วีดีโอ

this is stupid and unfounded

@@michaelriggs325 Only a religious zealot or an anti-religious zealot would post this.

A good question, indeed. Richard Dawkins did a documentary about Darwin about 10 years ago, and at one point he says, "I'm an ape, an African ape, I'm proud of being an African ape".

Dont know why people are so stubborn and stupid LOL. I have no problem in going to Africa LOL but it's cool where we are. We evolved and adapted for a reason.

I believe your reference from that book of fiction does not over ride science and facts. There are 22 circumstantial incidents that the Bible has alleged happen from the “parting of the Red Sea” to “the great flood” as science has proven beyond a shred of all doubt that not only did NONE of these incidences ever happen through any point and time that the plausibility of it even being possible cannot exist due to the fact that the radical exaggerations of the Bible performing such “acts of god” have never visibly been witnessed with credible accounts forming documented. Everything reference in the Bible is written in the manner of a presumed “I heard this happened”. They estimate that the Bible was a conscription of information that was only compiled by a dozen or less human beings.

In the words of Stephen Hawking “People who are not smart enough to understand science adhere to the simplicity of religion. Science makes you think, otherwise religion is simply told to you. The incompetent who cannot think resort to religion.”

@@greenmonkey7305 100% agree.

no you wont cause your a bitch

Neanderthal-Homo sapiens interbreeding Neanderthals are known to contribute up to 1-4% of the genomes of non-African modern humans, depending on what region of the word your ancestors come from, and modern humans who lived about 40,000 years ago have been found to have up to 6-9% Neanderthal DNA (Fu et al., 2015). Because Neanderthals likely evolve outside of Africa (no Neanderthal fossils have been found in Africa to date) it was thought that there would be no trace of Neanderthal DNA in African modern humans. However, a study in 2020 demonstrated that there is Neanderthal DNA in all African Homo sapiens (Chen at el., 2020). This is a good indicator of how human migration out of Africa worked: that Homo sapiens did not leave Africa in one or more major dispersals, but that there was gene flow back and forth over time that brough Neanderthal DNA into Africa.

The journey were the n-words we passed along the way

If you rewind the script, it would all back track to Africa. We are a African species and an African animal like it or not.

Hey is there anyway I can don’t the whole interview/discussion?

@@dmo-ra1655 You are not an animal. Are you really ?

@@Skello.mp3 African black white Asian Japanese Chinese negro Mexican are all social constructs. We are a African species..

@princekoffiofsalem9444 YES !! we are animals phylum chordates we have hair and milk glands We are classified as mammals and in the primate order.

Yes you should come. Choose between Eastern or Southern African countries to visit. You will love it.

You are beautiful, I would date you.

Go to Ivory Coast the country where the mother of Michael Jackson came from. Michael Jackson was there in the 90s.

Okay

Every single life form on earth is not "more or less evolved" than one other. Please stop spreading psuedoscience.

this is stupid

Finally… it took me calling them out, 2 accounts, and 15 minutes for them to grant me the ability to voice my opinion. Injustice to fundamental freedom much.

Now let’s talk about the hate speech of white Americans that are just over looked. Someone over at TH-cam have any answers for me?

You’ve got it backwards. Look at the supposed closest livening relative. The chimpanzees, pale white/pinkish skin, void of the ability to produce melanin. And I find it difficult to believe that early hominids developed bipedal movement 2-3million years ago and never made it out of Africa in this time with this significant development in travel.

No proof.

"Changed" = improved

⁠@@heldinahtmlhell Why do you say “improved”, a change isn’t objectively an overall improvement, it is only an adaptation to the task of surviving somewhere else.

Look at the respective societies of these racial groups.@@AdamWood-dx7xm

You didn't evolve from Peking man. That was a Homo Erectus. Every person you see migrated out of Africa 60,000 years ago.

Peking Man is one of the little branches off Homo Erectus. You didn't evolve from him. And the dating of Peking Man ranges from just 200,000 years (or so) ago to 780,000 years ago.

Religious people are like software programs, they just scroll to the bottom of the terms and agreements list without reading between the fine print first, and click "I accept"

S u dummy. Go back to school

Africa ➡️ Asia ➡️ north america

​@@fridaynight3181nope that was disproven only you monkeys came from Africa 😂

@@fridaynight3181 😂 😂 😂 😂 source : Dawkins

​@@yourewrongabouteverything YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH litteraly its irrefutable all human lifencame from africa but no everyone isnt african theye mixed with neanderthals and evolved into diffrent things so just pick up a book or continued to b3 blinded by bigotry

​@@the_real_tabbynope it was disproven recently

​@@yourewrongabouteverythingNo it hasn't.... In 1987 a groundbreaking study supported British naturalist Charles Darwin's 1871 theory that all humans originated in Africa. American geneticist Rebecca Cann and Mark Stoneking, and New Zealand biochemist Allan Wilson, compared mitochondrial DNA, the unique genetic code passed down from female to female in different populations around the world. They discovered an unbroken line that led to one female living in Africa around 200,000 years ago.

They always have, it’s just that sometimes people forget that certain lives matter, like black ones.

😌😌😌😌😌👌🏿👌🏿👌🏿👌🏿👌🏿

This theory is still the most supported and valid today and has the most evidence backing it up are u being ignorant u commented such a long comment even without researching about it tell me what theory is the leading theory on human orgins

@@adith9327 support does NOT equal validity. As a matter of fact usually support only amounts to people unwilling to bend do to being either indoctrinated or do to the fact that they've fed into a specific brand of dogma and are unwilling to read into the new scientific research. Science is not meant to work in that fashion. And I always write long comments so my point ends up getting made. That way morons like yourself can't come along and try to spaz out with an offended one liner. So the ignorant one here is you. And that's because you're unwilling to change as the science changes. You're basically just as bad as a religious bigot who can't get past something that was common 100yrs ago because it was popular with your congregation. 😂

@@adith9327 the out if Africa theory is no longer valid. Either get with the new science or stop acting like you care about science. Because obviously science is NOT what you're basing you ideas off of.

@@gimmethepinkelephant3685 Is there any new theory on this? According to u? Where did humanity orginated

@@adith9327 one thing that you need to come to grips with is that science is not based on consensus or groupthink. It's the individual that cracks the code and makes the discovery, and not the overall majority. Usually when you get groups of scientists together it causes more friction than anything else, and that's because all the work comes to a stand still and political ideology and dogma takes over. This is why you should never say that "Most Scientists Agree" when you're trying to explain something to someone. It doesn't matter what they all agree on. Most of the time what they all agree on is wrong. Keep in mind that most scientists disagreed with men like Einstein, Tesla, Newton, Galileo, and Hawking. But in the end the overall group of scientists ended up being wrong and the individuals like Hawking were correct and made the major breakthroughs while everyone else tried to call him crazy..... The same standard applies today, and it will always apply when talking about science because the work is never done.