วีดีโอ

It's not true that Jesus was black, but your comment is welcome!

All the people/tribes listed in your comment are part of the "Lies That Made It To The Bible." The Pyramids are the strongest proof that the Ancient Egyptians existed. Can you think of anything as evidence on the same level as the Pyramids to support the claims that any of the people/tribes in your comment existed without referencing the Ancient Egyptians?

The pyramids are indeed monumental evidence of Ancient Egyptian civilization, but most ancient peoples, including those mentioned in my comment, didn't leave behind comparable structures. This doesn't mean they didn't exist. Historical existence is supported not only by large monuments but also by smaller, less grandiose evidence, such as settlements, pottery, tools, inscriptions, and records in neighboring civilizations. For example: The Canaanites, who are the ancestors of the Hebrews, are well-documented through archaeological evidence, including fortified cities like Hazor, Megiddo, and Jericho, as well as written records from Egypt and Mesopotamia referring to the land of Canaan and its inhabitants. The Hyksos left evidence of their presence in Egypt, such as distinctive pottery, architecture in the Delta region, and Egyptian texts describing their rule and eventual expulsion. Even the Hebrews, while their early history is debated, are referenced in inscriptions like the Merneptah Stele (13th century BCE), which mentions a group called "Israel" in Canaan. Expecting the same level of evidence for every ancient group as the pyramids is unrealistic. Not all civilizations had the resources, centralized power, or cultural inclination to build such structures. Smaller-scale evidence is equally valid in reconstructing history." This answer highlights the validity of different kinds of evidence in ancient history and avoids the false equivalence of monumental evidence with historical reality.

​@@TROJAN9656 So I have been exposed to the information, people, tribes, and cities you have laid out in your comment. I created this platform to submit my findings after years of self-studying and realizing that most of the histories written about Egypt are fiction stories designed to deceive, sell, and steal identity. All the names listed in your example are fictional characters whose existence is only validated by their encounter with the Ancient Egyptians. Most of the evidence presented by archeologists to support your list are objects either created in workshops or are in the process of creating them in workshops as we speak. The reason why archeologists attached fictional history to Egypt is because of the Pyramids. Everything besides the Pyramids built by the Ancient Egyptians can be reproduced, including the Great Sphinx. We are still waiting for someone to duplicate the pyramids; until then, the pyramids are the set standard and not the lies written in the bible and religious books. There is no evidence to support any of the lists from the example you provided.

@@rosettastoneorigin Thank you for sharing your perspective. It seems like we fundamentally disagree on the reliability of historical and archaeological methodologies. While skepticism can be valuable in questioning narratives, dismissing all evidence as fabricated without presenting specific counter-evidence or alternative methodologies makes it difficult to engage in a meaningful discussion. You mentioned that most of the evidence supporting the existence of the Canaanites, Hyksos, and other groups is fabricated. This is a significant claim, and it would help if you could clarify the following: What specific evidence do you believe was fabricated, and what criteria are you using to determine this? How do you account for cross-cultural references-such as Egyptian texts that mention foreign entities like Canaan, or the Merneptah Stele's mention of 'Israel'-if these are also fabrications? Why do you believe the pyramids alone are an irrefutable standard of authenticity while dismissing all other evidence, even within Egypt itself (e.g., the temples, tombs, and inscriptions that also reference interactions with other peoples)? The claim that 'everything besides the pyramids can be reproduced' doesn't account for the purpose or context of historical evidence. Archaeologists don't rely solely on objects being irreplicable today; they rely on contextual evidence, stratigraphy, and independent corroboration from various sources. Reproducing the pyramids, impressive as that would be, wouldn't inherently disprove other types of evidence or narratives. History is built on piecing together evidence from multiple sources-archaeological, textual, and cultural. Rejecting all of it as fictional requires a robust alternative framework to explain the coherence of ancient records and archaeological findings across different civilizations.

@@TROJAN9656 The Great Pyramids Are The Only Objects in the Context of Ancient Egyptian History that cannot be duplicated, do you agree? Can you give me something besides the Great Pyramids created by mankind that we are not able to duplicate today?

🤣

Did you also steal the video on your platform? Do you think I have the time to debunk all the liars out here? shorturl.at/keqPt

@Leading NPC Does it matter??

@LeadingNPC Does it matter ??