วีดีโอ

Thanks man

When it comes too looks there isnt always a lot you can do, now strength and how you act is very different. As for Alex yea you can max out often and not get injuryed, and lifting gear does not increase the chance of injury either.

Do you even know what narcissism is?, mate you really ought to actually not just throw things around treat others as you wish to be treated.

Jeff trains to look good i train for strongman, so there will be a clear difference, if you look at my channel i have not a single video on how to get abs or how to be shredded for a reason. As far as for studies you do not need them to get strong jacked and so on, however sure go with Jeff if you want to. The only thing i will ask you are you actually getting the progress you want from his advice?

@@larsenconditioning6742 You train for eating a fuckton of pizza mate, not strongman.

@@larsenconditioning6742 has that training begun yet?

@@itzan7513 Cute i do train strongman, i love how the only thing you got is body shaming.

@@larsenconditioning6742 you mean the same bodyshaming you used throughout your video and comments?

Not rage bait mate this is a legit critism of Jeff and overall the science based crowd, however i do appricate you taking the time😁

Just because he works with it doesnt mean he knows anything, there was a study showing 45 sets of quads per week was better than 15. Take that and apply to all muscle groups and you will be left with around 300 sets per week, research is often wrong or misrepresented by people. Here is the thing with the strecth research, it shows it gave more growth in a certain subsection of a muscle like the triceps so one of the 3 heads got more from the strecth and they then use that to argue that it is just as good as full ROM when it actually isnt.

@@larsenconditioning6742 The tests are done on other people tho, it's already proven by countless articles that training with a slow eccentric and a deep stretch is where the muscle gets damaged the most, arguing against it just makes you seem ignorant since google (or the library) is free. But sure lets pretend Jeff doesnt know what he's talking about (even though he quotes others work) how about the thousands of other medical professionals in unis, physiotherapists or other excersice scientists? Is everyone just lying?

@@DonkeyFucker3000 The slow eccentrics and deep strecth leads to less load, as a natty your single greatest indication of growth is getting stronger and no not in 1 RM sense, whatever weight you can load up for decent reps, if that weight increases or the rep increases then you are getting bigger because you can lift a greater load. I will ask you this if the strecth was soo good how come the people Jeff and so on that uses it over the past couple of years, have either lost muscle mass or stopped growing competely even though they try their hardest to get bigger?

@@larsenconditioning6742 cool, this is just blatant information tho, whats ur proof to back it up? cause it sounds to me like youre just copying what people did back in the days, also u just refused to answer my question, so ill ask it again. If not for Jeff Nippard how about every other excersice scientist out there who writes their own studies that are not debunking his claims?

Jeff has in the past been dunked on for training to softly, he has legit done videos of him doing 5 more reps than he thought he could because he thought he reached failure. So just because he promotes, does not mean he does it himself and science based lifting suck. Reason 1 there are studies showing lifting heavy loads 1-5 reps that strength doesnt increase compared to doing higher rep work. Even though we know that is not case, if that was the case all strength athletes myself included would not try to lift super heavy. Reason 2 there are studies showing 45 sets per muscle is better than 15 sets, apply that and do over 300 sets per week and spend 4-6 hours a day in the gym and overtrain. Reason 3 studies are done on weaker lifters ie the general population, and not people with 225+ lbs OHPs and 550+ lbs deadlifts. The moment you include strong lifters, all that research falls flat on its face. If you dont belive me watch mitchell hooper the worlds strongest man 2 years in a row, and he says exactly the same.

​@@larsenconditioning6742 Dr Milo Wolf and Dr. Mike Israetel have discussed what you are saying many times, both promote science based lifting and both adress the points you make in a very practical and empirical way. it is called *nuance* You have some good ideas but you reach the wrong conclusion I recommend you to watch them too and better think about what you're saying

This is just one video vs science based lifting, in case you want another one ive seen people talking about how they cannot recover from 40 sets per week per body part. And they do it because of science based lifting, because there was a study showing 45 sets of quads per week gave more growth than 15 sets per week. You can do science papers all you want however that doesnt make you good at lifting mate, there were once the gymbros needed the science crowd a little now days it has taken over.

​@@larsenconditioning6742the goal of that study you mention wasn't to recommend training every muscle to such extent, rather to show that there doesn't seem to be any upper limit to how much hypertrophy you can create in a given muscle. also, preferring anecdotal evidence to empirical research? really?

@@farmingthetnt8081 There is a upper limit at best the study was showed it was comparable to just doing full ROM. And yes id rather use personal experience than studies, because over the years ive seen that the stronger i get the less volume i can handle. So it is clear a strong lifter needs less volume compared to a weaker lifter, a weaker lifter can also get away with more volume because they havent learned how to recruite high threshold motorunits. However your studies does not say that, i got more than enough expeience at this point to know what i can and cannot do training wise. When i was newer to lifting i could do 12 sets or more for chest in a single session, if i do that now it will be straight overtraining, however the research does not support it. Most subjects in studies are just normal folks with normal strength levels, when you are weaker you can handle more volume. If you do not believe me ask Mitchell Hooper, he himself have flat out said he doesnt do that many sets due to his strength level as each set drains him that much more.

