วีดีโอ

Paul can't be trusted. Yes, he had a revelation, but so does all who come to Christ. He's not who you think he is!

🔥

Another wonderful episode brothers! I am really looking forward to the Colossians series!!

This was an excellently balanced take on an issue that seems to be always relegated to either-or extremes.

This was an excellently balanced take on an issue that seems to be always relegated to either-or extremes.

🔥🔥🔥

This is so good. Definitely going to be sharing with others.

Great stuff boys!

Brothers you tackled this difficult topic with tremendous grace and wisdom. Thank you for jumping in with both 🐾 feet. It really is an issue that every Christian will face in every church they find themselves in. Agape love to you brothers.

Great episode! I learned a lot, as always! I thank the LORD for you brothers!

Love that you guys are doing video now. Also, you don't have crazy eyes. It's just the placement of your camera combined with the lighting. Put your camera above eye level. But you don't have crazy eyes.

I’ve been listening to you guys for so long, and now I get to SEE you podcast!! This is wonderful brothers!! One of my favorite Christian Podcasts! May the LORD bless your efforts and expose many people on TH-cam to the gospel!!

Are you guys back on the podcast?

We are all children of God. But separated from him by sin. We are accepted back into his kingdom through repentance and saved by grace. But we can always loose our salvation if we sin. And one can have faith and still be in sin. I hope you're not making an argument for once saved always saved.

The comment about sounding Lutheran is on point. When I say stuff like Knox people act like I’m a Lutheran

While playing pretend church; they could better spend the time trying to figure out how to come home to the Apostolic Church Jesus setup on Earth instead of trying to prop up their own man-made sect. That would be the best way to make them make any sense at all.

The way to understand them properly is within the Church that held them and has existed since the Apostles... Orthodoxy

Guys , you gotta start adding time markers in your videos. Y'all do a lot of rambling. Most of us want to go straight to the meat of the matter..

Scripture is man made immoral nonsense and has no authority.

Glad the music's back!

Scots Confession on the Sacraments is based and Calvinpilled, ESPECIALLY for The Lord's Supper.

🤔

Interesting

An awkward suggestion for a podcast would be to record with one sitting on the restroom floor with the door closed while the other holds the mic under the door from the hallway.

'Promo sm'

Ecclesiastes is old testament. Modern Christians aren't under the old covenant. I'm absolutely open to being proven otherwise. 🤘

I think it's important to maintain the distinction between the regulative principle of worship and the normative principle of all of life as those terms have been used by the Reformed historically, i.e., the way worship is regulated is not the same way the rest of life is regulated by scripture. In the RPW, very specific activities are commanded and only those activities are to be done without variation. The normative principle allows for the application of scriptural principles to a whole host of things that the Reformed have historically referred to as indifferent, such as what lawful field of work to enter, what color to paint your house, which grocery store to shop at, etc. The normative principle allows for a range of potential activities as we apply biblical principles. As we seek to obey God's law, use biblical wisdom, and thus please and glorify him, we do so in light of our providential context, which includes our sex, family situation, culture, God-given abilities, weaknesses, interests, etc. Thus, there will be differences in the specific actions resulting from the applications of those principles. Of course, the law of God does not change, and certainly in many ways living according to it looks exactly the same in any context, but sometimes its application does look different depending on one's circumstances. In contrast, the specific activities prescribed for worship are fixed and must always and only be done in every church in every context. There should be no variation in what we do in worship as there is in what godly Christians do in the rest of life.

guys, this episode has blessed me so much. I was really struggling with Lordship Salvation and when looking to myself and my fruit I was questioning my salvation. I had never questioned it before I was lead to study reformed theology. When would I ever be "good enough"? Or on Varsity as you stated. Literally so distraught because I feel like I was just constantly failing and disappointing God even when trying my hardest to see my fruit. Yes you will produce fruit but like you said the fruit isn't the tree. It's such a blessing to be able to hear someone reformed speak of faith in this way because its usually Arminians. This is what He means when he says my yoke is easy and burden is light. Tis so sweet to trust in Jesus.

