วีดีโอ

Akkadian Aramaic Canaaen hebrew and syriac dialects from aramaic all this things have their ROOTS in ARABIC langage..........Archeologists and linguists use ARABIC LISSAN AL ARAB to find the meaning of semitic ancient langage.Luxenburf METHOD is an aberration WHY. Because The syriac langage has less than 8000 ETYMON.Aramaic has less than 8 000 etymons,,,,,,,,,biblical hebrew has 8 000 words...............all this ancients langage and dialects need ARABIC for deceifring and getting meanings.........Arabic langage has 170 000 ETYMONS encampassing all semitic langages.....Arabic is new langage but INHERITED ALL the ancient semitic langage

Could you please show the reference where imams are allowed to lie to get converts, or to lie to new converts I Muslim asked me to show proof that imams are allowed to lie to get converts, this would be perfect

Are you beginning to see the problem? When I ask you wich Quran can be trusted as the original, and unchanged Quran? Which one do you trust as the eternal book? Just look at the dates and tell me that Muhammeds perfect preserved words are there. Which quran does your imam say is perfect? And how does he know that. The perfect one that Muhammed ALONE heard... Muhammed couldn't distinguish that quran from the speach of the devil. To Muhammed they both sounded the same. (Didn't you say that the words were so beautiful that only God could have said them? Because Muhammed didnt think so. He thought that the devils words sounded just as good... for 8 whole years before someone made him change his story) That's why Muhammed kept the demonic verses in the quran for 8 years and only took them out when somone else argued with him to prove that they were demonic. Muhammed couldn't recognize the difference without help. That's not a trustworthy prophet. And neither is 30+ variations in Arabic some with more and some with less chapters. We don't have this problem in the Bible. We don't need to abrigate and none of the TRUE prophets are STILL CALLED PROPHETS OR TRUSTWORTHY if they speak lies from the devil as if it was a message from God. Even if the appoligise afterwards. It's a failed test. They would be stoned to death for such a crime. Not made war chief.

But what about the others Qurans? Because there are even more LEGITIMATE ARIBIC QURANS that are all considered unchanged and uncorrupted. 30 official Readers & Transmitters (vs HAFS = 93,263 difference just between the Hafs and the others) * Readers 7 Chosen by Ibn Mujahid (d.936) 1) Nafi' al-Madani (Medina 689-785 AD) 2) lbn Kathir al Makki (Mecca 666-738 AD) 3) Abu 'Amr lbn al-'Ala' (Basra 690-770 AD) 4) lbn Amir ad-Dimashqi (Damascus d. 736 AD) 5) Aasim ibn Abi al-Najud (Kufa 700-745 AD) 6) Hamzah az-Zalyyat (Kufa 696-772 AD) 7) Al-Kisa'i (Kufa 737-805 AD) * Transmitters 14 Chosen by Al-Shatibi (d.1194) Qalun (835AD) Warsh (812 AD) Al-Bazzi (d. 864 AD) Qunbul (d. 904 AD) Al-Duri (d.860AD) Al-Susi (d. 874 AD) Hisham (d. 859 AD) Ibn Dhakwan (d. 857 AD) Shu'bah (d.809AD) Hafs (d. 796 AD) Khalaf (d. 844 AD) Khallad (d. 835 AD) Al-Layth (d. 854AD) Al-Duri (d. 860 AD) * 9 Chosen by al-Jazari (d.1429) 8) Abu Ja'far (Medina - d. 748 AD) 9) Ya'qub al-Yamani (Basra -d. 821 AD) 10) Khalaf (Kufa - d. 844 AD) 'Isa ibn Wardan (d. 777 AD) Ruways (d. 853 AD) Ishaq (d. 899 AD) lbn Jummaz (d. 787 AD) Rawh (d. 849 AD) Idris (d. 905 AD)

