วีดีโอ

It's Mr. Biggles 'Sopwith Camel'! lol Couldn't have been the earlier 'Sopwith Pup'!!! Haha. If not the S.E.5 or Bristol F.2 on the RFC Side (Britain 1918). As for the Luftstreitkräfte Side (German Empire 1918), if not the Albatros D.II then the 'Pfalz D.XII'! Surely NOT the Roland D.VI!!! lol Tell me which planes are present in the movie clip? We can 'collaborate'. :)

Remember in the movie when Mr. Biggles time travels into the future and steps into the helicopter and says: "If you can fly a Sopwith Camel you can fly anything...." Has to be an Albatros D.II or Pfalz D.XII vs. Sopwith Camel. If not, post the correct aircraft models (with proof), and I'll update the video title. Movies tend to portray less-than-accurate equipment.

Actually I did include Earth's Gravitational Acceleration: Terminal Velocity Equation (Vt): Vt = SqRt[(2 x m x g ) / (p x A x Cd)]. m = mass of Apophis = 2.7 x 10^10 kg. g = gravitational acceleration on Earth = 9.81m/s^2. p = Average Air Density (Across All Atmospheric Layers) = 1.22 kg/m^3. A = Apophis Projected Frontal Area (Stable Boundary-Layer) = Approximately Pi x (diameter / 2)^2 = [3.14159 x (340/2)^2] = 90,792 Sq meters. Cd = Apophis Approximated Drag Coefficient (Oblate Cylinder) = 0.8. Vt = SqRt[((2 x (2.7 x 10^10 kg) x (9.81 m/s^2)) / (1.22 x 90,792 x 0.8))] = 2,445 m/s Terminal Velocity (constant) -V = [(12,600 m/s outer space inertial velocity) - (2,445 m/s Terminal Velocity within Earth's Atmosphere)] = 10,155 m/s velocity reduction. Reality is a function of Mathematics, Physics & Chemistry. What I "think" means NOTHING. Science/Engineering = Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Operations-Research, and Computer-Science.

1 Earth's electrostatic fields-of-potential are dsitributed across the Earth's crust (850 miles thick), and Earth's atmosphere (70 miles altitude just below the Karman Line). The Sun's Neutrino emissions converted to Photons (inside Earth's atmosphere), charges Earth's atmosphere and crust with electrostatic-potential. Variations depending on material or molecular-chemistry (Atmosphere & Earth's Crust). 2 The Magnetic Poles of Earth AND their Lines-of-Magnetic-Flux DOMINATE Earth's electrostatic-potential or 'vertical-electrical-fields' by means of Inductance. 3 Most of Earth's electrostatic potential is absorbed into the Core of the Earth, grounding into DC Electricity, to maintain Earth's Molten-Iron-Core. Thus, allowing Earth to propagate a strong-and-wide Magnetic Field (eight times larger than Earth's diameter). For which without, would render Earth into Mars: space-debris scrubbed Mars surface barren after Mars magnetic field collapsed. 4 Conclusion: The 'vertical electrical fields' of Earth are reserved for maintaining Earth's Molten-Iron-Core. 5 Note: A Steel Factory has a VERY STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD, due to its large mass of molten Iron. Iron amalgamated with Carbon becomes Steel. However, Iron itself has the Highest Magnetic Permeability of any element. Copper has good Magnetic Permeability AND Electrical-Conductivity. But Iron alone, has the highest Magnetic Permeability. Imagine melting hundred-of-thousands of tons of Iron into Molten-Iron, this would propagate a VERY STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD. Steel workers cannot have anything metallic on their person, nor electromagnetic device upon or inside of their person.

1 IF 'Apophis' DOES enter predicted Key-Holes (2029, 2036, 2068 = 0.00000005% to 2.7% probability), trajectory(s) and Earth-strike-point(s) WOULD depend on the following: 1.) Key-Hole(s) position(s). 2.) Earth's rotation.. 3.) Earth's revolution around Sun. 4.) Apophis position in relation to 1, 2, 3. 5.) Inertial Speed Reduction (Space-to-Atmosphere). 6.) Trajectory Boundary Layer (Atmosphere). 2 These are KNOWN parameters to Space Agencies, Universities, and Private-Sector Tech Companies. 3 If you go online and visit relevant sites: NASA, NOAA, Universities-Astronomy-Dept, Space Tech Companies, Observatories, and other related sites; there should be Telemetric Data tracking Apophis in REAL-TIME. 4 The GOOD NEWS is that for practicality-sake (Theoretical vs. Actual Yields), 'Apophis' will NOT strike Earth. The Actual-Probability-Gradient is AS LOW AS 50% of the theoretical-probability, so: 1-in-4-billion TO 1.35-in-100 probability-gradient that Apophis will strike Earth. 5 Jupiter LOVES to protect Earth, and "swallow" intruders "harassing" Earth/Moon gravitational-synchronizations. Jupiter's stronger gravitational-field is why Earth wasn't destroyed a LONG TIME AGO. Whenever an uninvited celestial-body comes in close proximity to Earth, Jupiter's stronger gravitational-field PULLS it away from Earth. 6 For practicality-sake, 'Apophis' will more-than-likely end up: someplace else across the Milky Way Galaxy (not on Earth), OR absorbed onto Jupiter's gas-planet-surface, thermally-vaporized, and reformed into "solidity" = Gravitational-Deposition. Jupiter's strong gravity changes gases into solids = 'Deposition'. ===> PHASE CHANGES ===> [Solid to Gas = Sublimation] [Liquid to Gas = Vaporization] [Gas to Liquid = Condensation] [Solid to Liquid = Melting] [Liquid to Solid = Freezing] [GAS TO SOLID = DEPOSITION] 7 Jupiter is a 'gas-planet', 1000 times larger than Earth, for which its gravity is strong enough to convert gases into solids (deposition). Even though the gravitational-acceleration of Jupiter is only 24.8 m/s^2 vs. Earth's gravitational-acceleration (9.81 m/s^2), Jupiter's Mass & Radius are exponentially LARGER than Earth's Mass & Radius. Using the "BIG-G" Equation, or the gravitational-relationship between two celestial-bodies, the EQUIVALENT gravitational ratio between Earth and Jupiter equates to: 1 Tablespoon of Water on Earth will weight approximately 1 Ton (2.000 Lb) on Jupiter! 8 The REAL FOCUS should be on Jupiter, moreso than 'Apophis'. However, Jupiter was not able to 'protect' Earth during the MASSIVE Asteroid-Shower that wiped-out the Dinosaurs (while NOT destroying Earth). Even if 'Apophis' does strikes, Human survivors will remain, and Earth will not be destroyed. Aerodynamic-Drag (alone), will slow 'Apophis' down by 81%, substantially curtailing maximum destruction-potential. 9 So many things OPPOSE 'Apophis' striking Earth. So much so, that IGNORING 'Apophis' is ACCEPTABLE.

