วีดีโอ

Y porque a día de hoy aparcas saca publicaciones relevantes; motivo primar examen de oposición frente al éxito …

Abiogenesis fantasy

Thank you! Cheers from Brazil! ❤🇧🇷

Gracias por estos hermosos videos ojala mas como estos

Una pintura falsa aunque tenga 500 años sigue siendo falsa...

Hola Padre. Como lo puedo Contactar? Tiene email? Bendiciones.

God bless Ron Wyatt found Jesus blood on the Ark of the Covenant that he discovered on 6 january 1982. Ron performed, from his own pocket, a blood chromosome test. Amazingly, blood is still alive and test could be done. The stunning result: - unique 24 chromosomes: 23 from Theotokos and 1 from the Eternal ... In +4 decades since Ron found the Ark, not a single major Catholic figure from Vatican or Oviedo tried a similar test of Turin Shroud or Sudarium. I'm sure they'd have counted same 24 chromosomes.

WE ALL KNOW LEONARDO DA VINCI MADE THIS PHOTOGRAPH ON 15 TH CENTURY LINEN - ENJOY LYING FOREVER TO THE SACRED SOULLED HUMANITY!

El audio no es claro

¡Bravo por Oriol, me ha gustado mucho lo claro que lo tiene y lo bien que se le entiende!

Amazing lecture! This deserve 1000x more view

-

Hey! Co Hay. I understood what you were saying. Mais You can teach! “Y’all caught some frogs?”

Comment for traction

Took one of Dr. Feser's classes on Philosophy of Religion around 2010 and it had a major impact on me. I was a questioning/agnostic person who grew up in a secular home. I later pursued a degree in philosophy and things he discussed related to the nature of God, Classical Theism vs Theistic Personalism, teachings of St. Thomas Aquinas, and other arguments of non-material was very helpful when examining metaphysics and Philosophy of Mind. While I am not aligned with any particular religion at this point, I cannot deny the existence of God and the immaterial.

Sencillamente fascinante. Muchas gracias por esta visión.

What is the name of the speaker? This is fantastic

Excellent, thanks very much for this. Really very interesting.

Amazing, thank you! So beautiful to reflect on the Eucharist as one, continuous sacrifice. All of the masses throughout the world and throughout history are so many instants of spacetime, but are unified in Christ. Incredible!

He's saying what Bernado Kastrup says.

My impression is that Consciousness is fundamental,Mind is elemental; emerging with quantum events. In Eastern religion and philosophy, Universal Consciousness is God, whom they define as: Consciousness; Existence; and Bliss..Chinese philosophy has it that nothing happens without three. Therefore, Consciousness (fundamental); Mind (elemental; likely emerges with quantum events); matter or the physical; (elemental or physical: elements ( and forces at a grosser rate of vibration). If we understand vibration; starting with the Word and separating the waters from the waters as it was expressed in the Scriptures, then we understand that the reductionism of materialism is a totally wrong perspective. It is good that the Church is taking this on as now we are faced with the next atheistic horror; likely rivaling communism as eliminative materialism; its theses that nothing exists other than matter; the physical. With trans humanism also on the horizon it is important that the Church be a bulwark against these as it was against the dark occult between the dark age and the age of reason. Happy to see this that the Church is taking on and opposing what if it enters the mainstream could cause great harm and suffering. So let us be on our guard against Eliminative Materialism that wants to eliminate everything as real other than matter. As well as fighting back against Trans humanism which see the human (as biology only) ripe for experimentation and for being embedded with technology. Thank you Catholic Church for taking this on; you are on the job and doing what needs to be done in protecting humanity from the next potential horror that atheism presents humanity with as it strives to deify matter. Eliminative Materialism is the next untruth to be fought against and defeated.

It all depends on your definition of God.

A typical nonsense both scientific and theological. 1) A typical nonsense explanation of clock/twin paradox (like in most textbooks,i.e., physicists don't understand their own equation and experiments A.Einstein already made a mistake (a strange "peculiar consequence") in his 1905 Revolutionary paper in interpreting the case of "moving" clock but not (rightly) of a moving (rigid) sphere; a plain (and philosophical @for anyone case who has Aristotle's brain or Holy Spirit): in the reference frame of such "clock" is it moving or "at rest"? The same with old Reverend Copernicus Case, AD 1543: for the observer on the Sun, the Earth revolves but for the observer on Earth, the Sun revolves (Einstein). The case of GPS and atomic clocks is easily explained by the difference of the gravitational field of the ground and the above and not even ...Lorentz transformation which is only a typical mathematical trick and not a dynamical one as it would be contra the 1st Relativity principle! Why are scientists so...stupid? The "muon" case is also plain for the philosopher: 1) a "muon" is a name to describe a statistical property of the field of "muons" and the behavior is easily explained by its wave (of the matter: DeBroglie, Schrodinger) behavior- the change of length and frequency of such wave for a moving observer as in the case of an electromagnetic wave: treating "muon" as a point-particle (refers to any microparticle) is nonsense as such particle does not exist at rest (i.e., its group velocity would be zero then it mean it would exist at all- see the definition of a particle, "electron, photon, ...muon". Go back to school to learn the basics of philosophy (of science) and the basic Bible hermeneutics (see CCC nr 110) by yourself if your dumb Pastor and teacher did not do it Psps. She (and the sect of physicists, the majority: I've got a response form only....two by email of about 50ty). Relativity Theory is that of field and not of ....a (mythical) particle or, a rigid body or worse, alive matter; more, apply the main calculus theorem to the case of space-time (x,y,z,ict) and learn that the distance (for ds= dx +icdt) is NOT path dependent!

Turn playback speed down to .75, talking too fast. Interesting when slowed down. Thank you.

