- 67
- 153 044
Angela Macias
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 16 ธ.ค. 2011
วีดีโอ
From Outline to Rough Draft - Planning and starting your research paper
มุมมอง 6823 ปีที่แล้ว
From Outline to Rough Draft - Planning and starting your research paper
Revising Your Paper: 3 Common Writing Errors
มุมมอง 1044 ปีที่แล้ว
Revising Your Paper: 3 Common Writing Errors
Week 8 Overview Working in Collegial Groups
มุมมอง 614 ปีที่แล้ว
Week 8 Overview Working in Collegial Groups
How to use Weebly to make a web portfolio
มุมมอง 8214 ปีที่แล้ว
How to use Weebly to make a web portfolio
How to use Google Sites to make a web portfolio
มุมมอง 464 ปีที่แล้ว
How to use Google Sites to make a web portfolio
How to use Padlet to make a web portfolio
มุมมอง 1.4K4 ปีที่แล้ว
How to use Padlet to make a web portfolio
Thank you for the help here!
Summary of this video
Absolutely brilliant. Thank you.
This was a great breakdown. Thanks so much.
Love how your on the bridge in the enterprise 😂
I am a graduate student at Arizona State University and I've been exploring the distinctions between research and evaluation within education and I find the topic fascinating. As we all know, research involves systematic inquiry to generate new knowledge or test existing theories; it's the backbone of academic progress. On the other hand, evaluation entails the systematic assessment of the worth, value, or effectiveness of a program, policy, product, or process. While research seeks to answer "why" and "how" questions, evaluation focuses more on "what works" and "what doesn't." Research and evaluation are complementary yet distinct processes, each crucial to advancing our understanding and improving practice in the educational field. I'm eager to hear your thoughts on this topic. How do you perceive the relationship between research and evaluation? Have you encountered any challenges or insights while navigating these realms?
Thank you for your video. It is clear and very informative
Intersecting Axis of Privilege, Power and Domination. Let's not forget Spellingism. :)
Okay so this video totally threw me off. I have been under the impression this whole time that Lev Vygotsky was the originator of Social Constructivist Theory and it was called "Sociocultural Theory." Now according to this video he's got nothing to do with Social Constructivism, lol. I'm taking every TH-cam video I see on this subject with a grain of salt because everyone seems to be mixing up names for things. But yes any help you can give me in clarifying your understanding of things would be appreciated, thank you.
please don't. thank you but you don't understand him even though you have a good heart
Thank you for the good advice
Erikson, not Ericson
Hello im new guy and your new follower 😊can you help me for revising if you interested ☺️☺️
Hi Angella ,Vygotsky doesn't belong to cognitive constructivism he supports the theory of social interaction .Vygotsky is in fact a proponent of socio constructivism like Bandura So check this out and tell me more about it .
I had the same problem. Lev Vygotsky was the main Social Constructivist. Bandura apparently was a social COGNITIVE psychologist, not a constructivist at all. It seems like a lot of people mix these names up and there might not even be one finite "right" answer because a lot of these names were coined after the psychologists who made up the concepts were dead.
Fromm, adorno and the entirety of the Frankfurt institute are historical revisionists. The spin on their narrative is wild but I appreciate the perspective. (Frankfurt was 1920, pre ww2) so that's wrong.
0:26 When someone is hiring, they don't care why you can't, they just know you can't while the other 10,000 applicants can. Our education system serves a single purpose. That purpose is not for the student, but for society and the future employer of the student. if that fish wants to have a life in the greatest civilization that mankind has ever known, it had better learn to climb that tree like the rest of us.
Very well said
how can I download the powerpoint?
Outstanding presentation! thank you
Can we please keep Marxism out of education. Drop the critical theory and go back to critical thinking.
Im from Kenya and liked your review.
how can i reach you?
Excellent; thanks!
very inspring presentation, Thanks soooo much!
Great information, so well organized and summarized. Thank you!
invisible please
Great stuff, thanks, Angela. It's Karl Marx, however, as it's a German name :)
Thank you! Very helpful 🤗
can you please tell me what is bloom taxonomy
Very helpful
Great presentation :) really helpful. Thank you 😊
Hi there How can I start making my professional portfolio?
this was a great summary of learning theories! thank you for posting. I think it would be beneficial for Vgotsky to be included.
Thank you Ms. Angela, that was simple and fruitful.
>"If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree it will spend its whole life believing that it is stupid" So, what Critical Pedagogy proposes is that we bring our criteria down until its upper bound is within the capabilities of all "species" (her metaphor, not mine). This of course means that the previously incapable now find themselves capable within the positive reward structure of the system. But it leaves a large right tail of super-capable people. These super-capable people remain more desirable and atop the credential and remunerative stack. Nothing's been flattened. However, the criteria having been shifted down, the merely capable look at their credential, look at the credential of the super-capable, and observe a textual basis for supposing the operation of a parallel system of unfair, hidden advantages these super-capable, normally-credentialed types benefit from. So no problem has been solved. The same groups sit in the same place on the continuum. And there is a textual basis for dismantlement of the dominant group. It's not hard to see what is broken in Critical Pedagogy which permits it to reframe the assumed problem while perpetuating and perhaps exacerbating it a bit. It is the assumption that a fish and a squirrel are distinguished only by disposition. A fish doesn't have a nature which confines it to water. A fish merely has a disposition to remain in water. A squirrel doesn't have a nature which imparts facility in tree climbing. A squirrel is merely acculturated with a disposition to dart up trees. Were we to instead construct our pedagogy such that it reflects the differing natures of fish and squirrels, there could be useful social, political and economic congress between high-achieving fish and high-achieving squirrels. But this would not accomplish the fundamental, underlying aim of Critical Theory, which is to chop down trees, flood the plains and see to it that the squirrels all drown.
HI mam! Thank you very much for this video. I hope you can answer my question. Are all theories in the field of education learning theories? Thank you very much mam!
very usefully video!!
middle part plz
I love you
Thank you so much! You are great <3
I enjoyed your presentation and found it very informative. I do think that one cannot rely on Connectivism to encompass a comprehensive knowledge base. What is your opinion when considering the massive media bias and censorship that is occurring today? Doesn't that diminish the reliability of the information available?
Great summary!
Wooohoooo! Dr. Macias is the best!
That picture u said is from Einstein, it's not from him.... it's just something ppl attributed to him..
They literally said that in the video...
That was great! Thank you so much! Very helpful!
Thank for this very Informative video, iI have learned a lot on this,
What about connectivism?
thank you dear. I gained from you a lot of concepts. again thanks
nice
th-cam.com/video/FiA-7OkKR5w/w-d-xo.html
Awesome 👌
Could you please further explain how to draw effective diagram or flowchart.