Yep. Sinusoidally, with respect to the Poynting Theorem. Across Step-Up & Step-Down Transformer(s). Electromagnetic 'conservation-of-energy'.

1 Multiple NASA 'Parker Solar Probes' could tether onto Apophis and re-direct its orbit. Presently, Apophis is 165,320,565 miles away from Earth, moving at 7.8 miles per second. 2 Parker Solar Probe is the fastest object ever built, having an Inertial Velocity of 109.6 miles per second through outer space. Mass of Apophis: 26.99 billion kg. Weight of Apophis in outer space: 26.99 billion kg x 0 m/s^2 gravity = 0 N. 3 Weightless Apophis traveling through outer space, 'could' be re-directed (Ideal Inertial Physics). As of now, IF Apophis were to strike Earth, it is less-than 5,800 hours (less than 0.66 years) away from impact. 4 However, it is likely that Jupiter's massively powerful gravitational field will pull Apophis off its vector toward Earth. Unless Apophis "slips" through its 'Key-Holes' toward Earth on returning-orbits (2029, 2036, 2068). 5 Egyptian Mythos: 'Apophis' = Also known as 'Apep', a giant serpent and the primary demon of night. 6 Jupiter's gravitational field will more than likely redirect Apophis away from Earth, missing every Key-Hole (2029, 2036, 2068).

1 For all intents and purposes those "Megaton-Warhead-Rated" Thermonuclear Weapon/Ordnance applications are ONLY 'Science Experiments'. They will NEVER be used in any Nuclear Exchange, not ever. 2 Only practical Kilo-Ton Rated Tactical Nuclear Strikes, similar to the 1953 120mm Nuclear Cannon (Mobile Tactical Nuclear Unit), or nuclear-versions of the Mk-42 low-drag laser-guided aerial bomb(s). 3 No one wins if a 50 Mega-Ton Thermonuclear Payload is detonated (such as Tsar Bomba). The Earth's top-soil several-meters-deep would Isotope during the (global shockwave). Nearly all elements across Earth's top-soil would not support germination for decades. Say goodbye to Humanity. Not to mention the Sun blocked out by Nuclear WInter for a few years following the aftermath. 4 The initial detonation (2.5 miles above ground level) of let's say 'Tsar Bomba' (50 MT) would (first) proliferate Nuclear Winds, and (second) Fall-Out. Some survivors on Earth would remain, assuming they survived Nuclear Winter and irradiated top-soil (zero food/water consumability). 5 No one will ever use a Thermonuclear Weapon greater than 100 Kilo-Tons (0.1 MT). However, the idea of 'World Peace' is guaranteed through: Mutually-Assured Destruction (MAD) and MT Nukes. 6 No one can start a MT hot-nuclear-war, unless EVERYONE wants to DIE = World Peace = (MAD). 7 If Apophis strikes, it will reset the Earth. Old systems will be gone. Survivors build a new Future Earth, unlike the one we live on. More than likely Apophis will NOT hit Earth in 2029, 2036, or 2068. However, Apophis will be visible at certain places on Earth, some time during 2025. 8 Weapons built by engineers, scientists, and technicans are more dangerous than Apophis! lol 9 For sure. People at Ground-Zero, should Apophis strike, things will not work out very well for them. In fact they won't even hear or feel the impact, occurring faster than their nervous system can process (76 m/s vs. 2,445 m/s). 10 However, the approximate strike-location on Earth is predictable after Apophis Re-Enters (its) Key-Hole. Potential Ground-Zero survivors have 40-seconds to pry open manhole covers and hide inside deep-well sewers. They'll probably end up in a tomb/grave, but worth attempting anyway.

Told you what to do in the other video you commented at! lol Seed Phrase is incidental. Follow Binance Transfer Protocol. Are your comment(s) "encoded mesaaging", or are you AI?

Hi!

