วีดีโอ

Jsem rád, že se video líbilo!

Díky moc!

Well, the quality is really quite good, but no, it would not be fair to compare it to iPhone - generally, you could do much more with iPhones, because they can deliver great results in more situations. But fot the really low price, it is really an interesting option... Jan

No, this video covers the "normal" Xiaomi 14T, for the Pro version, see this one: th-cam.com/video/c2fyg5JCpQ8/w-d-xo.html

Dobrý den, ano, to je obecně problém, nebo spíš vlastnost 99 % všech mobilů - clona je fixní, tedy není možné s hloubkou ostrosti pracovat tak jako u normálních foťáků. Jsou modely, kde je možné clonu měnit (např. Xiaomi 14 Ultra), ale to je spíše rarita s mnoha omezeními... Portrétní režimy jen softwarově rozostřují pozadí, tedy nepomohou v tom, co potřebujete... Zdravím, JR

Díky moc, jsem rád, že Vás video bavilo! JR

Thank you! I am glad you liked it... Best, Jan

Good luck with your work! Jan

Thank you! Jan

Hi and thanks! EOR VR Utility can do it - just hit "Export" button and make sure the VR format is set to "3D 180"... Once you upload the file to YT, you will see the "wheel" to change the angle of the view... Best, Jan

@@jan-rybar I must be doing something wrong. The video uploads with no problem, but it's 2D with the two videos shown as two big circles. What are your export settings when you select 3D 180?

Commenting my own question, I just discovered that by tapping the screen when taking a photo, and thus getting the square with orange corners for where to place the focus, you also get an orange sun next to the square. By dragging that sun upwards it's possible to brighten your image "manually". However, it helps only partially and the center of the picture easily becomes too bright while the sides are still shady. And, when taking photos directly in WhatsApp or similar, that brightness adjuster isn't even available.

Dobrý den, díky a ano, tohle video bylo natočeno ještě před tím, než vznikla možnost přepnout to češtiny...

The zve-10 is more centered around video so I'd pick the R50 to instead but i could be wrong

Já si taky nejsem jistý tou velikostí snímače. Mám koupený redmi note 13 pro 5g, stejný snímač jako plus verze. Ale ještě ho máme zabalený na vánoce. Hlavně se bojím toho mediateku... Jinak 14t má krásný displej, vyšší PWM, 36bit proti 30bit. Nevím jestli mám koupit 14t, momentálně mám Xiaomi mi 10t pro a fotky jsou super.

@@petrbajer5478 I am also looking to replace a redmi note 10 pro, which seems to have a sensor of similar dimensions as 14T. Of course no OIS but other than that raw files are very good. Redmi 13 note pro has larger sensor than 14T but (as far as I know) raw files can only be obtained by GCam....Anyway, this is the kind of information photographers want to know...Processed jpegs that are resized and compressed in a youtube video are more or less useless for evaluating the camera of a mobile phone to be used for more serious work

@@kostass8011 no já používám gcam, většinou ale taková aplikace funguje dobře u levnějších mobilu, kde je slušný snímač ale špatný software. Takhle třeba redmi note 7 fotil luxusně. Redmi note 13 pro, nevím jak bude fungovat gcam s mediatekem, vždy je lepší mít se snapdragonem. Být tebou sehnal bych redmi note 13 pro 5g, má snapdragon, stejný snímač Samsung HP3, má vyšší rozlišení 1,5 vs full HD, ale taky vyšší frekvenci PWM 1920hz. Celkově ten displej je lepší, má i optickou stabilizaci. Rozhodně si proti note 10 pro hodně pomůžeš, co jsem tenkrát koukal tak ten displej nebyl moc kvalitní. 14t mi nepřijde že by nějak lépe fotil, hlavně hodně zasahuje software, to byl důvod proč jsem ho nekoupil. Udělá fotku a nějaké místa na fotce hodně zesvětlí, to se mi nelíbí, chci mít fotku co nejvíce podobné realitě. Často fotím i v manuálním režimu, na to je dobrej si pořídit stativ, ale pak člověk dokáže udělat krásné fotky. Já ještě nevím jestli si nenechám mi 10t pro, má skvělý snímač, detaily jsou lepší než na 13t i 14t. Problém je za horšího světla na automat, je tam méně barvy a teploty, ale to používám snapseed aplikaci. Je úžasná, člověk upraví světla, stíny, teplotu, ostrost, strukturu prostě všechno, je bez reklam a bez ztráty kvality fotky. Vyzkoušej třeba se ti bude taky líbit, z nezajímavé tmavé fotky jde udělat opravdu krásná fotka. 🙂

Díky!

