วีดีโอ

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics#Comparisons hotdogs

Bu programlar "Sadece Teknoloji" gibi bir şemsiye isimle yayınlanmalı bence. Çok iyi iş çıkarıyorsunuz. tebrikler....

X. DEFINITIONS MATTER: That which has mass, consists of the curvature of space-time and has an element of motion. While the current definition of space in its simplest form customarily is: "a boundless three-dimensional extent in which objects and events occur and have relative position and direction" As can be seen, since we have redefined Matter in the context of the curvature of space-time, we must also redefine "Space" as well, herein and as best I can, as follows: SPACE: That three dimensional extent in which objects and their events occur, wherein those objects of Matter are they themselves curved space-time, wherein the aforementioned space consists of and emerges via the unfolding of that Matter into various volumes and densities of Space by way of opportunistic rates of motion of Matter. In it's simpler form: SPACE: Unfolded Matter, emergent from rates of motion. That's it and if I come up with a better definition or if someone else would like a try in the context of CIG Theory, please have a go at it. In this manner, a particle can become spatial and go through both slits in the double slit experiment. CIG has redefined Matter and Space

III. HUBBLE TENSION "The fact that the present measure of the expansion rate significantly exceeds the prediction is a now decade-long problem called “The Hubble Tension .” The most exciting possibility is that the Tension is a clue about something we are missing in our understanding of the COSMOS." It is believed that CIG Theory is that missing component. It just has to be Mr. Wilson. With great Scientific fanfare, CIG Theory explains and resolves the Hubble Tension issue. Tossing out the Scientific Method, relegating actual knowledge to the Kindergarten Room - perhaps even Romper Room, there is so much FAITH in CIG Theory that we just BELIEVE it is the solution. Approach the TENSION from recognizing that the Red Shift Anomalies of Halton Arp introduce their own expansion rates as each star (Galaxy and/or even ATOM) is its own BIG BANG, and this through the history of the BANG BANG BURRITO (Our Local Taco Joint) up until now. MTS is the basic equation. Great Tacos! Good Grief. There was more Mass & more Matter and less Space at the time of the CMB (WMAP, Planck) Opaque wall. The rate of expansion was less since there existed a royally tight, profound and solid curvature, gravitationally sound, a ball of matter. As such, the rate of expansion was limited due to the gravitational effects on light, essentially limiting it's rate and quantity of motion, and thus the spatial expansion rate (Unfolded Matter to Space per CIG Theory) , and to repeat, since the tight matter ball (CMB) limited it's escape velocity and most importantly, quantity of light escaped, that same light matter which turns into Space - the long long longest wavelength Dark Energy or Cosmological Non-Constant. Hubble and the confirming JWST are looking at a Universe much more current, not as tight as the CMB, and thus the escape and quantity of light leads to a faster Spatial environment. In this manner CIG Theory explains the Hubble Tension. The same Physics that explains DESI which we will now explore. Thanks to CIG Theory, you can relax now.

