Burak
Burak
  • 1
  • 55 149
Nabokov on Kafka (1989)
This is a short TV movie based on Nabokov's lecture at Cornell upon "Metamorphosis," Kafka's bizarre story about a man who wakes up one morning to discover he has turned into a giant bug. This was filmed at 1989 by Peter Medak, and Christopher Plummer is portraying Vladimir Nabokov.
มุมมอง: 55 193

วีดีโอ

ความคิดเห็น

  • @theodoregateret996
    @theodoregateret996 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Walker Edward Moore David Garcia Kenneth

  • @LoadMaster-xl8dp
    @LoadMaster-xl8dp 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    In real Life Nabokov did speak with a strong Russian accent. It is impossible to completely eliminate foreigh accent, unless you move to a country under the age of 3. After 3, hasta la vista, baby, you will always have a foreign accent. you watch interviews with Nabokov online.

  • @JingleJangleJam
    @JingleJangleJam 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    While the psychology of Humbert Humbert is very literary and well-thought out in the book, I find that there is nothing particularly interesting or more than mundane in his depiction of Dolores' psychology. Franz Kafka is a much more accomplished writer, at the sense of absurdity and psychological confusion of adults making sexual gestures, although this is only contained implicitly in his work, it never explicitly posited itself as being about molestation or rape, but it did have those feelings of societal absurdism and the subjectivity and awareness of the desires of another person not equating to how one imagines or thinks of oneself much better and more interestingly. If it weren't for the interesting nature of the character of Humbert Humbert, Lolita would be a very empty book. The raptures are very one-dimensional, and once you get the quirk or gimmick of the book's controversial surface, nothing in it is really that offensive or shocking, unless its to the taste of the palette of a rigidly moralist conservative mindset of a bygone period of time in which the novel gained success through its publicity of its own censorship for its simple ability to have the gimmick of being about a naughty subject, but not for having a particularly original way of expressing kitsch ironic usage of romantic 19th century love prose to apply to contradictions in its scenario plotlines for cheap thrills of reading something daring and bold in its portrayal of a taboo set of themes. It is exactly what it appears to be; an urbane, Russian aristocrat bored in his life having fun giving writing to scandalize a spectacle in public that's imagination loves to feed on the forbidden thoughts of the public bad guy, who is Humbert Humbert, in the same way aristocratic newspaper men in New South Wales used to enjoy scandalizing the public by telling of all the bawdry and unwholesome tales of how the local alcoholic hang man romantically tried to marry his wife, a prostitute, in its chronicles of the wildly mundane and bored reading moral majority, which would love the sarcastic use of wit and irony in the romantic satire of the hang men. In contrast Kafka was not writing for public reactions of people, Kafka even tried to impel as his last wishes that his writings should have been put into the fire - because Kafka was more ambitious than Nabokov, Kafka was so ambitious his works themselves he wanted to destroy, as his own aim of in his words making a book that could break the ice of the human feeling with a sharp edge of an axe, wasn't an aim of a popular man, or a man who had literary success and privilege, but of a man broken in his heart and sharing an imaginative, original and completely new entire philosophy of how the entire world works through his pain. To me Nabokov was a best-Times-selling novelist of the type he portrayed and made a fame of himself to be subverting, whereas Kafka was a true genius.

  • @francescaemc2
    @francescaemc2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Grazie

  • @daveg4036
    @daveg4036 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could watch him go through all of Kafka’s work, in an epic 6 hour movie of just this 😂

  • @russbentley7677
    @russbentley7677 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thot for a bit this WAS Nabokov on Kafka. It's Plummer pretending. WTFk.

  • @speedracer2841
    @speedracer2841 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Today the learning elite would stage a walkout for refusing to listen to a white male who wrote that horrid book called Lolita, which of course they would not have read.

  • @뭐요-x7p
    @뭐요-x7p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please dont delete this video forever please please please please...i am begging u🥺

  • @explorerelka
    @explorerelka 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have to admire the old school actors , though strongly Shakespearian . Its sheer class and perfect diction and modulations

  • @davidlee6720
    @davidlee6720 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i think Kafka, shown here as a giant beetle, represents the outsider artist suddenly appearing unexpectantly in the midst of a bourgeois family. What are they to do with this abnormal freak?

