วีดีโอ

Breaking news! water springs can get up and walk to another spot!

Romans 6:23...For the wages of sin is death; but THE GIFT OF God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. John 4:10 Jesus answered and said unto her, "If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water." So. Jesus taught that just knowing and believing that God's gift is eternal life was not enough. We have.to ask for it in order to receive it! Also, I personally will never "debate" a person if they don't believe in the inspiration and preservation of God's pure word, the KJV. We're commanded to be of one mind: 1 Peter 3:8... Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, love as brethren, be pitiful, be courteous: Romans 12:16...Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits. Philippians 1:27...Only let your conversation be as it becometh the gospel of Christ: that whether I come and see you, or else be absent, I may hear of your affairs, that ye stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel; It's a waste of time when the other.person is.referencing a.different text other than the Holy Scriptures.

What does it matter exactly "where" the temple is in Jerusalem?

On what planet is a sermon about a temple mount edifying? The whole premise for the sermon was to create internet talk about himself. Its a great subject to nerd out on, but its hardly worth a sermon space.

Listening to Ross I kept thinking, bet this guy went to Bible college. Of course he did/does: M.A. Fairhaven Baptist College (2001), M. Div. Great Plains Baptist Divinity School (2007), Th. M. Anchor Baptist Theological Seminary (2009), Ph. D. Great Plains Baptist Divinity School (est. 2024.

Where was Paul? Not in the temple: Acts 21:30 And all the city was moved, and the people ran together: and they took Paul, and drew him out of the temple: and forthwith the doors were shut. Where was Paul? Down from where the chief captain of the band was: Acts 21:32 Who immediately took soldiers and centurions, and ran down unto them: and when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left beating of Paul. Where was the chief captain of the band? Well, obviously he was lounging with his feet on his desk in his office, ready to put on his shoes and run about with his men. The narrative shows him to be a man of action, but for the narrative of locating buildings, it is much more convenient that he's in his office. All the city was moved, the people ran together, but the one person who actually took decisive action was clearly lying around the barracks in his pyjamas, waiting for the bell to ring.

Buckle up and get ready for every NIFB "pastor" to be preaching a message on this topic 😂

The rapture of the church is not found in matthew 24. Matthew 24 is dealing with the time of jacobs trouble. Daniels 70th week, pertaining to the jew.

So does the judgement seat of Christ happen during or after the tribulation? From what ive read, the bride is at the marriage supper and judgement seat of Christ during the tribulation, and then come back withChrist at His second coming.

No wonder Anderson didn’t want Thompson to get ordained. He is an embarrassment to Christianity.

Although this is a fact; consider rather all of this may be a simple distraction put forth of the devil to hinder the greater works that could be done in the time we are given here now.

Tommy, forgive me if this is not the appropriate place to ask, but what are your thoughts on Ron Wyatt?

