วีดีโอ

I heard this song in school like maybe 3 yrs ago and it’s in my head so much I love it :D

hello i am joseph

I heard this 10 years ago - my entire family still knows it, and I hum it at least once every few days. What a lovely song :)

To South America and Tahiti New Zealand Maldives To Austrian and To South America and Tahiti New Zealand Maldives To Austrian and Tasmania peeling islands and Saint Helena. To Ascension and Mauritius and Galápagos Islands BY AMBER I GO TO YOUR SCHOOL

Excellent.

Darwin's finches show the exact OPPOSITE of evolution. Why? Because they are all still finches! All their descendants are 100% finches. If not, what are they "evolving"" into that is not 100% a finch? Some people, dogs, horses, whatever, have different sizes of "beaks". However they are all still equally as much people, dogs, horses, whatever as all the others of their kind. If not, what are they "evolving" into? . I used to call myself an atheist and thought Darwin was a genius. Let's look at the "Bible" of evolutionism, The Origin of Species. Maybe because it is so mind numbingly boring, people rarely notice something, namely that it never shows the origin of anything! Darwin's finch beaks are supposed to support goo through the zoo to you, but what do they really show? Zero. . Research reveals that the beaks grow back and forth in size depending on climate variations. The evidence that finches or Galapagos Island Turtles et al have ever been or ever will be anything but finches, and turtles et al? Zero again. . Oh, and btw, as usual in evolutionary theory you are being told one thing while the opposite is true, as about natural selection. It does not lead to evolution as Darwin claimed. It only shuffles, or sometimes eliminates, pre existing information that has always been in the genomes. It never creates new DNA as would be necessary, for ex., to turn a fin into a foot or a leg into a wing. Nothing ever observed creates new DNA. All DNA is just a copy of a copy of a copy which can be altered by things like mutations. . Beneficial mutations? They are said to be the second force for evolution. However, Charles Muller, who won a Nobel Prize for his work on them, said "The good ones are so rare that we can consider them all bad." . Darwin was nothing but an armchair theorist who, unlike his contemporary Mendel, never supported his theory through the scientific method and cast doubts on it himself. Yet he is an icon of evolution, like another contemporary, a lawyer named George Lyell, who came up with the totally fictional Geologic Column. . The GC exists only in art work. The real evidence? Fossils are jumbled, in no neatly organized pattern whatsoever. There really are no such things as Cambrian, Jurassic, and so on "periods." Like the GC those are just fictions presented as facts. Giant shark fossils are found with dino fossils in Montana, for ex. Whales' fossils are found in wildly improbable places like the Andes mountains, the Sahara and a desert in Chile. Deep sea "Cambrian" fossils, such as sea shells and mollusks, are found at every level on the planet, including on most mountain tops - like the world's highest, the Himalayans. Fossils of ocean floor life forms, like trilobites. are found in the hills of mid America and countless other places world wide, high and far inland. In fact, 90% of the fossils on land are marine. Golly, how did that seawater get everywhere all over the planet? Hmmm.... . Take a look. See the ocean floor dwelling, now extinct, so called "Cambrian", trilobites found on mountain tops all over the world. (They are supposed to be at the bottom of the GC.) www.bing.com/images/search?q=trilobites%20On%20Mountains&qs=n&form=QBIR&sp=-1&pq=trilobites%20on%20mountains&sc=0-23&sk=&cvid=9008D75298A54105AD924CA3AACAE385 Notice the exquisitely preserved details on many. This is also seen with innumerable sea shells, mollusks, etc. . Now some claim "plate tectonics" moved, intact and conjoined, vast stretches of ocean dwelling, bottom floor, marine life fossils in the countless billions to travel for millions of years and then wrap around the tops of mountains. Not uncommonly the fossils are in their original shape with perfect details as you see in the link. "Plate tectonics" are purely speculaitons, piled on theories, heaped on hypotheses. They can't explain the lack of erosion which should have caused those fossils to be nothing but dust and rubble after their so called millions of years trek. . (And please do not send me a post quoting Talk Origins, which I call Talk Spin. Yes, I know that they claim to have found one GC on this entire, vast, planet. But they didn't. If you will check thoroughly you will see them saying "Some of the strata are out of place", i.e. there ain't any GC there, either. I am very familiar with TO. They have no problems with flat out lying and are not even an authentic science source. If you can find an authentic science source that shows a GC, include that with a link to a photo. Then explain why the rest of the planet shows the exact opposite of a GC. My experience is that knowledgeable evolution defending people will say "Well, the GC is just a model. We know none really exists." When I ask "How can you make a model of something that has no evidence whatsoever that it existed?" they don't respond.) . The Bible says that flood waters completely covered the whole earth after, for one thing, "the fountains of the deep broke forth." (Did you know there is an ocean below our commonly known oceans, or have you seen the mid Atlantic ridge which looks like it used to be a great crack on the ocean floor? Probably not.). Again, the fossil record shows that marine life fossils are at every level on the planet, everywhere around the globe, and that, in fact, over 90% of the fossils on land are marine. And they say the Bible is not historical and not backed by science. And btw there are almost 300 Great Flood legends around the world. Even the one by the Aborigines of Australia is highly similar to what the Bible reports. . So you've been told a book showed the origin of species, but it didn't. You've been told G.I. animals show evolution but they only show they are having, at most, minuscle changes that leave them basically what they were before. . You were told there is a Geological Column, but there is not one on the planet. You're told over and over that natural selection shows evolutionism when it actually just somewhat modifies the organism through shifting already present information, or sometimes through loss of information, in the genomes, leaving it essentially what it was before. It may eventually become a new species of fish, or bee, or tree, etc., but it will always stay a fish, a bee or a tree etc. We see no evidence whatsoever of any species in a genus moving up to the next step on the Animal or Plant Kingdom to become a new family. (Not to mention never seeing any transitions from an order, class, phylum or Kingdom.) . Yet that would have had to have happened for evolution to occur, and it is claimed, with no evidence whatsoever, that it did happen over and over and over - in the conveniently invisible and unverifiable past. . We have trillions of life forms out there. So why don't we see mutations causing any lifeform of Family A to turn into a lifeform of Family B? After all, their ancestors have supposedly had hundreds of millions of Darwin years to make the switch and be moving around as part A and part B. But eagles stay eagles, bullfrogs stay bullfrogs, dolphins stay dolphins, eboli bacteria stay eboli bacteria, tulips stay tulips, chimps stay chimps, fruit flies stay fruit lies, and of course people stay people, no matter how much they change. . This fits in with what the Bible says about creation having been halted. What also fits is that no new strands of DNA are ever created. All DNA is just a copy of a copy of a copy, on and on. DNA can be somewhat altered by mutations and natural selection, selective breeding and even genetic engineering, but is never seen to be created from "scratch." . What else does evolutionism offer besides unsubstantiated theories, in fact theories that defy the real evidence, presented as facts? Logical fallacies. Logical fallacies always, always, undergird evolutionism defense. . The favorites are Correlation Does Not Imply Causation and Presuming Omniscience, though it uses many. . Correlation Does Not Imply Causation goes like this: "Look! Fossil A has some similarities to Fossil B! We'll use big words to sound impressive about that, like 'similar homology.' We have exactly zero evidence Fossil A even had a descendant, much less one significantly different from it, much less that it turned into B, C, D etc. But we are going to tell you, as gawd's truth scientific fact, that we know all about what happened to its evidence-free, data-free, descendants. We'll call that science." . This leads right into the Presuming Omniscience logical fallacy. Another example of a use of that fallacy is when an evolutionary paleontologist will pick up a fossil from the ground and tell you with absolute authority that they know all about what happened to it's invisible "descendants" in the untestable past - for over 100 million Darwin years. . "Missing links" (2 to 5 million Darwin years' worth of them between you and Lucy or some other such "transition" du jour) is a Presuming Omniscience logical fallacy phrase. How do you tell missing links from never existed links? Have...faith...brothers and sisters! And be so grateful that YOU ain't religious! . Learn how to spot logical fallacies and you will see them used in every defense in evolutionary literature. . Ignoring the actual data is also part of evolutionism. For just one of innumerable examples, they say life can come from inorganic matter (and don't say they do not - who came up with the antiscientific primal pond, creationists?) The data, what real science uses, shows life, always and only, comes from life and life of the same kind. . Pile theories presented as facts on top of logical fallacies, ignore the real data or try to spin it away, and stir well with sophistry. Then you have evolutionary theory. . You're not a fish update. You have a Creator Who made you and loves you and wants you to know Him, and to love Him, too. Don't trade that in for pseudo science mumbo jumbo.

