วีดีโอ

Neat

Excellent

I own one😊😊😊

Hey, I own the board game version of this.

Excellent

The fact that these didn't make it into later versions of the game makes me sad. It costs nothing but ink and a few hours of rules tweaking to make them work for modern versions. two extra sheets of paper for a rule book.

@13:52 I went in with 2 infantry and 2 armor

Played lots of games of this version!

Excellent

Russians ships can leave the Baltic as long as peace with Germany exists.

For the Allies you have to factor in the need for transports and the need to protect those valuable ships....especially for the US who have to cross two oceans to get troops into the fight

good video. very informative .

Quick question, what is this program you are using for the board?

Yea Peace through strength ! I dig it :)

Excellent

Where's US/China2?

Excellent

@10:48 that's insane too!

@10:31 that's insane!

Hmmm

I can’t say I’ve ever had a simple Germany game

im interested to know how you made the game, is this your own game program or are you using someone elses?

Japanese DDs can carry 1 infantry also

Yeah, I had some comments removed.

I think from a Christian prospective, both sides would be considered evil. Since the Soviet Union persecuted Christians, while Fascist Italy established great relations with the Church. The Jews always get punished in the bible from straying away from God, who is to say it dod not happen again.

6:18 I dont know why but for some reason I was expecting. “I cant think of anything bad” Haha

Thanks Crockett. Fantastic vid. The spiritual battle is very real, and we are blessed to have God's Holy Spirit and the whole armour of God to help us stand firm

TH-cam deleted my other comments....Hiroshima Nagasaki...that's all I'll say

Awesome video!

Heads up, you have to declare war with ANZAC for the Sneaky Karl to work. p11 of the Pacific rulebook has the special transport loading rule for powers declaring war which gives an exception for hostile sea zones. If Japan declares war, transports can be loaded freely in hostile sea zones that the transports start in.

Axis and Allies 1914 needs a remake

I have watched this part too (sorry my spelling). * I am crtizised to buy slow movers with Russia in round 6 and 7. fair enough, I think I need MEN and after all I have the North Africa money secured and I have time, no rush to over commit *In round 6 I place in defensive area to yunnan because I want the chinese NO of +6. dont get that if the japanese just walk in. Agreed, it slows down the pacific shore campaign. *I am about to give up after India, London and the sz54 fleet goes down. Well executed by gamerman01! And I am not patrionizing him, no way! I just did not fully understand the power of sz 54 after London and india....... * In OOB you need to think of Russian and China as one power. If Russia is strong support china. In this case China is strong and no need to support china early on. That is also a reason to by slow movers with Russia. You have time. * I think gamerman01 should have focused MUCH more on the north african russian money in round 6,7,8. I do a lot to protect it because it is so IMPORTANT to keep for Russia. Also the main objective is to avoid an Italian takeover of Egypt. gamerman01 should havve pressed harder for this after London went down * Then the Chahar placement in round 8 or 9. 9 i think. Where should I place it? Yunnan? Chahar is both a defensive placement but also a highly offensive placement. It is wait and see. After all I spreads out the thin Japanese forces all over china. JUST some thoughts

oysteilo here. I have watched end of round 6. First of all you have many things right. Some comments from me: The battle in korea is awefull. But the engine does it wrongly and we agree I am compansated with 2 hits with my 8 defending two's that never fire, It is what it is. Then thre are two more battles in china that goes really poorly for the allies. It is the dice will, it is what it is. Then I mess up India, I do the same error when I move offline and for some reason I manage to do the same error over again.... Come on! When it comes to London it is slightly more complicated and I thing you underestimate the situation at USA 4. it is dire times for the allies in the med, there are a 1-2 punch with italy 4 and germany 5. I simply underestimate/dont take into consideration a G6 sea lion. I will try to watch 7-10 over the weekend. It would be nice if I can join in on the next session

The US already did 5 damage...disregard my rolls

@17:15 I don't see a DD in 92

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Nice move up there in Finland....I thought you would go for Leningrad

Moved Russian mech to Egypt.

Maybe next time, the person with the camera should be facing the board in the right way...not upside down :D

@23:29...the Brit DD in 96 isn't there

The concept AndrewAAgamer is referencing in regards to the Japanese fleet vs the Uk fleet in India is the idea of a fleet in being. A fleet in being is a fleet that can influence a much larger area by staying in port than if it were to leave and go to sea. A good example of how not to do this is when the Germans moved the Bismarck and Sharnhorst out of Norway were they were a fleet in being that forced the British to leave ships nearby just in case. Once these ships left port all the British had to do was send a squadron of ships after them and destroy them. A tactical error by the Germans.

I think most good players are conservative players. The more experience you have the more you realize how many unnecessary risks there are in the game, and that its better to avoid them.

you are inspiring me on my own Napoleonic era epic strategic boardgame

Mistakenly uploaded video from last week

heh heh good action crockett. Glad you been getting some gaming in :)

That free unit/installation is huge. Smaller nation getting more than a full turns extra production (i ASSUME) it is production not on map start of game? Italy, Anzac, Far East Command...

I edited out the German sub by mistake. So 110 has 1 German 1 sub, zero British units.

Excellent