Peak Tommy

The Roman Historian Tacitus said a spring of never-failing water came from the temple in Jerusalem. The word "Gihon" means "gusher". Some Hydrologists believe the Gihon Spring comes from an underground cavern. This would allow the spring to pump water uphill several times a day at the temple site when the cavern filled with water and siphoned the water down to the temple location. Fort Antonia: Mat 24:1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. Mat 24:2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. Fort Antonia (Herod’s Praetorium, Acts 23:35) was built by Herod and given to the Romans. It was used to house the thousands of Roman soldiers needed to police the ancient city of Jerusalem. In Acts 23:23 the Romans sent 470 soldiers to escort one man. Are we to believe all of the soldiers from the fort were sent with this one man? During 73 AD the Jewish leader at Masada said the only thing left of Jerusalem was that which belonged to the Romans. Mar 15:16 Then the soldiers led Him away into the hall called Praetorium, and they called together the whole garrison. Act_23:35 he said, "I will hear you when your accusers also have come." And he commanded him to be kept in Herod's Praetorium. Based on Acts 21:31-40, we know the Roman fort was above the temple because the soldiers had to go “down” to rescue Paul from the mob at the temple. Paul later spoke to the crowd below from the steps, as he was being taken up to Fort Antonia. The following comes from Wars of the Jews, by Flavius Josephus, Book 5, Chapter 5, Section 8. “8. Now as to the tower of Antonia, it was situated at the corner of two cloisters of the court of the temple; of that on the west, and that on the north; it was erected upon a rock of fifty cubits in height, and was on a great precipice; it was the work of king Herod, wherein he demonstrated his natural magnanimity. In the first place, the rock itself was covered over with smooth pieces of stone, from its foundation, both for ornament, and that any one who would either try to get up or to go down it might not be able to hold his feet upon it. Next to this, and before you come to the edifice of the tower itself, there was a wall three cubits high; but within that wall all the space of the tower of Antonia itself was built upon, to the height of forty cubits. The inward parts had the largeness and form of a palace, it being parted into all kinds of rooms and other conveniences, such as courts, and places for bathing, and broad spaces for camps; insomuch that, by having all conveniences that cities wanted, it might seem to be composed of several cities, but by its magnificence it seemed a palace. And as the entire structure resembled that of a tower, it contained also four other distinct towers at its four corners; whereof the others were but fifty cubits high; whereas that which lay upon the southeast corner was seventy cubits high, that from thence the whole temple might be viewed; but on the corner where it joined to the two cloisters of the temple, it had passages down to them both, through which the guard (for there always lay in this tower a Roman legion) went several ways among the cloisters, with their arms, on the Jewish festivals, in order to watch the people, that they might not there attempt to make any innovations; for the temple was a fortress that guarded the city, as was the tower of Antonia a guard to the temple; and in that tower were the guards of those three (14). There was also a peculiar fortress belonging to the upper city, which was Herod’s palace; but for the hill Bezetha, it was divided from the tower Antonia, as we have already told you; and as that hill on which the tower of Antonia stood was the highest of these three, so did it adjoin to the new city, and was the only place that hindered the sight of the temple on the north. And this shall suffice at present to have spoken about the city and the walls about it, because I have proposed to myself to make a more accurate description of it elsewhere.” The Jewish historian Josephus said Fort Antonia was built upon a gigantic rock, on the highest hill, and had passages that went “down” to the temple. Josephus described it as a large structure, instead of what we find in Avi Yonah’s modern model of the fort. Josephus also said the fort blocked the view of the temple on the north side. In the passage below we find the Romans used Fort Antonia as the base to attack the temple during 70 AD. They had previously gained access to the fort by attacking the foundation for seven days. (Book 6, Chapter 2, Section 7) The passage proves at least part of Fort Antonia remained intact on the day the Jewish temple was destroyed. From War of the Jews, by Josephus, Book 6, Chapter 4, sections 4-5. "4. Now it is true that on this day the Jews were so weary, and under such consternation, that they refrained from any attacks. But on the next day they gathered their whole force together, and ran upon those that guarded the outward court of the temple very boldly, through the east gate, and this about the second hour of the day. These guards received that their attack with great bravery, and by covering themselves with their shields before, as if it were with a wall, they drew their squadron close together; yet was it evident that they could not abide there very long, but would be overborne by the multitude of those that sallied out upon them, and by the heat of their passion. However, Caesar seeing, from the tower of Antonia, that this squadron was likely to give way, he sent some chosen horsemen to support them. Hereupon the Jews found themselves not able to sustain their onset, and upon the slaughter of those in the forefront, many of the rest were put to flight. But as the Romans were going off, the Jews turned upon them, and fought them; and as those Romans came back upon them, they retreated again, until about the fifth hour of the day they were overborne, and shut themselves up in the inner [court of the] temple. 5. So Titus retired into the tower of Antonia, and resolved to storm the temple the next day, early in the morning, with his whole army, and to encamp round about the holy house. But as for that house, God had, for certain, long ago doomed it to the fire; and now that fatal day was come, according to the revolution of ages; it was the tenth day of the month Lous, [Ab,] upon which it was formerly burnt by the king of Babylon; although these flames took their rise from the Jews themselves, and were occasioned by them; for upon Titus’s retiring, the seditious lay still for a little while, and then attacked the Romans again, when those that guarded the holy house fought with those that quenched the fire that was burning the inner [court of the] temple; but these Romans put the Jews to flight, and proceeded as far as the holy house itself. At which time one of the soldiers, without staying for any orders, and without any concern or dread upon him at so great an undertaking, and being hurried on by a certain divine fury, snatched somewhat out of the materials that were on fire, and being lifted up by another soldier, he set fire to a golden window, through which there was a passage to the rooms that were round about the holy house, on the north side of it. As the flames went upward, the Jews made a great clamor, such as so mighty an affliction required, and ran together to prevent it; and now they spared not their lives any longer, nor suffered any thing to restrain their force, since that holy house was perishing, for whose sake it was that they kept such a guard about it." All of this provides tremendous evidence that the Dome of the Rock is the true location of Fort Antonia. Josephus said Fort Antonia was built upon a gigantic rock and that rock has not moved. If at least part of Fort Antonia remained on the day the temple was destroyed, where is that part of Fort Antonia now? Watch the TH-cam video… The “Temple Mount” is Roman Fort Antonia, by Leeland Jones, to see the truth with your own eyes. The scorpion was the symbol of the Roman Praetorian Guard, and that symbol is found on the underground section of the Western Wall.