I was shown this in Biology class about 7 years ago, and it has been stuck in my head ever since

bloody rammers tune

this is relly good

Now that you have heard this song, you will have it stuck in your head for the rest of your life. Good luck. I heard it about half a year ago in bio and I still find myself humming it all the time.

I fucking love this song......

This song is awesome! I love it! ... Is there more where this came from?

haha i put this on my prezi for school

what about charles darwin

Thank you.

Sorry, I meant in which book is it mentioned? I would like to find it in my copy.

Which one is it mentioned in?

I do apologise, but all I was saying is your original quote was not from Charles Darwin, but instead from Leon Megginson, who was summarizing Darwin's work. I heve read his books also.

Darwin didn't actually say that, but he did say something similar in On the Origin of Species.. "...one general law leading to the advancement of all organic beings- namely multiply, vary, let the strongest live and the weakest die."

Anyone know the chords to this song? I would love to play it!

"Only variations of already existing genes are possible" No stupid, scientists have observed new genes evolving, via fusions of two or more genes, or repetitions or gene duplications of genetic elements. "Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations" No stupid, we have observed nature doing just that. "Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it" You have no equation to measure "information", so you're lying.

Very cool.

This song is catchy. Your British accnt makes it even better. Go Darwin!

i love this! thank you! this video is going to help me ALOT with my science project! thanks xxx much love! i would give you 20 bucks if i can!

hahaaa mr haines came to our school :) complete legend. x

have you taken any biology classes...? or spelling/grammer lessons for that matter

has it ever occured to anyone that the creation and evolution are both possible...? The beginning of life has to start somewhere: creation. There are obvious pieces of evidence that species change: evolution

No to clarify bacon is not needed to make bread!

because evolution does not stopped here

Evolution = The Truth Some may deny it, but in the end truth and love always wins over lies and hate...

So what are you trying to say exactly? That we were created by a superior being up there somewhere in heaven??? I think that's even more of a crazy idea. I understand your point with the bread thing yeah, dont get me wrong but i'm sure the evolution of bread making took many years way back in the day. Getting the right ingredients to work together, adding other things. I dont know much about bread making, you seem to be the expert here. All i know is its great sliced with bacon in between!

+ egg to make a cake surely! + chocolate & cream to make chocolate gateaux, now thats cake making evolution! Darwin would be proud of us...

I believe you would need yeast to make bread!

Great animation mate! I certainly believe in a guy named Darwin! Be some stupid or not, i believe he went to crazy places and documented crazy animals in a crazy book/s. Creationists are weird, end of story. Keep up the good work!

Cheers!

i love this. perfect for science class! keep it up!!

Great video! Great song!

Nice Video Man