วีดีโอ

This is so true. It's always so hard to access places

Can you speak in layman's terms please. Because it comes across as though you're saying that the over 65's aren't to have a say in the running of our national parks, because their voices aren't diverse enough & that you'd like to be paid a bursary from a government scheme for saying so. I'm no body language expert, but you expressed dupers delight on some of the points in your presentation. You neglected to mention how you intend to achieve your Khmer rouge type goals in life. It all appears to be vaguely centred around this bursary. Please elaborate.

Please give if you can bit.ly/bgparks22

Visit this page to donate and have your donation doubled until 6 December: bit.ly/bgparks22

Visit bit.ly/bgparks22 to have your donation doubled at no extra cost to you

The Big Give Christmas Challenge opens on Giving Tuesday 29 November at 12 noon. Visit this link to give: bit.ly/bgparks22 Thank you 🌳

Respect, yes! Nor is it just a matter of visitors being respectful ('Leave nothing but footprints, take nothing but photos'). It's also those with careers in Countryside Management who often put their stamp on National Parks which spoil the sense of wilderness. Signs, waymarks, paths, fencing, picnic benches, etc, all 'suburbanise' the wilderness, taking it one step closer to being a human-built environment.

Every. Single. Word. Golden!!!! Xx

This is really useful in my studies. I am an undergraduate studying landscape history and writing an essay entitled, 'why were there no national parks in Britain before the 1940s?'

The Broads has similar status to the national parks in England and Wales but has its own legislation and therefore does not come under the same legal restrictions as real national parks. The term "Broads national park" can only be used for marketing purposes.