Quakes & Codes
Quakes & Codes
  • 63
  • 66 319
IS 16700-2017: Clause 6.2 Wind Effects
Intention:
To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions.
References:
IS 16700-2017 Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings.
IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures
IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision)
BMTPC Earthquake Tips
GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Code on Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures IS 1893: 2016 (Part 1- General Provisions and Buildings)
NPTEL Lectures on Structural Dynamics by R. Pradeep Kumar. nptel.ac.in/courses/105/106/105106151/
Acknowledgements:
The support of students in the preparation of the slides is sincerely acknowledged.
Thank you,
R. Pradeep Kumar
มุมมอง: 1 091

วีดีโอ

IS 16700-2017: Clause 5.2 Plan
มุมมอง 964ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions. References: IS 16700-2017 Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings. IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC E...
IS 16700-2017: Clause 5.3 Stroey Stiffness and Strength
มุมมอง 1.9Kปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions. References: IS 16700-2017 Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings. IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC E...
IS 16700-2017: Clause 5.5 Natural Modes of Vibration
มุมมอง 1.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions. References: IS 16700-2017 Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings. IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC E...
Tall Building Code, IS 16700-2017: Clause 5 4 Lateral Drift
มุมมอง 1.9K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions. References: IS 16700-2017 Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings. IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC E...
Introduction to Short Lecture Series on IS 1893-2016 (Part 1)
มุมมอง 1.1K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Cl 6.1.7 Additions to Existing Building and Cl 6.1.8 Occupancy of Change
มุมมอง 5102 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.1.6 Equipment On Different Floors
มุมมอง 4352 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.1.5 Soil Structure Interaction
มุมมอง 1.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.1.4 Members and Connections
มุมมอง 3902 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.1.3 Actual Forces on Structures
มุมมอง 7102 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016: Clause 6.1.2 Factors Affecting Response of Structures
มุมมอง 2332 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.1.1 Ground Motion
มุมมอง 6172 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.3.3 Design Earthquake Vertical Load
มุมมอง 6362 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.3.4 Combination to account for two or Three Components
มุมมอง 5262 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention: To help students and practising engineers understand IS Code Provisions References: IS 1893:2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IAStructE Code and Commentary on IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) BMTPC Earthquake Tips GSDMA Document Proposed Modifications and Commentary for Co...
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.3.2 Design Horizontal Earthquake Load
มุมมอง 8022 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.3.2 Design Horizontal Earthquake Load
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.3.1 Load Combinations
มุมมอง 6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.3.1 Load Combinations
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.2 Assumptions
มุมมอง 4902 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 6.2 Assumptions
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.7.5.4 Simplified Method of Dynamic Analysis of Buildings
มุมมอง 4322 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.7.5.4 Simplified Method of Dynamic Analysis of Buildings
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (vii) Irregular Modes of Oscillation
มุมมอง 4982 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (vii) Irregular Modes of Oscillation
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (vi) Floating Column
มุมมอง 5942 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (vi) Floating Column
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (v) Weak Storey
มุมมอง 4282 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (v) Weak Storey
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (iv) In-Plane Discontinuity
มุมมอง 2992 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (iv) In-Plane Discontinuity
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (iii) Vertical Geometry Irregularity
มุมมอง 3892 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (iii) Vertical Geometry Irregularity
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (ii) Mass Irregularity
มุมมอง 4542 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (ii) Mass Irregularity
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (i) Stiffness Irregularity (Soft Storey)
มุมมอง 6922 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 6 (i) Stiffness Irregularity (Soft Storey)
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 5 (iv) Out-of-Plane Offsets
มุมมอง 2542 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 5 (iv) Out-of-Plane Offsets
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 5 (v) Non-Orthogonal Frames
มุมมอง 4002 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1): Clause 7.1 Table 5 (v) Non-Orthogonal Frames
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1) Clause7.1Table 5 (i) TorsionalIrregularity
มุมมอง 1.4K2 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (Part 1) Clause7.1Table 5 (i) TorsionalIrregularity
IS 1893-2016 (part 1) Clause 7.1Table 5 Plan Irregularities (ii) Re entrantCorners
มุมมอง 9512 ปีที่แล้ว
IS 1893-2016 (part 1) Clause 7.1Table 5 Plan Irregularities (ii) Re entrantCorners

ความคิดเห็น

  • @swapnildesai5130
    @swapnildesai5130 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For cantilever porch do we have to calculate mass of the porch and multiply it by 5 and then apply the same in Staad??? Is it like that??

