you fantastic peeps who contributed

FYI - Ghost step on his spider unit only means that all terrain features are treated as open terrain (including impassable). It can’t pass through or over units.

Dan's army was based on many themes, including Dogs of War (the WHFB mercenary faction)! Looking forward to the spoiler videos :)

Just found your channel and I loved your BR! Gonna bingewatch the hell out of your reports now ;D

congrats on a resounding win, GITK. Good to see Tim's 3d printed KoE on the tabletop too!

I stopped playing 9th age when they changed all the stats and magic system

Content is good but you need SEO expert to grow your channel audience

Content is good but you need SEO expert to grow your channel audience

i think you are missing rule clarity here, t9a is so well written it's almost impossible to get stuck, maybe only real problems come with round bases that i hope they will get rid of with 3.0

volume is low on this one. Another nice report though!

oops on the breath of corruption! he couldve given it to a model that didnt fail a charge, but i dont see an eligible target. Well played though. you did well keeping the knights out of a big combat and was a good game to watch in person

Stupid elves... great batrep though!

9th age is the best tabletop war game

Normally I have to pay for this kind of quality opposition research…

Comment mostly for the algorythm Gotta love the 9th age, I got into it only 1 year ago, and jump in quality of rules, and balance between the armies in comparison to old wh 7-8th ed was astounding, Now after seeing the tow (unpolished as it is, which may change) I just cant get into the hype train for the old world

Seems like you had some trouble dealing with the wraiths! I found that keeping a unit in 'reserve' behind your army specifically to set up countercharges for where the wraiths end up after their magical move works well. That way you can push harder and for example also push up your judicators turn 1-2 so you don't have to suffer 6 turns of occultism damage ;)

Good game :D

VC Turn 3 - chariot was 18 away for breath of corruption range. so 11 for you. small deceptive glamor on judicators and evil eye on chariot, to give it a 12. you stopped the snipes :( lol

Great report as always!

Love the reports, keep it up. At ~16:00 you mentioned fields are flammable…I believe that is in a previous version of the game? Or was that a tourney thing?

Main reason why I left t9a and will never come back is cuz of the move away from the legacy rules that I grew up with. T9a is trying to do their own thing with the new labs but as a main Skaven player I can never accept the absolute disaster of a book the VS lab is. T9a also becomes stale and flavourless by sacrificing to much for the sake of balance. Balance is good but to much focus on balance and we get a game that looks more or less like checkers with fantasy miniatures. Ive played now two games of TOW and I have had more fun with TOW then I have had with t9a in a long time.

Would the use of different scale miniatures (i.e. 10mm Warmaster) on appropriate unit-sized bases, with wound tracking rather than removing models be frowned upon?

I love the freedom to use whatever models I feel appropriate for each army. Of course that's possible in Warhammer too but there's still strong sentiment of using official models only in Warhammer or any other game which has dedicated model line. Supplement armies are also something that I love wholeheartedly. Good video guys, love your content.

TOW Rules are so bad I came looming for something else new that is a good successor to 6th edition.

9th age is my main game, and I play team and individual tournaments whenever I can. I love the game and its community. With that said, I have to tell that data-driven adjustments are mostly a big mistake. If you do that, you don't understand why an option is chosen (or not) over another one. More pro-players advice should be considered. Nowadays, the game feels dull sometimes, with some armies over the top, like Saurian Ancients or dual daemon prince WotDG. We need more LABs and 3.0 as soon as possible. Furthermore, the pairings system should be considered: you never babysit your team's Dwarven player, but you should babysit your Dread elf player. If Dwarven Holds and Dread elves get on average the same score in tournaments, something's wrong with Dread Elves. This point is key in a team game, so if every army is between 9 and 11 points out of 20, that's not a balanced. I hope 3.0 will bring fresh air, or this game is going to be abandoned due to ToW arrival (which I think it's a bad game, but GW has tons of fans...).

that minions army is great :)

For the algorithm ;)

Great video fellas! I'm inspired by how gamers took the reigns of their own destiny rather than letting a anyone tell them "how to have fun." I hope more people come into the hobby. I may dust off my saurian ancients and add a fancy new titanopod.

As someone who didn't know what the 9th age was before this video, it looks really great! I'll be checking out those links for sure :)

Look Mom, I'm on TV.

I stopped to play t9a years ago when again a new years point update dropped and again I can't play my favourite things. Also the T9A community is more and more getting like GW: so you have a very strong core whichs favours some armies and you see the following like GW does: A new army is presented and everybody loses their mind how broken they are: And then it takes several months or a year to get a more balanced army like it was before Other armies need ages for a good update. Take my beloved Wood Elves: I can't play a legaly Tree only list as I am not allowed to take enough dryads for core. I can't buy magic weapon or usefull upgrages Skaven on the other hand, if you play right you get around 500 or 1000 points for free if a unit is destroyed it comes back on any skaven special entry . . . Skaven got a 25 points 5d6 strengh 5 one time item, could kill anything, wood elves got a 100 points speer trower bow, I would take the item .. . I would just play them as deamons if I ever play again Same goes for H(B)E: The favourite Charakter was the Swordmaster Standard Bearer (Master of Crainreg Tower) But instead of just remove the Option as Standard Bearer, they made the model super expensive and nerved it. So either nerve it, or make it more expensive or strike the option out if you don't like . . Same goes with Bows, Speerman and the Seaguard: The seaguard combines both with more options and special rules. So instead of making the bow man or speerman better, the just increased the price of the seagurad. . . See the newer Saurus: no General, no BSB but unit upgrades everywhere and their champions can leave the unit and used as chaff . . Warriors of Chaos: they should have after vampires courts the best warrior wizard in the world And now? Just a stupid caster . . . Oger Kingdom: a stupid 500 points character just destroyes my 670 avatar of nature because I am not allowed to buy anything usefull . . . New Orks and Goblins´. . . Orks are afraid, Goblins can rally free after a flee option? Shooting frenzied fanatics? some are asking for strengh 5 core orks and more and more are giving their thumb up . . I was so full of hopes for T9A but after years I gave up . . I will not play TOW - I am going to stick with Mordheim and travel internatial for playing it

i can 3d print a whole army for between 30-40 dollars but i also make my own stl files

I'd say the main reason is that GW don't make very balanced games, also they sell you just as much paper (in the form of rules books etc.) as they do plastic.

How is 500 points difference a 10-10 before objective? Thx for the report

Ok so about that combat prince on chariot vs dogs your opponent can't use hereditary there bcs his prince is put of 18" range only his general can have hereditary in his rooster and this model is in Sea Guards unit on board center there is no way he has 18" range to his prince.