IF the Quran is preserved, then where are the ORIGINAL MATN manuscripts? Now take note of what I am going to say, because I'm going to name the EARLIEST ORIGINAL COPPIES of the MATN that are known to exist from THEE Islamic sources. If you can find them you will be celebrated the world round by your brothers. (Or treated worse then an infidel... who can say) But these names should all be well known to you. Where are the manuscripts for: * IbnMasood (111 chapters) * Ubay Ibn Ka'b (116 chapters) * Ali Ibn Talib (Unknown # chapters) * Ibn Abbas (Unknown # chapters) * Uthman's (Unknown # Chapters) Now Uthman burned all of the above other four copies of the original. Burnt all of them except for his own... which were made into seven copies (from wich Two only, were coppied by someone and we dont know who did that work) So that breaks the hadith chain from Uthman. AND, all of Uthmans copies are destroyed or lost. So there is no unbroken chain of transmission in the original text of the quran there. And none of Uthman's writings OR the other 4 witnesses, are available to consult. The seven that came from Uthman were: Ibn Kathir ? 737 AD Meka Nah ( Bacame the Warsh) 785 AD MedinaNah ( Bacame the Warsh) 785 AD Medina Ibn Amir 738 AD Abu Amr 770 AD Asim (became the Hafs) 744 AD Kuta Hamza 772 AD Kuta al-Kisal 804 AD Kuta But wait, what about those seven from uthman and the two copies that survived. One became the Warsh and the other became the Hafs. The Qira'at. So from the oral tradition, of wich there was more then one recitation... while Muhamned was still alive!!! From that oral tradition, after many of the reciters were slain. It was FINALLY written down 100+ years after the prophet dies of poison. Uthman burns the original and all 5 coppies that were sent to 5 different cities (no one bothers to copy them while they are there even though the cities are full of scribes+velum+ink.) Then Uthmans 7 coppies are lost only to have copies of those copies be credited to Asim (became the Hafs) 744 AD Kuta and Nah ( Bacame the Warsh) 785 AD Medina. th-cam.com/video/SpvBGvCaJJA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=_4PvkU4vM-yINPnr

Muslims must ask themselves, is Mohammed REALLY the seal of the prophets? What prophets? The Hebrew prophets who had proven themselves sent by God with His message, to His purpose? Those prophets? Because if you are claiming that Mohammed is one of them then he must be able to demonstrate his credentials and pass the same tests that ALL of the prophets with the tittle "Prophet", to be given the seal of the Almighty. God must approve the message with a sign. As well as other qualifications as I mentioned. If Mohammed wants to be in the line of prophets this is what is required. God created the tests, so that his followers are not decieved. For many will come in their own name testifying about their own experiences and their own beautiful speach te decieve many. So we must test them. Bring out Mohammed's credentials. Take the "Demonic verses" for example... they MUST be part of the evidence that we consider. The WORST outcome would be if Muhammed dragged people to hell for 8 YEARS with his false teachings BEFORE someone else corrected Muhammeds blunder... because all of those who he dragged to hell with his error (lies) would be a witness against his own soul and a warning to all who trusted that Muhammed was true, and not a false prophet. But Muhammed DID continue to preach his demonic verses FOR 8 YEARS!! What amazing prophetic insight...??? How impressive??? Remember that a prophet SHOULD BE ABLE TO tell the difference between a message from God and a message from the devil... so that messages from the Devil are not QUOTED as if they were God's WORDS... That would be the mark of a FALSE prophet... the loudest proof that the prophet was a false one... did muhamned do that?... we all know he did. If Muhammed DID put demonic verses in the quran... did he IMMEDIATELY correct himself? Or did he have to be corrected by somone else? SURLY Muhammed would have recognized his own error... because he was a prophet... but he couldn't tell demon from angel? What kind of a useless prophet can't tell the difference? Who would ever trust such a man to ever speak truth from God. That is the greatest fail he could have failed at. Believe the prophets who can prophesy... and read their books... they still haven't needed to have the obvious pointed out to them. Because they weren't liers and could tell the difference between Jinns and angels. Muhammed didnt even know the tests... And so God endorced THEIR words with REAL miracles. Your Quran is a not eternal if it has abrogations, and part eaten by a goat. How can muslims know that it wasn't just those demonic verses that Muhammed lied about... and it wasn't his whole book? As it stands, it looks like Muhammed spent 8 years STILL not able to tell who's lies he was preaching until a non prophet WHO COULD SEE BETTER THEN MUHAMMED told him about the demonic verses... but that man was not even there to hear Gabriel, and yet muhammed accepted his correction? How is that possible unless muhamned was lying about Gabriel? Mugamned had to have the TRUTH pointed out to him. Mohammed who can't tell his left hand from his right hand. An angel from a demon... obviously Muhammed is no prophet... he is a blind clown. Now, these are not MY prophetic requirements... they are GODS PROOFS that GOD GIVES to put HIS seal of approval on HIS messengers that HE SENDS. This is why the Jews and Christians scoffed at Muhamed in His day. If you were a follower of the God in heaven and read His book you too would know the proofs, and recognize what those proofs are. But instead you take the word of the bandit preacher... who inserts demonic verses and can't tell the difference. How is that following the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob?