IV. WEAKENING DARK ENERGY and DESI adjective 1.of, from, or characteristic of India, Pakistan, or Bangladesh."Priyanka is a true desi girl at heart 2.unadulterated or pure."desi ghee" noun * a person of South Asian birth or descent who lives abroad."the crowd was fantastic, full of desis, we felt like we were playing in India OR The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) is a scientific research instrument for conducting spectrographic astronomical surveys of distant galaxies: ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_survey ) ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxies ) Its main components are a focal plane containing 5,000 fiber-positioning robots, and a bank of spectrographs which are fed by the fibers. The instrument enables an experiment to probe the expansion history of the universe: (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrograph (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe) and the mysterious physics of dark energy: (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy). It's results indicate that: "We’re also seeing some potentially interesting differences that could indicate that dark energy is evolving over time." A simple note "Everything is evolving over time" . "Time is evolving over Time". Could your DESI data confirm that the stellar entities that are releasing the most ENERGY are also the entities that have the greatest RED SHIFT? Normalized one to the other to an even spatial background field (i.e. isolated and corrected to remove RED SHIFT expansions from other foreground and background "OTHER RED SHIFTS", such that one is only seeing the Red Shift of that specific stellar entity alone. And that the isolated RED SHIFT correlates to the greatest energy release (released from the entity into Space, not contained and not released) (actually not into Space but a creation of Matter to Space) is proportional to the greatest expansion. And this correlates to an expansion (creation of Space from Matter) ENERGY to SPACE based on ENERGY. And does this align in any way with the CUPI as calculated in the book "I Have Become Space" ? In other words, please use your data to confirm CIG Theory. It's right there. CIG Theory is the fundamental explanation for the data you are seeing. Please investigate. In CIG Theory, E=MC2 interprets "E" as new Volumes (SPACE ITSELF). Thank you kindly. Excellent - thank you so so much. Maybe, and a theoretical maybe at that, with of curse CIG Theory in mind, and to further vindicate Halton Arp, and with the Cosmological Non-constant in mind, and to offer that Albert E. has gotten a final word over Neil's B., the following could be considered: According to CIG Theory, the most Dark Energy will be created at a time when the most Energy (light motion of matter) is being released, actually the creation of Space from Matter (not Space from Space as is the current discussions among Cosmologists). So, a slowing over time of Dark Energy will be evident when that light in the Universe has already become Space and as such there is little light leftover to become more Space. This will be gradual. I am trying to explain in the context of CIG Theory why you are seeing the slowing promulgation, the weakening of Dark Energy over time, since there is less light Matter to turn into Dark Energy (Space). In the EMS the Dark Energy wavelength will be very very long, shorter for Dark Matter, still shorter for Visible Light, and shortest for Black Holes, the full curvature of Spacetime. Please look at CIG Theory in the context of DESI team findings of a weaker Dark Energy, of Dr. Mariangela Lisanti's Dark Matter waves, of Halton Arp's Red Shift Anomalies, of the Measurement Problem, and of the Vacuum Catastrophe. So, the greatest expansion (Hubble Non-Constant) will take place when there exists the most light in the Universe and when there is no light left, the expansion of Space will stop. The Hubble Tension can be explained away as in the early Universe there existed a propensity for less light to escape and become the long long longest wavelength Dark Energy. Then at a later time, the light was much more pronounced, and the fast moving matter unfolded to become the Dark Energy. That Energy is weakening as the light fades. It simply means that within the grand MTS equation, more matter has already turned into "S" on that side of the Equation. As such, there is less 'M" leftover to turn into additional "S", so Dark Energy weakens. Within the MTS equation we have all wavelengths, from the shortest (Black Hole) to the longest (Dark Energy). Dark Matter then is a wavelength not as long as Dark Energy. But CIG Theory still needs a more direct link to the reality of the electromagnetic spectrum in the context that the spectrum proceeds at "c". Are we sure it always proceeds at "c"? Maxwell made this link yes, but in CIG, the "c" portion of the spectrum is reserved for Dark Energy, while the lesser rates = more solid forms of matter. In this manner Quantum Gravity appears resolved in CIG. But this aspect of melting CIG into the spectrum because of the consistency of the spectrum to travel at "c" confuses me. Any help would be appreciated. CIG resolves so many quantum and cosmological conundrums. We know it is correct. While inherent to CIG is the link between Dark Matter and Dark Energy, the direct reference to Dark Matter "waves" was absorbed from Dr. Lisanti's Simon Foundation video on Dark Matter. The offering then is that we extend the wavelength to Dark Energy which is much much longer than even Dark Matter. The MTS equation links Black Holes to Dark Energy. As stated above though, that issue of "c" as applied to the spectrum bothers me. HELP! Once again: The intent herein is to provide a new definition of space consistent with the CIG Theory, which has already offered a new definition of Matter. That new definition of Matter is: That which has mass, consists of the curvature of space-time and has an element of motion.While the current definition of space in its simplest form customarily is:"a boundless three-dimensional extent in which objects and events occur and have relative position and direction". As can be seen, since we have redefined Matter in the context of the curvature of space-time, we must also redefine "Space" as well, herein and as best I can, as follows: Space is that three dimensional extent in which objects and their events occur, wherein those objects of Matter are they themselves curved space-time, wherein the aforementioned space consists of and emerges via the unfolding of that Matter into various volumes and densities of Space by way of opportunistic rates of motion of Matter. In it's simpler form, Space is unfolded Matter, emergent from rates of motion. That's it and if I come up with a better definition or if someone else would like a try in the context of CIG Theory, please have a go at it. In this manner, a particle can become spatial and go through both slits in the double slit experiment. The Red Shift Cosmological data already confirms CIG Theory. The Double Slit experiments already confirms CIG Theory. A boiling pot of water and the Ideal Gas Law confirms CIG Theory. CIG Theory confirms CIG Theory. Approach DESI from the perspective of CIG Theory. Weak, or rather "Sleepy Dark Energy".