By bigger I mean in terms of aesthetics it's hard to be smaller than Jeff stature wise

It is not adhom mate i said if the strecth was soo good then he would be bigger, im not saying anything about his height that is out of his control. If you look at jeff now vs 2 or 3 years ago he looks smaller, and the last 2 years or so he has been all about the strecth and in that time frame he gotten smaller. So again just like in the video if the strecth was good how come he is smaller now, compared to when he did normal strength training. And btw an adhom is a personal attack i said nothing about him as a person, nor used to say he is smaller therefor hes worth less so no mate not a personal attack id never dream of doing that to anyone.

@@larsenconditioning6742 The comment literally directly addressed your whole point "regardless of whether other circumstances in his life have changed that may have reduced his size ie diet, frequency of training or general lifestyle changes." Just because Jeff has gotten smaller it doesn't mean it disproves science. Is Dr Mike getting smaller due to the stretch.

@@PaddyTheLilGuy I know nothing about jeffs private life just anyone else here on YT, my point is if the stretch was good why is he getting smaller?. As for mike funny enough he also stopped getting bigger once he started fouscing on the strecth, even though he is one a truck load of PEDs.

​@@larsenconditioning6742If you don't know anything about Jeff's private life, then you can't conclude that the stretch is making him smaller. Yes, there's correlation, but that doesn't mean causation.

Because Greg sponsors him and i believe it is a great move on Gregs part to call out Connors actions, it shows just because you are being sponsored by Greg that you are not immune to being called out by Greg.

Thanks i guess old timer

120 lbs to go🤪

That is true however due to the massive amount of americans on YT, and most fitness related content tends to be targeted towards them as well this goes for weight numbers as well. So it is 135 lbs actually now i am not american myself, however when it comes to weight numbers i still have to target them. For reference my best OHP is a log press of 100kg or 222 lbs, there is a clip of it here on my channel.

Not the smith version no however if you use a seated version from a rack then yes, because you can brace against the bench and just dummy press the weight up. We also want the bar bath to be the same as much as possible, with a smith machine it wont be. The bar path will get to be a little bit more in front of you rather than a more straight path up. I even use the seated OHP myself, because you can add reps and weight a bit easier so progression curve is better.

It is pretty normal having to put in some work to get to 150, now your claim of hitting 315 without ever going to the gym sounds hella sus. Now if the claim you make is true that then means you have ultra elite genetics.

@@larsenconditioning6742 I didn't say I never exercised. I did. I just never went to a gym or had any kind of training or help on how to properly exercise. I worked out with free weights and a benchI got on craigslist for about an hour a day 5 days a week. 320lbs was every plate I had on one of those skinny bars and i could press it. I got to that in two months. I was 22 and my goal was to compete in strongman competitions like I saw on TV. I got worried after lifting that much and checked the weight limit on the bench online since I was lifting alone. It was 500lbs combined person and weights so I got scared and stopped using it. I couldn't afford something stronger and ended up moving to a place I couldn't put a bench. I dont like being around people so I never got a gym membership. I'm 38 now and have lost an inch in height and gained an embarrassing amount of weight leaving me at 6'4" 360lbs but I can still do push ups. I think it's around 70% of your weight is what you lift in a pushup so make of that what you will. I had worked as a tree cutter, mostly on the ground lifting logs for ten years. I've kept some of that strength. It's also probably why I lost an inch in height.

That is very good clearly you went past 10 years which is a point i brought up, because most will not stay consistent for that long

Mate you cannot get me to rage bait, sorry man and honestly myron is a damn fool whom have clearly shown racism towards other people of his own skin colour. And wants to bring bullying however the moment he is in the line of sight he backs down is that your hero?.

You have a point however like i said most will not stay consistent for 10 years in order to reach the goal, if we look around in gyms most people just go in and do 3x12 just like they did their first day and they stop trying to progress in weight because it becomes to hard and so on. Most are not willing to be fatigued a little bit run down, and that is part of the price to get to that level unless you are a freak like larry wheels.

@@larsenconditioning6742 Sure I agree with that a lot of people train terribly. You see it all the time. And for those people, we have no clue what genetics they are. I was speaking from my personal experience from highshool dorm where I had group of 10 friends training with the same intensity really hard, and while some increased their strenght every week and got progresivelly bigger, others were simply stuck in one place which is unfair, but it is the reality. We even ate the same ammount of protein basically as we were fed by the school and were drinking protein shakes between the meals. (of course not exactly the same, that is not really possible but i hope i got the point across)

@@sleepstudyrelaxsleeprepeat6825 Yea i understand the point you are trying to make, and you are not wrong a lot of people will simply say "i have bad genetics" and then proceed to not actually try because why bother if your genetics are bad. I saw something almost the same when i started training, i started along side some friends and just grew faster than them and we even trained around the same time most days. So i get your point also what you said in your first comment, that we do not actually see people with average genetics get a following on YT and so on. Because most do not want to watch someone with average genetics, they will both be smaller, less lean and weaker than someone with good genetics.