Posted at the top: Total Resistance = 33.06 Ohms. However, to solve mathematically: 1.) Combine R4 & R5 in series = 91.5 Ohms. 2.) Combine 91.5 Ohms in parallel with R3 (90 Ohms) = [(1) / ((1/91.5) + (1 / 90))] = 45.37 Ohms. 3.) 45.37 Ohms in series with R6 (4.5 Ohms) = 49.87 Ohms. 4.) Combine 49.87 Ohms in parallel with R2 (50 Ohms) = [(1) / ((1/49.87) + (1/50))] = 24.97 Ohms. 5.) Combine 24.97 Ohms in series with R1 (8 Ohms) = 33 Ohms. Total Resistance Variation: from 32.97 Ohms to 33.06 Ohms. If we round calculation for accuracy (rather than precision), we calculate a Total Resistance of: 33 Ohms.

1 Refactive Index of Light (n) = [(Speed-of-Light In Vacuum) / (Phase Velocity)]. 2 Light passing through Gross Matter (atmosphere), other than a perfect superfluid vacuum such as outer-space, will incur a certain Refractive Index. 3 MIT built a 1 Trillion Frames-per-Second (FPS) camera to "measure" the one-way-speed-of-light. This turned out to be a failure. Yes, the propagation of light from Point-A to Point-B was in fact 'tracked'. But, if the light can already be 'seen', then it has already incured two-way reflection & refraction across its propagation-medium ("diameter of light beam"). 4 Including what you mentioned, that Light is not proprgating through a "perfect vacuum": the Gross Matter (atmosphere) itself is acticulating inherent reflection & refraction, simultaneously. 5 More than likely, the 'one-way-speed-of-light' is either 'Unknowable' or 'Non-Existent'. 6 Cautiously using the phrase 'Non-Existent'. Just because we haven't figured-it-out, doesn't mean it "doesn't exist".

@@markscythian7179 I forget where I heard this, but they said that light could be instantaneous. If that were the case then how can we measure the time is takes for light to get from the Sun, that is, 'if' we can really know the speed. The Sun was up and running before mankind so are we just guessing since we were not here to see it all happen.

​@@markstephens8423 Consider these eighteen (18) points: 1 (Instantaneous) Quantum Non-Locality. Just as matter & energy cannot be "created" or "destroyed", neither are all things "created" or "destroyed", across infinite time-lines or infinite probabilities. Therefore, Information cannot be "created" or "destroyed" either. 2 There is no "beginning" or "end". One's limited biological/physical senses posit error-concepts such as "beginning" and "end", OR "created" and "destroyed" OR "birth" and "death". None of these are locally real. 3 Matter as a derivative of Light & Magnetism, in-entanglement, below the "speed-of-light". Spirituality & Quantum Mechanics are more closely related compared to Classical Mechanics (particle physics). 4 Atoms are 99.9999% empty-space (energy = proton-input, electron-output= waveform/frequency), and 0.0001% "physical matter" (matter = neutron = entanglement of proton/electron = ground-state = "trend-line-resonance of sine-wave-frequency"). 5 Everything is information & energy, their "error" is what we percieve as 'physical reality'. Nothing more than electrical signals occuring within our brains, encased within 'darkness'. 6 The Human Brain: A Quantum Computer converting information & energy into physical matter. A Quantum Chemical Computer. For which ideas and thoughts of Consiousness (Light-Body merged with Physical Body) convert information & energy (having no mass) to their frequency-equivalent chemicals/particles/matter (entanglement = particle = neutron-ground-state). 7 Thought/Consciousness/Belief/Knowledge/World-View dictate one's physical reality. No two persons' "realities" are identical. One person has no clue how to "help" another person. All solutions come "from within". This is where "Biological Light", or Bio-Luminescence or Bio-Photons play their role in converting ideas into physical particles/chemicals. Organically, this is probably 'instantaneous'. 8 Instantaneous reaction or perception probably renders the concept of the "Speed-of-Light" as a misnomer. Case in point: The Human Body as a holistic bio-photonic-device, functions of instantaneous quantum non-locality. 9 For example, "testing" parts of the Human Body by taking biological samples, this requires killing the bioogical samples, and making them into Labratory Artifacts. For another person's subjective testing-methods or belief system to interpret. This is where one's belief-system, or worldview, or knowledge, or perception(s) dictates information, thus dictating energy, and therefore the material/physical outcome(s). 10 However, it was the 'Belief System' itself which dictated the actual 'Health Outcomes' (Placebo vs. Nocebo), NOT the actual testing, treatment, or lack-of-treatment. Understanding Schrodinger's Causality, Heinsenberg Uncertainty Principle, and the Einstein-Rosen-Bridge in Quantum Mechanics are KEY! 11 Light & Magnetism are the substrates of ALL information, matter, and energy, distributed across infinite time-lines (probabilities, possibilities, decisions), for which are ALL existing simultaneously. "Bright Idea" = Light. 12 Light holds the potential to make any idea, belief system, worldview, and knowledge into physical-reality, or particle, or chemical, or mass. Einstein-Rosen-Bridge ===> E = mc^2. At best, the concept of the "Speed-of-Light" is a 'Convention', and not an actuality. A Convention of 'Special Relativity'. 13 'The Black Sun': The Sun's Neutrino Emissions are probably instantaneous 'information', grounding into Photons (Light) within Gross Matter (Earth's atmosphere). Sunlight is not visible within outer space (Neutrino Emissions only). Neutrino Emissions grounding through Gross Matter (Earth's atmosphere) converts the Sun's Neutrino Emissions into Photons (Light). 14 We are perceiving the 'after-effect' of information converted to energy, and then into matter (Informatics + Einstein Rosen-Bridge). Our five senses are very limited or primitive compared to vast information-spectrum (actuality vs. reality) outside of Human Biological Perception. 15 Hence, we use Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry to detect vast datasets outside of our biological/physical perception. Classical & Quantum Mathematics unlocks undiscovered mysteries to infinity. Science is NOTHING without Mathematics. 16 Reminder: Sunlight is NOT visible in outer-space. In outer-space, the Sun's Neutrino Emissions have no Gross Matter to ground across and convert into Photons (Light). The "Black Sun". Only within Earth's atmosphere are the Sun's Neutrino Emissions grounded across into what we perceive as "Light" (Photons = Wave-Particle-Duality). 17 Thinking in terms of "beginning" and "end" is an exercise in erroneous-perception. There is no creation or destruction. There is no birth or death. There is no start or finish. We, like everything else JUST ARE. If this Cosmology is understood, then Quantum Mechanics becomes easier to understand. As for what WE THINK WE HAVE EXPERIENCED, is (probably) just Information playing out into energy & matter. None of it is locally real. This is the universally-accepted Convention in Quantum Physics, on a global level by every Quantum Physicist as of 2021 to the Present. 18 Just as you have stated, Light itself is most likely an Instantaneous Medium. For which Human Perception of Light occurs as Neutrinos ground into Photons. The 'Speed-of-Light' (c) then becomes a 'Reference-Point' or 'Scaling-Factor' to "measure" the capabilities of limited-function electromagnetic-waves (radiowaves, microwaves, gamma-waves, light-waves). - Mark Scythian - BSc. Aerospace Engineering Western Michigan University January 09, 2025

