- 19
- 460 883
Sanjay Gireesh
India
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 17 ส.ค. 2021
In Kollywood, there are reviewers, decoders, memers, and other content creators too. But ultimately, there is no one to speak the "unspoken". Wondering what "unspoken" is?
Find out by watching our videos!
Feel free to subscribe, and get ready to change your perspective on cinema!
For business inquiries and paid promotions, please contact: contactsanjaygireesh@gmail.com
Find out by watching our videos!
Feel free to subscribe, and get ready to change your perspective on cinema!
For business inquiries and paid promotions, please contact: contactsanjaygireesh@gmail.com
I (2015) MOVIE ANALYSIS - தமிழ் | 10TH YEAR ANNIVERSARY TRIBUTE | SANJAY GIREESH
The 2015 Indian film I, directed by the acclaimed filmmaker Shankar, is a multi-genre cinematic experience that blends romance, action, and social commentary. The film, starring Vikram in the lead role, combines technical mastery, emotional depth, and innovative storytelling. Shankar, known for his larger-than-life films, weaves a narrative that touches on themes of love, betrayal, revenge, and the consequences of vanity, while also exploring issues of body image, beauty standards, and human fragility.
Plot Overview and Themes
I tells the story of an ambitious bodybuilder named Lingesan, portrayed by Vikram, who dreams of becoming a successful model. His life changes drastically when he falls in love with a beautiful and ambitious makeup artist, Diya, played by Amy Jackson. Their romance, however, is marred by a series of betrayals, power struggles, and the toxic pursuit of perfection, leading to Lingesan’s physical and emotional transformation.
The film delves into themes of love and its consequences, the human obsession with beauty, and the lengths one can go to in order to achieve one's desires. Shankar presents these ideas through his signature style of grandiose spectacle and an almost mythological portrayal of the protagonist’s journey, which is rife with melodrama, action, and surreal moments.
One of the core aspects of I is its examination of physical beauty, with the protagonist's transformation at the hands of a vengeful antagonist. The body transformation, in particular, serves as a symbol for vanity, vanity that leads Lingesan to both greatness and destruction. His descent into disfigurement following his physical enhancement is a commentary on society's obsession with external appearance and the price one pays for wanting to fit into an unrealistic beauty ideal.
Character Development and Performance
Vikram’s performance is the central anchor of the film. His portrayal of Lingesan-before and after his physical transformation-is both compelling and haunting. In the film’s first half, Lingesan is depicted as a rugged, strong, and optimistic man who desires nothing more than to succeed in his career and to win Diya's heart. Vikram's physical transformation to embody the bodybuilder persona is both impressive and indicative of his commitment to the role. His transformation to a grotesque and disfigured version of himself in the latter half of the film, however, is what makes his performance truly remarkable. Vikram masterfully conveys the internal struggle of his character as he deals with the psychological and emotional repercussions of his appearance and the loss of his identity.
Amy Jackson’s portrayal of Diya adds another layer of complexity to the film. Diya is an enigmatic character who initially seems to be a figure of love and support for Lingesan, but as the plot unfolds, it becomes clear that she is not only a victim of circumstances but also a product of the ruthless world of beauty and fashion. While Jackson's role does not have the depth of Vikram’s, she plays a pivotal part in shaping the film’s narrative, serving as both a love interest and a catalyst for Lingesan’s tragic downfall.
The supporting cast, including characters like the villainous cosmetic surgeon and the power-hungry antagonists, are also crucial to the narrative. They serve as representations of the corrupting influences of society and ambition, which, in turn, push Lingesan toward his ultimate destruction.
Conclusion
I (2015) is an ambitious and visually stunning film that tackles complex themes of love, beauty, and vanity, while offering a scathing critique of the obsession with physical perfection in society. The film’s spectacular visuals, Vikram’s transformative performance, and its emotional and social commentary make it a significant work in contemporary Indian cinema. Shankar’s direction, combined with A. R. Rahman’s music, ensures that I is an unforgettable cinematic experience that pushes the boundaries of storytelling, blending entertainment with poignant reflections on societal values.