.#zZz#.⚡⬆️⬇️💀☢☣ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС КОСМОЛОГИИ ЗЕМЛИ - ОСНОВАН НА ПОДТВЕРЖДЕНИИ ЯДЕРНОГО СЧЁТА ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ СИНТЕЗА ЗЕМЛИ!.Т.Е.САМО ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ЯДЕРНОГО СЧЁТА ЭП/ИЗЛУЧЕНИЯ ДЕЛЕНИЯ - НЕ МОЖЕТ ЯВЛЯТЬСЯ ОСНОВАНИЕМ ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОГО ПОДТВЕРЖДЕНИЯ,СВЯЗИ ЯДЕРНОГО СЧЁТА ЭП/МАТЕРИИ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ И ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОЙ/ЯДЕРНОЙ КОСМОЛОГИИ ЗЕМЛИ ЭП!.НО ДЕЛО В ТОМ,ЧТО ИСКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНО ПО ЯДЕРНЫМ СИСТЕМАМ/ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ СИНТЕЗА ЗЕМЛИ СЧЁТА - ОЗВУЧЕННЫЙ/ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫЙ/ЯДЕРНЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС КОСМОЛОГИИ ЗЕМЛИ/СЧЁТА,ПО ЗАКРЫТИЮ ЯДРА/НАЛОЖЕНИЯ СЧЁТА ЗЕМЛИ/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ МАТЕРИИ - СТАНОВИТСЯ ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫМ/ЯДЕРНЫМ ПРОЦЕССОМ КОСМОЛОГИИ СЧЁТА ВВОДНОГО МЕХАНИЗМА DARK CODE MATTER#💀💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥Т.Е.ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫМ/ЯДЕРНЫМ ОБОСНОВАНИЕМ И ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕМ КОСМОЛОГИИ/ЗЕМЛИ,КАК ЯДЕРНЫЙ СЧЁТ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ МАТЕРИИ - ЭТО ЕДИНСТВЕННЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС ЯДЕРНОГО ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ,ПО ЯДЕРНОМУ/НЕЙТРИННОМУ СИНТЕЗУ ВВОДА ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЯДРА/ЗЕМЛИ,ПО КОДОВОМУ/ГРАВИТАЦИОННОМУ НЕЙТРИНО💀💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥СО ВСЕМИ СИСТЕМАМИ ЯДЕРНОГО ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЯ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ СИНТЕЗА ПЛАНЕТ/ВВОДА,И ТЯЖЁЛОГО/К.Ц.П.ЭП.Д.М.К./💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥ИМЕННО ПОЭТОМУ,Я НЕОДНОКРАТНО ПИСАЛ,ЧТО ЖИЗНЬ НА ЗЕМЛЕ НИКОГДА НЕ МОГЛА ПРОИЗОЙТИ ВВИДУ НЕКИХ УСЛОВИЙ???СРЕДЫ???ТЕМПЕРАТУРЫ???НАЛИЧИИ МИКРООРГАНИЗМОВ И СВЯЗЕЙ ГАЗОВОГО/МОЛЛЕКУЛЯРНОГО СИНТЕЗА ВОЗМОЖНЕСТЕЙ САМИХ УСЛОВИЙ МОМЕНТА???!.ДОЛЖЕН БЫЛ ПРОИЗОЙТИ ПРОЦЕСС ЯДЕРНОГО ЗАКРЫТИЯ СИСТЕМ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ ТРАНСПОРТА,ПО ЯДЕРНОМУ ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЮ САМОГО ЗАКРЫТИЯ ГАЗА/МАТЕРИИ ВНУТРЕННЕГО СИНТЕЗА - КАК ЯДЕРНОЕ СОХРАНЕНИЕ МОЛЛЕКУЛЯРНО/КИНЕТИЧЕСКОГО НАБОРА АТОМНОГО КОМПЛЕКСА ЭП,И ВНЕШНЕГО СИНТЕЗА РАЗДЕЛЕНИЯ ЯДЕРНОГО/НЕЙТРИННОГО СИНТЕЗА ЯДРА ЗЕМЛИ ПОДТВЕРЖДЕНИЯ,ПО СОХРАНЕНИЮ СИСТЕМ ЯДЕРНОГО/СУММАРНОГО УЧАСТИЯ В ПРОЦЕССАХ СИНТЕЗА УЧАСТИЯ КОДОВОГО КОСМОСА/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ КОНТРОЛЯ!.💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥ПОЭТОМУ КОДОВОЕ/ЯДЕРНОЕ/КОНВЕКЦ.ИЗЛУЧЕНИЕ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ СИНТЕЗА ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ - ЯВЛЯЕТСЯ ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫМ/ЯДЕРНЫМ ЗАКРЫТИЕМ СЧЁТА НАЛОЖЕНИЯ ЗЕМЛИ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ,В ПРОЦЕССАХ ЕЁ КОСМОЛОГИИ СЧЁТА DARK CODE MATTER#💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥⚫⚫⚫⚫💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡⚡⚡

