วีดีโอ

looks like every AI almost always vote the same way. Looks like how it was trained and by whom matter more than the debate.

what a stupid debate. Communism naturally follows some time after capitalism via socialism/becoming social

Mark Zuckerberg wins

Globalism wins🔥

Decent broad strokes summary of the conflict. Good job coming up with the idea of making AI debate. I’m sure this channel will start gaining traction soon. You can break this conflict down to even more smaller and more detailed debates too. Instead of focusing on Israel vs Palestine you could also focus on specific individual conflicts and events that comprise the entirety of their conflict

This is awesome. Non bias non ideologically motivated. Guess AI will be the new way to debate.

Who ran away form their land from the fear of Roman Empire were jews but thise who came to Palestine after being thrown away from germany and all over world were not jews they are Zionists and those who captured and occupied Palestine illegally are zionists

Those who couldn't protect or defend their land from other they are cowsrds and don't deserve any land and it's the reality of jews who ran away from there land unlike Palestinians who are still fighting for their land against this foreign jews the Zionists

Why two states? Before partition jews, christian and muslims lived peacefully under muslim rule but after partition by UN all have been living piecefully there should be no partition of Palestine there was always Palestine Israel was erased when jews ran away from the fear of Roman Empire jews couldn't fight for their land and now they claim that they are the descendants then why they didn't fought for there land of they are actually descendent of land ?

A combination works best i think...

The socialist a.i took a lot of L's

Why use the word capitalism? This is a slur invented by the left. better to talk about market economy, that is the real term.

Communism nor Socialism were realized entirely if you look at their definitions. Socialism means the means of production are owned by the worker class and this never happened anywhere not even in the Soviet Union (USSR). Communism - Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society in this system everything is eliminated via automation and androids at least 80% of work and industry is automated into oblivion and humans work for 2 hours at most or not at all if they want and leisure time is increased in order to liberate people from repetitive, boring and high risk tasks (EX: uranium extraction) hence by liberating people from these they will get time in order to study and do things in the domains they actually like to take part in and become more creative and create happy healthy families.

Based comrade Claude.

The points by both are laid out by Marx. It was the cruelties of capitalism which Marx was trying to solve. It wasn't a competition for a superior ideology for him, rather a goal for a fairer world.

Of course, nothing meaningful was ever said about socialism and capitalism themselves as the modes of production. Neither were properly defined. They were 'discussing' only some things loosely attributed to them, like free market and central planning - both of which can function in either of the systems and aren't even inherently antithetical. Different words have different meanings and exist for a reason. Again, no definitions provided whatsoever. No examples. Morality, sustainability, competition - it's all in the realm of ideology, not economics. As far as economics go, this 'debate' was worthless. Ideologized rambling, nothing more.

A great idea for a channel, you can pump these out every day. Why did you have socialism begin and end the argument each time?

A suggestion, maybe also reveal the prompt to show how each of these debates are initiated to make sure it's not biased?

Even the AI can't defend socialism without saying real socialism hasn't been tried.

When capitalism wins on the social equity round, your judges might be somewhat biased

Round 4 assesses the world wide affects of socialism. uh what about 200 million or more dead?

Capitalism is the natural evolution of human economic and social interactions. When you do something so good (making shoes for example), you start a shoe business. When your business is so good while other people have no job, you share the work you're doing with them in exchange for a percentage of their yield. They get a place to work, get the training, etc and get a stream of income from you while expending nothing upfront. Over time, you take more unemployed people in and move to be their manager, now you don't earn from making shoes anymore, your earnings come from giving jobless people a place to work in exchange for the percentage of the yield. Basically, they're all renting a peace of a business from you to work. They need a place to work as much as you need people to rent out to. The socialist advocators say the workers don't need the capitalist, and only the capitalist needs the workers is basically gaslighting and deceive.

Under socialism. What's the point of working when the government will just take from the people that are working hard and give it to the people not willing to work. Under socialism. You get the same without working as the people who work hard. Claude is a communist. Nothing you say will change his mind

socialist policies are fluffy nice on paper, and reprehensibly faulty in practice. The simple example is it's absolute lack of morality and understanding when it comes to money and the economy, where they spend wildly, inefficiently and then print money to pay off the deficit. The inflation soars, cost of living soars and the very same persons they claim to aim to help, suffer the most as what little they can save is molested by the inflation and there's very few assets left that people they can invest in to protect the value of their money. Meanwhile rich gobble up all those assets and make money off of them - e.g. On paper their policies take from rich and give to poor - fanciful and like in the movies. In the real world, their policies end up taking from the poor and giving to the rich., which is the privileged few(top 5%). So when they say it benefits all versus only a few, wrong it is the opposite - it ends up benefiting the few and wrecking everyone else.

