Royal Geographical Society of Queensland
Royal Geographical Society of Queensland
  • 69
  • 22 944
Insurance in a Changing Climate
In this webinar, the presenters will discuss the Actuaries Institute’s Home Insurance Affordability Index and the Australian Actuaries Climate Index (AACI), key contributions which have received extensive coverage in the media and public policy discussions.
The most recent analysis of the AACI shows that once-extreme weather events have become increasingly common, highlighting the long-term trend of more frequent severe weather conditions. This shift significantly impacts insurance affordability.
The 2024 report on home insurance affordability finds that 15% of households are now "affordability-stressed", facing premiums of more than four weeks of gross household income. Recognising the broader implications of this stress on the financial system and society, the report includes a discussion about what this could mean for residential mortgages.
These analyses provide valuable insights into the complex relationship between climate change, extreme weather events and the insurance industry, offering a nuanced understanding of critical issues affecting Australia's environmental and financial future.
Presenters & Interviewer:
Vanessa Beenders leads the Actuaries Institute’s thought leadership program, working closely with actuaries across a wide range of areas to deliver insights on key societal issues in major reports, papers and submissions. She is also responsible for delivery of Institute support to its Practice Committees, providing technical and professional support to its members. Before joining the Institute, Vanessa worked across government, financial services and education, in both public and private sectors.
Emma Vitz is an actuary and a consultant at Finity. She advises insurers and banks on personal lines pricing and natural perils and climate risk assessment. Emma compiles the Australian Actuaries Climate Index on a quarterly basis, which quantifies the changes in the frequency of extreme weather in Australia. She coordinates communication on the index with a variety of audiences, including the actuarial community and the wider public.
Vanessa and Emma will be joined in conversation by Christopher Zinn. Christopher has used a geographical perspective throughout his journalistic career in print, radio and television. He graduated with a Geography MA from Oxford and, after training in newspapers, left the UK to report from Asia and the Pacific. For the ABC, he covered the Royal Geographical Society's expedition for the Kimberley Research Project in WA in 1988. He has reported for Channel Nine, ABC Radio and TV as well as various newspapers in Australia and overseas. He recently moved to Brisbane and is intent on exploring Queensland and its people with a geographer's eye.
Chapters:
00:00 Welcome
03:31 Presentation - Vanessa Beenders
27:37 Presentation - Emma Vitz
37:54 Q&A
57:33 Conclusion
Find out more about The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland (RGSQ): rgsq.org.au/
Follow RGSQ:
Facebook: RGSQld
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/royal-geographical-society-of-queensland/
X: The_RGSQ
TH-cam: www.youtube.com/@rgsq
มุมมอง: 71

วีดีโอ

Fire in the Landscape - Session 2
มุมมอง 44หลายเดือนก่อน
The Australian landscape has been formed by fire for millennia. The arrival of Europeans altered land use and traditional management regimes. Recent global warming and increasing populations in fire-risk zones pose new challenges and potential conflicts between agricultural production and conservation. A public forum on the management of fire in the landscape will address some critical question...
Fire in the Landscape - Session 1
มุมมอง 48หลายเดือนก่อน
The Australian landscape has been formed by fire for millennia. The arrival of Europeans altered land use and traditional management regimes. Recent global warming and increasing populations in fire-risk zones pose new challenges and potential conflicts between agricultural production and conservation. A public forum on the management of fire in the landscape will address some critical question...
The Greatest Showdown: Wolverine and the Extinction of Australia’s Ice Age Giants
มุมมอง 170หลายเดือนก่อน
In mid-2024, ABC’s flagship science program, Catalyst, aired a two-part series titled Megafauna: What Killed Australia’s Giants?, narrated by Hollywood actor Hugh Jackman. The series explored one of the most enduring scientific debates in Australia, and indeed globally: the extinction of Australia’s Ice Age megafauna-large-bodied marsupials, birds, and reptiles that roamed the continent for muc...
MG Burke and Wills
มุมมอง 56หลายเดือนก่อน
Find out more about The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland (RGSQ): rgsq.org.au/ Follow RGSQ: Facebook: RGSQld LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/royal-geographical-society-of-queensland/ X: The_RGSQ TH-cam: www.youtube.com/@rgsq
Changing the World through Reef Conversations
มุมมอง 2462 หลายเดือนก่อน
Presenter: Assoc Professor Adam Smith is the founder and chief executive officer of Reef Ecologic, an Australian based company and social enterprise that provides research and monitoring, strategic advice, and capacity building to facilitate sustainable outcomes. Adam holds a BSc (Hons), PhD, and MBA, and has authored over 100 scientific papers, books, and reports. In his leisure time, Adam is ...
What does a disaster management Geographer do in the Qld government?
มุมมอง 352 หลายเดือนก่อน
Geography is about the interconnections between people, places, and the environment …. so is disaster management. Disaster management has evolved from early civil defence capabilities through to navigating the complex, compound and cascading disasters we see today. During this presentation Dr Rifai took us on a journey through the evolution of disaster management and talk about the role of a ge...
Brigalow Land for Selection: The inception of Australia's oldest continuing paired catchment study
มุมมอง 1273 หลายเดือนก่อน
Since the 1960s, millions of hectares of the Brigalow Belt bioregion in central Queensland, Australia, have been cleared for agriculture. About 4.5 Mha of vegetation dominated by brigalow (Acacia harpophylla) was cleared as part of the Land Development Scheme for the Fitzroy Basin which commenced in 1962. When the Queensland Vegetation Management Act 1999 was introduced, 93% of brigalow woodlan...
A Deep Dive into Ocean Advocacy with Sophie Kalkowski-Pope
มุมมอง 733 หลายเดือนก่อน
Sophie is an avid marine scientist, science communicator, and conservationist, and the outgoing 2023 Australasian Scholar of the Our World Underwater Scholarship Society. Born and raised in Australia on the Great Barrier Reef, ocean advocacy has always been a large part of who she is. Sophie graduated from the University of Queensland with a BSc/BA with majors in marine science and geography. S...
Climate Change in the Torres Strait - Risks, Impacts and Opportunities
มุมมอง 1173 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Torres Strait is a nationally and globally significant region on multiple levels, and yet its values remain relatively unknown to many Australian's. Sandwiched in a narrow strait between the tip of Queensland and Papua New Guinea, both the communities and the ecology of the region face an existential threat from climate change. Despite the challenges before it, the region and its people hav...
Cadastre of the Commons: An Historico-Spatial Materialist Overview of Metes and Bounds
มุมมอง 824 หลายเดือนก่อน
The spatial cadastre - a representation of imaginary land boundaries - is a vital component of the modern system of ‘land tenure’, meaning ownership. The symbols and systems (collectively “metrology”) of cadastral land surveying have been in use for almost 6000 years, and their emergence was entirely coincident with the introduction of formal taxation and the concept of debt, key material event...
Skills Session - National Map
มุมมอง 184 หลายเดือนก่อน
National Map is the primary online platform to search, access and visualise thousands of spatial layers provided by all tiers of Australian government (local, state, federal). This session will provide an overview of National Map’s functionality, and introduce how to make stories using your own data.
Emerging Trends in Spatial Technology
มุมมอง 484 หลายเดือนก่อน
The role that spatial technologies play in our lives is rapidly evolving. They are increasingly allowing us to track our takeaway order, travel the world, and visualise the spread of global pandemics. John Tasker (RGSQ Member) will provide insights into emerging spatial technology trends and their uses by government and industry. Time will be available for questions to continue the discussion a...
Professionals Talk: Urban Planning
มุมมอง 194 หลายเดือนก่อน
Join us for Professionals Talk: Urban Planning pathways, an evening centered around the experiences, perspectives and recommendations of young professionals working in the field of urban planning and design. Our panel of talented planners will each deliver a short presentation on their career journey from student to professional, followed by a group Q&A session with questions from the audience....
Professionals Talk: Transport
มุมมอง 164 หลายเดือนก่อน
Join us as we hear about the experiences of early and mid-career professionals working in and around transport in Brisbane. From urban planners shaping the cities of tomorrow to technical experts handling spatial representations of transport corridors, our speakers will share firsthand their expertise, challenges and advice for others interested in pursuing a career like theirs. Our panel inclu...
Turtles in Trouble: Impact of marine debris & recent flooding events on SE Queensland’s sea turtles
มุมมอง 454 หลายเดือนก่อน
Turtles in Trouble: Impact of marine debris & recent flooding events on SE Queensland’s sea turtles
The significance of the Ediacaran fossil of South Australia for understanding animal life on Earth
มุมมอง 3.1K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
The significance of the Ediacaran fossil of South Australia for understanding animal life on Earth
How USA States Got Their Shape
มุมมอง 635 หลายเดือนก่อน
How USA States Got Their Shape
Girt by Sea:Challenges & opportunities for a modern Port Authority: North Qld Bulk Ports Corporation
มุมมอง 2555 หลายเดือนก่อน
Girt by Sea:Challenges & opportunities for a modern Port Authority: North Qld Bulk Ports Corporation
The challenges of implementing sustainable cropping systems in north-eastern Australia
มุมมอง 736 หลายเดือนก่อน
The challenges of implementing sustainable cropping systems in north-eastern Australia
Protecting nature during the roll out of renewable energy
มุมมอง 1257 หลายเดือนก่อน
Protecting nature during the roll out of renewable energy
Navigating at both Poles, now and then. . . .
มุมมอง 1257 หลายเดือนก่อน
Navigating at both Poles, now and then. . . .
The Geology of the Darling Downs
มุมมอง 2338 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Geology of the Darling Downs
Ice Sheet Stability and Sea Level Rise in Australia
มุมมอง 9K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
Ice Sheet Stability and Sea Level Rise in Australia
NZ Doubtful Sound
มุมมอง 459 หลายเดือนก่อน
NZ Doubtful Sound
Energy and emissions: how to prevent changes to landscapes as we transition to renewables
มุมมอง 1189 หลายเดือนก่อน
Energy and emissions: how to prevent changes to landscapes as we transition to renewables
Navigating with the Scouts in 1925
มุมมอง 1149 หลายเดือนก่อน
Navigating with the Scouts in 1925
Practical and sustainable pathways to human community coexistence with wildfires
มุมมอง 4710 หลายเดือนก่อน
Practical and sustainable pathways to human community coexistence with wildfires
Young Geographers Forum 2022
มุมมอง 1910 หลายเดือนก่อน
Young Geographers Forum 2022
Connecting Agricultural Data Across Scales to Maintain Food Supply
มุมมอง 39ปีที่แล้ว
Connecting Agricultural Data Across Scales to Maintain Food Supply