The way you hyped this up I really thought you had something super convincing... What a nothingburger.

Tabernacle isn’t the Temple. Thompsons point to pinpoint where the tabernacle was pitched is irrelevant.

Can Thompson even preach without being nasty?

When I saw his sermon I facepalmed as well. He knows nothing of the subject.

I liked what you said, and believe you about the alternative temple mount that needs to be where water flows. But I want to asked this Is there any evidence of a water source beind [piped] under the traditional temple mount ?..

I think I responded to this video, and my comment got erased, so let me respond again to this. Ezekiel 43:1-8 the temple will be built in front of the dome of the rock with a wall between the two buildings. I didn't think u took down comments that proved something you were saying is wrong, but I guess u like the people u talk about that u prove wrong, they take down your comments, so u take down mine. I was going to come to your prophecy conference last week, but I didn't think I would be given a chance to ask any questions I wanted to do I didn't come.

Free Palestine and the rest of the world from zionism and Israhell

Sounds very interesting. Looking forward. I have a request......unrelated to this video. When you upload a SHORT could you 📌 pin one of your own comments at the top. For whatever reason I cannot leave a comment of my own on a short video. This is strange because I can on a non short video with no problem. It's like I'm being blocked on shorts only. I can REPLY to others' comments on a short, so if you the uploader leave a pinned comment I can comment/ reply. Thanks!!

Amen

Have you considered? That dispensationalism is not correct. I was like this until I discovered how to understand apocryphal language, which is throughout the Bible. Then I looked at Matthew 24 and it talks about one being taken one being left, but which one is which. Remember that with Noah, the righteous were saved in the evil perished same with Sodom andGamora. You may want to look into the concept of praterism the idea that the return of Christ was metaphorical in coincided with a fall of the temple in the year 70.

Harpodzo

Amen

And another thing. These jew-ish people don’t have a messiah because Jesus was never sent for them or for any of you. He was sent for the Israelites only. Christianity is the true Judaism? 😂 😂 😂 you people always want to be included in every damn thing, just as your people, the jew-ish people always wanted to be included into being Jews and also partaking in the promises that is only for the blood born Israelites.

