วีดีโอ

Put a dial indicator on your Ransom rest to make sure it is registering the same each time.

Would absolutely love to see a Laugo Alien on your rest!

~~Seller bellow~~ and this takes fun out of ripping S&B and stac!!

useless video

It looks like you are hitting the top of the trigger. Would it make a difference if you adjusted down to the center of the trigger?

Sell-Yay Bell-Low

Try it at 25yds also

Great video, Mike 😎👍🇺🇸

Do a real test. 25yards

Finally a decent accuracy test. Although the NRA used to go to fifty yards and now use 25 yards

Mine grouped into just over an inch at 25 yards, sandbagged from the bench. They're accurate pistols, especially with ammo they like.

Can you do the 632 model with wadcutters.

9mm sucks with wind fliers. I once did a 100 yard test by hand, 9mm vs 40sw and the 40s held up against the wind much better.

So its a 12MOA gun. Nice

It's interesting to see, but what's the point of such playingfield leveling rest and then NOT measuring the group size of each of the results and reporting those ? Also, there are many different varieties of Aguila 40gr, it would be good to know which of the Aguila rounds were actually used.

I've always been curious about a setup like this that allows for natural recoil. I'm glad to see this one out there. I wish more GubTubers used something like this for gun and ammo reviews because some of them are just horrible shooters and or biased. I would trust more reviews if GunTubers actually used a setup like this. Any fool can manipulate a review to make a gun or ammo to look worse. It's very challenging for a reputable GunTuber to make junk look accurate though.

Also could you compare M&P 9mm gen 1 vs 2.0?

What’s the most accurate sub $1000 dollar pistol that has been clamped up?

Hornady hollow points were vastly more accurate than my Blazer FMJ 9mm through my Ruger PC9 @ 60 yards. The explanation was Hornady is better quality but more because the slug is better balanced maintaining less wobble over distance. 1.5 inch groups vs 8 inch groups. Using 9x scope and average shooting skills. Ammo is very important for accuracy past 20-30 yards.

Oh wow, Kelly Baschand. What a blast from the past.

Eh the beretta did better but not bad for a gun half the price.

I own several different brands of semi-auto pistols, and I’m a big fan of Sig Sauer pistols. I bought my first Beretta 92FS because it was being sold at a sweet price. I honestly didn’t expect much from it. From the very first time that I took it to the range, I was completely amazed at its accuracy, how smooth it was to shoot, and its reliability has been absolutely flawless. I bought it in 1999, and it has never had a single feed problem nor has it had a failure to fire.

The beretta is also more expensive…

Good stuff, but zoom in more often especially when there’s tight groups happening

Please let me know the name of the ammo used on last target

finally, a gun channel that measures mechanical accuracy in a scientific and rigorous way. you should do this for as many common handguns as possible so customers can get actually objective, unbiased data. this channel should be far more popular.

Wish i could afford one of their rests.

Hello sir, can I get the design of the system that is holding the actuator? and which type of actuator have you used ?

This video is amazing for showing the deviations in different ammunition! I knew using good ammo or ammo your gun "likes" was important... but damn!! A full 12" spread on the Remington ammo to hitting the same hole over and over with Barnes. Thank you for this video. Is that the Remington 700 lr? Would love to know the specifics on that gun build.

This video is amazing for showing the deviations in different ammunition! I knew using good ammo or ammo your gun "likes" was important... but damn!! A full 12" spread on the Remington ammo to hitting the same hole over and over with Barnes. Thank you for this video. Is that the Remington 700 lr? Would love to know the specifics on that gun build.

So glad to see someone talk about how guns shoot some ammo better than others. I always try different ammo before carrying so it shoots where I want it to

OUTSTANDING Presentation! I've Been Following Ransom Rest since the 1980's. This Is The Space X of Firearms Accuracy Research. Great Job Done By All, Including The CEO of The Target Stapling Department.

Do you guys ever watch Paul Harrell's channel? ----- Federal's .22 ammo ALWAYS SUCKS ----- IMO IT's the WORST ammo out there -- the only one that has ever worked is the punch ammo.

Very helpful. Thanks so much

By far the best pistol I ever shot was a Sig P229. By best I mean I purchased the Pistol, Took it to straight to the range that was inside the gun shop and was using some Winchester White box and proceeded to group them so tight I thought I was being lucky. No adjustments, nothing. As a pistol should be from the factory.

Very impressive!

They did not have the right grip insert for the 2011, right?

Fiocchi...who'da thunk it?

My baseplate being delivered today, very excited. Going to get my wilson mechanically perfect zero soon. Have 12 different ammos to experiment with to see which one groups the best afterward.

👍 👍 👍 👍

What was the most accurate Glock ever on this channel so far?

Is this done at 100 yard

Very good job, but why do you never use Eley or RWS or Lapua, which are much more regular and accurate ?

While group size is important, so too is the location of the group in relation to the aiming point. Your testing seemed to be quite haphazard with respect to the latter: targets were all over the place, and no record was kept of where the ammunition grouped relative to point of aim.

sounds like a damn battletank going off.

I’m looking forward to testing a variety of ammos in my wilson combat EDCX9 to see what it likes the best. I plan on identifying best range ammo and best defensive ammo for this gun. Ransom rest was recently refurbished and I ordered the base plate today. I also plan to zero the dot at 25 yards and it’s difficult to bench it and hold it at 25yd for a tight group without something like a ransom rest.

The second gun with the optic on it, you can see some movement in the dot as the trigger hits the wall…

In some of those tests you can clearly observe the red dot walking off the original point of aim between shots and as the trigger is being pulled. The reason it’s doing so is irrelevant. If you are testing mechanical accuracy, that is unacceptable. It doesn’t matter why it’s happening. If your goal is to replicate the mechanics of a human firing the gun, a human will (to the best of their ability) correct for a change in point of aim, unlike how you conducted this test. Reset the point of aim to the center of the target after each shot, and if the POA is observably shifting during the trigger pull, find a way to fix it and throw out any data where a shift is observed. The video and camera work itself is great, and the camera view of the sight picture is essential. I love this video and the spirit of your product and the work you’re doing. This is purely constructive criticism and should not be taken as malice.

Interesting but too much banter

The amount of hate the 92fs gets over here is incredible. People asking why you even bought one, why didn't you get a CZ, people looking at you like you are crazy or "was probably really cheap huh?". I like Beretta, but I'm pretty much alone in this. Kinda sick of it already, might just trade it in just to be done with the bs.