  • @saiteka
    @saiteka 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir, Why only 1.5 i.e 50 percentage extra load for dead and live load why not 1.6 or 1.4 or any value

  • @shareqinamdar8903
    @shareqinamdar8903 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir, please keep uploading new videos

  • @Manish.S732
    @Manish.S732 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sir any real world examples of regular and irregular buildings

  • @ashutoshshrimali5772
    @ashutoshshrimali5772 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir please clarify Is16700 2023 table num 2

  • @bipinkarki9251
    @bipinkarki9251 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how is relative density and value of f measured for sigma K?

  • @vigneshkr7000
    @vigneshkr7000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir when it is above 150m building, what are the checks and design to be considered. Please explain sir

  • @ErKamalParekh
    @ErKamalParekh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Keep it Sir - this is Er Kamal Parekh from Surat … let do it for 16700_2023 too .. not only that - many of the expressions or equations - how it arrives shall be documented any how - so confusion / misinterpretation gets resolved

  • @ranjithalluri604
    @ranjithalluri604 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But sir in is 456 code the reason for 0.9 value of deadload is given as stability against overturning or stress reversal is critical.

  • @vejanidb
    @vejanidb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What if the height to thickness is more than 12, should that be considered a bare frame without infill?

  • @ajazmemon455
    @ajazmemon455 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this valuable information

  • @OkOk-ky7ww
    @OkOk-ky7ww 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir, please make video on IS 13920

  • @OkOk-ky7ww
    @OkOk-ky7ww 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir, please made explanation video on IS 13920.

  • @OkOk-ky7ww
    @OkOk-ky7ww 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please explain IS 1893- part 4 and IS 456 and IS 800 also

  • @smithakm1174
    @smithakm1174 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nice explanation 👍

  • @ankurbaghel3658
    @ankurbaghel3658 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for your support sir

  • @PawanKumar-xr4qm
    @PawanKumar-xr4qm 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the video sir

  • @shilpacv10
    @shilpacv10 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir can we classify the soil based on young modulus obtained from triaxial test

  • @begamsumaiyasultana9715
    @begamsumaiyasultana9715 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir I have a question that if my structure is orthogonal then is there need to take vertical load combination in 3 direction or I need take only in two direction??

  • @kartikaykrishna6284
    @kartikaykrishna6284 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir kripya aap hindi language me IS Code 1893-2016 ka video banaye taki mere jaise hindi language students easily is code ko samjh payege🙏

  • @goodmorningindia3805
    @goodmorningindia3805 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir how to find a re-entrant in Y shape

  • @prawingajbhiye8816
    @prawingajbhiye8816 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir your content is superb No doubt, but the quality of sound is not proper, why don't you hire anyone to manage your videos? some people do not have content like you, but their presentation is good...kindly take it positively you must have a good media team...

  • @swapnildesai5130
    @swapnildesai5130 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir can u pls eleborate more on why net pressure is increased?? Explanation given in the video is not clear

  • @subhajitmukhopadhyay4780
    @subhajitmukhopadhyay4780 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, sir! One question. What if we use only Elx and Elz, but not the vertical component i.e. Ely. Should we use Elx +/- 0.3 Elz combination?

  • @312-manasa2
    @312-manasa2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please explain IS 13920 code for design of shear wall

  • @akshaythakur2395
    @akshaythakur2395 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir, for drift calculation by which load combination these displacement values should find i.e, by service load combinations with load factor 1 or by strength load combination with load factor 1.2 or 1.5 or just by lateral load case only? this clarification is not given in the code

  • @ARUNSASIDHARANNAIR
    @ARUNSASIDHARANNAIR ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please complete all clauses it's more helpful for us

  • @AnilKumar-qm7ly
    @AnilKumar-qm7ly ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you soo much sir, for clear explanation of all these things..

  • @shaijalkm5002
    @shaijalkm5002 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please explain the recent amendment of the same clause

  • @suhaibkhan7356
    @suhaibkhan7356 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please i need your numbers

  • @sarmachandramouli2704
    @sarmachandramouli2704 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi sir.... Thanks a lot ...it's very helpful Pls do more....

  • @shareqinamdar8903
    @shareqinamdar8903 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, please upload regularly

  • @ruhilsaab5179
    @ruhilsaab5179 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Sir, here mention factored earthquake load combination, that means we should take factored load section properties ??