VIDEO CHAPTERS:
0:00 INTRODUCTION
0:51 SHANKAR'S UNIQUE MOVIE
1:18 TITLE CHOICE OF "I"
1:39 OPENING SCENE OF I
2:07 NON-LINEAR NARRATIVE
2:26 CHARACTERIZATION IN I
3:35 SHANKAR'S TOUCH
4:17 RAJINIKANTH IN I
4:24 VIKRAM'S PERFORMANCE
4:49 GREAT SONGS AND OST
5:58 FIXED PLOT HOLE
6:41 THEME OF I MOVIE
6:58 GREAT FIGHT SCENES
7:46 SCREENPLAY TYPE EXPLAINED
8:17 HIGH BUDGET SONGS IN I
8:55 GREAT CINEMATOGRAPHY
9:19 BEST SIDE CHARACTER
10:29 WHY I MOVIE GOT MIXED REVIEWS?
12:32 CONCLUSION
Plot Overview and Themes
I tells the story of an ambitious bodybuilder named Lingesan, portrayed by Vikram, who dreams of becoming a successful model. His life changes drastically when he falls in love with a beautiful and ambitious makeup artist, Diya, played by Amy Jackson. Their romance, however, is marred by a series of betrayals, power struggles, and the toxic pursuit of perfection, leading to Lingesan’s physical and emotional transformation.
The film delves into themes of love and its consequences, the human obsession with beauty, and the lengths one can go to in order to achieve one's desires. Shankar presents these ideas through his signature style of grandiose spectacle and an almost mythological portrayal of the protagonist’s journey, which is rife with melodrama, action, and surreal moments.
One of the core aspects of I is its examination of physical beauty, with the protagonist's transformation at the hands of a vengeful antagonist. The body transformation, in particular, serves as a symbol for vanity, vanity that leads Lingesan to both greatness and destruction. His descent into disfigurement following his physical enhancement is a commentary on society's obsession with external appearance and the price one pays for wanting to fit into an unrealistic beauty ideal.
Character Development and Performance
Vikram’s performance is the central anchor of the film. His portrayal of Lingesan-before and after his physical transformation-is both compelling and haunting. In the film’s first half, Lingesan is depicted as a rugged, strong, and optimistic man who desires nothing more than to succeed in his career and to win Diya's heart. Vikram's physical transformation to embody the bodybuilder persona is both impressive and indicative of his commitment to the role. His transformation to a grotesque and disfigured version of himself in the latter half of the film, however, is what makes his performance truly remarkable. Vikram masterfully conveys the internal struggle of his character as he deals with the psychological and emotional repercussions of his appearance and the loss of his identity.
Amy Jackson’s portrayal of Diya adds another layer of complexity to the film. Diya is an enigmatic character who initially seems to be a figure of love and support for Lingesan, but as the plot unfolds, it becomes clear that she is not only a victim of circumstances but also a product of the ruthless world of beauty and fashion. While Jackson's role does not have the depth of Vikram’s, she plays a pivotal part in shaping the film’s narrative, serving as both a love interest and a catalyst for Lingesan’s tragic downfall.
The supporting cast, including characters like the villainous cosmetic surgeon and the power-hungry antagonists, are also crucial to the narrative. They serve as representations of the corrupting influences of society and ambition, which, in turn, push Lingesan toward his ultimate destruction.
Conclusion
I (2015) is an ambitious and visually stunning film that tackles complex themes of love, beauty, and vanity, while offering a scathing critique of the obsession with physical perfection in society. The film’s spectacular visuals, Vikram’s transformative performance, and its emotional and social commentary make it a significant work in contemporary Indian cinema. Shankar’s direction, combined with A. R. Rahman’s music, ensures that I is an unforgettable cinematic experience that pushes the boundaries of storytelling, blending entertainment with poignant reflections on societal values.