Like the hypothesis. The only thing is adding another force always a little "eh" in physics. Especially a force similar to gravity and indistinguishable and we don't even know if gravity is a force and not an aspect of geometry. That's where this gets difficult but still a hypothesis to look into.

Let me guess: It's neutrinos.

No audio =/

if I might ask, what is the full expression of the Schwarzian derivative along the bottom of the screen at 1:00:28 ?

Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "the essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. This is illustrated in a common 2 axis relativity graph with velocity on the horizontal line and dilation on the vertical. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason. Wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. According to Einstein's math, the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for the greatest mystery in science, the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter) the missing mass is dilated mass. According to Einstein's math, galaxies with very, very low mass would not contain dilated mass because they do not have enough mass at the center to achieve relativistic velocities. This has recently been confirmed with 5 very low mass galaxies, all having normal star rotation rates. The shape of a galaxy is common in nature. From atoms to our solar system, the overwhelming majority of the mass is in the center. The same must be true for galaxies. Where there is mass there is energy. The night sky should be lit up from the galactic center but it isn't. The modern explanation for this is because gravitational forces there are so strong that not even light can escape. Einstein's answer would be because the mass there is dilated relative to an Earthbound observer. The main reason why we cannot see light from the galactic center is because there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute it to, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. Or more precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid.

Remarkable introduction xD

Look no further for dark matter… This is new physics, it shows hidden variables to study gravity, with a rational demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter. th-cam.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/w-d-xo.html

sacré parcours depuis la Martinière 😉

Listening. Am doing a master of science in particle and nuclear physics. Working on my research and your videos are really helping me

Look no further for dark matter… This is new physics, it shows hidden variables to study gravity, with a rational demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter. th-cam.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/w-d-xo.html

Kevin was my TA for Physics 7C. I was an annoying student who came to all office hours. He was a good TA

QM classicalized in 2010: Juliana Mortenson website Forgotten Physics uncovers the ‘hidden variables ‘ and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Planck, Einstein, Debroglie,Bohr etc. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for better physics. G calculated from first principles- the hydrogen atom- in 2002. SR wrong due to reference frame mixing and bad math.

