วีดีโอ

I felt same like forest, I spent nice time in the forest 👍

Super work , I want to see your farm sir

Super work , I want to see your farm sir

3:16 it's me I remember those days

Sir give me your mobile number please my mobile number is 9901054209

Superb work.tree planting on a war footing is the need of the hour.

I am proud of my school

Great🙏🙏

Time correction shows neutrinos during 2pi ~ 47710 km/s or slower speed have time correction of 0.096 seconds.Faster neutrinos at 299778 km/s have tc of 0.0153 seconds.Inverse relationship.

Well explained. It helps individuals to build on their ideas and change the world.

its my school!!

You are saying this because you have not accepted fully that time can be slow for things in motion or near gravity. Forget about clock and imagine you are travelling at very high speed, you will feel that time is not slowing, its passing as it was passing on earth.. But actually its slowed and everything will be slowed including aging.. you will come to know that your time was slow when you stop and compare with the relatively slow or stationary person. You got confused because you are imagining a clock ticking and comparing aging with earth rotating or revolving.. Just think that there is no clock that can measure absolute time.. Whatever clock we use is moving with earth rotation which in turn is revolving around sun which is revolving around center of galaxy which is moving around in clusters of galaxy and so on... So the absolute speed of the clock can't be measured and hence the absolute time can't be measured concluding we dont know exactly what actual time it takes by earth to rotate or revolve. So the time actually is slowing along with any process including aging..

Came across your video in doing some personal research. It sounds like you are saying that your origin or place of creation determines your experience with aging, growth, and time? Let us assume you are correct, that somehow your place or creation imprints your cellular with a degradation hard code (experience with time) and no matter where you go in the universe you will age the same as everyone on the planet you left, but gravity is a measurable force and it effects all the physical matter in the universe? Why would gravity effect the stars, planets, and light, but somehow not effect human beings experience with time as they traveled through various gravitational strengths? Remember that theoretically speaking "Time" itself is a construct, like cars vs Trains when traveling. Both Are constructs to allow for travel between distances but do not determine how much time it takes to get from one point to another. Time passing on earth is due to the gravitation forces attempting to push and pull our matter apart. Gravitational forces holding constant would mean that time would hold constant ( two people standing in a room in France will age the same all things holding constant), but if I travel at 100 miles per hour and got to some point of destination in 1 one hour and you traveled at 20 miles per hour to the same point it would take you 5 hours, are we affected the same? Say for example my trip is the full rotation of planet A and your trip is the full rotation of planet B, we will age differently, not because you are from Planet B, but because planet B is affected by Gravity differently than planet A. But who really knows....

FROM CNN ireport: Disclaimer: We are contradicting the application of Einstein’s theory of relativity to aging and time travel with a hope that this enquiry and conclusion prompts the scientists of tomorrow to re-evaluate the basics of our age old theories, formulas and assumptions that have yielded very little progress when it comes to space travel. I had been investigating for years about how time expands and contracts when we travel at high speeds or move into environments where force of gravity changes. Nothing that I read made sense. It was all too confusing - I would stay young if I travel at speed of light or if I go to a place of high gravity where the clock ticked slow. I concluded otherwise. But I had never thought of raising my conclusion on “Time” to an audience with a fear of rebuttal since it contradicted the theories, findings and assumptions assimilated by the science community over the last 100 plus years. All that changed. Over the last 3 months I visited multitude of schools to promote the thought - the next generation is smarter than the current and we need to encourage their imagination so they innovate. In conducting these brain storms I saw kids as young as 6 years come onto the stage and fearlessly express their ideas and thoughts …wow. And here I was, a 40 year old man, fearing the thought of rebuttal on a conclusive idea that I had. After consulting with the 6 year olds, I made a decision: I was going to talk about my idea to everyone since the smartest scientists on the planet, the 6 year olds, agreed with me. Here it goes..Around the year 1915 Einstein proposed the theory of relativity which states a clock slows down when gravity increases or when we travel at high speeds. Over the last 100 years scientists have conducted thousands of experiments to prove that time, per se clock, slows down and thus we age more slowly when we travel at high speeds or were to visit a planet where gravity was high. I know I am sounding like a broken record. My question was - what has my aging got to do with how a clock - be it atomic - behaves at high speeds or different gravity? I believe a clock is a devise to measure time. And what is time? Is it the tick tock tick tock of a clock? Nope:My time is connected to one rotation of the earth on its own axis - which we call a day or 1 rotation around the sun which we call it a year. Thus my time is Earth Universal Time. The million dollar question: do I age per earth’s rotation or at the rate a clock ticks? My conclusion was, I age at the rate of rotation of the earth since my time is connected to earth’s time. For e.g. if I am given to live 100 years, it means I get to be a part of earth’s 100 rotations around the sun. To take the conclusion one step further, let’s assume, I start travelling on a space ship that goes at the speed of light and I start noticing my clock in the space ship has slowed compared to the clock on earth. Or let’s say I finally land on a planet where gravitational force is really high (just like the planet with gigantic waves in the movie Interstellar) which in turn causes my clock to slow down. In either of the cases, travelling at the speed of light or planet with high gravity which causes my clock to slow down, has the rate of earth’s rotation on it’s own axis and around the sun changed during this time? Meaning, as I sit on the beach in the Interstellar planet and watch the gigantic waves come crashing, and my clock shows I have been sitting for one hour, what has happened to the rate of earth’s rotation - has it remained a constant? So if the earth completes one rotation around the sun( 1 earth year) in the one hour time lapse on my clock as I sit on the beach, I would have grown by 1 year. Meaning, I retain the time and growth rate that I had on earth. THE CONCEPT OF TIME BY ABHI RAJMANE + HUBLI(DOT)ORG: Each individual, entity and energy owns, holds and resonates with the Universal TIME they belong to, irrespective of the position, velocity or force being experienced. In summary, I will not age any different just because I am travelling at the speed of light or am living on a planet where the gravitational force is high. I will age at the same rate as I would have on Earth .

correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't there an experiment where they set 3 clocks, 2 on planes and 1 on where the planes departed from identically. the planes then flew 2 times around the world and using Einstein theory they accurately predicted that the clocks on the planes would be slower than the one stationed at the departure? If so wouldn't that same force then slow our internal organic clocks?

happy, provide of ma School

Very good sidd

To je pravi Hrvat pravoslavne vjeroispovijesti!