- 5
- 6 315
CxBlaze
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 26 ธ.ค. 2016
Dead Frontier: TN8, Dragon's Maw and Sand Scorcher comparison [No Damage Boost]
-0 Dexterity
The Dragon's Maw is definitely an upgrade from the TN8. Sand Scorcher is still the best flamethrower.
The Dragon's Maw is definitely an upgrade from the TN8. Sand Scorcher is still the best flamethrower.
มุมมอง: 2 305
วีดีโอ
![Dead Frontier: Dragon's Maw [No Damage Boost]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EeVP6zot9eg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Dead Frontier: Dragon's Maw [No Damage Boost]](/img/tr.png)
Dead Frontier: Dragon's Maw [No Damage Boost]
มุมมอง 2478 หลายเดือนก่อน
- 0 Damage boost - 0 Dexterity Damage per hit: 9.5
![Dead Frontier: Marauder 55 [No Damage Boost]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Rrv507s36xk/mqdefault.jpg)
Dead Frontier: Marauder 55 [No Damage Boost]
มุมมอง 1.2K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
- 0 Damage boost - 0 Dexterity Damager Per Hit: 12 Non crit, 60 crit (Marauder 55 has Very High Critical Chance)
![Dead Frontier: Cyclone X-150 [No Damage Boost]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jh0b5U36HcQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Dead Frontier: Cyclone X-150 [No Damage Boost]
มุมมอง 2.2K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
- No damage boost - 0 Dexterity [New] Damage Per Hit: 12 x 9 (Old DPH: 11.50 x 9)
I'd say that if you're primarily grinding, Dragon's Maw still tends to better. Some of the Wasteland Zombies (Black Tendril and Black Bone) as well as the Ashwoods zombies in Raven Ridge have sizeable Fire Damage Resistance which makes them take significantly take less damage from most Flamethrower weapons. Exception to this rule would be either the Cryothrower which does Frost Damage instead of Fire Damage or Dragon's Maw which has 100% Elemental Resistance penetration. Edit: Since Wasteland is still the best area for Grinding, you are able to grind more efficiently over there with Dragon's Maw over Sand Scorcher
Charred Tendrils and Charred Bones gave a 30% Flame resistance which makes a no dmg boost Sand Scorcher deal 11.9 per hit which still higher than maw damage (9.5 per hit) Maw is only "better" than Sand scorcher at RR
@@SrRichter It's actually 35%, not 30%. So it will be dealing 11.05 instead of the normal 17. You're also forgetting a few things: 1. That the 11.05 of SS per hit hits around 4 enemies, while the 9.5 of the Maw hits 5 enemies; and 2: Maw has a faster attack speed at 12(theoretical 20) hits per second vs the SS which has 10(theoretical 15) hits per second. So if we calculate: SS = 11.05 x 4 = 44.2 Damage per tick Maw = 9.5 x 5 = 47.5 Damage per tick Extrapolate that further to DPS and you get: SS = 44.2 x 10(15) = 442(663) DPS Maw = 47.5 x 12(20) = 570(950) DPS So yes, in WL Maw tends to be better.
Sand scorcher is the best
Wild Blez spotted
is it better than GAW?
Yes.
@@cxblaze3697 is it better than commander 10?
Waaaaay better. I'm saving for this beast too. Just 70M more and I can finally buy one.
Nice video, I needed this to decide me for buy the sand scorcher
SS is still much better, damn.
Strongest SMG that I've ever seen 🔥
Nahh raptor is better
This is very high crit
I remember you you bought marauder from me Eakapon555 😊
Hey,wanna collab?😊
Feels like a AA-12 back in the day
I think they shouldve stuck with hip fire with shotguns. It looks like an ar here.
Agreed.
What’s the dps. 11.25 x 20?
11.50 x 9
😮 Nice
LOL Keep it Up Cxblaze!! :)
lel