วีดีโอ

এক্সপ্লেইন টা সত্যি ভালো ছিল

Movie ta dekhe bujha gelo je rich manush der beshir vag e happy nai tara just happy howar acting kore 😕

The film focuses extensively on falsehoods about Karsandas Mulji, presenting him as a devout follower of Lord Krishna and a believer in Puranic deities, which contradicts historical records and his own statements in Maharaj Libel case. In reality, Karsandas Mulji was a critic of Puranic deities and did not believe in the stories of Lord Krishna's Ras Leela, which he described as false and amorous. His statements during the Maharaj Libel case, documented in his Gujarati newspaper "Satya Prakash" on October 21, 1860, reflect his disbelief in the Puranic texts and his systematic attack on Hinduism as part of a broader British colonial conspiracy. 1. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that all the Hindū Sanātana sects arisen in KaliYug are false “…the sect of the Maharajas has arisen in the KaliYug, therefore, according to the doctrines of the Shastras, it must be false ...” - “Satyaprakash” Gujarati Newspaper of 21st Oct, 1860 by Karsandas Mooljee 2. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that the stories of Lord Krishna, Gopees, Raas lila are false and amorous. “…The story of the "gopees" and the incarnations of Vishnoo are believed in by several sects, but are opposed to the ancient religion. The Shaivites believe in the incarnations of Vishnoo equally with the Vaishnayas. As far as I have reacl, all the sacred books do not contain amorous passages. I am not aware whether Sir William Jones has said that "Krishna is to this day the darling god of Hindū women." I have heard the story of Brahma coming out of an egg after remaining three millions and millions of years. I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Veds, which 1 have not read. The stories are considered by most Vaishnavas are literally true…” - Karsandas Mooljee, cross-examination by Mr. Bayley as part of Maharaj libel case proceedings (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249) 3. Karsandas Mooljee accepting that he has not read the Hindū Sanātana texts and does not believe in any texts apart from Veds. Hindū Sanātana believes in multiple texts as its foundational and core texts including Ved, Puranas, Smriti, Tantra agama, Itihaas, and Vedant. “…I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Vedas, which 1 have not read…” - (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249) Inaccuracies in the movie (as compared to Maharaj Libel case proceedings) The movie contains several inaccuracies regarding the beliefs and practices of the Pushtimarg sect. During the trial, the movie shows Karsandas explaining the correct meaning of Brahma Sambandh to the court, which was that all things are to be offered only to Lord Krishna and not to the Maharaja. However, this stand was actually taken by Jadunathji Maharaj in the real-life proceedings of the Maharaj Libel case. In fact, Karsandas Mulji maliciously and scandalously tried to prove to the court, by mistranslating the commentary verses of the Brahma Sambandh mantra by Gokulnathji (one of the Acharyas of Pushtimarg), and twisting the translation to mean that everything should be offered to the Maharaja and not to Krishna. This portrayal presents views that are far from the reality about Karsandas. The dialogues delivered on Brahma Sambandh by Karsandas in the movie were actually said by Jadunathji Maharaj as per the Maharaj Libel case proceedings. In the film "Maharaj," the facts of the historical Maharaj Libel case have been significantly distorted, especially in the pivotal trial scene. The movie inaccurately portrays the dialogue exchange between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj concerning the Brahmasambandha mantra, thereby misleading the audience about the actual events and character representations. Misrepresentation of Dialogues In the movie, the dialogues between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj during the trial are swapped, leading to a skewed portrayal of their respective positions. The film shows Jadunathji Maharaj accepting the Brahmasambandha mantra to mean that followers must offer their wives to the Maharajas. This is a gross mis-presentation of the historical records. In reality, it was Karsandas Mulji who presented this erroneous and defamatory interpretation in the court, not Jadunathji Maharaj. Historical Facts According to the actual case proceedings, it was Karsandas Mulji who twisted the meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra to suggest that the entire sect, including its original Acharyas, endorsed heretical practices. This misrepresentation aimed to malign the Pushtimarg sect and its spiritual leaders. Karsandas's allegations were part of a broader attempt to depict the sect as morally corrupt and its practices as deviant. Jadunathji Maharaj's Defense Contrary to the film's portrayal, Jadunathji Maharaj defended the true meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra in court. He clarified that the mantra meant all offerings should be made to Lord Krishna, not to the Maharajas. Furthermore, Jadunathji Maharaj acknowledged in the court that he was not a deity but a guru, emphasizing his role as a spiritual guide rather than a divine figure. This critical defense by Jadunathji Maharaj was aimed at correcting the false narratives presented by Karsandas Mulji and maintaining the integrity of the Pushtimarg sect's teachings. Character Assassination The film's portrayal of Jadunathji Maharaj as a manipulative and heretical figure is a severe mischaracterization that strays far from the documented reality. By depicting him as someone who endorses immoral practices, the film unjustly vilifies him and misrepresents the true nature of his statements during the trial. This distortion not only damages his reputation but also misleads the audience about the fundamental principles of the Pushtimarg sect.