ความคิดเห็น

  • @MartinFALLS-j4d
    @MartinFALLS-j4d หลายเดือนก่อน

    The professors need to factor in seafloor flexing downwards with addition weight and land masses rising as the weight of ice reduces on the land. The sea floor isnot a rigid solid. Nor are the land masses we stand on

  • @Thelma-q3v
    @Thelma-q3v หลายเดือนก่อน

    Full of sulphur. We been sick since we Been here. Sulphur mix with water . causes cyanide .and the human body is made up of 90% water so everyone who live in Mount isa is being poisoned with cyanide. My wife an I are going to the hospital again now. And hundreds of people in Mount isa have cancer. The mines here should be band. We are writing a letters to tv programs this must stop. The people are fedup

  • @Larry-Keet
    @Larry-Keet หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any sorces please?

  • @justiceO8149
    @justiceO8149 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this info; getting some action down in southern waters in restoration of the native oyster reefs through citizen science in partnership with scientists. Commenting to boost and hope to see more of your work.

    • @reefecologic7694
      @reefecologic7694 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for sharing your restoration action in southern waters and we appreciate you sharing this story to inspire others

  • @tatimoa
    @tatimoa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very average, not enough on Micronesia or eastern polynesia .

  • @bearhustler
    @bearhustler 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for a fascinating talk

  • @glenwarrengeology
    @glenwarrengeology 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They really should be using names that is country and language specific, and move away from Latin and Greek.

    • @TimJBenham
      @TimJBenham 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What would be the point of that? adding dozens of new languages to learn doesn't seem to be an improvement.

    • @glenwarrengeology
      @glenwarrengeology 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TimJBenham Whats the inconvenience?

  • @vickersonp
    @vickersonp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My wife and I were keen hikers but old age has caught up with us. We knew we couldn’t do the trek to the crash site (too steep) but we did visit Westray’s grave which is located along Christmas Creek. It’s about a 2 hour trek along Chrismas Creek from the carpark. Bernard O’Reilly was an incredible bushman. How he managed to locate the downed plane is a story in itself….incredible bushcraft skills. Absolutely amazing. I didn’t realise until I saw your site that he was a Terrace old boy as am I. Thanks for your presentation.

  • @bobdooly3706
    @bobdooly3706 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤ this video is indoctrination of falsehoods about global warming. Sea levels are NOT rising in Australia.

  • @jamesdriscoll_tmp1515
    @jamesdriscoll_tmp1515 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting talk, thank you!

  • @ohzone6464
    @ohzone6464 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    everyone k KNOWS that this is just a joke & so what else is new????

  • @BelisarioHRomo
    @BelisarioHRomo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too much bu11$hit...so little time !!! The false psyllogism the false premise is so, but so stupid!!! This Icehole should be in jail!! Syllogistic fallacies - ilogical fallacies that occur in syllogisms. Affirmative conclusion from a false premise (illicit negative) - when a fraudulent categorical syllogism has a positive conclusion, based on at least one false premise. That "EXTRA" CO2 is the false fraudulent psyllogism! Natural soils emissions (9 to 10 times all human emissions) fluctuate many times over antropogenic emissions!! Heat does up...not down! Cold comes down not up! Source CO2 Emissions (2021) Annual Contribution to Atmospheric CO2 (ppmv) Percentage Contribution to actual ~420 ppmv Percentage Contribution to Overall Atmospheric Annual CO2 Natural Gas 7.9 billion tonnes 1.01 ppmv 0.24% 0.24% Coal 15.3 billion tonnes 1.96 ppmv 0.47% 0.47% Petroleum 9.7 billion tonnes 1.24 ppmv 0.30% 0.30% Soil Respiration & 98 billion tonnes 12.56 ppmv 2.99% 2.99% Biota Respiration 60 billion tonnes 7.69 ppmv 1.83% 1.83% Ocean Degassing 330 billion tonnes 42.31 ppmv 10.08% 10.08% Seafloor Emissions 0.2 billion tonnes 0.03 ppmv 0.01% 0.01% Animal Stocks* 7.1 billion tonnes 0.91 ppmv 0.22% 0.22% Total Emissions 528.2 billion tonnes 67.71 ppmv 16.12% 16.12% The remanent 83.87% of CO2 is the constant volume that also fluctuates up and down there is no way in heven or hell that 1.01% of the total buget causes global temperature changes when the entrire yearly NATURAL variation is even duplicateing the CO2 to 600 ppmv will increase temperature to 15.5 average global ! (not taking intoconsideration cooling from dust and suspended particles!! SO ALL PREMISES ON THIS VIDEO ARE FALSE!!!

