วีดีโอ

Thank you!

Very underrated comment, you are not only 100% correct, but knowing this on your own you are probably one of the people who this information serves the most. This information coming out and all the confirmation of things theorized for the past 50 years (i.e ultra terrestrial/interdimmensional hypotethis) or better yet 1000’s of years (spiritual angle). I’ve known the past couple years as well it is all going to change in our lifetime. Even named my dog Dale Cooper! Ha. Good luck to you in the upcoming changes!

​@@nicholaslacorte3998I think the game is about to stop

I think you guys are silly.

@@Mogorman87 unfortunately, your opinion won't change what's about to happen in a few years

@@16Vagabond sure buddy. 👍

Why would you even watch twin peaks without David Lynch? It would just be hokey nonsense if he wasn’t involved.

@@curiositytax9360 i did

@@Micolash_is_behind_youyes, but as time goes on, it will become harder to watch. The original series when Lynch doesn’t direct an episode is hard to get through. It’s really dated and not in a charming way. Lynch’s episodes, the film and the return have an air of timelessness about them. Iv seen many films and they can stand with the best of them.

@@curiositytax9360 Lynch episodes are a standout, but many directors that worked on the show were also very good, it' s impossible to watch the episodes done by either Tim Hunter ( director of S1ep5 and S2ep9, the killer reveal, and 21, the episodes just before Lynch one) or the S1 finale by Mark frost, the co-creator, and be genuine in the affermation that they are episodes that aged up. David Lynch is an amazing creator, but Mark Frost is quite literaly the guy that made The return, and the original series, happen.

@@laforestadeimillepugnali3865 those episodes you mention by those directors, they only really work because they have major plot revelations in them. The directors have been gifted with major set pieces and honestly, I think they are shit. I don’t buy them at all. I almost switched it off after the episode when leland dies. That was awful. Lynch did the killer reveal. He did the beginning, the middle and the end. I’m not saying Tim Hunter is bad director but compared to Lynch it’s hard not to feel the dip. Describing it as a dip is being generous. It may work while your watching the show, as you are invested in the plot but as a whole it’s awful tripe. That scene when leland died in the water is laughable, sorry. Lynch was supposed to direct ep 5 in season 1, basically the log ladies episode when they visit her cabin. He had to leave to make a film. Getting the money to make a film is a miracle within itself so you can’t pass that up. It’s an ok ep but it breaks your heart when realise Lynch was supposed to direct. You can tell he’s left notes for the director. Again, it’s passable but really dated by this point. Feels like network tv. It doesn’t break that barrier, even if it attempts to be cinematic. They play into the night and cut to eye of a crow. Good idea in principle but you need to execute it just right it it becomes a disaster. This happens time and time again throughout the show where you can see it’s a Lynch idea but they are failing dramatically at conveying it. The same director of that log lady ep does the one in which Bob appears on the bed after josie dies. Probably one of the worst things Iv ever seen quality wise. The josie dying being absorbed into wood is great idea but when Bob and little man appears, they almost destroy this golden idea. Somehow they make Bob laughable. They turn it into camp instead of horror. They can’t dance the line like Lynch does effortlessly. Only episode in which the lodge stuff isn’t destroyed by the writer directors is Stephen Gyllenhaal’s episode. He tries to be subtle and it work. Still not great but at least he doesn’t nearly destroy the whole show. Have you ever seen the final script for the final episode that Lynch threw in the bin. Enough evidence has been produced to show where the talent lays but just watch the episodes themselves. The proof is in the pudding. I don’t really watch anything for ‘plot’. I love story but hate plot, it’s too mechanical. That’s why I don’t really watch tv or many films. But Lynch shows what real talent is when he directs his episodes. They don’t solve ‘plot’ but they exist within the story. And when a plot point is solved, the way he approaches it is cinematic rather than the writing basically telling you what to think or how to feel. Mark Frost is a writer. Tv is a writers medium. Film is a directors medium. In tv, you are mostly dealing in illustrated text matched to Victorian picture books. It’s boring and flat. With someone like Lynch, he brings the element of cinema in. He only uses the script as blueprint. Just look at the way the actors are in his episodes, for example. The way he works with actors is different from the other directors. It feels more like a film. Creativity is being allowed to flourish rather than fulfilling a quota. When someone like Lynch works with actors, parts of their real selves will make it into the film, series etc. The way he frames each shot, the way he approaches certain scenes, set pieces. Honestly, it’s next level. It really is. But really it’s the visual language and how it flows. It’s more like poetry or music than a book with Lynch. All great filmmakers are like that. It’s next level. I don’t even love Lynch that much but the original series shows what real talent is. Of Mark Frost has played a big part but you overestimate his authorship. The Return is basically a David Lynch film. Frost is a collaborator and everyone who works on it is apart of it but it’s Lynch’s vision through and through. The return is a sequel to the film, the original pilot and the episodes Lynch directed. That’s the tone and visual language carried through. That’s the through line. The beginning, the middle, the end all belong to Lynch. The original series would be unwatchable, unfinishable if Lynch hadn’t directed the beginning, the middle and the end. He is the spine of the story. Not dumb boring plot to fill out time but that’s the job of writers. Tv is a conveyer belt. Nothing wrong with that. It’s their job but I don’t care about peoples careers. What makes original Twin Peaks still stand out today is because Lynch was apart of it. That’s what makes it unique. You are watching a not very good network tv show and if you are paying attention, even if you didn’t see his directing credit, you can just instantly tell they have have got a master in to direct the episode and then you check and it is Lynch. I can’t believe people don’t see or feel this. I think this is why film struggles so much. So many people are visually illiterate and they don’t enjoy something unless they are being told how to enjoy it but the thing itself. It’s next level stuff. Lynch basically smashed though the ceiling. The other directors suffer from trying to mimic his style or tone. They fail dreadfully. They aren’t bad directors. They hired some movie directors but it’s just night and day sorry. It’s actually sad to me that people seem to be tuned in more to the writing of something than the cinema of it. It shows you how people think. If you can just shift your attitude then a whole world opens up. Everyone will disagree, I don’t care, as arrogant as it sounds, I know I’m right. You can just watch the Lynch episodes separate from the show itself they are that good.

Bahahah you think this isnt based on our reality? You need to look into Bohemian Grove... and more.

Archons.

The kite and the line

​@@S1aughtahyouyou think this is a game? You think this is a fucking game? "Well yeah..." Oh, ok then

the same way cows and other livestock matter to us.

Inside me - In the Shade. Yeh, can’t find it on Itunes. I downloaded it of Itunes back then.

@@domb.1522wait so can you still listen to it despite it being removed?

The call of Cthulhu :)

I am.