Hi and thanks! I am really glad you liked the video... Enjoy your mobile phone! Jan

Hi and thanks! Well, you do not have to buy a subscription, but it is not totally free, you are right. 1. You have to be an owner of a Canon product and fill the serial number of it to download the utility (I am not sure, if any product counts, or it has to be VR connected, I simply forgot...) 2. you can use the free version only up to 2 minutes of video...Jan

@ ah yes the 2 min limit. Thanks for the reminder

Myslím, že by se nic stát nemělo - mobily jsou obecně stavěné na podobné věci jako nárazy atp, tedy běhání neprovede nic... Ale zcela zaručit samozřejmě nemohu... JR

Thanks for letting me know, I am glad it worked! What type of glassed did you use? The anaglyph (blue and red)? Jan

@jan-rybar Yes. Anaglyph, basic ones off ebay. Served well for the last couple of months.

Yes, this could be the case - but on the other hand: we know close to nothing about the Apple's plans for spatial videos. Probably, they want to make them more mainstream... So there could be a space for some external solutions, like the Canon does... Best, Jan

New iphones already use the 2 cameras is has for stereo. However for proper stereo effect the lenses need to have the same distance as human eyes - around 62mm .. which both the Canon 7.8 nor the iphone has. I fear all this spatial video hype will just lead to a lot of dissapointment. The depth is only visible on very close subjects.

Zdravím - já se to vždy takto mezigeneračně trochu bojím srovnávat, protože bych je vážně musel mít vedle sebe v těch samých podmínkách, ale určitě platí, že Xiaomi 13T je opravdu šikovný mobil, tedy chybu jste určitě neudělal (jen tedy 14. generace má lepší ovládání portrétního módu)... Mějte se! JR

@jan-rybar ďakujem. Portréty veľmi často nefotím. Skôr najradšej "dovolenkové zábery", kde chcem mať aj postavy aj okolie, hlavne aby vynikli farby (predpokladám, že režim "vibrant" bude pre mňa. Rozhodla hlavne cena a dizajn. Dizajnovo sa mi oveľa viac páči 13t.

Hi and thanks for the question - I firmly believe that we do not have the full picture yet - there are rumours that Apple will come up with a new cheaper version of Apple Vision Pro next year, so the usage scenarios will be different, and so will the role of Canon in it... Jan

I totally feel that. My lens arrived yesterday, by surprise. For anyone else playing at home. The export settings on the EOS VR Utility seem to match whatever suits your style. The biggest difference I saw was that the 1:1 Spatial export ratio has a resolution of 1180, whereas the 1:1 ratio from an AVP recording has a resolution of 2200, but one is a camera, one is a face, soooo ? If you export as 3D theater then use Final Cut to export it again as a rectangular side by side, it will match the iPhone 1080p resolution and 16:9 ratio. You can also export at 8:9 which will give you the highest resolution, and you can export this in Final Cut at 1920 1:1 (or whatever you want really). 8:9 on a 4K Fine 30fps is probably the best option for the most work? Even if you create these exports, and then use them amongst a timeline made of footage from other devices. I can only sometimes tell any quality difference in the oversampling 4K Fine mode, but given that everything else will be 30FPS, maybe it's best to try to get the most pixels over frames? I don't know, frames are pretty nice. You can also make still photography. I've found exporting this to be a bit left behind. You can use Mike Swanson's Spatial command line tool do some pretty neat things. If you separate the image into left and right JPGs, then you can use spatial to join them together with something like this "./spatial make -i ./picture-left.jpg -i ./picture-right.jpg -o ./picture-exp.heic --cdist 11.8 --hfov 63", add it to your Photo Library and it's ready for viewing on your AVP, it may not be 100% correct, but it at least gets most of the way there. Fuss with it at your own pace. Ah, that might've been a bit too much for a YT comment. Oh well, yolo.

Hi, thank you! It is really very useful that you summed it all up! Let's see what comes out of this all... Just wondering: if you export the recording in to 3D Theater (side by side), what would be the point? Where would you use the footage (apart from, say, a paper Google viewer)? Jan

@@jan-rybar yeah good question. My personal aim would be to make little spatial movies in 16:9. But i think making spatial shorts in 1:1 would be a more optimal path. But we can’t put these anywhere, so it’s all for my own personal education. But i can see maybe in the future someone would be bold enough to make a service for headsets that does something nice. So far all the providers are doubling down on immersive content and it’s filled with pay walls and clunky UI due to the multitude of legacy videos and non uniform standards. I think maybe just some google drive or icloud link tape trading is the best way forward. Kick it old school.

I went outside with my lens and I have realised that you’re going to lose resolution on stabilisation if you are adding movement to your shot. The iPhone spatial video automatically stabilises the footage for you, but also has that iPhone footage colour. I think maybe a sane path forward is to use a gimbal for all spatial capture devices. Use the iPhone for slightly wider/longer shots, and use the lens for close shots. But IDK I’m pretty damn gumby with all of this. Would like an expert to weigh in.