@@markscythian7179 The fact that a strong magnetic field can bend light is interesting. Was Einstein, the one to discover that? What if all light is entangled? Then the entire universe is connected. Would that make light instantaneous. It would not need to travel, but just appear from one side of the universe to the other side. What if all spirituality is entangled? Then can the knowledge of everyone can be accessed? Every thought is connected to God.

​@@markstephens8423 Hi Mark Stephens! Strong gravitational fields (such as Black Holes) can distort/bend Light, Magnetism, and Time-Space. Gravity is the 'Curvature of TIme-Space'. The end-point of a Black Hole is a Star or a 'White Hole'. We're all part of GOD simultaneously-existing across infinite time-lines. Probably interconnected by Plasma: The Fourth State of Matter, moving at the "speed-of-light". Matter, Energy, and Information cannot be created or destroyed, but only changed in form. Birth and Death do not exist. I think what we're "experiencing" is a 'Bio-Electric-Simulation'. Most Quantum Physicists have reached a similar conclusion too. Atoms are 99.99999% empty-space or concentrated energy in-entanglement. What the 'Observer' observes is NOT the same as what the 'Experiencer' experiences. We all "could have" died on another time-line and instantly moved-on into another time-line, for which almost everything (quantum information) is identical, except that we didn't die (Schrodinger's Causality and his Cat). Seamless in continuity. Other than Near-Death-Experiences (NDEs'), there are also Near-Catastrophic-Events (NCEs'). Such as a motorist "some how" escaping certain death, despite being milli-seconds away from a lethal head-on collision (small car vs. semi-truck). "Impossible" outcome: semi-truck just disappeared, roadway normal and safe, as if the semi-truck was never there. Followed by driving to work, clocking-in, BUT, all personalities at work are completely different, a house that was never there now is, favorite black jacket is now blue, same company but different job description. Millions of NDEs' and NCE's have been documented, now, in the 'Information-Age'. The Earth is splitting into multiple time-lines as well. 'Mandela Effect'. How much of this has to do with CERN is debatable. GOD'S CREATION instantly and COMPLETELY established outside of time-space: all time-lines, all events, all information, all matter, all energy, across infinite-probabilities. We do not really "create" or, "invent" or, "destroy" anything. We just discover or partake these through intent, focus and Re-Search rather than "Search". More information to share about these concepts posted in a (new) video-upload titled: 'Plasma Physics & Quantum Superposition'. Thank you Mark Stephens for your stellar comments and inquiries! Please share your feedback.

You're welcome!

Hi John! Absolutely true. This lecture was from seven (7) years ago, prior to earning my Aerospace Engineering BSc. Degree (Western Michigan University). In my previous career, I was an (A.A.S.) FAA A&P Mechanic. While at university, I uploaded this lecture. It is incomplete and not updated. A few recently uploaded videos are fundamentals-focused across: Fluid Mechanics & Thermodynamics. Including Aerodynamic Lift (L), Aerodynamic Drag (D), Power Lost to Overcome Aerodynamic Drag (P-aero-d), Lift-to-Drag Ratio (L/D), Oswald Number (e), Reynold's Number (Re), Conservation-of-Energy (1st Law of Thermo), and Navier-Stokes (∇). Revisiting propeller-fundamentals posits: Lift Equation, Simplified-Momentum, Re-Number, L/D or T/D, in abstraction with various Helical-Twist Schedules (differing by manufacturer). We could assume an 80% Propeller Efficiency (outside of innovative design + materials). The Lift Equation + Simplified-Momentum tends to generate 'base-values', and nearly 15% accuracy-loss. Breaking these into Logarithms places consistent-accuracy across practical limits. Much is missing from this lecture such as: Lift Equation (L) = [(Cl x A x P x V^2) / (2)] <==> Drag Equation (D) = [(Cd x A x P x V^2) / (2)] <==> T/D <==> Multi-Blade Logarithms <==> Power-Transfer (Conservation-of-Energy), and their Partial Differential Equations. Just to name a few. An updated 'Propeller Thrust' video-lecture is long overdue! Thank you John for your comment!