  • @ErnestOfGaia
    @ErnestOfGaia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nothing sustainable about industrial monocrop agriculture. Tittle should be: challenges to sustained (increasing) intensification of industrial monocrop food production.

  • @brucefrykman8295
    @brucefrykman8295 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With regard to the phrase "climate change." One must recognize the two distinct groups pushing the agenda: Group A consists of those who just want to be paid to pursue their career of studying one aspect or another of long term shifts in local climate (there is no such thing as "global climate," ie all climate is local) these people aren't interested in anything besides their own humdrum careers. In other words they just want to get their own grant and let the world go on as usual - these people have not lost their marbles. Group B includes all of our socialist politicians (i.e.Democrats,) their sycophantic cadre of useless bureaucrats (ie the agency heads of NOAA, NASA, et al.), universities (leftist indoctrination centers,) the media, corporations seeking to cash in on all of the woke nonsense (Alphabet, Facebook, etc.) and finally the sad goons who believe all this crisis crap) It would be helpful to identify which group one is citing when referring to the climate hype being pushed.

  • @woodchipgardens9084
    @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2023 Canadian wildfire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Beginning in March 2023, and with increased intensity starting in June, Canada was affected by a record-setting series of wildfires. All 13 provinces and territories were affected, with large fires in Alberta, British Columbia, the Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Quebec. The 2023 wildfire season had the most area burned in Canada's recorded history, surpassing the 1989, 1995, and 2014 fire seasons, as well as in recorded North American history, surpassing the 2020 Western US wildfire season.

  • @woodchipgardens9084
    @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Westerly Winds push the Beaufort Gyre in a clockwise rotation draining the Sea ice into Siberia and the Atlantic, if you change to Counter Clockwise Rotation the ice goes to the Bearing Strait and Southwest Greenland Glaciers. It's all Natural, Study Physics and Weather Patterns not Scam Studies.

    • @woodchipgardens9084
      @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker Keep in Mind that Heat is always Temporary, Night Time is always cooling, Winter is always freezing and you Need Canadian Wild fires to Melt Glaciers that are drifting into the Atlantic as they pass Siberia on their way.

  • @woodchipgardens9084
    @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Myron Cook says Geologists in the 50's didn't know what they were looking at, he says the estimate about sea level being 400 ft lower during the ice age is wrong, he says there is sediment fans from rivers 3000 ft deep.

    • @woodchipgardens9084
      @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker How can you have a Tipping Point if Heat is always Temporary, Night Time is always cooling, Winter is always freezing, No Tipping Point Possible.

    • @woodchipgardens9084
      @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker My theories are solid as a rock and yours is some smelly gas out your rear. Heat is always Temporary, Night Time is always cooling, Winter is always freezing, No Tipping Point Possible.

    • @terenceiutzi4003
      @terenceiutzi4003 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, it is very well documented that the sea level was 400 feet lower when the poles were ice free!

  • @woodchipgardens9084
    @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Persistent westerly winds have also dragged the current in one direction for over 20 years, increasing the speed and size of the clockwise current and preventing the fresh water from leaving the Arctic Ocean. This decades-long western wind is unusual for the region, where previously, the winds changed direction every five to seven years. Scientists have been keeping an eye on the Beaufort Gyre in case the wind changes direction again. If the direction were to change, the wind would reverse the current, pulling it counterclockwise and releasing the water it has accumulated all at once. “If the Beaufort Gyre were to release the excess fresh water into the Atlantic Ocean, it could potentially slow down its circulation. And that would have hemisphere-wide implications for the climate, especially in Western Europe,” said Tom Armitage, lead author of the study and polar scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. Fresh water released from the Arctic Ocean to the North Atlantic can change the density of surface waters. Normally, water from the Arctic loses heat and moisture to the atmosphere and sinks to the bottom of the ocean, where it drives water from the north Atlantic Ocean down to the tropics like a conveyor belt. This important current is called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and helps regulate the planet’s climate by carrying heat from the tropically-warmed water to northern latitudes like Europe and North America. If slowed enough, it could negatively impact marine life and the communities that depend on it. “We don’t expect a shutting down of the Gulf Stream, but we do expect impacts. That’s why we’re monitoring the Beaufort Gyre so closely,” said Alek Petty, a co-author on the paper and polar scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The study also found that, although the Beaufort Gyre is out of balance because of the added energy from the wind, the current expels that excess energy by forming small, circular eddies of water. While the increased turbulence has helped keep the system balanced, it has the potential to lead to further ice melt because it mixes layers of cold, fresh water with relatively warm, salt water below. The melting ice could, in turn, lead to changes in how nutrients and organic material in the ocean are mixed, significantly affecting the food chain and wildlife in the Arctic. The results reveal a delicate balance between wind and ocean as the sea ice pack recedes under climate change. “What this study is showing is that the loss of sea ice has really important impacts on our climate system that we’re only just discovering,” said Petty. Rexana Vizza / Matthew Segal Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena Calif. 818-393-1931/818-354-8307

    • @woodchipgardens9084
      @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker Dont even try to Doubt Nasa Scientist.

    • @woodchipgardens9084
      @woodchipgardens9084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker I see you over there with your little measuring sticks trying to play a Roulette game, Heat is always Temporary, Night Time is always cooling, Winter is always freezing, No Tipping Point Possible.

  • @Nehner
    @Nehner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One another paid liar.

  • @billstream1974
    @billstream1974 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More fake climate BS.

  • @rodmac5633
    @rodmac5633 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s all cyclical. Get a real job

  • @brucefrykman8295
    @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My reaction to this narrative is to first challenge the notion of the concept of "global" sea level. The only places sea level is important is where its less than the hull depth of the largest ships or lapping at the local shoreline where the average sea level between high and low tide is zero. Local tide gauges that have accurately monitored changes in this zero point for as much as 170 years have established only that local changes in the zero point of the tide are: a) incredibly small b) linear changes over their entire history (there are no measurable increases in rates of change) be they positive, negative, or flat (unchanging) This informs rational minds that there is nothing at all new regarding sea level. The seas are falling at greater rates in Stockholm than they are rising in Manhattan. Therefore there is no rational reason to associate changes with CO2 levels or the popularity of tattoos and body piercings with sea level changes. So, now that we have deconstructed the concept of "global" sea level, here are the some of the factors that can result in local sea level changes by general rank of importance: 1) Plate tectonics, earthquake, and volcanism 2) Shore line erosion 3) Sedimentation 4) River effluence 5) Continental rebound 7) Local water table changes 8) Man made infrastructure affecting water table, erosion, and subsidence. Here are the things that have no effect on sea levels 1) Thermal expansion of sea water 2) Man made CO2 emissions Any person who is wealthy enough to live on the sea shore can afford to have his dwelling insured against loss which will occur with near certainly long before local sea level changes will have had any influence on its destruction. I will not expect any challenge to my remarks with anything other than ad hominems, I never have. Maybe this time someone will prove my assertions wrong.

    • @Nehner
      @Nehner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pretty solid arguments. You blew the global sealevel bullshit out of the water. I stored your comment. Great.

  • @bobdooly3706
    @bobdooly3706 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Ocean level (as recorded at Fort Denison in Sydney Harbour in Australia) , reveal that no change whatsoever has occured since 1870.