  • @mk-ww7ii
    @mk-ww7ii 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow this guy is clearly like to give spoilers

  • @sojourn-gv4ue
    @sojourn-gv4ue 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what an incredible little film...much thanks!

  • @SenjiaMurtic
    @SenjiaMurtic 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please explain the important notes to take away from such lecture?

  • @Damphouse
    @Damphouse 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "The passion of the scientist, and the precision of the artist" is probably the one quote that in my opinion separates a good writer from a great one.

  • @Edelweiss-wj5zx
    @Edelweiss-wj5zx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow! Thank you for sharing this, what a jewel! brilliant Nabokov, brilliant Plummer

  • @BrianArtese
    @BrianArtese 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    oy... Kafka was not a "petty clerk" in a Gogolian office -- he was an executive at a large insurance firm, and his legal knowledge of labor insurance issues was invaluable to his company

  • @LowKey433
    @LowKey433 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think there is something off with this narration of the Metamorphosis which might not have been approved by Nabokov. It is really great, but there is something subtle nuance missing here. It might have come from the actor’s perception of the book. I might be wrong. Any feels the same?

  • @Lisbnd1988
    @Lisbnd1988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    just wonderful

  • @niccoloflorence
    @niccoloflorence 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The real question is how Gregor the beetle mysteriously changes its size!

  • @karlbjornsson5004
    @karlbjornsson5004 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't know much about Nabokov, but I think the analysis of Kafka's Metamorphosis was brilliant. However, I can not say I liked Plummer's pompous sounding delivery, which was overly dramatic for my taste. Being an aristocrat, Nabokov may have sounded somewhat like that. I don't know. But the way Plummer spoke reminded me of William F. Buckley Jr. debating James Baldwin, the inflections and pompousness that are meant to indicate good breading and sophistication.

    • @sojourn-gv4ue
      @sojourn-gv4ue 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you are a sad cliché...

    • @lovingyaru
      @lovingyaru 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sojourn-gv4uenew favorite comeback

    • @douglasgerge6434
      @douglasgerge6434 หลายเดือนก่อน

      very well breaded he was

    • @burmashave
      @burmashave 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@douglasgerge6434 lol

  • @greydecaire8
    @greydecaire8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine knowing your English professor was writing Lolita in his downtime...

  • @mateoneedham6807
    @mateoneedham6807 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow!

  • @ilovepavement1
    @ilovepavement1 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know what this film stock needs? More red.

  •  ปีที่แล้ว

    He turned into a beatle but never played with John Lennon.

  • @slickrick5811
    @slickrick5811 ปีที่แล้ว

    My favorite things about Kafka is how he treats corpses , or bodies destined for death: with utter contempt, because… that’s how it is

  • @alex70max
    @alex70max ปีที่แล้ว

    Superbly done

  • @codonauta
    @codonauta ปีที่แล้ว

    Why 1989 if Nobokov died in 1977?

    • @paulstevens6043
      @paulstevens6043 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the movie is from 1989

  • @tombriggs5348
    @tombriggs5348 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is based upon his collected lectures, edited by Fredson Bowers. One volume on Russian literature, one on English literature and one on Don Quixote. There was little to no critical theory in his lectures. Most of them illuminate the practical issues of writing stories.

  • @dapperninji646
    @dapperninji646 ปีที่แล้ว

    Number pad a stream deck should be it’s own video.

  • @dmitriy2853
    @dmitriy2853 ปีที่แล้ว

    Без влияния такой литературы , интеллект все больше подчиняется инстинктам - практически возвышая их . Поэзия Владимира Набокова не уступит его прозе!

  • @andreadaleyutronebel5894
    @andreadaleyutronebel5894 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plummer became crap with egoyan.

  • @prst4190
    @prst4190 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kafka was born into the Austro-Hungarian empire as Czechoslovakia was not brought into being until after WWI

  • @rick.d
    @rick.d ปีที่แล้ว

    holy jumping cats that's great

  • @yaelfeldhendler6280
    @yaelfeldhendler6280 ปีที่แล้ว

    Humour in Kafka, Absurd, Marx in the novel America. Vera Nabokov translated Kafka for his husband. She was Jewish. He had a quarrel with Soljenitsin about the antisemitism of Alexander

  • @Anabsurdsuggestion
    @Anabsurdsuggestion ปีที่แล้ว

    Fine performance!