Amen

Its that both the Judaism religion , and the people who claim to be jews are of the same edomite/esau descendants as your people are. 😂 the real jews which are the so blacks that your people have enslaved for hundreds of years even until now, have allowed edomites (but being more specific amalekites) to convert into their ways and customs since the time of Esther. When 70ad happened these real Jews (the so called African Americans) fled to different parts of west Africa. These Caucasian jew-ish edomite converts left off into Europe and kept our ways and customs till this very day and even dared to claim it as their own until the balfour declaration happened which allowed them to possess a land which was never theirs in the first place and which was never given to them by God as an inheritance. God knows who these people are. You speak lies and parrot the lies and none of you Edomites ever take the time to see if these people in the land of Israel today are the real jews. They are jew-ish and not Jews. They are converts buddy, even their own rabbis say this over and over. They claim they don’t know who the real blood line Israelites of the bible are today. Esther 8:17 KJV And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them. These converts over there in Israel cannot inherit nor take the inheritance that God Most High has given only unto the lineage of Jacob aka Israel. The promises are only for the Israelites and to no other race of people. My people, the so called blacks, hispanics, and native indians, are the chosen of the Lord, the peculiar people of God Most High, we are the ones who suffered all the curses of Deuteronomy 28 that the Lord said through Moses would happen for disobeying his commandments, we are the ones who suffered the curse of our heritage being stripped away and us forgetting who we were, we are the ones who suffered the curse of the world forgetting who we were and where we come from in the bible, we are the ones suffered having to go into slavery by way of ships and being sold to another nation for bondman and bondwoman, every single curse that the bible said would happen to the Israelites have overtaken us till this very day. We as a people are not in the land of our forefathers just as the bible says. We will go back to our land when our savior comes back, as prophesied. So please tell me, who the hell are these people that ARE IN the land today and the messiah not even back yet? Isaiah 55:11 (KJV) So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: IT SHALL NOT RETURN UNTO ME VOID, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper [in the thing] whereto I sent it. These jew-ish people have not suffered all the Deuteronomy 28 curses. Their little 6million loss is nothing compared to the 70 million plus martyred that my people from the northern kingdom Israelites suffered when your people came to our land (arsareth aka Americas) in the late 1400’s, and the 20million plus martyrs that the southern kingdom Israelites suffered by the hands of our #1 enemy which is your people. Your people killed our savior, and your people will pay. Christianity is not going to save you when God is ready to send his Son back into this world. There is going to be a complete invasion of what the world calls ufos and these angels of the Lord will utterly destroy your people, make your kingdom to cease from existence and hand over the kingdom to Gods beloved Son, the black Christ that you people hate to acknowledge, and the 1/3rd Israelites that were beamed up shall come back to start the enslavement of every nation in the world, including every single Edomite man and woman. We shall possess you as an inheritance and make you work our fields, and mines, and everything we desire to accomplish. You have alot of reading to do. You christians mistake is that ya ignore real history, ignore the OT, ignore prophesy and the prophets, ya are blind to the truth and i wonder why?

I enjoy the fact that every year there are more archeological discoveries which support the Bible. This must drive academic purists right out of their narrow minds.

Amen

This is ridiculous! Pick one and take your chances. You'll get it right once you're on the other side.

Thomas Ross deserves every bit of Hell waiting for him.

Hey labeling someone a heretic is Biblical, it is never easy to do this, but it is Biblical. Plus u have to identify them, and separate from them, have no fellowship with them, until they come back to Jesus, this is Bible, and it's never easy, but must be done.

Given that Mr. Ross affirms a works based gospel due to his insistence that one must turn (stop) from all their transgressions (ironically saying one does this imperfectly, but that’s contrary to the text) - why even refer to him as a brother in Christ? He needs to repent of his view of repentance. He even sees the disagreement as being so sharp that he wants “free grace baptists” to be considered a different religion. And he’s technically right - different gospel = different religion.

The pastor of a church i went to knows im post trib, and we had great fellowship together. Despite our differences, we were still able to teach each other things from the bible, so yes, it is possible for us to get along as long as they're not off the deep end like the pre-trib pastor that yelled at me in my face for rejecting dispensationalism, etc.

My parents are Cahn's biggest fans. I am truly thankful the Lord brought me out of dispensational futurism. I pray often that my parents will see clarity in scripture.

What are you lunatics talking about? That guys still winning souls and baptizing people and preaching the ENTIRE Bible..I just can’t be mad at that. Oh, some of his kids rebelled? Well, David had a son who rebelled and tried to kill him, Samuels sons were wicked, so there’s that-but you keep making these stupid videos and keep that Pastor Andersons name in your mouth and see where that gets you, STUPID.

Calling on the name of the Lord IS NOT a prayer. There are NO examples of anyone doing that to be saved in the ENTIRE NEW TESTAMENT. Acts 22:16, and Acts 2:37-38 are the examples of calling on the name of the Lord. It means to OBEY the authority of Jesus.