1 This presentation is with respect to Fluid Mechanics, Aerodynamics, Kinematics, and The First Law of Thermodynamics (Conservation-of-Energy). 2 The asteroid would naturally lock-into its Aerodynamic-Boundary-Layer (longitudinally) as it enters Earth's atmosphere. Naturally positioning across the lowest projected-frontal-area (length-wise), and thus least likely to "tumble". 3 It is a 'world of difference' to measure zero-drag Inertial Velocity in outer-space (12,600 m/s) compared to through Earth's atmosphere. This is like comparing motion through a 'vacuum' to motion through 'quick-sand'. The Dynamic Viscosity potential of Earth's atmosphere alone, decreases the velocity of Apophis by 81%, or to 2,445 m/s (Terminal Velocity) from its Initial Velocity of 12,600 m/s in outer space. 4 The Dynamic Viscosity of Earth's atmosphere is quite high at extreme velocities. In fact, rockets traveling at 'Mach 27' (17,000 MPH) CANNOT in Earth's atmosphere, and need to reach non-atmospheric-sub-orbit, while not completely separating from Earth's gravitational field. Examples: The former 'Space Shuttle' and any sort of 'Intercontinental-Ballistic-Missile'. 5 If Apophis strikes Earth, its actual destruction potential is DECREASED by 81%. Due to the Aerodynamic Drag slowing down the asteroid by 81%, substantially decreasing its Kinetic Energy. The maximum constant velocity limitation of an object in free-fall (due to Aerodynamic Drag) is its Terminal Velocity. 6 Impact Force is equal to the asteroid's Final Velocity times its Mass, then divided into Gravitational Acceleration. Impact Time = 1 second. Kinetic Energy of asteroid = 0.5 x Mass x Velocity^squared. Kinetic Energy (Joules) per Second is equal to Watts Power. The Impact Power of Apophis will ONLY equate to around 1300 Hiroshima-Type nuclear blasts. Not enough Energy-Transfer to completely destroy Earth. 7 Apophis will shut down the world's systems if it does hit Earth in 2029, 2036, or 2068 . But, Apophis will not "destroy Earth", and is NO WHERE near as powerful or deadly as the Asteroid(s) that destroyed the Dinosaurs. Survivors of Apophis rebuilding civilization is a CERTAINTY, should it hit Earth. 8 Apophis isn't is the "deadliest asteroid". The Earth has experienced FAR WORST!

Don't dispute any of what you say here because there's a lot of long science words. Jargon aside, we can't do anything about and it will cause a mess wherever it hits so why worry? And 'ONLY 1300 Hiroshima type blasts'? That's alright then as long as it lands on the Idiot Trump's house when he's having a pool party with Elon the Sad. :-)

Chevy Volt & Bolt models, their software plaftorm, tend to use partial piston-electric AC generator interface along with battery draw. Depending on acceleration vs. constant speed (no-acceleration) driving techniques. Thus, prolonging battery runtime. This analysis models 67% battery draw for practicaliity. At 90% draw, residual charge (10%) would trigger LVC (Low-Voltage-Cutoff). Triggering startup of onboard piston-electric AC generator. At constant-speed (no acceleration), increased weight has little effect on power draw (W x V x 0.012) / (550) = Watts Power To Overcome Tire-Rolling-Resistance. However, Watts Power to accelerate an object: (m x v^2) / (2 x t) ===> substantially higher. You seem like a conservative driver (slow acceleration, constant speed, cruise control). 250 mile range on 60,000 Watt-Hours charge is feasible with Chevy Bolt: tons of abstract software architecture and partial piston-electric AC generator during heavy acceleration, unlike during cruise speed on level road. QUESTION: How much has your onboard Gasoline decreased after 250 miles? Chevy Bolt and Volt both have onboard piston-electric AC generator(s).

@@markscythian7179 The bolt is pure electric with a 65 KWH battery . It gets about 4 miles per kilowatthour.

@@donalddouglas5988 What is the mAh capacity of your Bolt's battery? Is it greater than 30,000 mAh?

@@donalddouglas5988 More specifically, what are the Battery Specifications for your Chevy Bolt EV? ===> 1.) mAh capacity. 2.) Battery Voltage. 3.) Discharge Rate Limits (usually 2.0C to 5.0C). Knowing you have a 65,000 Joule charge, we can work out the calculations based on 4 miles/kW-Hr. That is after the mAh capacity, discharge-limits, and battery voltage are known. Thanks.

At -20 degrees C, the vehicle's Amenities-Related Latent Heat (mass x temperature) is a fraction of the vehicles Amenities-Related Latent Heat at Standard Temperature conditions (15 degrees C). Approximately 10% of vehicle weight would comprise 'Amenities-Mass'. An 'LH Differential' (outside environment <=> vehicle amenities), substantially decreasing Battery Runtime, and yielding the following calculations: [((15) x (9/5) + (32)] - [(-20) x (9/5) + (32)] = -63 F or -52.8 C ===> [(3,500 Lbm x 0.1) x (-63 F)] = -22,050 BTUs' or -5,556.6 Kilo-Calories ===> Assuming one (1) hour battery run-time at (15 C) Standard Temperature Conditions ===> [(-22,050 BTUs') / (3,600 seconds/hour)] = -6.125 BTU/Sec ===> [(-6.125 BTU/Sec x 1,056 W/BTU/Sec)] = -6,468 Watts (lost to colder -.20 C temperature) ===> [(1) - (31,200 Watts DC Power - 6,468 W)] / [(31,200 Watts)] = 0.21 ===> 21% reduction in battery run-time. Approximate Runtime = [(1 - 0.21) x (1 hour)] = 0.79 hours = 47 MINUTES. If your runtime is lower than 47 MINUTES, then the assumed Amenities-Mass is greater than 10% proportionality.

