วีดีโอ

Thank you for your comment. Our intention is to make our show a platform to further the gospel. Whether someone subscribes to the Doctrines of Grace, is irrelevant, and frankly a secondary matter and an intramural discussion to us. What we do desire, is for people to be transferred from the kingdom of darkness into the kingdom of light by the work of Christ’s atonement. Thank you again for stopping by! Have a blessed day. Romans 1:16-17

Thank you for that suggestion. We have touched on the ‘Doctrine of God’ in our “5 Solas” Series. However, an attributes of God series may be something we looking into doing for season 2, in 2025. This book is a good primer on the topic: brokenwharfe.com/product/god-without-passions-us/

Hello, thanks for dropping by and supporting the podcast! A couple books to read (mentioned in the show) on the topic of Particular Baptist History can be found here: press.founders.org/shop/heirs-of-the-reformation/ press.founders.org/shop/the-1689-baptist-confession-of-faith-in-modern-english/ Thanks for listening and we hope you enjoy our content! Soli Deo Gloria

@@StayReformed Thanks for your response.

Hello, thanks for your comment. Regarding ‘Living Waters’ while we appreciate their ministry and recommend their material, we are not affiliated nor employed by them. It would be best to reach out to them directly and visit: livingwaters.com. In terms of Confessionally Reformed Baptists, the Puritan era produced 3 well known “Reformed Confessions”; Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), The Savoy Declaration (1658), and The Second London Baptist Confession of Faith (1677/1689). There is much unity and harmony between those Reformed Traditions. The main issues where they differ involve; Church Polity, Baptism, and the administration of the Covenant (with Covenant Theology). We have an upcoming episode on this very topic, in the meantime this might be a helpful article: www.logos.com/grow/reformed-baptist/ God Bless, and we hope you are edified by this ministry. Soli Deo Gloria.

most I know or run across describe the pope as the head of the church without thinking about what you're really asking them. those that are challenged on this will include "on earth" in that statement -- the title a pope takes as "vicar of Christ" backs this idea up, with vicar meaning essentially the same "in place of" or "instead of" (for the on earth part) yet the "anti" in antichrist literally means the same thing. take from that what you will. this idea that Christ is some invisible head off in the ethers of the current heaven and needs an earthly substitute is funny considering all the OT stories about oh my ppl really want a king on earth, okay i'll give you a king see what happens... not to mention the earthly substitute really gives a LOT of wiggle room on the rest of their theology, which absolutely contradicts much of God's word as we have it. so I'd have to agree the pop is of course either a "type of" antichrist as they suggest, or rather are one of the antichrists, which to me is just another matter of semantics, but catholic theology is absolutely against the Christ of the Scriptures and the catholic head is as well, even more-so looking at the various popes and their actions throughout history.

I totally agree! OSAS

Thank you for sharing your story! We praise God for what he has done for His Glory, and also, for the kindness he has shown you. We are very grateful for the ministry of Ray Comfort and Living Waters too! Thank you for listening to this episode, and we hope you enjoy the rest of our content!

Thank you for your comment. We would recommend reading more about Lysa TerKeurst here: michellelesley.com/2015/07/31/leaving-lysa-why-you-shouldnt-be-following-lysa-terkeurst-or-proverbs-31-ministries/

@@StayReformed gosh! Just a cursory mm through the article is shocking! I have never known any of this. Very interesting indeed 🤔