วีดีโอ

great content right here, me and my friend demitri really appreciated this. I liked , subscribed and put on them notifications. This channel is so good but like one comment aint gonna cut it. so i made it 2

Thank you for such useful content !

🎉❤❤ thankful 🥰

🎉 thanks 🙏🏻❤❤

Nice

Hii, firstly thanks for video, I really appreciate it. Can you please also answer the question which you discussed at the end of the video. Thanks

strerching the video to 11.59. mins nice try bro

The video is cut off again

This is the same to the last video?

video got cut off

Thanks ❤

video cut off

the audio is so fuzzy. Did you change the location or the mic to record this?

The video got cut off at the explanation about national saving

Video got cut off at shortage explaination

I think this one got cut off

(T)aste (E)xpectation price of (R)elated goods (N)umber of buyers (I)ncome (P)rice

Are you british?

Thật tình cờ biết đến kênh này mà sáng mai đã thi rồi -.-

حملة توصيل الراجل دا ل مليون مشترك 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

thank you for your effort

thank youuuuu

Awesome video

Thank you for a very well and clear explanation.

thank DR

Thanks Dr

Great Lecture! Could you current me refer to which book these are based on. Is it Paul Krugman's International Economics Theory and Policy?

This is very useful . Thank you

thanks but how can I calculate seigniorage?

Thank you this is amazing 😍😍

At 4:00 wouldn't the workers in home be worse off and the foreign workers better off? Since the distributional effects would bring down the standard of living for the home worker and raise the SoL for the foreign worker?

Thankyou, you're the reason I'm gonna pass in IE.

Very helpful! Highly appreciate this video

Truly Asian Elephant, Thailand. Why Should A Tiger 🤔

I can't thank you enough, this really helpful . please continue

Thanks it was very helpful, please continue

THANKS

「あなたのコンテンツはとても感動的です」、

e depends on how big the country is. In a case where the terms of trade (e) is bigger than the deadweight losses (b+d) the national welfare would increase under a tariff. But otherwise if the e<(b+d) the national welfare would decrease.

Hey man, Your are the one of the most educated eco man in the world. Well done work Can You Please Teach me Economics For Forex Trading

slay

🥰🥰🥰🥰

Yes

Fantastic video, could you touch on arbitrary token values pegged via seigniorage?

good course!

I wish I watched ur video soonerrr 😭😭

very helpful for my next asm in fridayy, thank you so muchhhhh

The major flaw in your argument is that worker productivity doesn't automatically depend on their effort or skills. Mechanization of the textile industry skyrocketed worker productivity, but it was due to capital investment rather than workers. The rise of computers has done the same thing for nearly every industry. It is not a tautology that worker productivity necessarily justifies a wage increase. I'm not saying workers shouldn't be paid this or that amount, but this isn't a good argument.

May i take this video for my university assignment? Its great.

Hi, I am interested on your teaching about Asian Tigers on South Korea and Taiwan. May I ask do you have the notes or textbook on this chapter? Thank you!