    • @keithw8286
      @keithw8286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really? tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=680-140 Extract: Relative Sea Level trends at the coast can be positive or negative. A negative trend does not mean the ocean surface is falling; It indicates the land is rising more quickly than the ocean in a particular area. Trends close to zero indicate the land is rising at nearly the same rate as the ocean.

    • @rodmac5633
      @rodmac5633 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shut up Al

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rodmac5633 Don't you mean shut up real data, we have an agenda and reality is interfering with it.

    • @kurtklingbeil6900
      @kurtklingbeil6900 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Liar soe.dcceew.gov.au/climate/environment/sea-level

    • @a.randomjack6661
      @a.randomjack6661 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You just don't get the concept of average and local geology. I know, it's complicated... Maybe leave that to specialists, or do you go see a plumber when you have a tooth ache?

  • @laetitiavisagie-gg6kk
    @laetitiavisagie-gg6kk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am not a scientist but I live in South Africa - it would be interesting to know how the sea level rise had been affecting our coastlines

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      South Africa does not possess any depth of historical tide gauge data: The Port Nolloth in the far Northwest corner of SA only goes back to 1959. tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=430-021 Most like the one at beautiful Knysna which i was fortunate to have visited some 30 years ago only goes back to 1960 tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=430-086 You can also see that since the SA went DEI all such data collection ceased around 2018 You should also understand all of this tide gauge data shows only changes caused by the relentless forces of mother nature such as plate tectonics etc. CO2 has absolutely nothing to do with sea level changes. You are being lied to over $$$$$$. As all lies are tied up in money, sex, and power. It's the same for the climate cult - there is far more money at stake than in all the banks of the entire world - now that's a religion that attracts thousands of internet evangelists.

    • @keithw8286
      @keithw8286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please, don’t use TH-cam as source material. Noaa is far better tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=680-140

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker Only a fool would consult TH-cam as a data source, have you a mirror? First, the oceans have risen over 110 meters since the onset of the current inter-glacial beginning about 20,000 years ago and ending about 8000 years ago. This was caused by the Asian, European, and North American continental glaciers often over 2 km thick being shed. CO2 had nothing to do with this only incidence of recent real sea level change, This massive loss of continental ice is what allowed agriculture, cities, language and civilization to flourish. You want it back? Move to Antarctica or Greenland where the ice is still growing. www.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level_rise2.png Second, over the last 8000 years global ice inventories have stabilized to the point where any current minuscule changes in local sea levels are easily attributed to one or more of a dozen or more causes of local sea shore geometry (plate tectonics, earthquake, erosion, sedimentation, etc) None of these minuscule changes can be associated with CO2 levels or fossil fuel usage . Easily observed data from historic tide gauges have any registered any sea level rate change during the period of a 30% rise in the life giving atmospheric gas called CO2. For the fools - take a look: tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/mslGlobalTrendsTable.html The "scientists" who claim otherwise are a peer-reviewed collection of nitwits and con-artists none of whom have any real bona-fides. Meaning they have zero accomplishments other than sucking at the teat of government -grants- welfare, in one form or another, in turn for supporting the lefts new cult religion they call "climate crisis" For the record no sane person can be convinced that women can impregnate men no matter what the American Medical Association claims to the contrary. Ditto for "climate science," completely controlled by radical leftists seeking to destroy civilization by government fiat.

  • @johnslater1460
    @johnslater1460 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    P.S. The zero in this case is the total mass of ice in Antartica. Doing mass loss rather than % mass loss is another way of fooling hoi polloi.

    • @peterjones4180
      @peterjones4180 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      After watching this presentation its clear fooling the hoi polloi is the reason for its existence. You seem to have missed the fact that the warm water shown in his map of Antarctica (the cause of the concern about glacial melting due to global warming) is adjacent to the West Antarctic Peninsula which sits on around 80 active volcanos and volcanic vents. What do you think happens to ice sheets sitting on an active volcano....they warm and melt increasing the temperature of the nearby ocean. THAT is not climate change at work or global warming. He MUST have known that but chose not to mention it He also forgot to mention that the conclusion of the scientific report on the Thwaites Glacier he referenced, showed accelerated melting on the bottom of the glacier starting SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS AGO ( long before current increase in atmospheric Co2) and STOPPED AROUND SEVENTY FIVE YEARS AGO !!!! That is important, once again he must have known that, but decided we did not need to know. So the current evidence indicates the Thwaites Glacier is not experiencing an increase in the rate of bottom melt and therefore is not likely to be in immanent danger of collapse. He also failed to mention that Antarctica has been cooling overall for the past thirty five years, guess he thinks WE dont need to know that either. He also failed to mention that the last few years has set new records for extreme cold in Antarctica or that ice mass has been increasing for years on Antarctica not decreasing.. I notice none of the adoring respondents knew any of that and so asked him NO hard questions.

  • @johnslater1460
    @johnslater1460 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    However good the arguments (and I have little doubt they are), scientists have a duty to present their graphs and diagrams properly. I spent 40 years teaching kids about the ease of misrepresentation and you have fallen straight into that trap. The least you could do is put zero on a scale of gigatons (time mark approx 20:00) or at least use a mark to indicate the break in the scale. Saying the computer did is no excuse. Doing otherwise just encourages hoi polloi to go wild instead of approaching our climate problems rationally.

  • @j.s.c.4355
    @j.s.c.4355 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Antarctica will be such a beautiful archipelago.

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm selling franchises to Antarctic beach front deck chair and umbrella services. Surfs up!

  • @peterbrown4943
    @peterbrown4943 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Their is NO glaciers melting. Their is NO sea levels rising. It is all a huge scam.

  • @klaudiapetersennaturopathi3794
    @klaudiapetersennaturopathi3794 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm sure there would be a different result if these God-playing psychopaths stopped using weather manipulation with Harps and Cerns. Climate experts talk about warming, but everything indicates that a small ice age is coming.

  • @nuuky
    @nuuky 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why doesn't high tides appear to be rising in Australia if Ocean levels are rising?

    • @joaquinmisajr.1215
      @joaquinmisajr.1215 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I imagine the bulk of the water collects in the equator, sloshing about, and eventually, Australia will feel it .

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker *RE: "Because @nuuky uses a stick on a rubber band to measure it. Scientists have "measury things" for that."* Another true "believer" I'm sure like snake worshipers, your belief can never be shaken since you have a cult mind not a "scientificy" mind; Here fool, read it and then park it the same place all good snake worshipers would: Port Adelaide tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=680-311 Port Pirie tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=680-391 Fremantle tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=680-471 These are the three oldest sea level "measury things" found in Australia going back as far as 1900 We in the USA are not as backwards so our "measury things" go back to the 1830s - same thing - nothing new about sea levels. Like most primitive religions, the climate cult preys upon the stupidity, gullibility, and ignorance of their target market - looks like they scored a bullseye with the snarks.

    • @peterjones4180
      @peterjones4180 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker Indeed that do and that shows no overall sea level rise at Fort Denison.

    • @keithw8286
      @keithw8286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, Extract: Relative Sea Level trends at the coast can be positive or negative. A negative trend does not mean the ocean surface is falling; It indicates the land is rising more quickly than the ocean in a particular area. Trends close to zero indicate the land is rising at nearly the same rate as the ocean.