  • @adityashrestha8549
    @adityashrestha8549 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please explain on how to calculate the storey lateral strength or total shear strength of a storey? Code seems silent on this.

  • @adityashrestha8549
    @adityashrestha8549 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please explain how to calculate the lateral shear strength of a storey for WEAK storey check. Code does not give any methodology.

  • @SoumyadipSaha14
    @SoumyadipSaha14 ปีที่แล้ว

    He is My God.

  • @mallikarjunatkalamma
    @mallikarjunatkalamma ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is Z/2 taken in IS 1893:2016 for design horizontal seismic coefficient? Now as per IS 1893-2016 the formula for the design horizontal seismic coefficient is (Z/2) x (I/R) x (Sa/g) . So here, Z is the zone factor and this value is determined on the basis of hazard analysis for a particular zone for maximum considered earthquake (MCE) and for Designed Earthquake we considered 50% of the value of Z that is why it is (Z/2). If I'm wrong, please currect me Sir

    • @quakescodes1142
      @quakescodes1142 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, your understanding is correct. Z is for MCE and Z/2 is for design basis earthquake.

    • @mallikarjunatkalamma
      @mallikarjunatkalamma ปีที่แล้ว

      @@quakescodes1142 thank you so much for your response Sir.

  • @eboy4686
    @eboy4686 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Teacher, while performing a nonlinear time history analysis to determine the storey drift ratio, for each time step, lateral forces differ from one another, leading to different storey drift ratios at every time step. So, how can I find the overall/governing storey drift ratio?

    • @quakescodes1142
      @quakescodes1142 ปีที่แล้ว

      You may first get the displacement time history of each storey and later find the drift at each time instant i.e., [Ui(tj) - Ui+1(tj)]/h. here i and i+1 represent floor levels, tj represents time instant, U represents displacement, and h is floor height.

  • @eboy4686
    @eboy4686 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Teacher, In IS-1893, the stiffness and strength irregularity building frame appear to have the same diagram, in which one of them shows complete removal of a column; so, my question is can I refer to this type of irregularity as "combined stiffness and strength irregular building frame"? And How calculations of strength irregularity are done in commercially available software?

    • @pulkitvelani
      @pulkitvelani ปีที่แล้ว

      Diagrams are for represention purpose to explain some concept. The objective of that diagram is to show difference in stiffness between two consecutive floors. However, your reference of considering them for both irregularities can also be true but not always true. Detailed investigation is required to reach to that conclusion. Since, for both stiffness and strength irregularities respective values (ratio) should be satisfied to declare the building as having particular irregularities.

  • @iliyasbagwan6961
    @iliyasbagwan6961 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks alot sir

  • @mallikarjunatkalamma
    @mallikarjunatkalamma 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Sir

  • @mairajhabib9754
    @mairajhabib9754 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    in lecture explained, how prog calculates k value. But how strength to be cross checked wrt to upper floors.

  • @mairajhabib9754
    @mairajhabib9754 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why code permits 0.7k(i+1) ? How 70% arrived ? What is the basis of it. pl suggest literature. Infact, lower lvl k shall never be permitted on lesser side wrt upper lvl.

    • @pulkitvelani
      @pulkitvelani 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not sure about the 0.7 value but Tall buildings usually have ground storey with height more than the height of typical floor. Such architectural practices will surely introduce the difference in storey stiffness (lower stiffness of such ground storey). Hence, code committee in India and around allow difference of 30% in stiffness.

    • @mairajhabib9754
      @mairajhabib9754 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pulkitvelani your point sounds ok wrt Ground and First floor.

  • @gnanavelkanniappan8637
    @gnanavelkanniappan8637 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice 👍

  • @mallikarjunatkalamma
    @mallikarjunatkalamma 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @manikandank8987
    @manikandank8987 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, what about masonry tall structures??

    • @pulkitvelani
      @pulkitvelani 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      IS 16700 deals with RC tall buildings only. The fundamental behaviour of tall structure might remain same, however, specification and consideration will change based on material, occupancy etc.

  • @debasishgoswami9291
    @debasishgoswami9291 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir...1893 is very helpful, also was waiting for 16700..... Thank you again.

  • @mallikarjunatkalamma
    @mallikarjunatkalamma 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Sir

  • @swapnil6923
    @swapnil6923 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir.