วีดีโอ

Great interview! Fantastic guest! Listening to the interview, I had a few thoughts: -Regarding treatment resistance. I believe it was either Dr. Allen Frances or Dr. Michael Garrett (who is coincidentally at SUNY *Downstate* Medical Center, and who was a past guest on your show) who once said " _Treatment-resistance_ _could_ _just_ _as_ _easily_ _be_ _framed_ _as_ _treatment_ _inadequacy_ ". Similarly, Milton Erickson was quoted as saying “ _There_ _is_ _no_ _such_ _thing_ _as_ _resistant_ _clients_ , _only_ _inflexible_ _therapists_ ” 😀 - I loved your "tweak" as Dr. Pies put it, on the metaphor of medications being the bridge, and your suggestion that another alternative route the patient might take is to "swim", rather than walk over the bridge (i.e., taking meds) 🏊‍♀🙂 -I like how Dr. Pies included spirituality in his view of the Biopsychosocial Model. In fact I have seen many people amend that model to be more commonly referred to now as the Biopsychosocialspiritual Model. -I could hear Dr. Jonathan Shedler scream into his computer when Dr. Pies mentioned "personality disorder" at one point. As I know Dr. Shedler (and others like Dr. Nancy McWilliams) are of a firm belief that "one's personality cannot be a disorder". Mind you, they are of course drawing from Kernberg's level of personality organization to make sense of an individual's personality in the context of their level of functioning. Moreover, as they point out, after DSMIII, with the neo-kraepelinians and wanting to quantify/measure/operationally define things, they ended up taking well known, clinically accrued and observed personality "styles" and ratcheting them up in their severity (often times to the point of caricature) and slapping a label of disorder on it. -Finally, not sure if you know how Dr. Jordan Pedersen got off his benzo addiction, but he ended up going to Russia and getting some pretty "unorthodox" treatments over there, and then coming back. But ya he was suffering for quite a while. Great work man, this channel is a gem!

My thanks to Daniel Bourne for his interest in these important issues, and for his effort in bringing this discussion to fruition!--Ronald W. Pies, MD

Too bad these two are absolutely ignorant about Geopolitics especially Ukraine & NATO & Russia. At least they didn’t embarrass themselves by talking about Syria. Other than that, the Jung part was interesting.

50:59 I do appreciate the time and effort put into this presentation, food for thought too. I do not take the same view of humanity. Maybe there is some truth in myths of fallen angels and exile from paradise. Who knows what it would look like after all this time? There was no real crisis of religion, a crisis of an ego God deflating only affects the racketeering. The question of Nous and Gnosis still remains alive in the divine mysteries of life. I rather think Nietzsche had it backwards, everywhere one can look science is being crushed by complexity. The weight of un-certain-ty and a hopeless belief. Science is looking for zero time and zero space, where they have untangled all the complexities of a psychic cosmology. Science looks backwards through time as it unravels creative complexity to their nihilism, there is no zero. Society is being swallowed in the same black hole. Taking things apart and reducing everything to simplistic descriptions ADDS the complexity of how things are arranged. There is no path, no causeway through complexities in uncertainty. It isn't the only complexity to be found here. Jung’s archetypes are impulses, if they're not, they work in similar ways. Strip away layers of communication and we're wondering what we're trying to say, release? Projection seems an inevitable conclusion of impulsivity, I sense it more a magic than a curse. When you get down to basics, consciousness is a fancy word for a connection. That is worth considering. Divine mysteries reach a little further because the complexity can hold more wonder than desire. Sorry to go on, it was a roll.

Thank you very much

I already enjoyed the conversation between Mansager and James, but Carveth made the reflection complete. Lovely discourse, interesting topic, thank you all for this conversation!

Wonderful to know a bit more about your work and experiences Sue Mehrtens and I appreciate your interview style, Daniel. Thank you.

Great conversation in plain good English. Loss me on extending reparations and bringing "back into the fold" serial sexual offending therapists who sexually target their patients. Hell NO! The rule is do no harm and sexual contact with patients is beyond the beyond. When psychoanalysis was being established, early disciples were finding their way and addressing the harms of having sexual contact with patients. The dynamics and significance of the therapeutic relationship, power dynamics, was still being understood. Today we are better informed about boundaries, frame, falling in love with your analyst, transference-countertransference.

This was great meeting. Being a Mental Health Councilor in Training, this is great extra info for me to listen to and learn from. Hi Uncle Erik.

What a stimulating quarter hour you've created! Your interest in depth psychotherapy is a gift. Thanks for sharing!

great video!