@@markscythian7179 can you explain this in english (im not smart)

@@DarthLeopard This analysis calculates the equivalent Potential Energy of a typical Electric Vehicle's FULL-BATTERY-CHARGE to the equivalent Potential Energy of UNBURNED GASOLINE. A typical EV's Full-Battery-Charge has a Potential Energy equivalent to the Potential Energy of 1.9 gallons of unburned Gasoline.

@@markscythian7179 sorry I meant the -20°c maths

@@DarthLeopard The calculation decribes the temperature difference at -20 C from Standard Temperature (15 C), multiplied times the Amenities-Mass (mass of car involved in heating or approximately 10% of total vehicle weight ===> 0.1 x 3,500 Lbm = 350 Lbm). Thus, calculating the required change in Latent Heat (mass x temperature), or in this case the (negative-value) -BTUs/Hr to maintain 15 C temperature within -20 C outside air temperature. -BTUs'/Hr then converted to -BTUs'/Sec by dividing into 3,600 seconds per hour. Conversion Factor: 1 BTU/Sec = 1,056 Watts. Hence, -BTUs'/Sec converted to -Watts, or the additional battery power needed to support amenities.

Thanks! In this particular analysis video, I decided to screen-record a Slide Presentation instead. Usually, I'll animate sequential handwritten text from blank to populated whiteboard. Graphical animations comparing the Energy Densities of Gasoline & Lithium-Ion-Battery (materials) seems like a start. Thanks for the suggestion!

That's disappointing you should have listened to the entire video because he covers that

@NVAfilm Maybe I would have it weren't so dry. Still the point of his title is just nonsense here. There are so many more variables. Just the "typical" ev battery charge may be 2-3 times his assumed number

The energy-density of most EV batteries do not possess the energy-density of crude oil: [(60,000 Joules / 454.5 Kg) = 132 Joules/Kg = Typical EV Battery] vs. [(20,000 BTU x 1056) / (1/2.2 kg) = 46,464,000 Joules/kg = Crude Oil/Hydrocarbon-Fuel]. 132 Joules/kg = EV Battery vs. 46,464,000 Joules/kg = Crude Oil. The Pu-238 nuclear-electric battery has an energy-density of 2,200,000,000 Joules/kg. Used experimentally and safety in non-civilian applications. Even at higher electromotive efficiency (85%) compared to gasoline-piston-engine thermal efficiency (33%), conventional EV battery materials have TERRIBLE energy-density. This analysis EXCLUDES onboard gasoline-piston-engine driving AC Generator to power AC-Electric-Motor, for which most EVs' are equipped with. EV Battery run-time ALONE is not competitive.

DOF calculation + equations ONLY. Angular Velocity (w) = 2(Pi)(RPM/60), w = radians/sec, not posted in video. The Motion Equations can be used for design (long-hand or CAD).

Sir can u upload how to create Linkage 3.0 for it​@markscythian7179

Hi!

0402 0.1uF

"On 31 January 2008, the U.S. Navy tested a railgun that fired a projectile at 10.64 MJ with a muzzle velocity of 2,520 m/s (8,270 ft/s).[80] The power was provided by a new 9-megajoule prototype capacitor bank using solid-state switches and high-energy-density capacitors delivered in 2007 and an older 32-MJ pulse power system“ - Wikipedia

@@alexipeck4201 So I would need an aircraft carrier size subwoofer..

"The fireball is a result of pieces of the projectile shearing off during launch and igniting mid-air."

Arc Flash. Google arc flash videos. The device is effectively a purpose built arc flash device designed to fire a projectile

nope thats the result of quite a large amount of electricity 🤣

vaporized aluminum explodes when it touches air

@Angryharry1 Yeah, if the wires were exposed to the air. The full gun would explode and not be able to fire again if the explosion was electricity.

Reality is Mathematical. Critical-Thinking Skills. Thanks!

@markscythian7179 You read my greater signal! Given the context of course.

You're welcome Seb!

We'll know April 13, 2029... I think it's a continent destroyer and it would disrupt the planet for at least 10 years... in don't look up, the chalkboard had the same numbers, 0.000...

Seriously, how would you get there and where would you live?

​@@whateyecanseeElon Musk is the one to ask😅😅😅

[(10,791 kW-Hrs/Yr) / (12 months)] = 899.25 kW-Hrs/Month ===> [($63.00) / (899.25 kW-Hrs)] = $0.14 per kW-Hr. Localized (smaller) steam-turbines could reduce the cost of AC Electricity by 50%. Excluding taxes, fees, regulations, overhead, etc.

Can some one help us we live in Bardwell Kentucky and I promise u will find these objects hidden in are home day and night it’s used!! “Contact fbi” please

@@MichaelDerousse Are you certain that you are T.I.? If so, Electronic or Frequency Countermeasures can solve your problem. If you find various Frequency-Meter Apps and download them onto your phone, you could measure the Hertz Frequency(s). If above 20KHz or below 20 Hz, then you'll have proof of unauthorized frequencies within civilian domain. There are other ways of shielding harmful EMF frequencies. Even changing which foods you eat such as herbs, water, electrolytes, as these too dampen EMI frequencies. Countermeasures include: mechanical, electronic, biochemical, structural, and material. Faraday Clothing used by those who work on Radar Systems also works. Tell me more. Maybe we can connect outside of YT.