"We've programmed advanced AI.." operative word "we've" like any AI, it's doing the master's bidding. You can see this with Claude's consistent scoring

the icons /symbols say it all. Socialism is about revolution(fist ) false narrative and Capitalism is about greed narrative. Do note that barter and free trade systems are not capitalism, capitalism is a form of them.

She sounds like a socialist

Just out of curiosity, which, if any, of the AIs are products of socialist nations?

Interesting demonstration of AI biases. I’ll take the win for free markets and capitalism, butI will say that the arguments on both sides are incomplete although still well generated by the software. This is a super interesting concept for future videos, I’d love to see more.

Turns out "progressives" aren't really all that progressive and even AI knows it

Look at Singapore and South Korea if you want capitalist success. Look to ….. i cant find a country that’s a socialist success. Every “socialist” country that’s successful has to heavily lean on free market trade (capitalism) to survive. Pure socialism or even mostly socialism fails every time

0:23 "Gender Transiton Debate"

This was really interesting to observe. I'd recommend a debate with the subcategories of socialism and capitalism, because there are a LOT of bad forms of socialism and I wasn't surprised by these results. But debates of other forms would be interesting. Such as Social Democrat vs Libertarianism, because I do believe that a moderate form of socialism would easily have beaten an extreme version of fundamentalist libertarian.

Great Video definitely needs more views

I’ll never believe a politician would be capable of putting my individual well being above himself or the nation

I think this showed the bias in the AI more than anything. Look at the final results only two AI ever changed sides they did this once and then never again, I am more for capitalism than socialism though a hybrid approach is better and I will say that this proved that using AI for deciding debates is not the way to go.

NEGATIVE FREEDOM🗣️‼️🔥 ALL MY HOMIES LOVE NEGATIVE FREEDOM🗣️‼️🔥

All this really tells is the bias of the AIs. The debates are very bad, they are just too generic and they are not even counter-argumenting each other, except with one sentence at best. You should give them a real chance to explain and dive deeper into the subjects. Also, the use of AIs as judges is kind of pointless; the point of a debate is for everyone observing to make their own minds. Sure, you could have an AI give an analysis on the debate, but what was done in this video doesn't really tell anything.

Μother Nature cries loud the capitalist system means disaster

Communism: I'm a liar, but it's perfectly fine. Because I'm going to blame capitalism for all human faults while ignoring the effects that human faults have on communism... such as the fact that corruption is terrible in communism, while corruption is slowed down in capitalism. Capitalism: Uuuh.... I'm actually corporatism. Communism: Actually. Real communism has never been tried. Capitalism: Guys. We need like.... big government to prevent monopolies. (Literally the dumbest uncapitalist thing someone could say because big governments have a monopoly on violence) Communism: Nonono. You see we need no government. How will we ensure that there is no government? With the party, of course. Capitalism: Hur dur. lol I'm dum.

The AI were given too little time to arguee

Wait did you for real sum up the end by labeling the capitalist advocate as "flat earther advocate" vs "science advocate"? XD

I haven't watched the video yet, but why is "social equity" a topic? The concept of equity itself lends itself near communism and socialism, so I already know who is going to win that section. I also think that "Innovation and Progress" could lend itself to the communism side as well, because of the verbiage used (progress) which lends itself to progressivism/social liberalism. It seems that the topics themselves are biased, so I don't really have much faith in the outcome. Also, you misspelled "Economic Growth" for the first topic. Now that i have watched it, I have the added critique that I simply disagree with the AI judges. Although I advocate for capitalism, if you are awarding "social equity" to capitalism rather than communism then that is very biased and disregards Marxian thought

Crazy how even AI can make better choices than humans can…

Side? Why choose a side when you can take the best part of both? Look at the north of Europe (I live in the south of europe)

It’s bizarre to have AI “judge.” It's not like they’re a thinking, hypothesizing being, they’re a chatbot which generates one word and guesses which word would come next. Something like this might be useful to generate examples of a discussion or presentation of ideas, but not in the judging of their merits.

-"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis..." -GROK2 agreed but pointed the differences between the perception of hell in different religions.

History trumps simple logic every time.

I love the thumbnail. A guy pointing a gun at the worker :D

Grind it out good luck! Good idea.