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@keithw8286 I think you are unknowingly suggesting nonsense. The "level" of the seas have no context without reference to the shorelines they wash. The plates that all of our continents ride upon are moving towards or away from one another at an average rate in excess of 15 mm/year due to inexorable geological forces while the sea beds change shape at similar rates and yet some people are terrified by climate propaganda into believing 3mm/year local sea level advances or declines are now considered "catastrophic" Virtually none of the historic tide gauges register any measurable change in rate of sea level advance or decline over their entire existence, some of which are over 160 years old. Are you now suggesting that "climate change" is masking this presumed recent "global" sea level rise rate by also altering the steady march of the drifting continental plates in a manner that exactly nullifies the evidence of this mythical increase in 'global' sea level rise rates at all of the Earths tide gauges? Much of this new hysteria is grounded in the belief that satellite based radio altimetry provides climate activists a "record" of recent changes in "global" sea level rises rates that are somehow the fault of humanity as left to their former state of unmolested claims to liberty. The very position in space of these surveillance satellites, as influenced by ever-changing tidal tugs, cannot be determined without referencing their instantaneous position to land-based beacons that sit on land masses that are also constantly "on the move." Add to this the unknown characteristics of the atmosphere such as pressure density, temperature, humidity levels, etc. of the entire atmospheric path through these electromagnetic sounding waves must pass, all of which alter their propagation speed. Do you place trust in such "measurements" that those who attempt to remove these and other multitudes of unquantifiable sources of error do not?

  • @davidharrigan9884
    @davidharrigan9884 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Polar iceberg melting according to the USGS, gone from 80% to 67.5 % in 10 years, that equates to a sea level rise of 7 metres. We have a problem it is in mm not metres. Why, simple really, it is called water vapor, that has double in the last 10 years. 0.3 % to 0.7%. The last time the atmosphere had a Global maximum of 4%, it was called the green planet. The sunrays had to pass through this atmosphere and were responsible for incredible growing conditions for vegetation.

  • @Sq7Arno
    @Sq7Arno 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To my mind the most useful average to look at is not over the entire period from 1970-present. A more useful metric is the decadal averages. When you plot the difference then you can see clearly that the rate at which the decadal averages increase is itself increasing. Which if you plot that into the future, then you get to a number of around 2.4m sea level rise by the end of the century. But of course there's no reason to believe the trend will continue like that. There may be beneficial factors, maybe the weakening of the Antarctic jet stream will lead to greater ice oceanic ice shelf extent during winter, increasing albedo. But I doubt it will be enough to offset potential negative tipping points, even if pans out like that. An important point is of course that if sea level rise is that rapid, then it will have severe impact on the stability of Arctic and Antarctic ice shelves.

    • @Sq7Arno
      @Sq7Arno 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker While this type of calculation doesn't guarantee accuracy by a long shot. It would be fair to say that an insistence on maximizing accuracy, including only well understood factors in models, could in essence amount to head in sand projections. There's a wide array of concerning trends unfolding in the present, and a wide array of potential future negative feedback loops. I think it fair to say that while atmospheric greenhouse gas levels increase, or even remain stable at present levels, the decadal average sea level increases will likely increase. Global temperature increases trail behind increased greenhouse gas levels after all. And getting rid of excess atmospheric greenhouse gases is no short term feat. Tipping points are a very real concern, and I doubt they are included to a sufficient degree in models. Exactly because the scale of their impact cannot be determined accurately. Not beyond, "very likely very seriously impactful". Which isn't really something you can punch into a model as a parameter. And certainly not when "exactly when" isn't known. More's the pity. So I wouldn't be surprised if we have several meters sea level rise by the end of the century myself. Not at all. I wouldn't bet on it. But, I wouldn't be surprised. The anomalous sea surface temperature increases we've seen are particularly troublesome. The models predicted increases, but not as much as actually occurred recently. Even considering it's an El Nino year. So that's truly concerning. Invariably more ice melting will lower the salinity of the oceans, and coupled with anomalously high sea surface temperatures that will as a matter of course lead to anomalously high levels of evaporation. Water vapor is itself a very potent greenhouse gas. So from there anomalously high levels of warming. And from there anomalously high levels of melt... Anomalously high sea level rise. I wouldn't bank on anomalous albedo increases being worth a fart in a thunderstorm. Localized occurrence, if any, will likely be offset by global trends for one. And then even localized occurrences of such are even more difficult to predict than negative tipping points. Highly speculative. And also in the general way it's going - Likely short lived if they occur.

    • @Sq7Arno
      @Sq7Arno 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker Antarctic ice is in large part grounded below sea level. Take away the ICE and you're left with something more reminiscent of say the rest of Oceania, than say Australia. So there's ample avenues for the warming ocean water to reach well into the midlands of the continent eventually. Even the location of the pole is technically over ocean. So, much of the KILOMETERS thick (above sea level) Antarctic ice shelf IS technically oceanic. Even though their vertical extent above sea level ranges into the kilometers. And should be considered in such terms. Accounting for that changes the average thickness of what is considered Antarctic sea ice quite a bit, doesn't it... In as far as the storing of excess climate heat in the oceans we see, it's generally referring to the roughly 15 zettajoules currently being "stored" in the first 2000m of the ocean. Per year. Given 76 years, that's a combined 1140 zettajoules of excess energy in the system, if the rate remains the same. While not all of that will, sadly, go towards melting oceanic ice in Antarctica (sadly, because life in the oceans are bound to get fairly dodgy for oceanic life as we know it) - Even 3% of that would be 34.2 zettajoules. Of course just with the way the movement of energy works, thermodynamics and all that, the warmer the oceans get, the more energy will move towards Antarctica. And, since Antarctic ice is in large part oceanic - Icebergs calving will likely be a greater contributor to loss than direct melting. If said icebergs then take 3 years or even 10 years to melt somewhere in the wide open oceans is neither here nor there. The sea level rise from an iceberg, previously almost entirely above sea level, occurs the moment it breaks off and starts floating. On a side note. Ice bergs calving off a kilometers high oceanic ice shelf would be no joke. That'll make some waves to be sure. 2-4m covering the entire global ocean "massive"? If you take all the, often kilometers deep, oceans of the world, and collect them into a sphere. Then compared to the planet it looks like a little marble. 2-4m would be a few more drops in the bucket so to speak. Not even nearly all the ice in Antarctica and Greenland have to melt for us to see 2-4m sea level rise. Only a small fraction. Also... Due to its location at the pole. Effectively Antarctica, when considered in isolation, spins. Like a top. Or a ballerina if you please. With all the associated forces such a state of affairs infers. So we shouldn't be surprised when deglaciation occurs a tad more rapidly there, than elsewhere on the planet. Just a smidgeon.

    • @Sq7Arno
      @Sq7Arno 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker Didn't say that most of the glacier loss will be direct melting. Said it will likely be iceberg calving due to melt along the base of the glaciers. Which are, in Antarctica, in very large part, grounded below sea level. You can google what Antarctica looks like without ice. It's basically half and half ocean vs land. Extremely erratically distributed. And the albedo effect from floating icebergs is not all that great. Only a tiny portion of an iceberg generally protrudes above seawater. The rest is at best more "blue lagoon" and less "reflective white". You can google what an iceberg looks like from above. Then consider that the part you see above water is only about 10% of the entire mass. And of course you can't rely on them not melting for more than a small fraction of the time remaining until 2100. Once they float - The sea level rise is set (90% below water remember - Ask Archimedes if you're still not sure). In any case. I don't think you're listening to the things I'm telling you, since I have to repeat myself. So well that's no good for me. Cheers.

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *RE: "When you plot the difference then you can see clearly that the rate at which the decadal averages increase is itself increasing. Which if you plot that into the future, then you get to a number of around 2.4m sea level rise by the end of the century."* Show me the source of your data, sea level is a local thing and I have found no such place on Earth that is seeing any significant changes in rates of sea level change. Here is one of the higher rates of sea level change (Stockholm where the ocean is falling at an unchanging rate of 1.2 feet per century tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=050-141 Here is a tide gauge at Skagway AK where the sea level is falling at an unchanging rate of nearly 6 feet a century. tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=9452400 Here is another for Manhattan, where sea level is rising at an unchanging rate of almost 1 foot per century tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=8518750 The rational mind would observe no significant change local rates of sea level change which would have occurred if something new and exciting were happening due to CO2 levels. This is true no matter where I look for it in the data (not models, I ignore climate models - they are all fake) I cannot conceive how the irrational mind would process this info. Maybe you can help me here.

    • @peterjones4180
      @peterjones4180 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What they failed to tell you is that the melt rate they are really talking about is on the West Antarctic Peninsula note the RED the ocean is coloured on his map there to visually indicate warner water, he referred to it specifically. What he DELIBERATLY failed to mention is that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet sits on top of around 80 active volcanos and volcanic vents THAT is why the melt rate is higher there and why the adjacent ocean water is warmer than the rest of the continent. He knows that but he didnt want YOU to know that. If you knew that it would undermine his attempt to get you to believe that its Anthropogenic Global Warming at work. The average melt rate for the rest of the continent s NOT increasing IF there is a substantial future loss of ice mass there it will be due to vulcanism NOT global warming. I note he also failed to mention that the rest of Antarctica has been COOLING overall for the last 35 years, or that the last few years have seen record levels of extreme cold in Antarctica and that ice build up has been increasing over most of Antarctica for years NOT decreasing. I also remind you that if ALL Arctic and Antarctic sea ice melted tomorrow sea levels would DROP that is because ice displaces MORE than its equivalent volume of water.

  • @Chiefworldplanningcommission
    @Chiefworldplanningcommission 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1) Protojoya extinction 2) Fungi extinction 3) Animal dinosaur extinction 4) Insects extinction 5) Birds extinction 1990 last life extinction picked up will continue 2545, after that earth will no more life planet, remember human is only creatures which destroyed regenerate ability of earth life again, human is culprits creatures and nasty, 28% is 18+ out of 8.1 billion 😢, it is mean as 91% birth rate population will be 15 billion by 2050😢, The current population of India in 2024 is 1,441,719,852, a 0.92% increase from 2023. The population of India in 2023 was 1,428,627,663, a 0.81% increase from 2022. The population of India in 2022 was 1,417,173,173, a 0.68% increase from 2021. Eco+ nomy, nomy is human activities, so less eco more nomy indicates upcoming collapse and horrible things 😢 67% ecology destroyed, 98.97% biodiversity totally destroyed, 99.95% animal species gone extinct, 78.79% fungus species gone extinct, fungus are medicine for trees, so trees are no more immune from micro life infections, human creatures already acquired 85% land of soil on earth, 21% drinking water river got dried 😢, 2022 birth rate was 88%, 2023 91%, ecology is immune system of earth, biodiversity is nurvurs system of earth 😢, as trees are not immune from micro life infections, all green animals wil face horrible disease soon, 2025 fst cat 6 hurricane landfall 😢 2035 cat7 as temperature will be 62°c 2055 cat 8 temperature will be 65°c and 39% drinking water river will dry totally 😢 2075 fst cat 9 hurricanes will landfall 55%drinking water river will dry with 89% ecology destruction 😢 2475 Highest temperature will be 97°c 😢 Please give rest to planet 😢 I hope my knowledge and love can protect earth, knowledge is Power and love is solution,all boys can apply for my boyfriendship, minimum 10 years relationship required to be my husband, knowledge is knowing with ledger and love is creatures like to do most naturally. BN

    • @Nehner
      @Nehner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go find a good neurologist

    • @Chiefworldplanningcommission
      @Chiefworldplanningcommission 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Nehner let me tell you a neuro surgeon has died my brain problem,🤗, this is how fool human has destroyed earth, only planet which supports life in solar system,fool

    • @Chiefworldplanningcommission
      @Chiefworldplanningcommission 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Nehner you don't believe untill you see, don't worry if you live longer, all you will see by eyes 🤗

  • @gigabane7357
    @gigabane7357 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Urgent, please read! If nothing else it may trigger a brain storm. ( I am no one and know no one,so this idea needs to be seen and shared with clever people). Proposal for a Solar-Orbit Ice Shield Satellite: A Climate Intervention Initiative Executive Summary: This proposal outlines an innovative approach to climate intervention through the deployment of a satellite system designed to construct an ice shield in solar orbit between Earth and the sun. Utilizing advanced freezing techniques and solar power, this initiative aims to create a scalable, energy-efficient structure to partially shade the Earth, thus reducing solar radiation and mitigating global warming. Objectives: Climate Intervention: To reduce the impact of solar radiation on Earth's climate by deploying an ice shield, contributing to the stabilization of global temperatures. Innovative Use of Space Resources: To leverage the cold vacuum of space and solar energy to efficiently construct and maintain the ice shield. Sustainability and Regeneration: To create a system capable of self-repair and expansion, ensuring longevity and adaptability to changing climate intervention needs. Methodology: Ice Panel Fabrication: Water, slightly heated using solar energy to ensure fluidity, will be precisely dispensed into molds or trays aboard the satellite. Exposed to the vacuum of space, the water will freeze, forming uniform ice panels. These panels are designed with interlocking features, allowing for the assembly of a cohesive and structurally sound ice shield. Assembly and Reinforcement via Hot Water Jet Welding: The satellite will utilize a solar-powered hot water jet to melt the edges of ice panels slightly, enabling them to fuse together upon refreezing. This method ensures strong bonds and enhances the shield's structural integrity. This welding technique also facilitates the construction of an ablative armor layer for the satellite and shield, providing protection against micro-meteoroids and other space debris. Energy Efficiency and Environmental Impact: By utilizing the natural cold of space to freeze water, and solar power for heating and welding, the satellite system minimizes energy consumption, making it a highly efficient method of construction. The creation of the ice shield aims to be a reversible and non-intrusive method of climate intervention, avoiding the potential negative side effects associated with geoengineering projects. Conclusion: This proposal presents a visionary yet scientifically grounded approach to climate intervention. By deploying a solar-orbit ice shield satellite, we can leverage the principles of space engineering and environmental science to forge a new path in the fight against global warming. This initiative not only showcases human ingenuity and our ability to address planetary-scale challenges but also underscores our commitment to preserving the Earth for future generations. Call to Action: We invite the climate science community, environmental organizations, and international bodies to join us in exploring this pioneering approach to climate intervention. Together, we can turn this vision into a reality, demonstrating leadership and collaboration in the face of global environmental challenges.

    • @Nehner
      @Nehner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Forget the bullshit. There are only 2 types of satellites Yuotube channel planate veritas Author Robert Bassano Video library All satel.... are on balloons The video is 2 hours long and in English. A. The Lockheed U2-S, flies 25 -30 km high, top speed 800 km per hour. Eight hundred. B. Global hawk C. The hawkeye prop Jets who are the eyes of every carrier of the us navy D. Helium-based STRATOSPHERE BALLONS. NASA is the largest consumer of helium in the world. Balloon size up to 500,000 m3. Carrying capacity for up to 4 tons payload. At the bottom of the balloon hangs the so-called satellite. Launching takes place in remote regions. Arctic Antarctica North Sweden. Altitudes up to 80 90 km. Can stay up for several months. Ability to maintain radio contact with objects billions of km away = zero. To be verified In Ytvideo planate veritas Robert Bassano All satelittes are on balloons. The video is 2 hours long and in English. It starts with an interview of a lieutenant who was a member of a secret air force unit in Alaska in the 50s 60s. This unit had the task to catch the satellites hanging on parachutes with special airplanes in the air after the balloons had been blown off. It gets really exciting when you look through the reference list of balloon satellite launches of the Swedish service provider. Among others, balloon launches for MIR 12 balloonlaunches INMARSAT 2 balloonlaunches ENVISAT 13 balloonlaunches NASA > 8 balloonlaunches And there will be more than one service provider than the Swedes In another part you will see how such a satellitelaunch via balloon in Antarctica really happens. In the last part you make acquaintance with the Dragon Lady, the legendary Lockheed U2-S. SHE flies 25 -30 km high, top speed 800 km per hour. Eight hundred. 30 of them exist in the world 1/3 of them unmanned and refueling in the air. Range 10,000 km. These are the successors of balloons. Unit 1.5 billion There are no orbiting space sattelites. Signals are transmitted by ground based towers, cable networks, and high altitude balloons/aircraft

  • @thelastaustralian7583
    @thelastaustralian7583 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it interesting how Humans are starting to become conscious to the fact . that It is controlled 'subconsciously' by unevolved (or other) ,self destructive 'Primal Instincts .

  • @DanielWatson-vv7cd
    @DanielWatson-vv7cd 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We need to make a worldwide effort to harvest as much ice+water as possible before it melts into the ocean. Freshwater from melted ice can be stored in the ground in deep bore holes drilled in mountains. Or poured out in hot desert lands like the Sahara desert.

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker Does ice melt faster in water or in alcohol? I'm going to see if I can get a grant to research this. I'll need a dozen cases of Johnnie Walker Green Label and as many cases of Evian brand pure water (Evian is Naive spelled backwards)

    • @peterjones4180
      @peterjones4180 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh goodness really ? The only place in Antarctica where there is evidence of warmer water is on the West Antarctic peninsula, BECAUSE the ice sheets there sit on top of around 80 active volcanos and volcanic vents. What do you think happens on the bottom of ice sheets where they contact volcanic vents ? The ice MELTS, thats why you get a plume of warmer water off the edge off the peninsula. That is what the red colour was on his map of Antarctica. The volcanic areas are the ONLY ones with warmer water. He wanted YOU to think this was because of global warming, thats why he did not tell you about the volcanos. He also did not tell you that Antarctica has been cooling overall for around the last thirty five years, or that the last few years has seen record levels of extreme cold there. Or that ice mass has been increasing there for years NOT decreasing. You need to stop being so gullible and realize that these videos are simply sponsored propaganda.

  • @wind-leader_jp
    @wind-leader_jp 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    興味深い内容でした。 想像で恐れるよりも、正しい知識で判断した方が良いので具体的なデーターが知れて良かったです。 結局北極圏で氷河が溶け始めて海面が上昇し、結果的に南極の氷床に浮力を与えて割れやすくなっている。 又は、単純に海水温が上昇し、氷床の下側が溶けて重力の影響から割れやすくなっている。 もう一つは夏に雪が解けて湖になった箇所から水がクレパスに流れ込み、割れやすくなっている。 先日大きな氷河が南極から分離したと報道で見ましたが、この辺りが考えられると理解しました。

  • @robertmanella528
    @robertmanella528 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stip mining permafrost releases tons of methane gases, that are way,way more dangerous than co2!! We must stop stip mining permafrost world wide immediately!!

  • @rrmackay
    @rrmackay 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Glaciers have been retreating with the associated minuscule rise in sea level since the end of the last ice age. !5,000 years ago a warming trend started and has continued to this day, claims of the hottest ever and glacier melting is absolutely 100% correct, they are just not caused by human activity, they may be slightly enhanced by human activity but I have yet to see data that justifies that claim.

    • @Muddslinger0415
      @Muddslinger0415 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s all around you open your eyes

    • @antonyjh1234
      @antonyjh1234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then you would have data to explain why since 2010 we have had a 175% increase in global warming per decade? Sure 15,000 years ago until now was a nice stable period but that's changing. You would be able to explain how energy into a system doesn't matter then? For every 60 litre tank of diesel there is 636 kilowatts of energy, around 3-5 months of my electrical energy, you would be able to explain why this stored energy that we burn and has around 40% efficiency so most is lost as heat, you'd be able to explain why this heat doesn't mean anything?

    • @antonyjh1234
      @antonyjh1234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker "Mixing in the huge "natural fluctuations" like you just did, whether it's done through ignorance (a lack of any worthwhile studying), or done intentionally (lying), and also regardless of which opposing Social-Wealth Team is doing it (because the coal-oil-gas-wealth disinformers have been deliberately bundling in the huge "natural fluctuations" like you just did, "cherry picking" for about 20 years now), isn't in the slightest the pursuit of physical science and Facts" What on earth is your point, to me? "Like you just did" etc etc, what proof are you relying on that stating facts of current warming puts me in the same realm of disinformers?

    • @antonyjh1234
      @antonyjh1234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker And what are you talking about, 0.2, it reached 0.49, it was 0.18 pre 2010. Sure El Nino year, but it was 55% above 0.18 before this.

    • @antonyjh1234
      @antonyjh1234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker No I don't because you have no clue what it's going to come down too. Notice you didn't mention anything in your reply about the 55% increase that had already happened. To say something isn't approaching something when it's heading directly towards it, maybe we have a different teaching on the word approaching.

  • @strayspark1967
    @strayspark1967 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    human activities is not the main driver of 'climate change'. the earth is still recovering from a global flood. which you can see everywhere. the grand canyon layers were laid down with water over a period of weeks/months.....not millions of years. if you look closely and ignore the noise from mainstream academia, you can actually see real stuff, sorted, graded layers of mudrocks on top of an erosion surface (great unconformity). but ... noone wants to see ....so noone will believe whats actually pretty obvious if you lose your academic religion. Of course, i may just be a whack job.........................am I?

  • @OldJackWolf
    @OldJackWolf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    While I have great respect for many of my science colleagues at the IPCC, know that we're already at 1.5C temps and that the models do not address the many positive feedbacks that have begun and that will further force temperatures upward in an accelerating basis. Therefore it do not adequately capture future sea level rise. Furthermore, now that fossil fuel interests have invaded the IPCC and indeed control it from the top, I no longer look to the IPCC to assist in planning and adaptation efforts. While the science of the IPCC may still be strong, its interpretation to the public in the policy sections is indeed lacking. The fact that fossil fuels were not mentioned in their reports until this most recent publication tells me we're no where close to addressing the cause of climate change.

    • @rrmackay
      @rrmackay 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe instead of trying to address the causes of climate change you could step back for a minute and prove that Humans are causing it. I know for a religious believer in climate change this may come as a shock but not everyone believes as fervently as you do. I have yet to see any trend that doesn't have an underlying natural cyclical cause. Don't point me to the IPCC report, thats politics not science.

    • @mark-remanHamilton
      @mark-remanHamilton 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the public has only one reaction: panic. The public cannot carefully plan ahead. Instead the plan is to be able to say, "I told you so" whilest at the same time milking us like goats. Radical change benefits banks when they're very big. All the little guys will be gone. Plan for that.