@everyone Ten Most common arguments that muslims will repeat till the end of time... assuming that they have scored a point or poked a hole in your faith... no matter how many times you repeat your answer... 1. The Trinity is Polytheism: Fallacy: The Islamic critique often argues that the Christian doctrine of the Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is a form of polytheism, contradicting the monotheism of true Abrahamic faith. Rebuttal: Christian apologists have historically clarified that the Trinity is not polytheism but a mystery of one God in three persons, co-eternal and consubstantial. The Nicene Creed (325 AD) explicitly affirmed this, stating that Christians believe in "one God" with three distinct persons who share the same divine essence. 2. The Bible is Corrupted (Tahrif): Fallacy: Some Islamic teachings assert that the Bible has been altered or corrupted over time (known as tahrif), making it unreliable compared to the Qur’an. Rebuttal: Christian apologists have historically countered this claim by emphasizing the reliability of the biblical manuscripts. The Dead Sea Scrolls and other ancient manuscripts have shown remarkable consistency over millennia. Additionally, early Islamic sources sometimes acknowledge the integrity of the Bible during Muhammad's time, complicating later claims of corruption. 3. Jesus is Not Divine: Fallacy: Islam teaches that Jesus (Isa) is a prophet, but not divine, rejecting the Christian belief in the divinity of Christ. Rebuttal: Christian apologists point to biblical passages where Jesus is worshiped (e.g., John 1:1, John 20:28, and Colossians 2:9), asserting that the New Testament consistently presents Jesus as God incarnate. Early church councils, such as the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD), affirmed Christ's dual nature as fully God and fully man. 4. Jesus Did Not Die on the Cross: Fallacy: The Qur’an (Surah 4:157) claims that Jesus was not crucified, but that it was made to appear so, rejecting the central Christian belief in the crucifixion and resurrection. Rebuttal: Christian apologists have pointed to both biblical and extra-biblical sources (e.g., Josephus, Tacitus) that affirm the historical reality of Jesus' crucifixion. The resurrection is defended as a historical event based on eyewitness testimony recorded in the Gospels. 5. Muhammad is Prophesied in the Bible: Fallacy: Some Islamic scholars claim that the Bible predicts the coming of Muhammad, often citing passages like Deuteronomy 18:18 or John 14:16. Rebuttal: Christian apologists argue that these passages do not refer to Muhammad but to Jesus or the Holy Spirit. Deuteronomy 18:18 is seen as a prophecy fulfilled in Christ, while John 14:16 refers to the Holy Spirit, the "Comforter" or "Advocate," not another prophet. 6. The Bible Has Been Abrogated by the Qur’an: Fallacy: Some Muslims believe that the Qur’an, as the final revelation, abrogates or supersedes the Bible, making the earlier scriptures obsolete. Rebuttal: Christian apologists assert that God's word, as revealed in the Bible, is eternal and unchanging. They argue that the message of the Gospel is final and sufficient for salvation, as affirmed by scriptures like Hebrews 1:1-2, which speaks of God’s final revelation through His Son, Jesus Christ. 7. Christianity is Based on Paul, Not Jesus: Fallacy: A common Islamic critique is that Christianity was corrupted by Paul, who supposedly deviated from the original teachings of Jesus. Rebuttal: Christian apologists respond by showing that Paul’s teachings are consistent with those of Jesus, as reflected in the Gospels. They also point out that the early church, including those who knew Jesus personally, accepted Paul as an apostle and acknowledged his writings as authoritative scripture. 8. The Concept of Original Sin is Unjust: Fallacy: Islam rejects the doctrine of original sin, arguing that it is unjust to hold all of humanity accountable for the sin of Adam and Eve. Rebuttal: Christian apologists explain that original sin refers to the fallen state of humanity, not to personal guilt for Adam’s sin. They argue that this doctrine highlights the need for redemption through Jesus Christ, who offers salvation to all through His sacrifice. 9. Christianity is Idolatrous: Fallacy: Some Islamic critiques accuse Christianity of idolatry, particularly regarding the veneration of the cross, saints, and icons. Rebuttal: Christian apologists clarify that veneration of the cross and saints is not idolatry but a way of honoring the instruments and examples of God's grace. Worship is directed to God alone, and the use of icons or images is meant to inspire faith, not to replace God. 10. Christianity Teaches a False Atonement: Fallacy: Islam teaches that each person is responsible for their own deeds, rejecting the idea that one person's sacrifice (Jesus) can atone for the sins of others. Rebuttal: Christian apologists defend the doctrine of atonement by pointing to the sacrificial system in the Old Testament, which prefigures Christ’s ultimate sacrifice. They argue that Jesus’ atonement is an act of divine love and justice, fulfilling the law and providing a way for humanity to be reconciled with God. Conclusion These fallacies are rooted in fundamental differences between Islamic and Christian theology. Christian apologists have historically addressed these critiques by clarifying theological doctrines, appealing to scriptural and historical evidence, and emphasizing the continuity and coherence of the Christian faith from its inception to the present day.

I will be reading this

Quran is not from a person, but its a group work under some RULER, its clear how it has a global aim, how it favors one group over others, all laws and regulations for people. So I think the book we have now its the work done very later than the period of so called muhammed, well may be after some kind of Arab revolution of monotheistic faith which could had been started by a single person in Mecca, whose history was obscure and later created by stories and a lot of assumptions as per some peoples own fantasies. The later group was split and each claim that single person to be related to their clan in some way or other and fight among themselves.