  • @srothbardt
    @srothbardt ปีที่แล้ว

    Conrad taught himself English through reading. He wanted to read Shakespeare in original.

  • @solonightingale2632
    @solonightingale2632 ปีที่แล้ว

    His ingenuity borders on incredible. Of course, no Russian speak that British English rich and fluent as he did any more. He is undoubtedly the very last of the Mohicans of the great literary tradition dating from the heart of that golden age represented by Pushkin, Gogol, Tolstoy and Dostoyevski. I am inclined to imagine his American audience of the day had been rather tempted to write by his example, his ardent vigor, in spite of the ageing body, his general drive of an artist. In that sense, the Kafkean beetle lurks in each and every of us endowed with a few droplets of talent, for it is this kind of metamorphosis that turns us as human beings into a creature of creation, however trying and even repugnant such prowess may appear to the unproductive and secondary mind of an onlooker.

    • @kabokaisara5293
      @kabokaisara5293 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dude do you write this is like a Delillo essay

    • @yowhatitlooklike
      @yowhatitlooklike 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally, mid century American stylists owe so much to the guy.

  • @StopFear
    @StopFear ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the “Nabokov” in this video actually Nabokov or is this a reenactment for the show?

    • @ad0906013
      @ad0906013 ปีที่แล้ว

      Already mentioned: Christopher Plummer as Nabokov. Someone needs to get an eyecheck.

    • @PlumGustave
      @PlumGustave ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ad0906013someone needs to try to be more decent.

    • @0xmixo260
      @0xmixo260 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ad0906013 Shut up

  • @StopFear
    @StopFear ปีที่แล้ว

    10/10 to the show how’s for pronouncing Vladimir Nabokov with an authentic sound of a Russian speaker.

  • @qamarm1831
    @qamarm1831 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's amazingly performed, love it . Christopher plummer RIP .

    • @jamesnicol3831
      @jamesnicol3831 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes few star actors today would do an intellectual exercise like this let alone know what it means

  • @BigPhilly15
    @BigPhilly15 ปีที่แล้ว

    The greatest short story ever written.

    • @1fattyfatman
      @1fattyfatman 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It bugs me.

  • @timelanguid4813
    @timelanguid4813 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is crap

  • @courathiam256
    @courathiam256 ปีที่แล้ว

    Takes you back to university days, eh ?

  • @mark1321
    @mark1321 ปีที่แล้ว

    1959 was a great year for literature like lolita and naked lunch novels that led the way for such wonderful works as the atrocity exhibition and last exit to Brooklyn clockwork orange (1962 if not mistaken) and twelve to name but a few.

  • @roberthalny403
    @roberthalny403 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic! Thank you!

  • @mikejones9156
    @mikejones9156 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fun stuff...

  • @karen3890
    @karen3890 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a marvelous actor! No one has played such a wide variety of roles! RIP Christopher Plummer.

  • @brdmohamedali
    @brdmohamedali 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    wonderful story by Franz Kafka!

  • @vladis..
    @vladis.. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nabokov was native English speaker, he was trilingual

    • @StopFear
      @StopFear ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, most educated Russians then were

    • @vladis..
      @vladis.. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StopFear если вы сравните высокообразованную русскую интелигенцию с Набоковым, вы поймёте: что это разные измерения относительно понимания ритма и стиля английского языка, даже в случае пренебрежения сложностью лингвистических конструкций и оборотов, не говоря уже про запас слов.

    • @nohisocitutampoc2789
      @nohisocitutampoc2789 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're wrong.

    • @edgarbleikur1929
      @edgarbleikur1929 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is the English language the native language of Russia? No. So you're absolutely incorrect.

    • @vladis..
      @vladis.. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@edgarbleikur1929 Can you even imagine how many nations live in Russia? Anyway, it doesn't matter in which country you have lived. What matters is what kind of person you are and what kind of meaning you possess.

  • @vladis..
    @vladis.. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Два гения