Very good lecture! Thank you.

word salad of worst kind . The kind that gives philosophy a bad rep.

Fascinating! Thank you Mr. Webber !!!!

ai tech bro bullshit

I am reminded of Native American stories of The Peacemaker which have many curious parallels with those of Christ. Perhaps we already have, on this planet of many isolated groups, multiple examples of the varied 'alien' incarnations of Christ that come at pivotal, spiritual moments for a race/culture.

I read Ms. Mattheiss', "Drink from it, all of you”: Science supports Jesus' words" and it's just nuts. Claiming science agrees with this. No science I'm aware of does. This is just crazy talk!

immateriality is much less different from materiality than theists wants to admit.

Noone is going to be resurrected to live to infinity .

But God allegedly did appear in glory to the Israelites in the alleged Exodus. He allegedly did public demos for Elijah. Weird how he "comes to us as a man" then, furthermore conveniently floating off into the sky post-resurrection after allegedly popping in and out to appear to a few in his personality cult, and won't even show up in that form to us today.

The content is very good, I learned a lot. Little advice on the video editing: splitting the screen into equal quadrants and wasting the NE and SW quadrant for static info, and assigning equal space in the NW and SE quadrants for the presenter and the slides made following the lecture somewhat hard. Instead, putting the presenter into a smaller SW quadrant looking up diagonally to the slides in a larger NE quadrant would've been more natural and the slides would've been readable.

He has a picture of the completed manuscript of his new book on his blog site: “Immortal Souls: A Treatise on Human Nature”! More details to follow.

A wise intersection of "ET" with Catholic theology and philosophy. Attend the Latin Mass.

21. No busques lo que te sobrepasa, ni lo que excede tus fuerzas trates de escrutar. 22.Lo que se te encomienda, eso medita, que no te es menester lo que está oculto. 23.En lo que excede a tus obras no te fatigues, pues más de lo que alcanza la inteligencia humana se te ha mostrado ya. 24.Que a muchos descaminaron sus prejuicios, una falsa ilusión extravió sus pensamientos. 26.El corazón obstinado en mal acaba, y el que ama el peligro caerá en él. 27.El corazón obstinado se carga de fatigas, el pecador acumula pecado tras pecado. 28.Para la adversidad del orgulloso no hay remedio, pues la planta del mal ha echado en él raíces. 29.El corazón del prudente medita los enigmas. un oído que le escuche es el anhelo del sabio. 30.El agua apaga el fuego llameante, la limosna perdona los pecados. Eclo 3, 21-30

A quite biased view of the science. There is vigorous debate on this subject within the scientific world. Judith Curry is perhaps the greatest authority on Hurricanes and climatic conditions and worked for / advised NASA on the subject / Climatologist at Georgia Inst. of Tech. (th-cam.com/video/i4YUnZIKneY/w-d-xo.html ). The IPCC categorically stated that there is no evidence that climate change has any impact on "extreme weather events" at all. People seem to mix up the SPMs in the IPCC (written by politicians / NGOs and interested parties) with the ARs (the assessment reports written by scientists. There was one AR in the IPCCthat did link extreme weather events such as hurricanes, cyclones, typhoons and the like but it was discredited and withdrawn as the data within the AR actually showed the reverse of the AR's conclusion. Kerry Emanuel seems to say "the science is clear" on a lot of things without actually highlighting the science. The climate scientists (alongside Judith) providing a much better evaluation of the science include: Patrick Moore (eco-activist and founder of GreenPeace), John Christie (Alabama Chief Climate Scientist and Prof. at University of Alabama in Huntsville & IPCC)Steve Koonin (Obama's Under secretary for Science and Energy), Will Happer (Bush's Under secretary for Science and Energy), Bjorn Lomborg (Director of Danish Government's Environmental Assessment Institute) Roy Spencer (Prof. at University of Alabama in Huntsville; NASA; & IPCC) Stuart Harris (emeritus prof University of Calgary, still publishing a couple of papers per year at 93 - good 2017 book on china, Canada and Russians and then Americans on permafrost science, heat travelling around the globe). Arthur Viterito (geo-thermal scientist specialist).

LOCALITY clause is conveniently dropped .... determinism is not shown to be false. LOCAL realism is.

Genomics has shown that the "central dogma" of gene to MRNA to DNA is very woefully inadequete to describe the machinery of the cell. The world is ever more wonderful the more we look, even in its mundanity.

Thanks!

Soul exist? If i get damage on my brain i can change my behavior. This is argument aganist soul? What u think? Sorry for my bad English

Who is this genius?? You had me at phenomenology.

Don't mention animals that you never got to know. I have observed a puppy size up an obstruction and choose the downhill way around it.

6:00

👇 'Promo sm'

I really like Prof. Kerry Emanuel. Wish he could have a chat with classical economist Prof. Michael Hudson 🤞

During several interviews with radio's Art Bell, the late Father Malachi Martin (exorcist, advisor to 2 Popes, and Vatican Dead Sea Scroll researcher) said this about aliens. th-cam.com/video/VKgQiT2vM80/w-d-xo.html

Excellent throughout. It is worth noting that the prebiotic soup is pure nonsense which is suitable exclusively to science fiction, RNA World spends so much time trying to find replicating RNA that it fails to notice that RNA has to originate before it can replicate, and finally DNA seems to originate at the end of the process but if so there's a tremendous amount of information that preceded DNA and therefore the originating cell needed to realize that it had information, that DNA could encode information, create the DNA code and then perform a census of pre-existing information and translate it to the code, write the original genetic code and set up the entire biochemistry system of reproduction and gene expression. It is an awful lot for a protocell to do!

But if you opened up the box with the cat inside and found it empty or the box was opened and nothing was inside, we could conclude that you cannot keep an observer in one place of measurement if the Geiger Counter measures radiation.