วีดีโอ

1985 (86 was the Mansell blowout year) and they did hit each other Streiff finished on three wheels and a bouncing fourth and was actually fired for trying to overtake Laffite

@ ah yes my bad!

Senna and Alonso probably. Dunno about Prost and Hakkinen. Hakkinen was very fast but sometimes lacked 100% commitment. Alonso was an angry abrasive personality back in the day, in a way he’s only got himself to blame for ‘only’ two titles. Prost was the most methodical but all round slower than anyone else mentioned.

@@mattjc1021 Yeah, you're right. Besides Senna and Alonso, actually Prost and Hakkinen are equal to Schumacher. However, with the same car, I still pick Prost over Schumacher because of his methodical approach. And don't forget one thing, among these names I think Prost is the most consistent above anyone else. Hakkinen, well, I don't think Hakkinen is faster than Schumacher week in week out. But, the peak Hakkinen vs peak Schumacher with the same car in one race, Hakkinen for me.

@@rezzaakbar7236 I love Mika, he was my favourite driver as a kid. But to be honest he let the 2000 title slip when McLaren had the better car and in 2001 the car was also good but after his crash in Melbourne and stalling on the grid in Brazil he lost all motivation. He only beat Schumacher legit in one year out of having potentially the best car for four years. He was very fast when he wanted to be but ultimately I wouldn’t say in equal cars he would beat Schumacher over the course of a year. Maybe in about 1/3 of the races I would think and depending on the track. We were robbed of a proper Senna Schumacher battle, it would’ve been epic given how ruthless they both were. Alonso is another interesting comparison. By the time he came along to compete for wins and titles Schumacher was on the way down. If Alonso was ten years older and he showed up early 90s, I actually don’t know who would win. Not as much peak speed over one lap but a great wheel to wheel racer and very few mistakes over the course of a race, plus great ability to develop a car because his feedback to engineers has always been talked about. I think one of the reasons why Adrian Newey chose Aston Martin was because he’s far more likely to have quicker success working with Alonso than say Hamilton at Ferrari, because conversely it’s also known that Lewis does not provide useable feedback to engineers and this is amplified if the car is bad.

I don’t think he would’ve won either way but he was definitely the best driver in 1999

NOW I get why he wasn't good enough in '97 while Villeneuve took the championship. Patrick Head!

You’re right, thanks for pointing that out!

Shes never your girl. Its just your turn

Giga blackpill knowledge 🎉​@@MCsmileyB

If that happened then Frentzen dodged a bullet.