วีดีโอ

Yup.

X 5 isn't actually doable as that would require 110 bot slots. X 4 would require 88 bot slots, and 10 slots would be for players. very few spectator slots for robots. Also it would be very much more laggy than X 3.

@wizardii4961 heheheheheheheheh

How would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list and why?

@@Loner098 D+ It's not quite as bad as the int, but it's rather, dull spams bleed and has a boss that's just a DPS race.

Both my computer and Potato's servers are quite strong.

It's public. It's potato mvm testing. Though do note it is a testing server. Make sure there's some available for testers.

Ok thanks

We had tested the last wave before and the server didn't crash. I don't think there was a huge number of projectiles on that wave. The main part that causes performance issues is the 50 homing soldiers at once.

This was on Potato MvM Testing.

Yeah, And the final wave had considerably more.

Maybe...? But we just fought it a few days ago.

Alright. Making stuff for MvM is quite doable, once you learn it.

Yeah that would be highly illegal. Especially cus they aim lead.

That's quite a statement because adding Engineer-bots to pick up the pacing didn't seem to work for Program Seppuku on the Teien, though the Engineer-bots simply kept spawning too late and didn't fix of the pacing for that mission should the average team be pushed back. Anyways, how would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list?

@@Loner098 Well, I don't know the specifics of that mission, but I have tried to make an expert on Casino. It was called Die and eventually turned into Death's Door on Derelict. Anyways. C-. Alright final wave. Pacing dies when pushed.

@wizardii4961 A TF2 TH-camr by the name of Soggy Flaps has made a review on the Titanium Tank event that does include the specifics of Program Seppuku if you are curious enough to want to know more.

@@Loner098 I've seen it. Though I'd need to do it myself to get the full specifics.

More or less.

Rusty. Plus front isn't exactly easy to snipe on.

With an underwhelming final boss wave, how would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list?

@ I'd say it's a D+. The battalions overuse hurts certain classes as well as the lackluster final wave hurt it.

Ah, that's right. I forgot that Barren currently has a total of *7* missions... Anyways, how would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list?

@@Loner098 C. Like I said, it drags on a little too long, a likely consequence of submission criteria back then.

Yup, sometime you have a super scout moment.

Where would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list and why?

@@Loner098 C+ It's ok.

It probably would be.

How would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list and why?

@@Loner098 C+ as well, but for other reasons. Has some pacing issues, but has a fairly cool boss.

@wizardii4961 Do you think the final boss is a decent enough finale for the mission?

@@Loner098 yes. A little easy for us, but that's because we are good players.

yup.

How do you feel about this mission on an F-to-S tier list and why?

@@Loner098 C+. Alright but nothing special.

Likely vore. Which ain't great. I don't want to subject my viewers to that shit.

Maybe.

I wish I knew. I wanted sound. Tress has good sound design... :(

Yup, just dodge ~100 homing rockets in the air at once.

Ok I guess?

@@wizardii4961 heres something funny the first robot i made the server owner instant made me a worker

I could have dodged all of that.

It's hard when like a quarter of them can lead their shots.

Sorry I was having a wee skill issue.

Soda Popper hype might have helped.

I'm pretty sure you can airblast their rockets, not sure quite how they'd behave cus their guided.

I tried.

I can imagine in an actual game it will be even harder to dodge cus they'd be aiming for like 8-10 different people.

Hard to dodge when there's that many of them who don't know how to aim.

@@wizardii4961Parry, Block, Dodge

yeah, just dodge 5head.

The time will come where I'll have to deal with this.

So, how would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list and why?

@@Loner098 I'd say B or A. It's a strong improvement over the original.

How would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list and why?

@@Loner098 I find it weird to rank, due to how different it is from regular mvm, I'd say B. It's very ambitious, and an interesting idea, but it has very much a bad habit of breaking.

Due to the criticism coming from the design of the map (like how most people complain about the map known as Teien), how would you rank this mission on an F-to-S tier list?

@@Loner098 The map itself isn't the problem It's this mission on this map. I'd provisionally rank it a C.

Derelict Revengeance status I believe. I've played it but don't particularly remember that much of it. Didn't record it.