    • @bobsterling123
      @bobsterling123 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Au2❤😊

    • @peterjones4180
      @peterjones4180 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hmmm my contact with a number of IPCC lead authors and IPCC independent reviewers leads me to conclude that your comment is rubbish ! The IPCC has a well deserved reputation for being strategically controlled by U.N beaurocrats and environmental activists who are themselves the geopolitical tools of very powerful business interests, via The Club of Rome. The IPCC was specifically set up to ONLY accept research that supports the Anthropogenic Global Warming Hypothesis (which was falsified more than ten years ago). The UNEP and the IPCC were effectively set up by those business interests to advance their geopolitical and financial goals and that continues today. I suggest everyone not familiar with Maurice Strong , an oil industry multimillionaire, white collar criminal, member of the Club of Rome, fervent Communist supporter , and (along with Henry Kissinger) a servant of the House of Rockefeller, should explore his role in setting up the IPCC and his worldview. I suggest everyone read Donna Laframboise's book The Delinquent Teenager Who was Mistaken for the Worlds Top Climate Expert, if they want to understand how the IPCC REALLY operates. So far even the CSIRO (who publicly support government policys on global warming) CANNOT supply empirical scientific evidence that human emissions of Co2 are effecting climate and have said so. We are NOT at 1.5 Deg c anomaly in fact, that is an artifact of data homogenization which has the effect of artificially increasing land surface temperature measurements in the official record. If YOU are in fact a scientist who has contributed to the IPCC scientific report (which I doubt based on your comment, you sound like a know nothing environmental activist pretending to be something you are not) then YOU know with absolute certainty that the 1.5 Deg c figure is pure propaganda sourced from the Potsdam Institute and is as they said scientifically meaningless. After all temperatures were around 2 Deg C WARMER than now during the Medieval Warming and warmer than that during the Holocene Thermal Optimum 8000-6000 years ago 3000 years ago and 2000 years ago.. Note that the scientist in this video fails to mention that the warmer water predominantly around the West Antarctic Peninsula in his slide is produced by CLOSE TO 100 ACTIVE VOLCANOS sitting under the ice sheet melting the ice. Thats important because human emissions of Co2 DO NOT create VOLCANOS. Therefore if his feared melting occurs IT WONT BE BECAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE. It is extremely dishonest of him not to make that clear (but not unusual). Remember if all the Arctic sea ice and Antarctic sea ice melted tomorrow world sea levels would FALL. Thats because ice displaces more water than its mass in liquid form. Remember ice mass in most of Antarctica has been INCREASING for years, Antarctica has been COOLING overall for around 35 years COOLING not warming. Furthermore positive feedbacks have NEVER been demonstrated to actually occur whereas POSITIVE feedbacks have.

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *RE: "While I have great respect for many of my science colleagues at the IPCC"* Many have great respect for snake worshipers, TV evangelists, Che' Guevara, Pol Pot, The Cultural Revolution etc. You can "respect" whomever you like, even the mob. I chose to respect my mind instead.

  • @johnmheaton
    @johnmheaton 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the very interesting presentation.

  • @darthex0
    @darthex0 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Those opposing global action on this are going full global nuclear winter. Their doomsday bunker is in the Grasberg mine west papua, serviced by a spaceport on Biak island!

    • @Jablicek
      @Jablicek 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know someone who worked on the mines up there. This is horseshit.

    • @garyjones6142
      @garyjones6142 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sounds plausible; billionaires everywhere are buying up deserted islands, decommissioned missile silos, abandoned mines, or passage on the next spaceship to Mars -getting ready to write out the apocalypse while profiting from the earths demise.

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm not opposed to running the the world as long as I am chairing the "Lets Run the World Committee" with full veto power. Only God would have more power than me.

    • @peterjones4180
      @peterjones4180 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually those who are promoting the anthropogenic global warming panic now are the some organization's that were promoting the anthropogenic ice age panic in the later 1970's. If you look at the long term data for the last 8000 years ts clear NOTHNG unusual s happening at all. Climate is TOTALLY within normal long term variability for our current interglacial. It was around 2 Deg C hotter than now about 1000 years ago and hotter still during the previous peak warmings 2000, 3000, 6000-8000 years ago. In fact over most of the last 8000 years temperatures were HOTTER than now. You are so gullible its shocking.

  • @rdallas81
    @rdallas81 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By 2055 to 2065, NYC and tens of thousands of square miles of US, Canadian , Mexican coastlines will be underwater.

    • @rdallas81
      @rdallas81 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What we have mapped today as "coastlines" absolutely will be under water. Already happening.

  • @mark-remanHamilton
    @mark-remanHamilton 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A few inches of sudden sea level rise will cripple the world's sewage systems. The worst case scenario is within months, not years away.

    • @rdallas81
      @rdallas81 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Facts. Salt water inundation will destroy much fresh water systems. Most people live within 100 miles of coastlines.

    • @rdallas81
      @rdallas81 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I believe places like NYC and Miami, Mississippi River, great lakes, East coast of usa will sink as the water rises. Nothing will stop whats coming.

    • @mark-remanHamilton
      @mark-remanHamilton 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The affect of cities without sewage, worldwide, will be stimulating to munitions suppliers. Warships in the harbors of the world will be turned on their respective cities. Civil unrest will be curbed. Cyborgs will then move in? The job will be too dangerous for me.

    • @OldJackWolf
      @OldJackWolf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rdallas81 So will the storms and their surges whose heights will be even greater, allowing it to invade more and more into upland positions in the landscape. Furthermore, the slowdown in AMOC is also increasing sea levels along the US east coast. Its a shame our governments and institutions have refused or have been unable to act, regardless of their political system. It really exposed the faults of civilization. Good luck.

    • @rrmackay
      @rrmackay 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sea levels have been rising for thousands of years, since the end of the last ice age, 3cm per year is common. It would take a several inch rise in sea level within a year or maybe two to convince me that sea level rise is an actual threat.

  • @YoSip3Ek
    @YoSip3Ek ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the introduction of Polynesian navigation histories and lessons but I’m very disappointed on the stick charts are not given the respect and true origin very sad. Once again these are not made in Polynesia but only in the Marshall Islands Micronesia. These are waves chart of the atolls of Marshall’s seas not Hawaii or New Zealand. Please reconsider your teaching facts because the Marshallese are not happy right now. Thank you respectfully from the RMI. Micronesia😊

    • @winstonturipa2388
      @winstonturipa2388 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you're going to narate our history at least get the stories right,

  • @Seawithinyou
    @Seawithinyou ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Hamish for this very informative podcast Fascinating stuff 😇

  • @anthonymorris5084
    @anthonymorris5084 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you reconcile that data proves that humanity has never been safer, healthier or more prosperous than at any time in history, by almost any measurement you care to examine? This trend has remained uninterrupted throughout 200 years of warming, 200 years of growing fossil fuel use and 43 years of abject climate hysteria.

    • @stevangelical7052
      @stevangelical7052 ปีที่แล้ว

      The party is over.

    • @anthonymorris5084
      @anthonymorris5084 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stevangelical7052 Not an argument, and there isn't an ounce of evidence to support such a claim.

  • @allenbaxter5180
    @allenbaxter5180 ปีที่แล้ว

    NO SUCH THING. JUST A NEW PHRASE COINED BY THE HIGHLY EDUCATED TO SHOW THEIR INTELLIGENCE THAT'S ALL. WE STILL CALL IT "RELENTLESS RAIN STORM".

  • @michaelpereira8553
    @michaelpereira8553 ปีที่แล้ว

    We are at the Last Stage.