VIDEO CHAPTERS:
0:00 INTRODUCTION
0:51 SHANKAR'S UNIQUE MOVIE
1:18 TITLE CHOICE OF "I"
1:39 OPENING SCENE OF I
2:07 NON-LINEAR NARRATIVE
2:26 CHARACTERIZATION IN I
3:35 SHANKAR'S TOUCH
4:17 RAJINIKANTH IN I
4:24 VIKRAM'S PERFORMANCE
4:49 GREAT SONGS AND OST
5:58 FIXED PLOT HOLE
6:41 THEME OF I MOVIE
6:58 GREAT FIGHT SCENES
7:46 SCREENPLAY TYPE EXPLAINED
8:17 HIGH BUDGET SONGS IN I
8:55 GREAT CINEMATOGRAPHY
9:19 BEST SIDE CHARACTER
10:29 WHY I MOVIE GOT MIXED REVIEWS?
12:32 CONCLUSION
มุมมอง: 26 058
วีดีโอ
Q&A ANNOUNCEMENT!
มุมมอง 838วันที่ผ่านมา
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
WHY GAME CHANGER IS SO BAD? - தமிழ் | BETTER THAN INDIAN 2? | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 20Kวันที่ผ่านมา
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
24 MOVIE ANALYSIS - தமிழ் | TRIBUTE | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 14K14 วันที่ผ่านมา
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
KANGUVA - REWRITTEN SCREENPLAY - தமிழ் | STORY REPAIR | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 8K21 วันที่ผ่านมา
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
HERO WORSHIP RUINED INDIAN CINEMA - தமிழ் | PAN INDIAN MOVIES | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 10Kหลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
LUBBER PANDHU MOVIE ANALYSIS - தமிழ் | BEST POLITICAL SPORTS DRAMA | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 3K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
YAVARUM NALAM MOVIE ANALYSIS - தமிழ் | THE BEST TAMIL HORROR MOVIE? | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 37K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
VAAZHAI MOVIE WRITING ANALYSIS - தமிழ் | RANJITH ROAST | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 31K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
[THE BOYS] BILLY BUTCHER: CHARACTER ANALYSIS - தமிழ் | MOST FAVOURITE CHARACTER | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 25K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
WE REWROTE THE SCREENPLAY OF INDIAN 2 - தமிழ் | STORY REPAIR | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 158K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
ANALYSIS OF MAHARAJA MOVIE - தமிழ் | BEST MOVIE OF 2024 | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 8K6 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
[THE BOYS] HOMELANDER'S CHARACTER ANALYSIS - தமிழ் | WELL WRITTEN VILLAIN | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 56K6 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
ANIRUDH IS NOT A COPYCAT! - தமிழ் | MUSIC PLAGIARISM EXPLAINED | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 14K6 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
INFINITY WAR IS BETTER THAN ENDGAME - தமிழ் | ENDGAME IS OVERRATED | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 21K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyri...
VAARANAM AAYIRAM IS OVERRATED! - தமிழ் | WRONG MESSAGES PORTRAYED IN V1000 | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 11K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
VAARANAM AAYIRAM IS OVERRATED! - தமிழ் | WRONG MESSAGES PORTRAYED IN V1000 | SANJAY GIREESH
TOP 10 CHARACTERS OF DASAVATHAARAM - தமிழ் | RANKING | SANJAY GIREESH
มุมมอง 6K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
TOP 10 CHARACTERS OF DASAVATHAARAM - தமிழ் | RANKING | SANJAY GIREESH
It's my favourite movie bro ❤🔥
Bro can u make an analysis of ayrathil oruvan? I get the movie was very underrated when it was released and it has great complex story especially for it's time but the more I watch there seems to be lot of screenplay/story phasing flaws that no one wants to talk about or is it just me?
@@Life_is_miraculus Will try bro!