I read some of his books there actually not bad books in most of them he just compares the spirit of modern america with that of ancient israel from a biblical historical standpoint however chew the food and spit out the sticks lol however Gods israel is comprised of jew and gentile of all nations and its the new testament church those of us who have faith in Jesus Christ God doesnt have two different brides

I'm only 33 minutes in but I'm going to hazard a guess. Based on what I've heard so far, I'm going to suggest that everything Charlie says to the end of this video could be expressed very simply like this. "You know there's a lot of nominal Christians out there and I'm very concerned about that!" Now for the rest of the video.😁

It's as if there's a whole religion built around the word "repent", based on the particular emotional connection the individual has with that word, with various schools of thought, but all of them making way too much out of a simple word. It seems the basic definition for repent (change your mind) is not enough for many.

The deification of feelings as a standard of Truth has been taught for a long time now. That's why we have an epidemic of spoiled brat narcissist ingrates. Those who determine that their experience and their feelings regarding salvation are now the required standard for any authentic salvation, make a grave error. An individual's emotional state at the time of salvation or any other time is completely irrelevant when it comes to anyone else. The idea seems to be, if you're not reduced to a blubbering pile of sorrow you're probably not saved. Making my feelings and my experience the standard for everyone else is egotistical and narcissistic, and I've been reduced to a blubbering pile of sorrow many times! 😁

This Charlie guy brings in confusion!!

Christ’s human spirit went to God as all the spirits of mankind go back to God at death, and Christ’s divine nature is omnipresent so the Thief would be with Christ in Heaven, while Christ’s human soul was in Hell.

Bro. McMurtry, I would side with you more so on the issue of repentance as it pertains to salvation. I would only offer that there is indeed a sin, one in particular, people are turning from, and that is idolatry. Jesus paid for all of humanity's sins. The sin that the Holy Spirit now reproves the world of is not believing on Jesus (John 16). Salvation is deliverance. Deliverance from what? The common evangelical answer is hell. While there is truth to this, this is not the Bible's primary emphasis when speaking of deliverance/salvation. Through the Catholic church and the reformation, particularly through Luther many centuries after Jesus, salvation was emphasized in the context of metaphysical torment: either in purgatory for Catholics, or hell for Luther. Luther's emphasis is very much a part of modern evangelism. I would contend that Luther was more correct than Catholicism, but that he still missed the biblical emphasis of salvation, which is deliverance from slavery/bondage. Particularly, slavery to Satan, sin, and death, of which hell is a component. This goes all the way back to the fall, in which mankind was sold/imprisoned under sin, becoming a slave to Satan's counterfeit kingdom, and alienated from life in God (i.e. death). No one can free themselves from slavery, but Jesus can. It's why eschatological salvation is viewed as the greater exodus (Jer. 23). Mankind, embracing his own knowledge and wisdom in rejection of God's knowledge and wisdom, is the first instance of idolatry. Salvation, or the deliverance from the bondage of Satan, sin, and death, is all about our believing allegiance to the one true God and how He does what is impossible for mankind to do on his own. Is our believing allegiance to ourselves, to our family, to our job, to our wealth or some other god? Or will we turn from the false gods we've created and given our loyalty to, and give our believing allegiance to the one true God and King of the universe? This is the example of David, a man after God's own heart. David sinned some pretty serious and horrendous sins, but his believing allegiance was always to God. Whether it's the rich young ruler, Simon the magician, or the people at Athens, salvation is about the deliverance from the bondage of Satan, sin, and death because one has turned from their false gods (idolatry) to the one true God, giving to Him their believing loyalty. Often that looks like denying or dying to oneself, rejecting our own ideas of knowledge and wisdom, turning and trusting in God and His knowledge and wisdom, finding life. The bottom line is who is the one true God, does He have our believing allegiance as King of the universe, or our we enslaved to another god of our own making who in actuality holds our believing loyalty?

Matthew 23:8 “8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.” Cahn freely accepts being called rabbi.

Infected with using the original name of the one who died for us that we love? Why would you not want to use his original birth name?

Bro. Tommy, your explanation of regeneration makes so much more common sense than the reformed view. Thank you for that.