Gordon's Reloading Tool (GRT) software is industry-specific: not bad for reloading. However this video utilizes Thermodynamics, Gas Mechanics and Engineering Physics to derive given application(s). I could make another video with an Excel Ballistics Software platform that I designed a few months ago for viewer simplicity. Deriving physics equations to solve engineering problems is what I do. Hence, I prefer to solve/prove sub-systems by means of long-hand calculations. Should I make another video for viewer simplicity by publishing an Excel Ballistics Software Platform?

For an American, Goddard built the best rockets during his time (Cold War Era). As a kid Goddard almost got into a lot of trouble building stainless-steel rockets and launching them near-horizontally over his hometown! lol As an adult rocket engineer, Goddard's rockets were very innovative. However at the time, his fellow Americans did not take him seriously, even ridiculing him. Goddard got his break during the Cold War, and became the American version of von Braun. It's all history now: Goddard, von Braun, and Johnson remain as the Western world's aerospace engineering legends. Media is never qualified to share their opinions on anything STEM-related, because Media are not Physicists, Chemists, Engineers, or Mathematicians. Typically, Media takes Big Money from industrialists to downplay competition or innovation toward maintaining the Status-Quo. The lay public should never take Media seriously. In fact, the lay public should demand that ONLY qualified Engineers & Scientists share their thoughts on technological innovation. Anyone with a Mechanical/Aerospace Engineering or Physics background after let's say Sputnik (1950's Sergei Korolov & Valentin Glushko = Eastern/Soviet world's best Cold War aerospace engineers), and especially during the 1950's Jet Age, should have clearly known that the Conservation-of-Momentum supports rocket propulsion in a vacuum or in outer-space. Thrust pushing against an atmosphere, at best, will harness no more than 8% to 10% of total thrust.

Love and La Ratta

1 EVs' (5.28 MJ/kg) just don't have the Energy-Density compared to Hydrocarbons (21.12 MJ/kg). However, the Overall Efficiencies of EVs' are higher compared to Heat Engines (70% vs. 25%). Portability, recharge/refill, and cost are substantially lower regarding hydrocarbons as well. 2 Modern 4-stroke Gasoline piston engine-driven cars literally reduce 1 Gasoline Mole (C8H18) + 25 Oxygen-gas Moles (O2) to carbon-dioxide gas (plant food), and water-vapor made possible by: Anti-Detonation-Sensing supporting 11.5:1+ Compression Ratios', Variable-Valve-Cam-Timing (VVCT), thus maintaining 100% Volumetric-Efficiency at all RPM-settings, Power-Recovery-Systems (mechanical, electrical, thermal, pneumatic, hydraulic), graphene-die-electric-subtrate-electrical-and-electronic solid-state materials (rather than wiring), looser tolerances, nano-graphene, software-heavy, and fewer parts. 3 The 'late-model automobile' is literally a water & carbon-dioxide output generator, with very low or trace-levels of Oxides-of-Nitrogen (NoX), and Oxides-of-Sulfur (SoX) emissions. Not to mention that literally all engine blocks are recycled aluminum, 3-D-Printed, if not graphene-substrates, or CNC-Machined, inlcuding reuse of CNC-subtracted scraps. 4 Recycling aluminum takes very little effort and energy to re-form into components, compared to titrating aluminum from bauxite-ore in the absense of oxygen, using fluorine-gas at around 900 degrees C and 14 ATMs', i.e. Aluminum-Smelting: almost a thing of the past, as most if not all aluminum-reserves have been processed into aluminum-alloys over the last 90 years. Forming engine blocks from recycled aluminum is cheaper and MORE environmentally-friendly compared to manufacturing parts for EVs'. 5 EVs' and their electromagnetic and inductive-field isolation systems also require many exotic polymeric materials, some of which are radio-active carbon-isotopes, also having manufacturing emissions which are difficult to contain, and damage the environment. 6 As for Nuclear Power, all nuclear and thermo-nuclear power sources are created UNEQUAL. If we're just talking about discharging neutrinos at higher electron-count and quantum-spin-propgation compared to naturally-existing Atomic Number(s) for let's say Uranium, then we're dealing with issues of Fall-Out, an unacceptable source of high-energy-density potential-energy. However, if we're working with Depleted Fall-Out artifacts such as Plutonium-239 having an energy density of 1.8 million times that of Hydrocarbons, HANDLING is already INERTED. Such as in our University Nuclear Engineering research, we work directly with INERTED Pu-239. Or else it would never have been commercially-viable. 7 Nuclear-Battery would work with respect to electron-discharge applications, NEVER fission, NEVER Fall-Out. The real source of clean, safe, and reliable electrical power are the HUGE stockpiles of INERTED Pu-239-Isotope: the reduced/spent material of Uranium-235 Nuclear-Testing. 8 Regarding nuclear weapons, ONLY Kilo-Ton warheads could ever be set-off into weapons applications. All Megaton warhead applications are just "science experiments" and are NOT usable for warfare, unless EVERYONE on Earth is to be killed. 9 Clearing atomic neutrons or the word "nuclear" means nothing outside of SPECIFICS! All of us in the Engineering, Physics, Chemistry or STEM Communities know this. Unlike the non-engineers and non-scientists across 98% of the population. The Media isn't real. The Media relies on scientifically-illiterate people to accept their nonsense. 10 Electric Vehicles would work well if they were powered on INERTED Pu-239. This goes for Electric Power Utility Companies too. 11 Elon Musk already told the public this as well. But no one listens. Everything is hype and "feelings" rather than pure science/engineering: Calculus, Physics, Chemistry, and Engineering. Only 2% of the US adult population are accredited scientists/engineers. This is the real problem. 12 Science is not a "Democracy". Science is limited only to: Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (across Newtonian, Quantum, and Informatic paradigms). There are also many systems in Mathematics/Science that are TRUE but NOT provable! 13 However, we in the STEM Community have already solved all problems regrding the "energy crisis". The real problems are: politics, business, economics, and the burdern of monoplies having huge stakes in governmental affairs. 14 Most if not all of the "green energy" products are literally worthless, and only function as Investment Slush Funds at best. 15 However, eventually INERTED Pu-239 Substrate nuclear-electric cores will be used (probably by Musk & Tesla), within ten years. This is when million-mile (non-chargable) EVs' roll-out. Trust me, "they" will never tell the public these are nuclear-electric-solid-state EVs', even though they will be the SAFEST, MOST RELIABLE and MOST ENVIRONMENTALLY-CLEAN EVs'. 16 Not much one can do with any sort of Battery (Lead-Acid or Ni-Cad or Lithium-Polymer) to support continuous-operation RPM/Torque. Except scam people out of their money. lol 17 It's all about squeezing enough profits $$$ until everyone knows it is a scam. Followed by suddenly releasing the "real technologies". People quickly forget and it becomes 'business and usual'. 18 Mastering Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Calculus, Computer Science, Operations-Research, Statistics, across a Mechanical Engineering or Electrical Engineering, or Physics, or Chemistry Bachelor of Science degree is the first step to understand what is really going. Followed by at least ten years of work experience, plus a Master's of Science and PhD degrees' in either Physics, or Chemistry, or Mathematics. 19 Remember, only 2% of the US adult population are accredited engineers & scientists. Everyone else literally has no clue what's really going on. 20 Science is NOTHING without Mathematics. 21 In fact, science is just a "word". 22 Real 'science' is DESCRIBING sub-atomic particles, energy, atoms, molecules, and all natural & synthetic systems MATHEMATICALLY (Differential & Integral Calculus). Or else it is not science at all. Science is nothing without Mathematical-Modeling. 23 Lastly, 96% of the known universe is Energy and described by Quantum Physics-Chemistry-Biology-Mathematics. Only 4% of the known universe is Physical and described by Newtonian/Classical Physics-Chemistry-Biology-Mathematics. 24 The DETAILS are EVERYTHING! lol Subscribe to my channel to gain access to the lastest fundamentals & concepts in engineering/science. Thanks for you comment!