@sanjaygireesh thanks 🙏🏻
Movie mattum illama Anime series um panalam la Super powers fantacy anime nan recomend panala, just crime, thriller, suspense mari anime um pathu2 video poduga If you want we can recommend that kind of anime Cause movie la pana mudiyatha things lam animation la panalam, so try pani paruga
Let it full screen bro why its floating
Ulaga Nayagan Kamal Shankar Combo 1. Indian Blockbuster hit 2. Indian 2 Flop 3. Indian 3 Flop
Super Star Rajini Shankar Combo 1. Sivaaji blockbuster hit 2. Enthiran blockbuster hit 3 2.0 flop
1. I 2. 2.0 3. Indian 2 4. Game Changer After this 4 flop movies waiting for Shankar Come Back
Shankar last hit movies 1. Enthiran blockbuster hit (2010) 2. Nanban super hit (2012) After 13 Years no hit movies for Shankar
Shankar Flop movies list 1. 2.0 2. Indian 2 3. I 4. Boys 5. Game Changer 6. Nayak
Shankar Hit movies list 1. Indian 2. Gentleman 3. Mudhalvan 4. Anniyan 5. Jeans 6. Sivaaji 7. Enthiran 8. Nanban 9. Kadhalan
I le irunthu thaan Shankar career close aachu
I movie positive Chiyaan Vikram dedication making AR Rahman music I movie negative Shankar story & Screenplay
I flop big budget movie 3 years project 2012 le start panna movie 2015 le release aachu budget 330+cr collection 240 cr producer kku loss thaan adukku apparam anda producer ascar Ravichanthiran movies produce pannale audio launch kku producer 55 cr selavu pannaaru
Bro extremely good analysis i thought only the jokes in love portion was bad but after seeing ur video i realised the writing has lot of places to improve u channel is totally different from other reviewers please don't change ur type of content ❤
Lag screen cut panitale negative reviews varathu
Basic ah na oru watch mechanic
Yes correct I didn't like that much movie only songs phograhphy acting goods narration very slow
My opinion also V1000 overrated only music slow pace 2nd half worst In my point of View sachein kushi Kandukonden kandukonden Thiruda thirudai>>>V1000
Wow mind blowing bro after watching kanguva i too felt if anyone could rework this story and by luck found you loved ur work keep this good work❤🎉lots of love ur new subscriber 🔥✨
Bro few months ah follow panren bro your videos are good but this one some of the things are not much good and iam not fan of vaaranam ayiram but some things you have not noticed.. Father is smoking and drinking is his choice but it doesn't mean the son also do the same.. if father surya asked the son to do smoking is bad but he politely says not to do so. Even this type of character shown in bigil even now also there, as his father cant control this but he says son not do so.. you can clearly see in the hospital where after knowing he has cancer but he refused to quit this is the fore shadowing and younger surya smokes drinks and drugs but he quit all this the character arc of both of them 1st father period la irunthey loves are done in the same way either film or in real Then the way simran said that he is handsome do she liked is bit manipulative in ur sense she was attracted by his look and attitude which made her not complain, but this doesn't mean if the ugly guy should not stalk. It is if a girl doesn't like it is bad or if she politely says she doesn't like so he must stop even if he is handsome or ugly Then the younger suriya had fight with senior and his father have asked him. To fight means he not indulging him to go and beat him , instead of u r not wrong u can fight not get hit by some one for un wanted reason. As his father knew that his son is not stalking anymore he is in love with her so he may have Said to follow his heart and bring her. Iam not commenting about train sequence or stalking .. but when suriya went to America and heroine believed that .. suriya is taking effort to meet her as you or me don't go to extent to meet any of girl for stalking so see reciprocated. Then first the visa person has provided the visa as they believed that the surya don't settle in America as their primary point is any citizen settle which will affect there economy .. as suriya said he don't want to settle but want to meet his girl and take her back so embassy doesn't take him as a serious contender .. just a lazy excuse😂 Then suriya gets failed in his love and start to get disturb his mental balance .. but you see travel changes a person a lot and the way he thought that his parents have trusted him and sent him outstation even after knowing him as drug addict made him to change aswell as saving the baby from the dacoits made him to reform and show his pain angush and aggression towards the workout and think to join in army where he can show his aggression to a right cause and towards unwanted allies and satisfaction of saving someone with the uniform and authority The 2nd love not started when he is on army camp but it started from the bus stop where she proposed but he was not ready to accept after he got reformed, his pain reduce and he don't want to loose another woman in his life because of past pain and his thought on " life has to move on" . Coming to sister may be director may have not want to stretch this film on showing addition al line on the sister and sister family .. ( not all women have bindi in fore head) Finally his father dead and varanaam ayiram is the way simran looks his huband. And this is.not muttu but my theory which you may have missed ..!! Reply if am correct
Everything will be justifiable if the arguments are so lazy and biased. And bro, I never want people to hate V1000; I just want people to stop glorifying it and realize nothing is perfect in this world.
