วีดีโอ

helpful😀

C

Thomas Maria Johnson Kevin Lopez Kenneth

133 Teresa Summit

Martinez Jessica Davis Richard Young Paul

Gonzalez Frank Wilson Susan Harris Cynthia

Commendable

Nicely guided and seems to be very helpful to the new project developer. Thanks GS.

Looks useful.

KK KK KK KK

Sim ❤🎉😂😊😮😂

I can't hear

❤Hi, I was analyzing your TH-cam Channel. Your video is excellent but there are major problems. Video optimization is very poor and no SEO Score. The TH-cam logo and banner are not pretty enough. No rank tags and there are many problems on your TH-cam Channel. Immediately need optimization and SEO friendly for your TH-cam channel. Otherwise, there is a possibility of damage to your TH-cam channel. As a Digital Marketer, and SEO Specialist. I can solve your problems if you want. Thank you.❤

Thanks for sharing. From Singapore

Great presentation thank you very much

Thank you

Thank you for the presentation. Please also share the webinar presentation on Program of Activities

💚

I am surprised ​Anshari Rahman seemingly claims Art.6(2) links into the EU∙ETS.

Florian mentioned posting a link. Where is it?

Hi sir I'm Arif There is some problem with your youtube channel..I will customize?

"Promo SM"

We have about 8-10 "functional" years left once you consider the nature of feedback loops and how conservative studies are in general due to the need to retain funding.

NEED to silence the presenter's notifications and sounds... impossible to concentrate.

Slxnnb.

Thank you

please, whenever possible use native English speakers. Dense, technical and long content like this ends up becoming even more challenging to understand.

Ɖe sa ɔn aɖsaɖs ɔn hns

Great presentation

It is very difficult to listen to the voice, the music is too loud

Thanks for the insights

Would like to collaborate with Gold Standard

"Offsets" is "old" Kyoto thinking. Art 6 is about a cash transfer mechanism. A quid pro quo. Not necessarily to cause an "offset" but to cause the funding required for transformation. Anyone who says otherwise is missing the bigger picture. Veronika Elgart was impressive in such regards but all missed the real issue, which is a price support mechanism in the eventual Art.6(4) mechanism. Nothing was said here on that. This could have been a session from 5 years ago, not post COP 26 Art. 6 Rulebooks. The second aspect missed by all is simply this: although the NBS removalist agenda dominates most climate finance discussions, the Art 6(4) will be agnostic, in the sense that one ITMO has exactly the same outcome as against any other w.r.t. NDCs. Cheap credits only serve "bottom feeder" strategies and do nothing to promote high Capex projects. To wit, Adriaan Korthuis resides in a myth that SDG goals are not for Annex 1 countries. Meanwhile, I have read that the US and EU are not going to avail themselves of Art6 mechanisms. So what was the point of their COP26 designates even showing up in Glasgow? So my question to Andrea Bonzanni, which Annex 1 countries have said they will take ITMOs? We must also be careful and precise about what is meant by *double counting* in the sense that for ex. whereas Scope 3 mechanisms such as EPDs are additive, CDM methods are subtractive.

Dear Hugh i am an organic farmer in India how do i certify my farm through Gold Standard Foundation and start generating carbon credits

The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. th-cam.com/video/0Jijw7-YG-U/w-d-xo.html The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.

Hi Sir I have seen your vedio which is very informative. Could it possible share this presentation.

Murat was here. TFS (Thanks For Sharing)

So they can own all the land and live in feudal lordship standards (gold) while we live controlled in cement boxes. Never give up your weapons and teach your children what their agenda is and teach them to use a gun along with the tactical training that will be needed to fight the hired blue and green goons that always support tyrants since history...

Pp

I welcome the insight but I'm seeing nothing that is going to give price support for Science based carbon mitigation tech. NBS should be removed from offsets and only projects that cause avoidance should be funded in voluntary markets, to include for example cooking technology, low energy devices etc for developing countries. NBS should be for governments rather than providing a cheap worthless offsets for (say) aviation. Beyond this, we need to be very worried that the Net Zero system is being rigged in an exlusionary manner such that for SBS, to favour ONLY DAC/CCS, which if true, would be astonishing given both are HIGHLY controversial.

No sound after 12minutes ...

Is the audio out after 11:32 ? or an upload issue?

While you need to do step 1 before doing any of the other steps, I don't see why step 2 cannot be done in parallel with 3-4. Edit: I liked this video at the point made at 1:06:20. It is very frustrating to see this fallacy be propagated among climate activists. Of course you ultimately have to concentrate on bailing out water from a leaky boat. That doesn't make bailing more important than plugging the holes.

We need crores of centers like these in India!

Is the GSF still supporting afforestation?

Hundreds of billions of dollars have been wasted on unreliable renewables, if only a fraction of that money was spent on clean fuel technologies the carbon so-called problems would have been solved long ago..."The climate will keep changing no matter what"... Climate scientists are just false prophets.

What does net Zero-emission mean?... Does it mean, that the largest atmospheric jet fuel pollution on the planet, the global aviation industry, will be grounded, or will all of the jumbo Jets etc, will fly on batteries?

I want to invest in carbon offsets. Kindly guide me

Great presentation

Hmm