วีดีโอ

@@malthus101 17.7cm

@@ASB88 I’m 17.7cm and with tang on the Helm 3rd from the top is tight 4th is a loose fit. With deployant the 4th from top is a perfect fit. (top meaning counting from the watch head side)

@@watchgambit thanks for the info 👍🏼

@@drdesign6886 all comments welcome allthough I may not agree. Nobody can buy or alter my opinions.

@@watchgambit may not agree with what? You don’t answer the question - did you pay full retail for these straps or did Artem send them too you for free? It’s a simple and honest query.

@@drdesign6886 I do apologise I did not register that as a question. I did state on the video that we have a collab and I did receive the straps foc but paid the vat at border. I have prebioudly also bought Artem products. The video explains availability, tech. features and my user experience like any other review. It is overall positive because I do like what they do and it has little to do with said collab.

@@watchgambit so it’s sponsored content. You need to add the sponsored tag to your video. These are expensive straps and clasps - that high value is in effect a payment. And it undoubtedly impacts your review - so tell your audience that. I’ve purchased an Artem strap myself - it’s fine not great - it’s worth about a quarter what they charge at best. Had I got it free I’d be grand with it though.

@@drdesign6886 thanks for your active input. I come from a culture where people can constructively disagree 🙂

@@Outdoorlander 17,7cm

@@SlapShotRegatta22 thanks buddy. You’ re right about the lugs - 22mm

Just a matter of taste mate. I like it a tiny bit bigger… and 17,7cm

@@renebense so happy to hear stories like this. Wear it in good health mate 😃👍

I found out, that 100% moisturised air can penetrate a watch much easier than actual water. So extensive sweating, especially when the watch is covered by a sleeve for example, gives a pocket of 100% saturated air surrounding the watch. Walk in the rain in a forest for hours and find out your watch has condensation on the inside of the glass. You don't have to dive into the ocean, to get water inside your watch. A water tight watch is not an airtight watch. Nobody seems to test this. Start to workout in the gym. You start sweating. Under the watch is sweat and air. You don't dive, but the effect on the watch is cruel.

@@renebense I suspect you have a sealing problem there mate and should have it checked

@@lulul known fact but when I checked I can almost get a second hand full watch at the price of a spare new bracelet 😓😅

@@siddhant46s54 my thoughts exactly bro. Top 62MAS 😍

@@user-iz9co4qf6z this top of the line field for sure

@@marcdee4427 many people like 39-40. In some watches I can take it too but its a fine line to walk 😄

Thanks for watching 🙏

Cheers Canada. What is you favourite canadian brand?

@@watchgambit VanBanner, Whitby, Cannister are a few in my price range.

Uncles are great.

Thanks buddy 👊😎

In all honesty it is a tough choice. Comes down to taste really so I’d go for the piercing blue dial and grade 5 almost indestuctible case.

Oh the meteor look spectacular mate.

Both great watches. I’ve had the 025 and it didn’t wear well on my bony wrist. I’ll pull a Spork if I can find a mint one but other than that I’m propably retired… meanwhile my other side of brain says … mmmm Omiwatari… 😅

@@watchgambit A mint Spork is probably the grail of most Seiko collectors.. the chase is on!..

Damn one more competitor 😅

@@watchgambitwell I’m sidelined for a bit.. waiting on my black/black SLA061 Uemura to arrive .. gotta give the wife a break 🥵..

Sweet piece that 61

Cool pieces that stand out different

Bang for the buck for sure. I wish the black was available with metal too

I know right👊 one of my faws too

I know right👊 one of my faws too

@@watchgambit I used to have one. Wish it was even just 42mm or less because that dial is superb.

Sorry but I don’t have it 😢

Thanks mate 😎👍

@@watchgambit I bought mine today 😎

@@AndySmith4501 Congrats 😀👊

Thanks, I agree 😀

All good points. What’s your stance on Stainless vs. Titanium?

@@watchgambit I prefer the appearance, feel, and durability of steel. I'm not a fan of titanium watches.

Second hand?

Hi. Lighter, higher, better finish and obviously the spring drive magic versus the pretty good 8L I have in my SLA. I’ll put it this way that I wouldn’t mind selling my MM300 but the SNR is mine forever

@watchgambit stoked to hear, this will be my next timepiece. Edit: these are a man's man's watch. They're meant to look big and badass and also be legible and badass. I'm really excited. I recently bought a Seiko srq029 automatic speedtimer and it's 16mm too (but 2mm is the sapphire crystal, which is beautiful), so I kind of know 16mm size isn't as big as people want to talk sh*te about it. They'd for sure buy one if they could afford it, but the high-end seikos like the lx line seems so out of grasp for 95% of people's budget. So they hate on it and claim they'd rather have a GS or whatever 🙄. I'm not dismissing their opinion on that these are big watches, they are, but thats the point of the design. Having the highest end Seiko is cool in of itself, a spring drive... I'm buying what I like, not what other people like haha. The omega planet ocean is bigger at 16mm+ and a lot of people seem to absolutely love those. Yours is so nice dude! I'm blown away by how good it looks, pictures do not do justice. Great video 😊

@@WristWatcher I’m with you mate. Buy what you like. I had a SRQ029 too. What a gem of a watch and a column wheel chrono at that price #mindblown

Thanks mate. Pretty cool though right 😎 Both feel quite solid pieces

@@watchgambit price is good also :)

Thanks for the question. Ghost date is removed.

Thanks for the review 😄👊

@@watchgambit It is an honest and accurate description about your review, others have commented on the negative aspects of your review also. Hope it helps your channel

Turn up the volume Sir 😊 thanks for watching

Well said mate. The bund was a bit of trolling to be honest 😅 Its back on the boring black nato already

It wasn’t on a bund for long I give you that 😅👊

I don’t know. You can ask them at hello@henryarcher.com

Cheers mate 👊😊

Maybe the original 70’s diver heritage limited the design? It would be so good with ceramic though I agree

"Waaaa... it's not ceramic. Waaaaa." Go get a ceramic sub homage if you want wrist jewelry. This watch is a real diver; and real tool divers use aluminum and steel inserts, not brittle ceramic or sapphire.