The trinity does not exist because ALIEN, UNKNOWN to the directly concerned Person: JESUS. He reiterated throughout four gospels to be ONLY IN THE COMPANY OF THE FATHER (who is a spirit), NEVER with two Persons! Thus, we are sure that NO THIRD DIVINE PERSON EXISTS. For example, the following verses are INCOMPATIBLE with the existence of a triune God "I am not ALONE because the Father is with me" or "The Father has not left me ALONE because I always do what pleases Him.". The trinity theory was formulated later to bring together the different currents of thought about Christianity that existed at the time. Its goal was to put peace and uniformity of thought in Christianity - good for the roman empire - NOT to respect the Truth. That theory was negotiated between the different parties until an agreement was reached. That is, the doctrine of the trinity is only a CONVENTIONAL (i.e. false) doctrine issued in a first form by the Nicaea CONVENTION. It was not understood that the gospels disclose just three divine NAMES, not three divine PERSONS! The "Spirit of God" (AKA "Holy Spirit") is simply "God (almighty) who is a spirit", i.e. no "helper-God" person exists. That old conventional doctrine sets out EXTREME nonsense regarding an invented "substance" which is supposed "to form God-Persons"! When you have one "substance" forming three different Persons, it logically ensues that the alleged ONE God can only be that one "substance", not the three Persons. Further, from the gospels you can very easily READ that (A) NO THIRD GOD-PERSON EXISTS: for ex. "those who will believe in me through their word so that they all may be one, as you, FATHER, are in ME, and I in YOU. THEY also may be ONE IN US..." and that (B) THE SON IS NOT ALMIGHTY as the Father: for ex. ("the Father is GREATER than I"). In this time of IRREVERSIBLE DECLINE, only TRUTH can save Christianity: that doctrine should be dismissed.

As usual from non-EFSers, very, very little interaction with verses of Scripture. You presupposed your view.

Early church Christology and the formulation of the orthodox language about Christ and Christology is very interesting. First Constaniople did rule on Christology and that the Word assumed a full human nature. Against Apollonarianism The president of leader of the council of Constaniople, Gregory of Nazianzus', famous statement "What is not assumed is not healed." Also Chalcedon is an affirmation of a particular understanding of Cyril of Alexandria's Christology. He first used one nature language for Jesus Christ against Nestorius in order to affirm that Jesus is only one subject (the Word). There is not the man and the Divine word.

What do you make of this? Too basic? th-cam.com/video/GyyWaFWYJQo/w-d-xo.html

A inquiry from an outsider to your religion: do people who hold to a young earth and a six 24hour day creation because of how they read Genesis also hold that the description of all the events, creatures, places and personages in Revelation must be held to just as concretely?

The Essence-energies distinction, as expounded by Gregory Palamas (which is dogma in EO: the councils of Constantinople 1341, 1347, 1351 & 1368), is in conflict with the classical Latin doctrine of divine simplicity, because the multiplicity of divine energies is posited as uncreated yet really distinct from the divine essence. The title of this video is misleading. The ad intra-ad extra distinction has been the common one in the West, or even rather the Creator-creature distinction.

• Jews(including the Prophets) in the Old Testament did not believe in or teach about a triune godhead. • Two people sharing the same human essence, two human beings. Two people sharing the same Godly essence two Gods • John 1:1c contradicts the Trinity doctrine. The Father is not the Son according to the doctrine • I wouldn’t jump to the conclusion that just because “our” is used in Genesis 1:26, that must mean God is triune! Why not 4-in-1, or 10-in-1 or 100-in-1 etc.? • Trinity doctrine is far from clear from scripture, relies on way too much reading into scripture(inferring).

Is there a verifiable source for the claim that Scott Oliphint admits he got divine simplicity wrong @1:00:59? I wonder how this admission affects his defence of his work on covenantal apologetics.

It be easier to call White, and tell him. 🤦🏻

I really enjoyed this format. The critique was fair. I so so so much appreciated that you (Tony) took the time to go back to original sources and included the link to James White's video.

I haven't finished listening through it all yet. But, I just need to say... I never realised until this moment that I've always pictured cartoon face Tony talking to cartoon face Jesse.

It’s very clear that you haven’t read Ride, Sally, Ride. Your “critique” as such is invalid and is actually slander. As someone who has read it, you have seriously mischaracterised it. If you want to be taken seriously, read the book!

Really, guys - get a life. This is a misrepresentation of Doug Wilson of the first-order.

There are ZERO sexually graphic scenes in Ride, Sally, Ride. Repent of your lie and slanders.

Doug Wilson's books and ministry are what saved my marriage in an egalitarian hellscape. Who are you and what have you done other than misrepresent a faithful minister's book? You don't have to answer that cause I don't really care.