This is brilliant. Sooooo many good points, where to begin?? Great job at pulling together and drawing links between historical literary writings, and principles found in psychoanalytic theory (in terms of how the client's unconscious problem manifests, and is ultimately treated/cured). Its clear you have a deep understanding of psychoanalytic concepts and principles, as well as how the unconscious operates. Great editing as always. 5:47 hehe... liked this 😄 9:39 - love the Appointment at Samarra story (was in my Master Gems document ;). I liked the linking it to anxiety and the counter-intuitive & paradoxical nature of the cure, namely, that one must expose oneself to the anxiogenic thing in order to resolve the anxiety. Further, and as you point out, that often it is the "fleeing", or "acting out", or "re-enactments" that the person is drawn to that ultimately helps them resolve the issue (without disclosing too much, I actually just recently experienced this myself IRL lol 😅). Your description of this was bang on and very well articulated...reminds me a bit of Dr. Marvin Goldfried's very entertaining story of how he helped George Striker overcome his fear of heights with repeated trials, exposing him to that which he feared. He tells this story here: th-cam.com/video/qmQ2oi66Ok0/w-d-xo.html It also reminds me of what Dr. Knafo often speaks about when she says there is _meaning_ in the client's delusions - that "incoherent speech is not always incoherent"...that the client's "delusions" are often the individuals (unconscious) attempt at restoration and restitution of the self. That psychotic delusions can be viewed as a sort of autobiographical play of personal myths playing out... Fascinating how the mind can create a sort of 1-to1 correspondence between transference's from things repressed, onto other things (like marble status - or perhaps in modern day, we might view certain sexual object fetishes as following a similar path) Gradiva is such an awesome, unknown, yet historically rich, name. If I ever get a pet, or open my own private practice, I can see myself including/weaving in the name Gradiva somehow 🤣 Great vid, this channel is a gem!

I really respect this doctor a lot, unfortunately two advertisements in one minute and 14 seconds, I'm out

Great video, and nice editing! Very interesting little tidbits and linkages to other psychoanalytical people like Nancy. That analogy of "the best kind of therapy" to "most nourishing type of music" was great, I'd never heard that one before (I'm gonna add it to my Master Gems document). As well, I liked that first quote of Nancy's about all the possible causes of that behaviour reminds me of Dr. Robert Sapolsky when he talks about "distributed causation/causality", meaning, its hard for people to see all the interacting/transactional/bi-directional influences of things on other things (e.g., Social determinants of health). 5:38 - Regarding Freud's talking about "unconscious acts" that always come out.....I was watching this Paul Wachtel lecture the other day and he was saying that apparently the original term was "acting out", but then came to be tempered down by language to eventually be called "enactments" or "re-enactments" --> th-cam.com/video/VEWXzr1zm5s/w-d-xo.html Regarding that Carl Jung quote, and as you may have seen in that Master Gems document I sent you, Dr. Stephen Bacon's explanation of Dr. Heights analogy to the Elephant and the Rider is, I think, another relevant metaphor to the conscious/unconscious. --> th-cam.com/video/IX5veVWPmqs/w-d-xo.html. The rider can’t muscle the elephant into going where he wants it to go. However, if the rider befriends the elephant, tries to understand it, learns about and is attuned to its needs, he can better guide where they (both!) will ultimately end up going. Dr Bacon also points out here the study whereby people judged faces to be more beautiful when they had been digitally edited so that their pupils were bigger (more dilated), which signalled reciprocal liking. Yet another example of how people can be unaware of unconscious mental processes that influence their perceptions. - 8:15 Lol I can imagine if Nancy were there she would say "Oh please, call me Nancy" 🤣🤣 - 9:25 We all know Jungle/Drum & Bass is the best genre of music! 🤣🤣 - Lastly, nice bookshelf collection you have going! I've noticed that all the great therapists who I follow and watch, all seem to have an enormous bookshelf behind them of all the books they have (presumably) read. hehe. I recently learned that there are now companies who will "curate" your own custom bookshelf/library for you (if you have enough money), and fill them with all the books of themes of your choice, and arrange them beautifully, etc. Anyways, thanks for the vid! And see you Friday! 👍🙂

Needs more jonathan shedler..

THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY. Was all Christian. AMERCAN SLAVERY. Was all Christian. MANIFIEST DESTINY. Was all Christian. THE CONFEDERACY. Was all Christian. RECONSTRUCTION. Was all Christian. DRED SCOTT. Was all Christian. JIM CROW Was all Christian. PLESSY V FERGUSION. Was all Christian. SEGREGATION. Was all Christian. THE KU KLUX KLAN. Was all Christian. THE TRAIL OF A THOUSAND TEARS. Was all Christian. THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE. Was all Christian. THE TULSA MASSACRE. Was all Christian. CRITICAL RACE THEORY. Was all Christian. RED LINING. Was all Christian. THE CHILD RAPE HISTORY OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC EMPIRE. Is all Christian. THE RAMPANT LEVEL OF SEXUAL ABUSE IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION. Is all Christian. DENIAL OF WOMEN'S RIGHTS. Is all Christian. DENIAL OF LGBT RIGHTS. Is all Christian. Christianity is Patriarchy Christianity is Supremacy. Christianity is Fascism. AND PROJECT 2O25? Is absolutely and totally Christian. So don’t listen to what they say. Just watch what they do. 💙

The small confirming noises from you is very distracting

Why do we need God für Goodness?