@@markscythian7179 And thanks for your utter nonsense.

@@markscythian7179 The only reason I would subscribe to your channel would be to to counter the endless stream of bullshit you’re spewing.

@markscythian7179 Utterly ridiculous, anti-science, nutjob arguments.

Because the right-side is the MIDDLE OF THE CIRCUIT, for which positive-electron-flow transitions to negative-electron-flow. In DC Electrical Circuits, electricity flows from positive (+) to negative (-) ONLY. DC = Direct Current. By starting at the MIDDLE OF A DC SERIES-PARALLEL CIRCUIT or at the 'right-side', resistances can be combined sequentially and accurately.

Yes. 3-dimensional vortical displacement. I'm glad you asked this question. Another video is on its way focusing on: Heart "Valves" (Magneto-Oscillation Nodes), blood displacement Magnetic Resonance, and Bio-Transduction.

If the heart is not a pump (and that certainly makes sense), then what does that mean for blood pressure as a biomarker?

@mikeobrien1559 that volume versus capacity has a particular balance in order for the oxygen in the hemoglobin to be transferred properly. Also allows for things like insulin to balance sugar for ribosomes to make glycerin for cells. The heart makes a delicate balance between volume and capacity.

@@buckaroundandfindout I thought oxygen was "disassociated" from hemoglobin via the Bohr's effect. (We're getting to the point where I'm in over my head, so type slowly.🤣)

@@mikeobrien1559 I'm not sure to what context you're referring to when you say disassociated because hemoglobin is responsible for oxygen being fed to tissues. Now. It is true that oxygen has an s figure and that precludes it from attaching to the external arms of the hemoglobin, but I'm not sure that that is a disassociative factor so much as a limiter.

'Chaos Theory' or Non-Linear Dynamics [(xn+1 = rxn(1-xn))] = Finite-Elemental or Discrete. Quantum Numbers and 'Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle' yield more accurate abstraction-decoding compared to "unrecognized-pattern" (non-linear & colinear systems) aka "Chaos". Even the 'Double-Slit-Experiment' makes 'Chaos Theory' obsolete = too specialized. If one has completed their Bachelor of Science degree in either: Mechanical/Aerospace Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Computer-Science, or Operations-Research, one would know that 'Chaos Theory' is too specialized, and could, at best, quickly solve 'Structural Resonance' models. However, Quantum Mechanics and Fractals are more efficient, and correlate Order w/ Chaos, as one system, under Fractals, and/or '8-D Quasi-Crystalline Matrices'. Even Partial-Derivatives across Fractals out-perform Chaos Theory. Please write the Differential Equations you find most useful pertinent to 'Chaos Theory'. Thanks.

'Chaos' (Non-Linear Dynamics) brings forth Order, in Reverse Entropic Systems. 'Order' brings forth uncertainty but not Chaos across random position and momentum (Heisenberg). Proving Chaos approaching the Limits of positive or negative Infinity yields 'No Solution'. Non-Linear Dynamics (Chaos) models are useful when isolating Structural Resonance (Linear Algebra and Eigen Values = Scalar NOT Vector). 'Maxwell Field Equations' and 'Fibonacci Sequence' (also) yield complete Order-Chaos models across Wave-Particle-Duality (Lambda-Cubed Wave Function). What are your thoughts?