➡️ 18cams.xyz ⤵️ B.e.S.T f'u"l'l D.a.T.i.n.G h.o.T G.i.r.L's -L-o-V-e-S-e-X---❤️😘 ..👍 !💖🖤❤️今後は気をライブ配信の再編ありがとうです！この日のライブ配信は、かならりやばかったですね！１万人を超える人が見ていたもん（笑）やっぱり人参最高！まさかのカメラ切り忘れでやら1かしたのもドキドキでした,. 💖🖤在整個人類歷史上，強者，富人和具有狡猾特質的人捕食部落，氏族，城鎮，城市和鄉村中的弱者，無`'守和貧窮成員。然而，人類的生存意願迫使那些被拒絕，被剝奪或摧毀的基本需求的人們找到了一種生活方式，並繼續將其DNA融入不斷發展的人類社會。. 說到食物，不要以為那些被拒絕的人只吃垃圾。相反，他們學會了在被忽視的肉類和蔬菜中尋找營養。他們學會了清潔，切塊，調味和慢燉慢燉的野菜和肉類，在食品市場上被忽略的部分家用蔬菜和肉類，並且學會了使用芳香的木煙（如山核桃，山核桃和豆科灌木 來調味g食物煮的時候 1618416961

Where do you draw the line between not being able to live a sinless life and living an ungodly lifestyle to the point where one was never saved in the first place? Can any sin we commit be used as evidence that we were never saved in the first place?

۞―P̳r̳e̳m̳i̳u̳m̳ ̳P̳r̳i̳v̳a̳t̳ ̳S̳e̳x̳―۞ ➡️➡️️ 》》 18cams.xyz 《《 -----------------^^----------------- ♠【﹄💖𝐊𝐋𝐈𝐊≔⫸LINK 💖﹃】 ♠みゃあこさん！ฅ( ̳• •̫ • ̳ฅ)ﾆｬﾝ !❤️ 在整個人類歷史上，強者，富人和具有狡猾特質的人捕食部落，氏族，城鎮，城市和鄉村中的弱者，無`'守和貧窮成員。然而，人類的生存意願迫使那些被拒絕，被剝奪或摧毀的基本需求的人們找到了一種生活方式，並繼續將其DNA融入不斷發展的人類社會。 說到食物，不要以為那些被拒絕的人只吃垃圾。相反，他們學會了在被忽視的肉類和蔬菜中尋找營養。他們學會了清潔，切塊，調味和慢燉慢燉的野菜和肉類，在食品市場上被忽略的部分家用蔬菜和肉類，並且學會了使用芳香的木煙（如山核桃，山核桃和豆科灌木 來調味食物煮的時候 1618112735

My contribution to the directory of weird things that Jesse and Tony have said: Episode 210: "There's a lot of modularity with a bathrobe." - Tony. Really the whole bathrobe conversation was a winner. Jesse was clearly taken off guard: "This hit me in a couple of different ways. It's possible that I lost focus at least part way through because the question that came to my mind is, Are you rockin' a bathrobe often in the mornings???? ... Well... so... I'm not sure... is that a common experience????" Classic. But the modularity comment definitely has to be in the directory!

Speaking as a 1689 federalist I must say you guys did a good job and you clearly understand the larger framework of our position. Your analysis was fair and very accurate. Also, I love my RP brothers and I’ve been attending a Reformed Presbyterian church (RPCNA) for 3 years, just wish they would only allow me to become a member. I would love to see this dialogue go further between the two camps. It’s frustrating when our position is not understood by our brothers, it makes it impossible to have a meaningful conversation on the topic, so thank you for the effort. Well done!

Matthew 7, 23. Was Ravi a doer of lawlessness? Yes. Philippians 1, 6. Did the holy spirit transform his life into the image of Christ? No. Did he continue in sin? Yes. 1. John 3, 9. There is no sign of Ravi fighting against sin. Ravi was fighting to conceal his sin. Romans 1,5. True faith is visible, because obedience is making true faith visible. And so is disobedience making visible true unbelief John 3, 36. The conclusion of this verses is clear. I highly recommend Matthew Bates book "Salvation by Allegiance alone. Reconsidering Faith, Works and the Gospel of Jesus the King." Be blessed!

Religions and religious leaders have always failed because we homosapians have not evolved to live our lives by the rules made up by religions.