In some languages an 'H' sound is written as a 'b' (gaelic ??) So, is Bsem a short form of Hashem?

Ibn Tabari is not an Arab! 😂 That might explain why he doesn't have a strong Arabic vocabulary. lmfao

Kimchi is nasty, idk what they eat in Croatia, Lions and bears?

I think you say what you need to so as to explain it to the stupid people...thanx, God bless! Oh, and I agree with you CP!

I can't believe it.. This religion is so fake! Everything fake!

muslms=mushlmana (siriac jewsh group )

This is totaly nonsense bro.

You are not forgotten,never despise the day's of small beginnings.

We are sharing your beautiful voice and its going to grow Murad.

Any of these research personal with proper education from a regular University?

Masjid al haram made in 690s says rock inscription

the picture with the aramaic texts isnt the quran though

May Allah guide the seekers of the truth to the right path. Ameen.

Shlomo❤

Thomas Alexander is the best analyst of Islamic origins.

This presentation is from 2 years ago. It shows that Christian support for Israel was 64%. What happened in those 2 years that switched support to Palestine, against Israel?

Excellent ❤

I love this becauce I strongly belive this will bring peace to the world. - amen -

Is there anything positive in Islam? I can't find anything. It looks like it comes straight from hell.

Most muslims want to implement Sharia when they get the upper hand.

Jesus said that too that he's the seal of prophets for the children of Israel

I read through the whole of Surah 56 the message is very biblical in nature. However the bits about the eternals you in 56:17 and Houri changes the context drastically.

So Ur debunking Christians because basmala Christians use that before islam

Thank you Dr. Jay. So the manuscripts burnt by Uthman is more of Aramaic Bible scripture . He inserted a b.s story with himself as the imaginary hero named Muhammed. What a tragedy.

This idea of “one in unity” is absolutely wrong. At least In Hebrew. I really don’t know where this idea came from. Never heard before, now its everywhere. Echad is one. Just one. Like 1. One in one two three.. one is 1, two is 2 and three is 3. Like in genesis 42:11 we are sons of echad (one) man.

Why don't these Muslims contact their Sheik's. God told Elijah to go and invite the prophets of Jezebels false God to a trial by fire. Why would not Allah send one sheikh or one scholar to shut down CP if he is speaking lies against Allah and his prophet the best of mankind Mohammad? I know my God would send someone to shutdown a TH-cam influencer that was bragging and telling lies.

It is crazy that no Muslim can see the hypocrisy of the man they call their prophet. They can't see how the Jews came and tricked him into showing how uneducated and ungodly he was. His own companions accused him of not only being a thief but also a dirty person. Even in his verse he proved he wasn't a prophet. It is not for a prophet to do, the thing that I done. His wives even made accusations against him. The wife that was trying to show him how wrong it was to say a man can beat his wife. Giving violent men a verse to beat their wives. When the man and his beat wife came for the prophet to say what was just. The prophets own wife told him. Look how her skin is greener than her clothes and the prophet sided with the man. His wife said a non believing woman has never suffered as much. Then another wife said she is jealous of all the women bringing their underwear to the prophet. Then to consummate his marriage to a 9 year old girl. No prophet would do these things. No prophet should never have any of these things said about them.

Christians: islam is a joke Also Christians: fossils were placed here by satan

Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household” (Matthew 10:34-36).

Why is CP so vulgar?

Bro don't lie you copying from the Bible 😂😂

OH Islam is a Joke 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

WHERE ARE YOU BROTHER

Thanks for posting this...cant watch it on rumble cause it's sucks high data and with my limited data it's impossible to watch it.... God bless 😊🙏

th-cam.com/video/gKvRY-b0yts/w-d-xo.html

How I earnestly wish that there is now an original ARAMAIC GOSPEL because I am dying inside to read it. I hope there is a translation in English. It's hard to read it in its original form in Aramaic. I don't know that language. I think Aramaic is much harder to read than Arabic. I believe that this Gospel is a book of spiritual guidance from God. Unlike the 4 make-believe gospels, their contents are purely biographies of Prophet jESUs (pbuh) but with a huge hole in the accounts of his life covering the primetime of his age. From what museum or library can we find the original ARAMAIC GOSPEL? Is there any original manuscript for it? I am urging Jay Smith and his cohorts to produce that book as soon as possible so that Muslims and Christians alike will be enlightened. -05-28-23

th-cam.com/video/VnFp-AlABwI/w-d-xo.html

Stop this please 🥺

Did Al Fadi take it down on his channel? Couldn't find it there

Which people are known as donkeys ? No one can challenge the Christian Prince.

You have to add the story of the sleeping seven boys who have slept for 309 years It’s a Christian syriac story and Mohamed took it in the Quran 😂