@sanjaygireesh yes bro glorification is. Avoidable but we must respect the art and find why it is made here
4:00 nice humour
The movie release before 15 years then we dont need logic just magic. Now a days only we are keen in finding mistakes than enjoying the movie. Overrated or underrated let it be a classic
Tamil audience oru thanda 🌸🤡 Ivanungakalukku intha madiri padam ellam padikkaathu nalla padam vantha theatre poga maattaanunga athuve Big star Film na nalla illana kooda hit pannuvanunga Athuve middle or low budget film la pakkama aprom pesuvanga thanda 🌸nga Example Ayiraththil oruvan kadaisi vivasaayi Edit: itha meeri oruthan nalla irukkunu sollitta avan kindal panniye nalla illanu solla vachchiduvanunga
Appo surya big star illanu othukra apdidhane. Aama aduthavan taste ah judge pandradhuku nee yaaru
Indha padam odama ponadhuku innoru reason indru netru naalai. My theory is that in Indru Netru Naalai, they have shown time travel differently by showing two versions of heroes in the same timeline, which is the most common template used by directors of sci-movies that were persuaded by the audience for ages, and they got used to it for acceptance. But coming to 24 the director takes different way to show time travel irrespective of place and time the character travel from present to past he ends in the desired place he wants to for that in Hollywood and superhero movies have a concept of space-time quantum theory for example in flash web series the hero has the power of speed to do time travel or time jump by achieving a speed of light with help of speed force while running into it(speed force) so that he can travel into desired event and place from his past. This was not explained well in 24, and there are some poor, lame writings in the script to move the plot to its end. The director foreshadows the eagle as a sign of external force or fate, mentioned in the comment section by one of the subscribers because there's a saying that when you change a single thing, even a very small change can end up a huge adverse impact on your present which is not known to you. So there's an external force that drives everything in the universe in a streamlined way. If there's a disturbance, you'll face the consequence according to it. That's how I see the eagle as an external force that makes the watch work so that the scientist has the worst end. This suits for area too he wanted to play god but ended up in vain
Good one bro👍🔥
@@mr.kettaven Thank you so much brother! ❤️
VTV is the creepiest stalker film ever. Andha ponnu train scene lendhu kerala scenes varai fulla venam venaam nu soliyum forcefully kiss vera panuvaan. Idhu cult classic aam 🤮🤮
Bro just for attention seeking like the dialogue in sarkar if we say something in negative it will give much impact. Just cuz u want to get attention and earn money through youtube. U don't get to decide on what ppl should like and dislike
Last hit and masterpiece of shankar
நித்திய வலி மரணத்தை விட பெரியது
1.who is your girlfriend?
unga voice great bro
Cinematography +acting +vfx +superb
Bro is literally manipulates my entire childhood 😭😭😭😭
visuals are irritating bro
4:52 best 🎉intro