Glad i could make you laugh.

@@larsenconditioning6742 I was laughing at you 😹

@@kevingniga Cool not sure why but hey you do you do boo.

@@larsenconditioning6742 yea you get back on the treadmill🤡

@ Says the Mario fan. I bet you can’t even bench a plate.

Then i guess you are 6 feet or close to it? which also at least in terms of height makes you above average. And what you said is part of the reason why i in my video say, i am inclined to disagree with greg because most will not be consistent for 5-10 years.

That is beyond world record i happen to know the current junior world champion in that weight class, and hes max comp approved bench is around 455 so not only do you claim to have over 100 lbs on him and for reps at that. That sounds unlikely that is larry wheels strong, so having to be honest i doubt that.

@@larsenconditioning6742he said with gear lol

@@Spedfree Mate even with gear if you are not a genetic elite, you will not hit those numbers no matter how much gear you take. You really believe some random comment on YT claiming to hit world record numbers??

@@Spedfree dont believe anything you read on internet. This guy does not rep 565 most likely. If he does, he can make carrer on youtube out of it and upload video of doing that.

It depends we a thing called max power were supposed to be in november but has been delayed til next year in febuary i believe. It is a short comp powerlifter style, 3 attempts log and deadlift max weight. And then one in maybe april we do not know yet as it is brand new, it will be the first time ever and then one in june. A down side for me is im very explosive so my lifts always look easy, as my ability to grind is god awful

@@larsenconditioning6742 Where is that competition at? Sounds fun! Not a 10 event death comp haha

@@PATRICKMARCUCCI Dunno yet it moves around year from year, strongman is very small here in Denmark sadly in 90s and early 00s it used to be huge.

Thank you brother

Frick sake Corey

Welcome on board😀 and thank you for the support, hope you have an amazing day.

Depends on your goals mate it is not strictly about the amount, most people want to move and feel well and focusing purely on how big you are leaves a lot of holes. How much are you even doing right now, just so i can get an idea, and what are your goals with training? Id love to give you some pointers.

@@larsenconditioning6742 I want to be flexible, build strength like a fighter. I don't care about muscles, abs, biceps.. I want to be a good fighter with great stamina. I'm 18, how should I train?

@@AlphaSigmaRichMan That is a little bit outside of my field i will admit, however in order to be a good fighter you need power and not just great stamina. Lets say you train 4 days per week upper/lower body style, 1 upper body day would be more power based and the other day more volume based akin to what a bodybuilder might do just with free weights though. And the same with lower body things like clean and presses are super good, med ball rotation throws as well, these are power based so you would want to be powerful and fast meaning lower reps without slow down of your reps. For more volume based we would have you train more around 15 reps maybe even more, because you need to be able to work while being under a lot of lactic acid for this you could trade the clean and presses for the normal military press and do 15-20 reps. Plyometrics are really good for fighters, again because of speed and power things like high jumps and box sqauts again with the focus on power and speed could be very good for you. As well as doing some long distance carries like a farmer walk, trains your posture and your stamina like nothing else.

@@larsenconditioning6742 thank you so much for this. I'm completely beginner & I do calisthenics not gym. Any way to train at home & park without weights?

@@AlphaSigmaRichMan Would be better if you had a few things however yea, lunges, bulgarian split squats, pull ups, chin ups, dips, push ups. Clap push ups can be good to help you develop power, however you should master normal push ups first just so you do not fall flat on your face. So once you can do 20 solid controlled reps of push ups, you can start doing some clap push ups, a clap push up is like a normal version however you generate so much force you make your upper body leave the ground for a bit and then clap and catch yourself. Which is why say master normal push ups first, control on the way down and explode up, once you can do 20 good ones you can start practicing the speed getting up you should be able to generate enough force for your hands to leave the ground without moving them. Once you can do that you know you can generate the force needed to do clap push ups, however remember the point of them is power and speed so you shouldnt do them to a point where you start slowing down. However having some gym access would help you greately.

Thank you and thanks for the support😁

Wassup bro

Denmark so i guess sort of close my accent is really werid, it got shaped over the years talking to people from all sorts of places.

@@larsenconditioning6742ah okay Allright

yea it is a not good way to train, nor can most people sustain it for more than a few months, especially as you are getting into moving very heavy weights. If you are repping 3 plates on the bench, the wear and tear is massive and doing so several times a week on top of other things.

Never will see the big difference is i would never sign a paper where the other side gets rewarded for breaking it. Anyone who gets married is seriously stupid at least as a man.