วีดีโอ

Answers are towards the end of the video

Thank you. Please recommend the channel to your friends preparing for the exams.

You are very welcome. Please recommend the channel to your friends preparing for the exams. Thank you.

‘The master of your driving’ English version, is one of the best books to use

To the best of my knowledge both bicycles are same. We call them electric bicycle. they can be charged to assist with movement with no/minimal pedaling. The normal bicycles do not have this function and are self pedaling.

@@thejapandryve8828 thanks

in 16- there is NO safety zone present. In 19- there is safety zone present. these situations are different. I hope this helps.

Please is it the English written exams or the practical driving?

I going 3take failure of written of karemen exam 😢 this month

So difficult

@@Nanay884 me too dear ,

@@Nanay884 was your exam true or false?

Please don’t give up. You will look back on this day and laugh 😆. Ganbatte ne 💪.

It is a `No parking or stopping` or `No parking and stopping` sign. The question means it can be either No parking or No stopping, which is wrong. It is NO for both parking and stopping. The no parking and no stopping must not be separated. I hope this helps. Thanks for watching.

You’re welcome 😊

Glad it is!😍

Thank you

It’s a tricky question

its no parking and stoping sign

@@akirayoshikawa3364 no parking but can stop ?

That is no parking AND no stopping. But not or

The thick line along the side of the road means vehicles 🚗 should not cross it. this kind of side walk is designated for only bicycles

The sign is for ‘No parking or stopping’ and not ‘no parking’ or ‘no stopping’. It’s a trick they used. The first means you can’t stop nor park meaning, you can’t do both. But the latter mean the sign means ‘no parking’ or ‘no stopping’ implying that it can be either this or that. This is wrong. I’m not sure if you get the difference now. Thanks

​@@thejapandryve8828 I think I get what you're trying to say but this still doesnt really make sense. The trick to this question is that they're trying to get you to agree that it's a "no stopping" sign without agreeing that it's also "no parking" sign. If you say that it's true, it means that the facts can alternately be true. (ex. "No parking", but not necessarily "no stopping") It's not an inclusive "or", if that makes sense. Realistically speaking, this is a very poorly written question. Both "true" and "false" have the same outcome. That said, the original comment was left a year ago so I hope you got your license, Be Nature!!

​@@thejapandryve8828that doesn't make any sense? If a sign says no eating or drinking, you can't do both together either. In fact, and would be wrong because grammatically it means doing both at the same time, whereas that sign says you cant do neither. It's just shit English.

I hope it does to you soon. Genuinely, Thanks

Most of these questions are what I remember reading in my exams. You can point out those you feel are incorrectly used and I will explain them to you. By you pointing them out, I may be able to spot typing errors too. Thanks you for patronizing.👏

Sure dear.

Always. Wish you the best. Please share with friends

Sure. I will. Thank you