- 41
- 263 707
Symbolic Logic
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 18 พ.ค. 2016
Understanding Overlapping Quantifiers Sharing Predicates and Scope
Understanding Overlapping Quantifiers Sharing Predicates and Scope
มุมมอง: 2 546
วีดีโอ
Translating Non-Standard Propositions into Standard Form Categorical Propositions
มุมมอง 8K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Translating Non-Standard Propositions into Standard Form Categorical Propositions
Understanding Logical Relations in Standard Form Categorical Propositions
มุมมอง 4.1K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Understanding Logical Relations in Standard Form Categorical Propositions
Basic 4 Types of Categorical Propositions
มุมมอง 23K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Basic 4 Types of Categorical Propositions
How to Apply the Rules of Inference in a Proof
มุมมอง 14K8 ปีที่แล้ว
How to Apply the Rules of Inference in a Proof
More on Truth-Tree Recovery of Partial Truth - Values
มุมมอง 1.9K8 ปีที่แล้ว
More on Truth-Tree Recovery of Partial Truth - Values
Propositional Logic: Semantics Basics of a Truth Table
มุมมอง 5K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Propositional Logic: Semantics Basics of a Truth Table
Using Truth Table: Tautology, Contradiction, Contingent Propositions
มุมมอง 4.1K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Using Truth Table: Tautology, Contradiction, Contingent Propositions
Using Truth Table: Testing Arguments for Validity and Invalidity
มุมมอง 6K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Using Truth Table: Testing Arguments for Validity and Invalidity
Great explanation maam
I want a pdf of these notes pls 🙏
Crystal clear .🙏
👍
Outstanding explanation it is , I'm watching it after 7 years , but this is gem watching it 💫 thnk by heart..
thank you
What a banger intro! Loved it
I'm not a fan of writing comments. But this brilliant explanation gave clear answers to many of my confusions. Thanks a lot!
Mam can I get the pdf!?
Do someone know where can I get these notes from?
Very Helpful
Thank you so much ma'am for making it so detailed & easy. I'll watch again & take notes. This one is very detailed vedio on TH-cam you'll nowhere find such detailed vedio on quranyifiers. ^_^
THank you for such a wonderful course
Where Do we Take The A From in the 3rd step . I am not understanding. Just need the answer not the explanation behind it . Do we Take it from the first premise or do we take it from the conclusion?
We take it as Assumption
Thank you ma'am ❤🙏🏻
That was smooth as fuhhhhh
just doing the job in boring manner
Bhot tagda ❤
Great videos
Thank you very much ma'am
Thank you ma’am!
Thank you very much ma'am
Thank you very much ma'am
Thank you very much ma'am
Thank you very much ma'am 🙏
Thank you very much ma'am 🙏
Thank you very much ma'am
Thank you very much ma'am
rizz on point
rizzening
ok
agree
+1
Bruh.
THATS WHY SHES THE GOAT, THE GOAT!!!☝️
goat
the GOAT
If anyone is confused by the horseshoe, it is just a different symbol for If A then B (A -->B)
@17:30 proof example 1 @ 21:14 proof example 2 @ 25:48 proof example 3
Great video, thank you! Sometimes "Transposition" is known as "Contraposition" and "Tautology" as Redundancy (as in the "Power of Logic" book by Howard-Snyder, Howard-Snyder and Wasserman.
Thank you! This helped me a lot.
Y do u act like a supporter of western logic. The whole western logic is form oriented then it doesn't bother about the material level. This video u said form& structure . Totally no clear but lengthy lecture.sorry mam
Amazing! You have helped me understand so much. Thank you
Mam, I can't enroll but Im learning logic from ur video on logic by that I'm understanding the logic very well. So thanks to ,NPTELMHRD to provide this opportunity.
Thank you ma'am it help me alot
Great, thanks!
Thank you mam
Well explained
Who else is with me here 😁?
me lmfaooo
Thank you so much ma'am, you are so awesome ❤️❤️
amazing thanks
Great,
Wow, she deserves a Nobel
thank you lm 19 and the help me thank you very much 💖
In the last example, I failed completely to get how you assigned the values of the consonants because if you compute by using the assigned values we cannot have the truth values of the premises. The best way is to assign the TRUTH values to A, C, D, L, M and N with False values. With that, we are able to get the truth values of the premises and false values in the conclusion. I stand to be corrected.
If you take C and N to be false,then according to matrial equivalence it will be true ,but here in shorter truth table method we try to make conclusion to be false