A kmn end holo, pitia mere dewa ucit cilo jj ke

Movier seas er dek e dekhe hotas hoie gelam uchit selo jj k fasir ray deowa juta pitha kora

ভাবতে ও অবাক লাগে যে এরকম একটা যুগ ছিল যেখানে মেয়েদের সাথে এমন জঘন্য কিছু করা হতো এবং তারাই সেটা সমর্থন করতো।🙂

আপু এই মুভিটার নাম কি

যারা এই কমেন্টটা পড়তেছেন, তাদেরকে বলছি কেউ যদি মুভিটা আসলেই দেখতে চান মুভিটাই দেখেন। মুভি-এক্সপ্লেইন্ড দেইখা ভালো জিনিস দেখা বাদ দিয়েন না।

I like Dhanush a lot

😢😮😮

Hindura ato boka??

নাস্তিকরা কতটা অসুস্থ মস্তিষ্কজাত তা এই ছিনেমা তে প্রমানিত হয়

ব্যাখ্যা তা দারুন লাগলো 🌟

How someone could be so cruel 😢😢

দাদাজি নেহেরু নয় উনি দাদাভাই নৌরজি

Amir khan er chele junayed

Ratri apo

Wow your explanation is just amazing. Thanks sister.

Please explain the ending as soon as possible

😮😮😮

টিকটক থেকে কারা আসছো মুভিটা দেখার জন্য?

পরের পর্ব কই

Interesting story😮

অনেক সুন্দর ছিলো ছিন গুলো ❤

❤

এই ভিডিও তে মুভির শুধু কিছু অংশই দেখানো হয়েছে। তবুও কিছু জিনিস খুব চোখে লাগছে। সেটা হলো কিশোরি ছাড়া বাকি সব মেয়েদের ড্রেসের পেটার্ন একরকম। কিন্তু কিশোরির টা একটি রিভিলিং লেগেছে। হ্যা হিন্দি মুভি হিসেবে এটা কোন ব্যাপার না কিন্তু যখন একটু ফিল্মে একি এলাকার সিনে সব মেয়েদের একরকম লুক আর একটা মেয়ের আরেকরকম লুক এটা খুব ই বাজে লাগছে। তাও আবার এমন একটা সিরিয়াস টপিকের মুভির মধ্যে।

ইস কি জঘন্য। এই ভারতে আবার এখন ওই মোদি উচ্চ বর্ণের হিন্দুতবাদ জাগ্রত করে অন্যদের উপর আক্রমণ করতে চায়।

Explain Sundor chilo❤

Amazing movie 😱

Sotti.. vabtei abak lage... Ki din chilo.. manush dhormer name ki ki baje kaj korto.. bapre

❤❤❤❤❤❤

Stroy ta oti dartiy holeo Real stroy, eisob kankir seleder corom saja paoyai zuggo,

Awesome explanation

Nice massage❤️❤️❤️❤️

❤❤❤❤

এত এবং ব্যাবহার করছেন

Your honor k drama explanation koren please

Explaination sundor cilo

Apu red sawn er next episode please

Next episode please 😊

Ota vagoban shri krishna, kono debota non, vagoban

Nehru na dadavai naoroji

I love this drama...

Nice

Next episode Please

❤❤❤❤

Dadabhai Nouroji. Tata steel plant er protisthata.

Munjya movie tar o explanation upload korben please ❤