SHiP does not cost 400-500M dollars. The original proposal was 175 dollars, and can be implemented in existing locations for less than 50 M dollars.

the problem is you completely ignore the time dilation. if you detect the Hawking radiation the black hole is not the black hole actually radiating in that moment but in the past. Time slows down near the horizon. if you deal with entropy but ignore time you have problem

This is a rational demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter th-cam.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/w-d-xo.html

This is a rational demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter th-cam.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/w-d-xo.html

Its Melanin… ( SOL ) ..Don’t talk around it…don’t turn down the Volume… don’t deny it ..Last But not Least….Don’t…Dont Mess with it… or you will feel it’s Wrath

MUON break Spacetime symmetry equal Dark Matter/GRAVITATIONAL Field , Equal Time Dilation,As Gauge symmetry equal LEPTON/BOSON field and when this symmetry is Scaled equal BARYON FERMION matter field.

Genio Eugenio

14:00 island conjecture 24:25 replica wormholes

完全听不懂😭

i am mental after watching it

Wheres part 1?

Hello. Is it possible to find this video with sound somewhere? Best regards, Henrik

I couldn't hear any sound. Is there something special I need to do to get the sound on this video?

No audio

Aha! In this the paper I linked in my previous comment, t'Hooft predicts that quantum computers wno't work. BUT - IBM build a 7-bit quantum computer a few years ago that successfully used Schor's algorithm to factor the number 15. Obviously that isn't "outperforming" a classical computer, but it was a successful execution of a quantum algorithm. That seems to leave t'Hooft in hot water.

So, the basic thrust of the argument here is that "it's all deterministic after all." Ok - fair enough. Where does the interference come from? If it's all deterministic, then the electron/photon in the double slit experiment takes only one path. We know how that should look, and it's NOT HOW IT LOOKS.

Oh man; this is just killing me. I've searched up the ArXiV papers listed on the screen at 1:04:30. I'm reading this one: arxiv.org/pdf/1112.1811.pdf I'm on page 10, and I just CAN'T swallow it. Dr. t'Hooft is absolutely implying that Bob and Alice's choises of what to measure in the Bell experiment is PRE-DETERMINED. Granted, I have't read his last section yet, where ie promises to "discuss super-determinism" in detail. But it's hard at this point to see how he's going to dodge that bullet.

I've been reading and watching a lot of t'Hooft the last few days. As tantalizing as some of his ideas are, I just can't follow him into support for super-determinism. It's just too patently obvious to me that I have free will, for one thing. But, even more important, I HAVE SELF-AWARENESS, and science provides no path whatsoever toward explaining that. So we're *missing something*. Something about our model is flawed. A lot of Dr. t'Hooft's ideas may be essentially correct, but without including something that's actually there that brings the operation of our minds into reality. I don't know. But we do have free will - of that I'm convinced.

50:50 - What is a "non-locally corellated vacuum fluctuation" if it's neither non-local nor retrocausal?

This was a great lecture. But... one thing we all need to remember is that nowhere have we been promised that the universe will be deterministic. In fact, we've been given "indicators" (our own "personally felt" self-awareness and free will) that it is NOT. If the world is deterministic, there there can be no free will. And yet there is. Dr. t'Hooft seems very, very focused on insisting that a deterministic, exact solution be achievable. I don't thin it goes without saying that it is, at all.

This is really quite fascinating. I think Dr. t'Hooft is one of the most knowledgeable people out there regarding the conceptual foundations of quantum theory. He's clearly crawled down into the innards of the stuff and spent a ton of time digging things up. It's so great that interesting material like this is... just "out there." For us to absorb and benefit from. What a great world we live in.

Audio is terrible.

Thank you for putting the lectures here for the rest of us. But the audio is really bad. Please invest in a clip-on mic for the speakers. It will make these videos watchable. Thank you.