วีดีโอ

Biết sài hết tính năng 16 chưa nữa mà đòi ra 17 vải đạn

Baru ak mo milih in 2...msh bingungggg

Moto❤

Why camera go from 64MP to 50MP on a newer model?

Do you have Instagram?

❤

45W Win?

16 pro camera 48 48 12👈

2 wrong information 1.not gorilla glass it's another type of protection same like vivo used 2. its not aluminum frame its plastic it's only coated in aluminum color

are u sure gorilla glass on 200pro i think it's not

Redmi note 13 pro 👎👎👎👎

1k

point to point comparison in just 4 mins..No Bakwass..Only Kaam ki baat

Bhai channel monetized ho gya kya

❤❤❤❤

like iphone 16 dis like iphone 17

Has the same ammount of ram and half the price. 16 gigs option too for both.

so many wrong information

Thanks for your comparison!

17 is only rumours at the moment so how can you make a comparison

Why is the more weight the better?

Great comparison made.Also do practical outdoor photo shoots to know camera better

you are showing a14 for the a15 so its wrong

Kalah jauh reno 12f

What? 13R has 7 points. Nord 5? Why?

Wrong in formation 1 plus 100v charger

display resulestion😭

I don't see any huge leap compare to the 6 pro I already own. Probably no enough reasons to upgrade to the 7, especially the already good efficiency battery embeded on the 6.

Có bán tại thế giới dđ ko ad

GalT video bnaye hai 32mp p2 m2

Драка мобилок 14 версии😅

Thanks. In hand feel result contradicting to the earlier comparison. Nord 4 likely to be better due to less weight..

Fake xiaomi is costly

Fake

Motorola moto g200 vs OnePlus ace 5 vs realme gt neo 5 se

The Sharp R9 Pro is best described as a camera functionality, given its emphasis on photography. In addition, The Sharp R9 Pro carries a very hefty price tag, and while it boasts some upgrades like an improved camera and a QHD+ display, its choice of processor raises serious concerns about its value proposition, especially at its price point of US$1400. Specifically, the device utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8S Gen 3 chipset. While not a bad processor in itself, it's simply not designed to efficiently drive a QHD+ resolution screen. This combination is a significant mismatch. The 8S Gen 3 is more suited for devices with FHD+ displays, where it can deliver a smooth and power-efficient experience. I thinks they could applied 8 Gen 3 for QHD+ and sell US$1400.

3:09 what's "CONNCEVITY"?

Son lo mismo solo cambiaron de nombres y ya lo poco que tienen de diferencia es mínima

Redmi note 1080 60😅

Claramente el ganador sería 14Tpro porque es una comparación inadecuada, si vas a comparar el Xiaomi 14T pro con un motorola sería el Motorola 50 edge ultra que es el top de Motorola.

totally wrong

Video chesetapudu mobile model phone payina pedute bavuntundi and Pro 1st 2nd Pro+ pedute chusevalaki bavuntundi

Se eu quiser ler eu compro um livro kkkkkkkkk

Better Processor (Elite) and Better Battery is the main reason for selecting OnePlus 13. I always used their odd number series like 3/5/7/9/11 and now 13. Love the phone from begging and a big fan of One Plus. (It doesn't rip off the pocket)

Redmi

Das Edge 50 Neo besitzt nur Gorilla Glas 3 kein Gorilla Glas Victus!! 😉

Vai t2 pro mai headphone jack kaha se aya mere wala Mai to nahi hai 😂😂😂😂

全てのスマホやアイフォーン他よ、❤永遠なれ。

Oled esports display not amoled

Cuando sale el 8500 ultra ?