Excellent content. Thank you!

Turkington! Kingdon! Legendary ! Dr. Brabban is wonderful!

❤❤❤

Interesting parallel between Greenberg and Rogers, starting of in different fields.

Epic.

You said you love the russian orthodoxy as a tradition. You really need to take a closer look at it, it is just a huge vehicle for corruption and abuse. And it has actually been that for a long time. But most importantly, it is that if there ever was a church resembling a prosecutory super-ego, that would essentially be the russian orthodoxy. I'm not even going to start about how they pray for putins' health and literally promote the invasion of Ukraine to their believers. They also are very much against LGBT or literally anything they don't like.

I don’t know much on this subject but I have been watching couple different people Todd mcgowan and lacan and now Zizek, my question is though what is the different views from don and the rest ?.

Can't thank you enough for this. I've watched many of Dr. Carveth's videos, but this is the first I've heard him link certain psychoanalytic and Christian concepts so clearly in one presentation - and particularly within the context of his own life and experiences. Metaphor, love, narcissism, sin, guilt, conscience, conversion, splitting, projection, superego, atonement - and then speaking so cogently on penal substitutionary atonement as he did toward the end really brought it all home. So helpful as I'm in a process of reformulating my own thoughts at this time in my life.

en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Course_in_Miracles/Text The text Jesus wrote thru a scribe (1975), in psychoanalytic language ^^^ Do you realize what's being offered ? Peace.

I hope Dr. Carveth knows how incredibly influential he has been to so many young aspiring analysts. He has kept the psychoanalytic tradition alive, exciting, and playful.

Wow, that’s very high praise, thank you so much.

Lovely conversation. I have to say as someone who participates in institutional church, Carveth has deeply integrated Christianity and psychoanalysis better than the people writing tomes about the topic.

the audio is fuzzy for Dr McWilliams

What a woman! And a good interview. i really enjoyed learning about the personal life of Dr McWilliams

love the content 💕

Thank you for offering english subtitle. it is essential for my learning from this film.

Fascinating interview. Had to take a break after 23 minutes because my mind was getting overwhelmed. Yes, the "Passive and good" student mindset is still a tremendous obstacle for the Japanese psychology profession. Around 25 min. the cultural viewpoint is brought up. I'm currently seeing for myself how the strong motivation towards adapting the Western therapy to fit Japanese culture is destroying the essence of the Western way which takes into account the cultural aspect. In other words, Japanese traditional culture prevents the acceptance of non-Japanese cultures into Japanese society.

There is a worldview which judges the world by good an evil. There is an other worldview which judges it by cause and effect. Which one is more easy? Which one is more open? Which one is the reason of war and which one is the reason of healing? Good and evil can never be a base for peace. In opposition to a worldview which is interested to understand cause and effect. Good and evil is the base of war. An understanding of cause and effect ist the base of any real Diplomacy. I am sorry Mr. Stein that you only partially understand this. Did C.G. Jung knew it?

Merci 🙏💯

Thank you 🙏💯

Thank you for this interview Daniel. Met Sue in 2007 and did dream analysis with her, she is an inspiration to live a purpose filled life.

Yuval harari

I don't think I could support someone who's committed sexual assault or domestic violence. An abuser isn't 100% bad but it's pedantic to point that out when supporting their status also means putting insult on injury to their victims.

These podcasts are great! This page is severely underrated.

A very interesting and informative interview of Dr. Les Greenberg, revealing his background and basis of Emotion-Focused Psychotherapy often with a richly personal flavour, which fits well given his humanistic brand of psychotherapy. (Either Dr. Greenberg was in a positive and open mood, or Daniel encouraged him to open up --likely both.) Dr. Greenberg has contributed immensely to the field of psychotherapy, and is a wonderful person -- an international and Canadian/South African treasure.

it’s one of my favorite books 📚

God bless all our veterans, first responders and active duty!!!

I think he's calm because hes clearly always been highly intelligent. He knows his stuff. I think whats unqiue about him is that he has a highly scientific mind but hes clearly also highly relational...a unique combination!

Excellent!! Thank you for doing this. I like to combine 3 approaches of Freud, Jung and Adler…adding tp that case, I would also to add approaches of Masterson and Reich ie personality styles (schizoid, narcissistic and borderline) & character styles (ocular, oral, anal, phallic & genital)

Amazing fascinating happy video🤗

Religiosity is depth past experience. Hmmm, interesting. So, we'll gratify the respondent. Freakin' wicked.

Derh. Like the perceived shines a light on what isn't. Er you gonna shine a light on yer analysts own being.